Re: [PATCH] recode fix

2004-08-07 Thread Bruno Rodrigues
If recode is sucessful but there's entities inside, first if fails and second if tries to recode again. I've fixed it correctly and will commit in some minutes. Thanks for noticing this Rogelio M.Serrano Jr. wrote: Hi All, This is a quick and dirty fix. All UTF16-BE messages i was receiving can

Re: Is 1.3.2 stable enough to call it 1.2.2 ?

2004-08-07 Thread Stipe Tolj
Pedro B. wrote: Bruno said he had to do the pack before August 13th. I swear i looked at the calendar just now and appeared to me that 1 week from now is past August 13th. now, to make things more easy, we can roll it even earlier. I'll have to catch-up with the list and mantis, since I was sort

Re: Is 1.3.2 stable enough to call it 1.2.2 ?

2004-08-07 Thread Bruno Rodrigues
Stipe Tolj wrote: Alexander Malysh wrote: Hello Bruno, 1.3.2 should be good tested and remaining bug's should be fixed first before we can call it stable (IMO) and cvs version (before 1.3.2) was not tested by too much people, so we should wait a bit... P.S. why not package 1.3.2 for debian and

Re: send-url for HTTP-based relay in 1.3.1

2004-08-07 Thread Stipe Tolj
Peter Beckman wrote: Folks -- Having a little problem with kannel and binary messages sent via HTTP. Right now, I can't seem to successfully convert the text passed by kannel via an HTTP relay connection back to the hex encoded string. The original: UDH: 0B050415810003010301 Txt:

Re: [OT] WAP emulator for Linux

2004-08-07 Thread Stipe Tolj
Arne K. Haaje wrote: This is very off topic, but does anyone know of a decent WAP emulator for Linux? I have been using Deckit, but it is getting a bit long in the tooth. there is such a beast living at http://www.yospace.com/ which is very good IMO. (includes the orginal firmware look and feel

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Kannel 1.3.2 development release available

2004-08-07 Thread Bruno Rodrigues
Arne K. Haaje wrote: fredag 16. juli 2004, 07:13, skrev Paul P Komkoff Jr: Replying to Norbert Naveen: Is this the implementation of WAP 2.0 or is it extension of WAP 1.2.1 ??? AFAIK WAP 2.0 is basically http so you can use apache with mod_proxy and mod_(appropriate compression) to achieve your

Re: [Kannel-Users] Re: Is 1.3.2 stable enough to call it 1.2.2 ?

2004-08-07 Thread Alexander Malysh
Hi, Sahil Aggarwal wrote: i have lost many messages because of this type of disconnection as everytime i have to restart the gateway. if you don't use store-file then it's your problem... Sahil On Thu, 2004-08-05 at 23:54, Peter Beckman wrote: On Thu, 5 Aug 2004, Bruno Rodrigues

Re: Is 1.3.2 stable enough to call it 1.2.2 ?

2004-08-07 Thread Stipe Tolj
Pedro B. wrote: Can this aspell version replace the www docs too? yep, I'll hit it towards the htdocs dir ;) Stipe mailto:stolj_{at}_wapme.de --- Wapme Systems AG Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany phone:

Re: [Kannel-Users] Re: send-url for HTTP-based relay in 1.3.1

2004-08-07 Thread Peter Beckman
On Sat, 7 Aug 2004, Stipe Tolj wrote: Peter Beckman wrote: Folks -- Having a little problem with kannel and binary messages sent via HTTP. Right now, I can't seem to successfully convert the text passed by kannel via an HTTP relay connection back to the hex encoded string. The