Re: [RIP] Remembering René Kluwen

Very, very sad news. Thank you for sharing Stipe - our thoughts with his family and friends at this time. RIP René. Your reach was global - your contributions will live on. On Fri, 2021-06-11 at 15:00 +0200, Stipe Tolj wrote: > Dear all, > With deep regret and sorrow we let you know that René

Re: GIT

Gerrit worth considering also On Mon, 2014-04-21 at 05:15 +, Rachman Chavik wrote: Hi, Is there any plans to migrate to git? Or even to github? IMO, this will make contributions much easier. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Status page not responding, among other things.

Hi Brenton, To me one consistent message I am hearing is environment (network / comms) issues - mySQL disconnect, monitoring showing up and down .. status slow response. These don't sound like issues with Kannel itself .. but possibly how you are trying to implement it. It could be something like

Re: Kannel MongoDB dlr support

Hey spameden, Watch the x-posting. Search the mailing archives the author did post from memory. I tried to build but didn't success (likely issues at my end with make related things). My 2c .. Whilst I was interested we already have DB set-up on related platforms so adding more to the mix

Re: [FYI] New 'dlr-storage = spool' available in SVN trunk

, schrieb Alan McNatty: Hi Stipe, Sounds great - as you say being able to use disk based replication techniques would be good but also providing persistence as a default option is also very valuable. I'll be keen to do some tests on IO performance - my biggest concern for larger installs

Re: [FYI] New 'dlr-storage = spool' available in SVN trunk

-09 at 14:00 +0200, Stipe Tolj wrote: Am 07.08.2012 23:54, schrieb Alan McNatty: On Wed, 2012-08-08 at 09:43 +1200, Alan McNatty wrote: also providing persistence as a default option is also very valuable. An additional enhancement might be to spool the current in memory hash on shut-down

Re: [FYI] New 'dlr-storage = spool' available in SVN trunk

Hi Stipe, Sounds great - as you say being able to use disk based replication techniques would be good but also providing persistence as a default option is also very valuable. I'll be keen to do some tests on IO performance - my biggest concern for larger installs (as often disk choice is not

Re: [FYI] New 'dlr-storage = spool' available in SVN trunk

On Wed, 2012-08-08 at 09:43 +1200, Alan McNatty wrote: also providing persistence as a default option is also very valuable. An additional enhancement might be to spool the current in memory hash on shut-down and load on start-up.

Re: Making SMPP esm_class configurable?

Ah that's great, thanks Alex. On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 22:08 +0200, Alexander Malysh wrote: Hi Alan, after the long discussion this patch commited to SVN. Thanks, Alexander Malysh Am 15.08.2011 um 09:35 schrieb Alan McNatty: Thanks Nikos, That's good news since, thanks to Edgard

Re: Making SMPP esm_class configurable?

, Alexander Malysh wrote: Hi Alan, thanks for the patch but I'm waiting for more comments in this topic. If no comments coming, I will commit your patch next week. Thanks, Alexander Malysh Am 07.09.2011 um 02:14 schrieb Alan McNatty: Hi Alex, Based on option a) please

Re: Making SMPP esm_class configurable?

. For cannel it's equal, which value to set as esm-class because kannel doesn't interpreting it. Thanks, Alex Am 15.08.2011 um 09:35 schrieb Alan McNatty: Thanks Nikos, That's good news since

Re: panic inducing use of gwlist_extract_first in dlr_pgsql.c

); +if ( res != NULL ) + gwlist_destroy(gwlist_extract_first(res), octstr_destroy_item); I put this inside else because there we know the list is not null... gwlist_destroy(res, NULL); Thanks, Alex Am 10.08.2011 um 06:51 schrieb Alan McNatty: Hi All, I'm finding what I

Re: Making SMPP esm_class configurable?

what he does. For cannel it's equal, which value to set as esm-class because kannel doesn't interpreting it. Thanks, Alex Am 15.08.2011 um 09:35 schrieb Alan McNatty: Thanks Nikos

Re: Making SMPP esm_class configurable?

for commission. Don't worry, he never misses a patch. He is the gateway maintainer. BR, Nikos On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 3:22 AM, Alan McNatty a...@catalyst.net.nz wrote: Thanks Rene, Can anyone with commit access give a final nod of acceptance

Re: panic inducing use of gwlist_extract_first in dlr_pgsql.c

being a running bearerbox without any smsbox(es) attached. On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 16:51 +1200, Alan McNatty wrote: Hi All, I'm finding what I think is incorrect use of gwlist_extract_first in the postgres dlr implementations (it may also exist in others - I've not checked yet). The DLR methods

Re: panic inducing use of gwlist_extract_first in dlr_pgsql.c

responding to the heartbeats that smsbox sends. As a result, smsbox logs in bearerbox gone, shutting down and shuts down. The parent bb process should handle heartbeats, not the child. HTH, Nikos On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Alan McNatty a...@catalyst.net.nz wrote: Also note

panic inducing use of gwlist_extract_first in dlr_pgsql.c

Hi All, I'm finding what I think is incorrect use of gwlist_extract_first in the postgres dlr implementations (it may also exist in others - I've not checked yet). The DLR methods issue 'error's when they fail to return results, etc but subsequent calls to gwlist_extract_first on NULL lists cause

Re: Making SMPP esm_class configurable?

. HTH, Nikos On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 5:01 AM, Alan McNatty a...@catalyst.net.nz wrote: Thanks Nikos, See attached. Also just wanted to check thoughts the range check (possibly remove and leave it open?). i.e

Re: Making SMPP esm_class configurable?

patch attached. Votes / comments, etc? On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 09:39 +1200, Alan McNatty wrote: Thanks Nikos/Alex for the feedback - I will work on config patch. On Tue, 2011-08-02 at 23:10 +0300, Nikos Balkanas wrote: Hi Alan, Just to clarify on what Alex says. Some other modes

Re: Making SMPP esm_class configurable?

:02 AM, Alan McNatty a...@catalyst.net.nz wrote: patch attached. Votes / comments, etc? On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 09:39 +1200, Alan McNatty wrote: Thanks Nikos/Alex for the feedback - I will work on config patch

Re: Making SMPP esm_class configurable?

the default mode wouldn't be appropriate. Configuration would be fine for those buggy SMScs, that do store and forward, but do not accept it as an option. BR, Nikos - Original Message - From: Alexander Malysh amal...@kannel.org To: Alan McNatty a...@catalyst.net.nz Cc: Nikos

Re: Making SMPP esm_class configurable?

: Alan McNatty a...@catalyst.net.nz To: devel@kannel.org Sent: Monday, August 01, 2011 6:21 AM Subject: Making SMPP esm_class configurable? Hi All, I found a thread on this from back in Feb 2005 (having received a query from provided now myself) .. last word by Alejandro

Re: Making SMPP esm_class configurable?

-u.submit_sm.esm_class | ESM_CLASS_SUBMIT_UDH_INDICATOR; On Tue, 2011-08-02 at 15:59 +1200, Alan McNatty wrote: Hi Nikos, You mean simply change the default: Index: gw/smsc/smsc_smpp.c === --- gw/smsc/smsc_smpp.c (revision

Making SMPP esm_class configurable?

Hi All, I found a thread on this from back in Feb 2005 (having received a query from provided now myself) .. last word by Alejandro and a lukewarm (+0 - +1) comment from Stipe about committing if patch provided. I would provide a config patch if anyone would vote in it's favour? Consider:

Re: Kannel 1.5.0 Debian packages

Hi Alex, Thanks for rolling us a new deb. Thanks also for building with Postgres support - that will save me rolling my own :) Just a couple of questions: 1) I notice we have the usual binaries ... but I thought there was talk of run_kannel_box being deprecated since we have --parachute

Re: configure patch for building with Solaris

Hi All, Just following up on this historical thread [1] as I came across it recently building 1.5.0 on an old box running Solaris 10. The upshot is it's all do-able (I had success with OpenCSW) - just check your paths (and run a ldd on the resulting binaries to make sure you haven't incorporated

Re: Kannel wiki

participate that much on it). What do you guys think? -- Alan McNatty, Wellington, New Zealand Catalyst IT Limited http://www.catalyst.net.nz/ DDI: +64 4 8032201 MOB: +64 21 02950201

Re: SQLBox 0.7.2 not compatible with kannel version cvs-20090706

kannel version (e.g. before the meta-data patch) it could cause such problems. Regards, -- Alejandro Guerrieri aguerri...@kannel.org On 10/07/2009, at 6:53, Alan McNatty wrote: Hi all, I have just been testing sqlbox with a modem for monitoring purposes. Without the sqlbox (bearerbox-port

SQLBox 0.7.2 not compatible with kannel version cvs-20090706

? -- Alan McNatty, Wellington, New Zealand Catalyst IT Limited http://www.catalyst.net.nz/ DDI: +64 4 8032201 # Core stuff group = core admin-port = 13000 admin-password = bar admin-deny-ip = *.*.*.* admin-allow-ip = 127.0.0.1 log-file = /var/log/kannel/bearerbox.log box-deny-ip = *.*.*.* box-allow-ip

Re: Kannel not load balancing after restart and messages get stuck inqueue

back into it and hopefully make some suggestions). Cheers, Alan -- Alan McNatty, Wellington, New Zealand Catalyst IT Limited http://www.catalyst.net.nz/ DDI: +64 4 8032201

Re: Kannel not load balancing after restart and messages get stuck inqueue

|-| Env� Β½e y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde cualquier celular y Nextel en el Per�  , M� �‰xico y en mas de 180 paises. Use aplicaciones 2 vias via SMS y GPRS online Visitenos en www.perusms.NET www.smsglobal.com.mx y www.pravcom.com -- Alan

Re: Kannel not load balancing after restart and messages get stuck inqueue

. Available means anything but Failed (Dead,etc.). An available SMSc could be down, or coming up or connecting. In this patch, router will wait to start until all SMScs become active. What is DR? BR, Nikos - Original Message - From: Alan McNatty a...@catalyst.net.nz To: Nikos Balkanas

Re: run_kannel_box - forcing umask to be 077

run_kannel_box because it's deprecated, just use: /.../bearerbox --daemon /.../smsbox --daemon Thanks, Alex P.S. A new init scripts for debian using --daemon option are highly welcome... Alan McNatty schrieb: Hi All, We're been on stock standard debian kannel installs for awhile now so it's

Re: run_kannel_box - forcing umask to be 077

it and you'll find a new init.d script and a sample configuration file you can use to be running in no time. It is designed to be used with user kannel. You can of course tweak it to suit your needs. Regards, Alejandro Guerrieri El 17/11/2008, a las 11:02 p.m., Alan McNatty escribió: Hi

Re: [PATCH] Extra Includes and Libs locations for MacPorts on Mac OSX

After patching, autoconf needs to be run to recreate the ./configure script Regards, Alejandro Guerrieri -- Alan McNatty Catalyst IT DDI: +64 (0)4 8032201, or TEL: +64 (0)4 4992267

Job Opportunity

Hi there, There is an opening at Catalyst IT (www.catalyst.net.nz) for someone familiar with Kannel and related technologies. Ideally also skilled in Java, Perl, and Php. If you are interested in working in Wellington, New Zealand please email [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cheers, Alan -- Alan McNatty

Re: Two (possible) bugs with 1.4.0

to service Play from +27828553923 to +2782121 It looks like it received Play correctly. However, I will test the mo-recode = true as you suggested. Thanks again Johann -- Alan McNatty [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Alan McNatty [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: SMS routing based on smsc-id does not work properly.

in my config, then all work fine. But kannel users guide shows than i can do routing based on smsc-id, denied-smsc-id, accepted-smsc params. What i do wrong? Thank you beforehand. -- Alan McNatty [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Alan McNatty [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: FW: Validity Period wrong calculation in SMPP code

Hi Alex, How about this (see patch) - not sure if it's *nice* to use difftime but it keeps it clean. Cheers, Alan ps. will look at have a relative vs absolute patch if 3.3 or =3.4, etc On Thu, 2004-11-18 at 03:23, Alexander Malysh wrote: Paul Keogh wrote: Btw. I don't know, why we

Re: [PATCH] preliminary confirmed sendsms

Hi Kalle, I'm hoping I've understood your post. Apologies if I've lost the plot - I've put some questions/comments in-line below. On Thu, 2004-10-07 at 01:52, Kalle Marjola wrote: So, what does this first version do: Instead of immediately saying '202 Send' for valid sendsms request, this

WARNING: SMPP: PDU element password to long (length is 9, should be 9)

Hi All, Just checking - the SMPP password field can be max octets of 9 in length. But when I set it to be 9 characters in length I get a warning that's it's too long, etc. My understanding of octets is not fantastic (like a C string - has a null char which takes up 1?) so looking for some

Re: Is 1.3.2 stable enough to call it 1.2.2 ?

Hi Bruno, I've tested the pgsql dlr storage on 7.2.1 (debian stable) but found that Kannel utilised a DELETE ... LIMIT 1 in dlr_pgsql_remove from gw/dlr_pgsql.c which is not supported in 7.2.1. ERROR: PGSQL: DELETE FROM dlr WHERE smsc='foo' AND ts='243251116' LIMIT 1; ERROR: PGSQL: ERROR:

Re: Is 1.3.2 stable enough to call it 1.2.2 ?

under development, because everyone in the postgres world (hate these tags, but they are sometimes needed) has implemented 7.4. These are the 2 cents from a deep-into-postgres-point of view. \\pb Alan McNatty wrote: Hi Bruno, I've tested the pgsql dlr storage on 7.2.1

Re: Compile error

Hi Rene (just replying to list this time). If you delete the wmlscript/wsgram.y file everything is good. I've had this problem before. Can't remember I'm thinking I was lazy and maybe copied code from one server to the other (which used different yak type animal). Question: should distclean

Re: X-Kannel-SMSC and message splitting

Thanks - I will re-test with this set in config. May be able to close out bug as a result. Cheers, Alan On Sat, 2003-11-29 at 00:47, Stipe Tolj wrote: Alan, Note my config doesn't include any allowed or preferred sections in smsc configurations (except for MODEL connection). So it seems

Re: X-Kannel-SMSC and message splitting

Hi Stipe, Tested again with TEST1 and TEST2 connections both with allowed-smsc-id = TEST1;TEST2 - this makes them available as 'best' choices but not preferred (so the first best choice wins, TEST1 or TEST2). So, if I have smsc=TEST2 I still can't guarantee delivery via TEST2. I don't want to set

Re: X-Kannel-SMSC and message splitting

routing process? Should it be removed? Cheers, Alan On Mon, 2003-12-01 at 12:24, Stipe Tolj wrote: Alan McNatty wrote: Tested again with TEST1 and TEST2 connections both with allowed-smsc-id = TEST1;TEST2 - this makes them available as 'best' choices but not preferred (so the first best

Re: X-Kannel-SMSC and message splitting

would be triggered? Cheers, Alan [1] http://bugs.kannel.org/view_bug_page.php?f_id=101 On Thu, 2003-11-27 at 13:22, Stipe Tolj wrote: Alan McNatty wrote: Just a question really. I've been looking at the X-Kannel headers and noted that if you receive an MO message from SMSC 'A' and you

X-Kannel-SMSC and message splitting

Hello All, Just a question really. I've been looking at the X-Kannel headers and noted that if you receive an MO message from SMSC 'A' and you specify the message should go back via SMSC 'A' for normal short message fine. However if you respond with content with content that gets split. The

pdu functions, eg append_encoded_integer

Hello list, Experimenting with optional parameters in SMPP pdu's. Slowly getting my head around pdu packing/unpacking (some clever stuff - taxing my poor brain) .. Reviewing previous posts to this list I found references to append_encoded_integer which in cvs lives in both radius_pdu and

Re: dlr mask question...

On Thu, 2003-09-25 at 18:26, Andreas Fink wrote: From a user's perspective you ask for a delivery report. You want toknow success or failure which are the two things you are interestedin. Those are the two most important ones to know. The end userdoesn't want to know exactly where it fails or

Re: dlr mask question...

Be aware that if you get message expired this usuall ymeans that youcouldn't reach the destination phone for 7 days so I'm not thatconvinced you really want to resend in such a case. Usually yes but not if you set validity period to a number of hours, etc ...

Re: dlr mask question...

On Wed, 2003-09-24 at 23:21, Alexander Malysh wrote: I'm voting -1 for this mix feature I'm -0 for removing it. It's a nice mix ;) Some smsc's are soo broken , that msgs are rejected even when msg is correct... Ok I know , you would say: use DLR_SMSC_FAIL ;) If you know the SMSC is

Re: Problems with the handling of DLR's / SMPP

this is broken implementation of SMPP. I had assumed that it was a bug in Kannel..? David. - Original Message - From: Stefan Cars [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Alan McNatty [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Alexander Malysh [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003

Re: Problems with the handling of DLR's / SMPP

Hi Stefan, Your problem seems to be that the SMSC is switching source and destination address (between submit_sm and deliver_sm). I have one SMSC which does this ... ie: (from your logs) submit_sm DEBUG: destination_addr: 46708443600 deliver_sm DEBUG: source_addr: 46708443600 WARNING:

Re: [Patch] To add timeouts to SMPP connections

Hi Alexander, I prefer Alex's patch as it conforms more closely to spec I believe. Alex I have added a couple of bits to your patch (cfg.def and docs/userguide.xml). Please double check this and vote. Cheers, Alan On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 05:10, Alexander Malysh wrote: Hi Alex, sorry for

Re: [Patch] To add timeouts to SMPP connections

On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 09:45, Alexander Malysh wrote: sorry but Alex's patch is not closely conforms to spec. Please read smpp v3.4. issue 1.2 page 165. Quote: inactivity_timer - This timer specifies the maximum time lapse allowed between _transactions_ , after which period of

Re: Patch: To add timeouts to SMPP connections

On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 21:25, Aaron Brady wrote: Looks good, however I'd potentially make it more configurable so that the X x wait is one of the default settings and can be configured should it need be. If it's easy enough, then I don't see why not, but I'm not altogether familiar with

Re: Kannel quits without reporting fatal error

... On Wednesday 30 July 2003 00:16, Alan McNatty wrote: Patch to run_kannel_box to log to syslog. On Wed, 2003-07-09 at 12:54, Andreas Fink wrote: On Dienstag, Juli 8, 2003, at 11:13 Uhr, Alan McNatty wrote: Hello, run_kannel_box is a strange beast (at least

Adding syslog support for smsbox and bearerbox

to actually get the wapbox syslogging to work I believe. Please comment/vote, etc ... -- Alan McNatty [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Kannel quits without reporting fatal error

Patch to run_kannel_box to log to syslog. On Wed, 2003-07-09 at 12:54, Andreas Fink wrote: On Dienstag, Juli 8, 2003, at 11:13 Uhr, Alan McNatty wrote: Hello, run_kannel_box is a strange beast (at least to me). It's purpose seems unclear (or more

Re: Adding syslog support for smsbox and bearerbox

patch attached. On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 10:13, Alan McNatty wrote: Hello, I have attached a small patch to add syslog logging support for both smsbox and bearerbox as was done for wapbox some time ago. I have made some minor changes to gwlib/log.c to reformat in case of syslog logging

Re: Kannel quits without reporting fatal error

Hello, run_kannel_box is a strange beast (at least to me). It's purpose seems unclear (or more appropriately 'undocumented'). I understand it's part of the utils directory (out of main source) but it is part of standard build (eg: debian packages). Andres could you explain a bit about what it's

Kannel quits without reporting fatal error

:56 [6] ERROR: SMPP[..]: Couldn't connect to server. 2003-07-08 09:46:56 [6] ERROR: SMPP[..]: Couldn't connect to SMS center (retrying in 10 seconds). -- Alan McNatty [EMAIL PROTECTED]