RE: Patch: EMI UUCP DLRs (final)

2010-08-03 Thread Rene Kluwen
To: Rene Kluwen; 'Alexander Malysh' Cc: 'Kannel Devel' Subject: Re: Patch: EMI UUCP DLRs (final) I see. Isn't it always in openSMPPbox installation instructions to download and install latest kanell sources? It wouldn't be a bad idea to release an openSMPPbox patch just to align it with latest

RE: [PATCH] Smppbox acks

2010-08-02 Thread Rene Kluwen
Not receiving acks is only on topic if the connection is bad, somewhere. Probably you will need to reconnect in that case anyway. -Original Message- From: Victor Luchitz [mailto:vluch...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, 02 August, 2010 09:18 To: Rene Kluwen Cc: Tomasz Konopka; Kannel Devel

[PATCH] conn.c

2010-08-02 Thread Rene Kluwen
Hereby I want to propose a patch in gwlib to add a function that would make life a lot easier in smppbox. == Rene conn_shutdown2.patch Description: Binary data

RE: Patch: EMI UUCP DLRs (final)

2010-08-02 Thread Rene Kluwen
The problem is not adding an extra actual parameter. The problem is that people must now update to the latest Kannel code or otherwise smppbox won't compile. == Rene -Original Message- From: Nikos Balkanas [mailto:nbalka...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, 02 August, 2010 19:29 To: Rene Kluwen

RE: Patch: EMI UUCP DLRs (final)

2010-08-02 Thread Rene Kluwen
No, sqlbox doesn't use dlr_find(). -Original Message- From: Nikos Balkanas [mailto:nbalka...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, 02 August, 2010 20:11 To: Rene Kluwen; 'Alexander Malysh' Cc: 'Kannel Devel' Subject: Re: Patch: EMI UUCP DLRs (final) I see. Isn't it always in openSMPPbox installation

RE: Discussion: Prepaid counting

2010-08-01 Thread Rene Kluwen
[mailto:nbalka...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, 01 August, 2010 15:04 To: Rene Kluwen; devel@kannel.org Cc: kinch...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Discussion: Prepaid counting Hi, I can see a couple of problems in this approach. 1) Billing should be implemented in bearerbox, since it decides on final routing

RE: Discussion: Prepaid counting

2010-08-01 Thread Rene Kluwen
I would handle this problem the same way it occurred: With a lot of imagination :)... Haha, but I get your point. -Original Message- From: Nikos Balkanas [mailto:nbalka...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, 02 August, 2010 00:56 To: Alejandro Guerrieri; Rene Kluwen Cc: devel@kannel.org; kinch

RE: Patch: EMI UUCP DLRs (final)

2010-08-01 Thread Rene Kluwen
I propose the following patch. It adds #define DLR_FIND_USE_DST To dlr.h. It is a convenient way to know if I should add an extra parameter to dlr_find or not. So smppbox (and possibly other gwlib based programs) can happily compile with the dlr_find with the extra option and also (if the

[PATCH] Smppbox acks

2010-08-01 Thread Rene Kluwen
Here is a more advanced patch. Messages to bearerbox are acked, once the deliver_sm_resp pdu is in. Also submit_sm pdu's get their responses, after bearerbox has acked the message. And if not, a failure notice is returned. Before, message acks were given right away, without checking for failure

Discussion: Prepaid counting

2010-07-31 Thread Rene Kluwen
Suppose I add 2 tables to sqlbox: mysql describe sms_users; +-+--+--+-+-+---+ | Field | Type | Null | Key | Default | Extra | +-+--+--+-+-+---+ | binfo | varchar(100) | NO | PRI | NULL| | |

RE: [PATCH] SMS Box routing

2010-07-28 Thread Rene Kluwen
No, you are right. I saw your solution only after I made the smsbox-route-between patch. I think your solution is cleaner. It depends of the routing options that are already available. I attached your (Stipe's) patch another time, as I see that it is still not committed to svn trunk. So the 2

RE: [PATCH] SMS Box routing

2010-07-28 Thread Rene Kluwen
: Wednesday, 28 July, 2010 23:08 To: Rene Kluwen Cc: 'Stipe Tolj'; devel@kannel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] SMS Box routing Hi, it's a clean approach that costs performance. But it should be tested first, how much performance it costs. Now to this patch: +/* store temporary DLR data for SMSC

[PATCH] SMS Box routing

2010-07-25 Thread Rene Kluwen
Hereby the patch, for you guys to review. == Rene -Original Message- From: Rene Kluwen [mailto:rene.klu...@chimit.nl] Sent: zondag 25 juli 2010 1:04 To: 'Rene Kluwen'; us...@kannel.org Subject: RE: SMS Box routing Sorry for the double post. But my email got sent before I was finished

[PATCH] SMS Box routing

2010-07-25 Thread Rene Kluwen
I made a small enhancement, in case the smsbox (or open smpp user) is not online. == Rene -Original Message- From: devel-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:devel-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf Of Rene Kluwen Sent: zondag 25 juli 2010 16:43 To: devel@kannel.org Subject: [PATCH] SMS Box routing

RE: SMPP data_sm implementation for MT messages

2010-07-23 Thread Rene Kluwen
I did the same thing, a long time back already. Would be nice to add something like this to Kannel, because I keep getting requests for it. Some comments after just a quick glance: 1. If you add tlv's, first check if client version 0x33. 2. My previous patch added the following v3.4 fields,

RE: [PATCH] smppbox :: support for v3.4 DLR tags

2010-07-22 Thread Rene Kluwen
I just committed this patch. Current trunk version is 28. -Original Message- From: devel-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:devel-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf Of Victor Luchitz Sent: woensdag 21 juli 2010 15:41 To: devel@kannel.org Subject: [PATCH] smppbox :: support for v3.4 DLR tags Hello,

RE: [PATCH] smppbox :: TLV support

2010-07-19 Thread Rene Kluwen
That's what we do now. Thanks for the backup. == Rene -Original Message- From: Alexander Malysh [mailto:malys...@googlemail.com] On Behalf Of Alexander Malysh Sent: dinsdag 20 juli 2010 0:19 To: Rene Kluwen Cc: 'Victor Luchitz'; devel@kannel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] smppbox :: TLV

RE: smppbox code questions

2010-07-12 Thread Rene Kluwen
To be honest: I didn't try it. But report_versions() is a gwlib library functions and outputs the values that it was compiled with. == Rene -Original Message- From: Nikos Balkanas [mailto:nbalka...@gmail.com] Sent: maandag 12 juli 2010 11:45 To: Rene Kluwen; 'Victor Luchitz'; devel

RE: smppbox code questions

2010-07-12 Thread Rene Kluwen
- From: devel-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:devel-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf Of Rene Kluwen Sent: maandag 12 juli 2010 17:27 To: 'Nikos Balkanas'; 'Victor Luchitz'; devel@kannel.org Subject: RE: smppbox code questions To be honest: I didn't try it. But report_versions() is a gwlib library

RE: Kannel documentation

2010-07-12 Thread Rene Kluwen
Current smppbox revision is 22: r22 | rkluwen | 2010-07-12 18:00:56 +0200 (Mon, 12 Jul 2010) | 6 lines Added VERSION file. This is needed for the configure script to determine current svn version. Added some words about how

RE: smppbox code questions

2010-07-11 Thread Rene Kluwen
I haven't tried. But it will only work if I recompile gwlib after the new #define's. == Rene -Original Message- From: Nikos Balkanas [mailto:nbalka...@gmail.com] Sent: zondag 11 juli 2010 9:46 To: Rene Kluwen; 'Victor Luchitz'; devel@kannel.org Subject: Re: smppbox code questions Hi

RE: smppbox code questions

2010-07-11 Thread Rene Kluwen
Nikos, you disappoint me. report_versions() is linked in from the gwlib libraries with the values that it was compiled with. Try it, and you will see. == Rene -Original Message- From: Nikos Balkanas [mailto:nbalka...@gmail.com] Sent: zondag 11 juli 2010 17:33 To: Rene Kluwen; 'Victor

RE: smppbox code questions

2010-07-10 Thread Rene Kluwen
] Sent: zaterdag 10 juli 2010 9:16 To: devel@kannel.org; Rene Kluwen Subject: Re: smppbox code questions In my opinion it doesn't make much sense to have things this way. First of all, you still need to list each system-id/password/system-type triple individually in the smpp-logins file: system-id1

RE: smppbox code questions

2010-07-10 Thread Rene Kluwen
Having two of the same system-ids with a different system-type is not allowed. Only the first one will be used. == Rene -Original Message- From: Victor Luchitz [mailto:vluch...@gmail.com] Sent: zaterdag 10 juli 2010 10:10 To: devel@kannel.org; Rene Kluwen Subject: Re: smppbox code

RE: smppbox code questions

2010-07-10 Thread Rene Kluwen
To: devel@kannel.org; Rene Kluwen Subject: Re: smppbox code questions In this case, system-type is just a mandatory but redundant alias for system-id :P I can code a patch that will make system-type optional, in this case smppbox will use system-id as boxc_id. This mode will be toggled by a config

RE: smppbox code questions

2010-07-10 Thread Rene Kluwen
I decided to change the sources with longer variables, so things are consistent with smsbox. cfg.diff has also been committed. == Rene -Original Message- From: Victor Luchitz [mailto:vluch...@gmail.com] Sent: zaterdag 10 juli 2010 15:53 To: devel@kannel.org; Rene Kluwen Subject: Re

RE: smppbox code questions

2010-07-10 Thread Rene Kluwen
To: devel@kannel.org; Rene Kluwen Subject: Re: smppbox code questions Yeah, I made similar changes locally with the same result: at startup, smppbox prints the following message: [91108] [0] DEBUG: Kannel smppbox version `svn-r4833M'. which is kannel's svn revision number, not that of smppbox

RE: smppbox code questions

2010-07-09 Thread Rene Kluwen
to distinguish to which box_id it belongs. == Rene -Original Message- From: Victor Luchitz [mailto:vluch...@gmail.com] Sent: vrijdag 9 juli 2010 11:12 To: devel@kannel.org; Rene Kluwen Subject: Re: smppbox code questions On a side note, why does smppbox use boxc_id as the first parameter passed

RE: smppbox code questions

2010-07-09 Thread Rene Kluwen
If bearerbox sends a report_mo, then it should include a status (dlr type) as well. Or am I wrong? == Rene -Original Message- From: Victor Luchitz [mailto:vluch...@gmail.com] Sent: vrijdag 9 juli 2010 14:24 To: devel@kannel.org; Rene Kluwen Subject: Re: smppbox code questions

RE: smppbox code questions

2010-07-09 Thread Rene Kluwen
. == Rene -Original Message- From: Victor Luchitz [mailto:vluch...@gmail.com] Sent: vrijdag 9 juli 2010 15:35 To: devel@kannel.org; Rene Kluwen Subject: Re: smppbox code questions Yes, but how is this relevant? I mean, there are two possibilities to make smppbox be aware of bearerbox

RE: [PATCH] smppbox :: ton/npi configuration

2010-07-09 Thread Rene Kluwen
Will include this patch, as soon as documentation is patched as well. 1. I could do that but it takes a little while before I found the time, or: 2. Maybe you can create a patch against the documentation that I sent you the other day? == Rene -Original Message- From:

RE: How to set up Kannel without using a 3rd party gateway service?

2010-07-09 Thread Rene Kluwen
You have two options: 1. The expensive one: Get yourself an SS7 connection and a contract with each network to send sms to via SS7. Contact the particular network for the costs of this. This option is not available with standard Kannel, but commercial SS7 drivers exist (but also cost a

RE: [PATCH] smppbox :: ton/npi configuration

2010-07-09 Thread Rene Kluwen
Also there should be a default ton/npi (possibly 0) in case it is not specified in the configuration file. -Original Message- From: devel-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:devel-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf Of Victor Luchitz Sent: vrijdag 9 juli 2010 20:39 To: devel@kannel.org Subject:

RE: [PATCH] smppbox :: ton/npi configuration

2010-07-09 Thread Rene Kluwen
Sorry for the triple post. Default value should be -1. So ton/npi will be inherited from the smpp pdu. Only needed if you want to manually force these values. == Rene -Original Message- From: devel-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:devel-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf Of Rene Kluwen Sent

[PATCH] sqlbox documentation

2010-07-09 Thread Rene Kluwen
I get an error building sqlbox documentation. This patch fixes it. I see that my previous patch (escaping of quotes in messages) didn't make it into svn trunk yet. Could you check it in? It is an important bugfix. == Rene docbook.patch Description: Binary data

RE: smppbox code questions

2010-07-08 Thread Rene Kluwen
the: /* we could not find a corresponding dlr; nothing to send */ line. I'm also attaching another patch which allows transmission of custom error codes in DLR's in the same manner as the message text bit. 2010/7/6 Rene Kluwen rene.klu...@chimit.nl: I have no way of testing this here

RE: [PATCH] smppbox :: TLV support

2010-07-08 Thread Rene Kluwen
Wow, this is easier than I expected. I was expecting a long diff. IMO, we should ONLY send if the interface version (that is sent with the bind request) is at least 0x34. V3.3-clients could possibly choke on it. == Rene -Original Message- From: devel-boun...@kannel.org

RE: [PATCH] smppbox :: TLV support

2010-07-08 Thread Rene Kluwen
To: devel@kannel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] smppbox :: TLV support SMSBox doesn't have such a check, so I assumed it would be fine not to have them here either. We could also set the protocol version to 0x34 now, don't you think? 2010/7/8 Rene Kluwen rene.klu...@chimit.nl: Wow, this is easier than I

RE: [PATCH] smppbox :: TLV support

2010-07-08 Thread Rene Kluwen
. As for the protocol version, what I assumed is that we can now default it to 0x34 instead of 0x33 or do you really want to keep 0x33 compatibility? Are there any pure 0x33 clients out there? 2010/7/9 Rene Kluwen rene.klu...@chimit.nl: SMSBox doesn't do SMPP, does it? And we could set

RE: smppbox code questions

2010-07-06 Thread Rene Kluwen
To start with the last thing: 2) You are right. It should use the msgid's in the dlr_url from the dlr instance. I changed it. About 1): We assume msg-boxc_id and box-boxc_id are the same in this case. Otherwise the message wouldn't have ended up there. == Rene -Original Message-

RE: smppbox code questions

2010-07-06 Thread Rene Kluwen
from the table and then subsequently readds it, which is rather stressful on the DB for no sane reason What it does instead is simply setting the sms_type to report_mo, leaving box_id empty as in regular MO messages. 2010/7/6 Rene Kluwen rene.klu...@chimit.nl: To start with the last thing: 2

RE: Potential memory leak in smppbox :: msg_to_pdu

2010-07-01 Thread Rene Kluwen
The list was empty already, since gwlist_extract_first has been used for all items. But true: gwlist_destroy should have been called as well. I fixed this in the latest revision (11) of smppbox/trunk. Thanks. The first msgid is special, since it is returned by Kannel. The others are not. That's

RE: [PATCH] dlr.c

2010-07-01 Thread Rene Kluwen
Malysh Sent: woensdag 30 juni 2010 10:47 To: Rene Kluwen Cc: devel@kannel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] dlr.c Hi, -1 because you are wrong: Octstr *cfg_get_real(CfgGroup *grp, Octstr *varname, const char *file, long line, const char *func) { Octstr *os; if(grp == NULL

RE: Patch: test/drive_smpp.c

2010-06-30 Thread Rene Kluwen
I agree with Nikos, in this case. drive_smpp.c is supposed to test Kannel internals... So it shouldn't use too many Kannel calls. Otherwise the test function will be void. == Rene -Original Message- From: devel-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:devel-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf Of Nikos

[PATCH] dlr.c

2010-06-29 Thread Rene Kluwen
The octstr_destroy(dlr_type); in dlr.c is a bug. It shouldn't be there, since dlr_type is either an immutable or a string got from cfg_get. == Rene dlr_bug.diff Description: Binary data

RE: Patch: EMI UUCP DLR

2010-06-24 Thread Rene Kluwen
Also: a multi-part message sends more than one sms to the same destination in the same second. == Rene -Original Message- From: devel-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:devel-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf Of Vincent CHAVANIS Sent: donderdag 24 juni 2010 17:34 To: devel@kannel.org Subject: Re:

Configure error

2010-06-24 Thread Rene Kluwen
I get three related errors when compiling revision 4833 of gateway/trunk. When starting: ./bootstrap aclocal:configure.in:248: warning: macro `AM_ICONV' not found in library After that, when running ./configure: ./configure: line 7123: AM_ICONV: command not found Then, in line 78 of Makefile,

RE: Configure error

2010-06-24 Thread Rene Kluwen
That did the trick. I needed openmpi as well. == Rene -Original Message- From: Alejandro Guerrieri [mailto:aguerri...@kannel.org] Sent: donderdag 24 juni 2010 23:49 To: Rene Kluwen Cc: devel@kannel.org Subject: Re: Configure error I think you need to install the gettext package

RE: Client routing

2010-06-21 Thread Rene Kluwen
: Alexander Malysh [mailto:malys...@googlemail.com] On Behalf Of Alexander Malysh Sent: maandag 21 juni 2010 18:29 To: Rene Kluwen Cc: 'Nikos Balkanas'; 'Kannel Devel' Subject: Re: Client routing Hi Rene, look for system-type kannel and not generic... Thanks, Alexander Malysh Am 20.06.2010 um 23:23

RE: Client routing

2010-06-20 Thread Rene Kluwen
been changed meanwhile? == Rene -Original Message- From: Alexander Malysh [mailto:malys...@googlemail.com] On Behalf Of Alexander Malysh Sent: zondag 20 juni 2010 22:06 To: Rene Kluwen Cc: 'Nikos Balkanas'; 'Kannel Devel' Subject: Re: Client routing hi Rene, look at smsc_http. you can

RE: Client routing

2010-06-19 Thread Rene Kluwen
: zaterdag 19 juni 2010 17:00 To: Rene Kluwen; 'Kannel Devel' Subject: Re: Client routing Not necessary. Already exists. Check bb's reroute-smsc-id. BR, Nikos - Original Message - From: Rene Kluwen rene.klu...@chimit.nl To: 'Kannel Devel' devel@kannel.org Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2010 5:37

RE: [PATCH] SMPP box multipart messages

2010-06-18 Thread Rene Kluwen
I changed it. It does look tidier. == Rene From: konstan...@appcell.net [mailto:konstan...@appcell.net] On Behalf Of Konstantin Vayner Sent: vrijdag 18 juni 2010 9:04 To: Rene Kluwen Cc: Kannel Devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] SMPP box multipart messages Rene, Looks good. +1

Multipart DLR issue

2010-06-17 Thread Rene Kluwen
This is the setup: KANNEL 1 KANNEL 2 CGI PUSH -- SMSBOX 1 -- BEARERBOX 1 -- SMPP LINK -- Open SMPPBOX --- BEARERBOX 2 I am working on smppbox sending multi-part messages via the same SMSC (on Kannel 2). I do this by

RE: FW: Issue with concatenated messages and load balancing over SMPP

2010-06-17 Thread Rene Kluwen
with sending two (or more) DLR's: one for each message. But smsc_smpp doesn't seem to be able to find the other ones. == Rene -Original Message- From: Nikos Balkanas [mailto:nbalka...@gmail.com] Sent: donderdag 17 juni 2010 18:19 To: Rene Kluwen Subject: Re: FW: Issue with concatenated

RE: Multipart DLR issue

2010-06-17 Thread Rene Kluwen
So what I will continue to do send a DLR for each part. Even if Kannel doesn't like it. == Rene -Original Message- From: Alexander Malysh [mailto:malys...@googlemail.com] On Behalf Of Alexander Malysh Sent: donderdag 17 juni 2010 18:25 To: Rene Kluwen Cc: 'Kannel Devel' Subject: Re

RE: Multipart DLR issue

2010-06-17 Thread Rene Kluwen
I tend to agree with Alex more :). -Original Message- From: Nikos Balkanas [mailto:nbalka...@gmail.com] Sent: donderdag 17 juni 2010 18:54 To: Alexander Malysh; Rene Kluwen Cc: 'Kannel Devel' Subject: Re: Multipart DLR issue Hi Alex, Actually, stated more correctly, kannel cannot

[PATCH] SMPP box multipart messages

2010-06-17 Thread Rene Kluwen
Okay, to comply with Kannel's common practices, hereby I send in a patch for open smppbox that allows for all parts of multipart messages to be sent via the same smsc (letting bearerbox split the message up). The patch applies to current svn trunk of smppbox. Known issue: This patch submits a

RE: Multipart DLR issue

2010-06-17 Thread Rene Kluwen
To: Rene Kluwen Cc: 'Kannel Devel' Subject: Re: Multipart DLR issue it may not work for load balanced connection via different SMSCs... Thanks, Alexander Malysh Am 17.06.2010 um 18:32 schrieb Rene Kluwen: So what I will continue to do send a DLR for each part. Even if Kannel doesn't like

RE: [PATCH] RE: Messages with php stripslashes

2010-06-12 Thread Rene Kluwen
] Sent: vrijdag 11 juni 2010 23:52 To: Rene Kluwen Cc: 'Tomasz'; 'Kannel list'; devel@kannel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] RE: Messages with php stripslashes + msg_escaped = msg_duplicate(msg); if (msg-sms.sms_type != report_mo) -gw_sql_save_msg(msg, octstr_imm(MO

RE: [PATCH] RE: Messages with php stripslashes

2010-06-12 Thread Rene Kluwen
Guerrieri [mailto:aguerri...@kannel.org] Sent: zaterdag 12 juni 2010 19:04 To: Rene Kluwen Cc: Tomasz; Kannel Devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] RE: Messages with php stripslashes Ok, got it :) Seems like it's working then. I'll make a couple of tests myself and commit it to SVN then. Regards, -- Alejandro

RE: [PATCH] RE: Messages with php stripslashes

2010-06-12 Thread Rene Kluwen
23:21 To: Rene Kluwen Cc: 'Tomasz'; 'Kannel Devel' Subject: Re: [PATCH] RE: Messages with php stripslashes Ok, standing by. Hmm, not sure about applying the same behavior on the other engines. I mean: nobody reported the issue on engines other than MySQL. I wonder if that means that the problem

[PATCH] RE: Messages with php stripslashes

2010-06-11 Thread Rene Kluwen
Sorry for crossposting. But I think the users are allowed to know what is going on, even if this is a developers matter. I think I found the solution to the problem below, which affects all smsbox-sqlbox-bearerbox users. I must admit: Haven't tested it yet. But it should work. See attached

Has anybody noticed...

2010-06-11 Thread Rene Kluwen
...that sqlbox is not going down after bearerbox sends a shutdown command? Or am I the only one?

RE: smppbox

2010-06-07 Thread Rene Kluwen
I see an excellent opportunity for you, Nikos, to prove your skills, writing documentation :) -Original Message- From: Nikos Balkanas [mailto:nbalka...@gmail.com] Sent: maandag 7 juni 2010 14:12 To: Rene Kluwen; Alexander Malysh Cc: devel@kannel.org Subject: Re: smppbox Dear Rene

RE: smppbox

2010-06-07 Thread Rene Kluwen
split up (like the way it is now), it is fine for me as well. == Rene -Original Message- From: Nikos Balkanas [mailto:nbalka...@gmail.com] Sent: maandag 7 juni 2010 15:39 To: Rene Kluwen; 'Alexander Malysh' Cc: devel@kannel.org Subject: Re: smppbox OK, then. When it is accepted

RE: smppbox

2010-06-07 Thread Rene Kluwen
, which happens to be part of Kannel). == Rene -Original Message- From: Nikos Balkanas [mailto:nbalka...@gmail.com] Sent: maandag 7 juni 2010 16:26 To: Rene Kluwen; 'Alexander Malysh' Cc: devel@kannel.org Subject: Re: smppbox Hi Rene, You may not be aware of it, but there is a 2-step

Sqlbox feature request

2010-06-07 Thread Rene Kluwen
Talking about sqlbox: If smsbox (or smppbox) is not connected, it stores the message in the sent table after which the message cannot be delivered anymore to smsbox (because it is not connected). This message could possibly be flagged with not delivered. Right? I am talking about MO messages

RE: Sqlbox feature request

2010-06-07 Thread Rene Kluwen
, in the current code? I am not sure about where to look. == Rene From: devel-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:devel-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf Of Rene Kluwen Sent: maandag 7 juni 2010 16:57 To: 'Alejandro Guerrieri' Cc: devel@kannel.org Subject: Sqlbox feature request Talking about sqlbox

RE: Sqlbox feature request

2010-06-07 Thread Rene Kluwen
[mailto:aguerri...@kannel.org] Sent: maandag 7 juni 2010 17:30 To: Rene Kluwen Cc: devel@kannel.org Subject: Re: Sqlbox feature request Afaik, messages are kept on bearerbox store until the box ACK them. At that point, bearerbox deletes the message(s). Regards, Alex -- Alejandro

RE: smppbox

2010-06-07 Thread Rene Kluwen
: Alejandro Guerrieri [mailto:aguerri...@kannel.org] Sent: maandag 7 juni 2010 18:45 To: Nikos Balkanas Cc: Rene Kluwen; devel@kannel.org Subject: Re: smppbox Well, there's (always) a tradeoff between simplicity and scalability, isn't it? Regards, -- Alejandro Guerrieri aguerri...@kannel.org On 07/06

smppbox standalone

2010-06-07 Thread Rene Kluwen
This release is ONLY for developers. It contains an smppbox-standalone package, similar to sqlbox standalone. Most part were shamelessly stolen from the sqlbox trunk. Please add your own credits if you feel addressed ;). http://www.chimit.nl/kannel/smppbox_standalone.tar.gz How about making a

RE: smppbox standalone

2010-06-07 Thread Rene Kluwen
://www.chimit.nl/kannel/smppbox_standalone1.tar.gz. == Rene -Original Message- From: devel-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:devel-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf Of Rene Kluwen Sent: maandag 7 juni 2010 20:38 To: devel@kannel.org Subject: smppbox standalone This release is ONLY for developers. It contains

RE: Sqlbox and scheduled pushes

2010-06-02 Thread Rene Kluwen
). However, I think this gives that much extra flexibility (and maintaining backward compatibility) that this quick patch can be incorporated already. It is useful for a lot of persons and it is just a quick patch. Todo: also patch the sql statements for other storage types. Rene Kluwen Chimit

RE: Sqlbox and scheduled pushes

2010-06-02 Thread Rene Kluwen
Do we really need a configuration parameter? Just a question. From: alejandro.guerri...@gmail.com [mailto:alejandro.guerri...@gmail.com] Sent: woensdag 2 juni 2010 10:07 To: Rene Kluwen; 'Emmanuel CHANSON' Cc: Kannel Devel Subject: Re: Sqlbox and scheduled pushes Hey, I've told Emmanuel

RE: Sqlbox and scheduled pushes

2010-06-02 Thread Rene Kluwen
[mailto:alejandro.guerri...@gmail.com] Sent: woensdag 2 juni 2010 10:50 To: Rene Kluwen; 'Emmanuel CHANSON' Cc: Kannel Devel Subject: Re: Sqlbox and scheduled pushes If you don't need the scheduling, the query would be heavier and would break backward-compatibility. BlackBerry de movistar, allí donde estés

Billing

2010-05-28 Thread Rene Kluwen
I just answered an SMPPBox billing issue on the users list. I think billing shouldn't be an SMPPBox/SQLBox/SMSBox issue but rather something that handles Kannel itself (i.e. bearerbox). I think if we implement something like this, the community would benefit from that a lot. I mean, for every sms

RE: req_feat patch

2007-05-10 Thread Rene Kluwen
variable? Rene Kluwen wrote: There is a possibility to extract the value, given the MSG struct and it's members. Will that be a better option? I can come up with a version that does that. But before spending time on that, I want to know if it is an acceptable solution. Rene Kluwen Chimit

RE: req_feat patch

2007-05-10 Thread Rene Kluwen
don't feel like having the same discussion over again. I don't mind if this patch is not in CVS. It will just mean that the Clickatell http driver is partly broken. Rene Kluwen Chimit -Original Message- From: Andreas Fink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: woensdag 9 mei 2007 16:09 To: Rene

RE: req_feat patch

2007-05-10 Thread Rene Kluwen
Feel free to contribute a patch :) Rene Kluwen Chimit -Original Message- From: Hillel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: woensdag 9 mei 2007 16:17 To: 'Rene Kluwen' Cc: Kannel Devel Subject: RE: req_feat patch Hi, Can we not rather have a generic HTTP interface that can be configured

req_feat patch

2007-05-09 Thread Rene Kluwen
Nowadays, clickatell requires the req_feat parameter to enable to set the sender id or send binary SMS. This patch enables this. Votes? Rene Kluwen Chimit Index: gw/smsc/smsc_http.c === RCS file: /home/cvs/gateway/gw/smsc

RE: req_feat patch

2007-05-09 Thread Rene Kluwen
There is a possibility to extract the value, given the MSG struct and it's members. Will that be a better option? I can come up with a version that does that. But before spending time on that, I want to know if it is an acceptable solution. Rene Kluwen Chimit -Original Message- From

Re: [PATCH] (sqlbox-standalone) gw/sqlbox_pgsql.h

2006-11-25 Thread Rene Kluwen
Stipe, It would be for me if it were sqlbox. The sqlbox patch is kind of outdated by sqlbox standalone. Martin Conte maintains sqlbox standalone. I suggest Martin takes over sqlbox maintanance? Just an idea. Since he is a lot more active lately on the list and with patches. Rene Kluwen Chimit

RE: Release process

2006-10-21 Thread Rene Kluwen
If someone ask for my opinion: I agree with this. Rene Kluwen Chimti -Original Message- From: Enver ALTIN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: zaterdag 21 oktober 2006 16:29 To: Stipe Tolj Cc: devel@kannel.org Subject: Release process On Sat, 2006-10-21 at 14:33 +0200, Stipe Tolj wrote

RE: [RFC] SMPP: refusing DLRs that are not found in DLR storage?

2006-08-20 Thread Rene Kluwen
incoming messages from all connected threads. So in short: I don't think we will actually solve an issue if we start doing things this way. Rene Kluwen Chimit -Original Message- From: Stipe Tolj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: zondag 20 augustus 2006 2:13 To: Kannel Development list Subject

RE: [PATCH] Service routing based on the account field

2006-07-22 Thread Rene Kluwen
I agree with Stipe on this one (for a change ;]). Why don't you just use smsc-id for what you want to accomplish? Or otherwise: Please explain more. Rene Kluwen Chimit -Original Message- From: Stipe Tolj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: zaterdag 22 juli 2006 14:14 To: Alejandro

RE: SMSbox CRASH: PANIC: gwlib/octstr.c:2458 Assertion `ostr-data ==NULL'

2006-07-17 Thread Rene Kluwen
Is this reproducable? Your smsc says Clickatell. Is this an SMPP connetion or the HTTP driver? Rene Kluwen Chimit -Original Message- From: Vincent CHAVANIS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: maandag 17 juli 2006 14:00 To: devel@kannel.org Subject: SMSbox CRASH: PANIC: gwlib/octstr.c:2458

RE: wappush on CDMA

2006-07-13 Thread Rene Kluwen
in optional parameters. Rene Kluwen Chimit -Original Message- From: Alex Antropoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: donderdag 13 juli 2006 9:31 To: devel@kannel.org Subject: Re: wappush on CDMA On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 07:53:43PM +0200, Rene Kluwen wrote: RK Chimit has a patch for Wap Push

RE: sms_dict problem

2006-06-22 Thread Rene Kluwen
At this moment I am a little bit short in time. But probably you are looking at a bug. Rene Kluwen Chimit -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of francesco emmi Sent: donderdag 22 juni 2006 19:29 To: kannel devel Subject: sms_dict problem Hi list

RE: resend_try and sms_resend_frequency in splitted msgs

2006-06-21 Thread Rene Kluwen
Won't this block sending of other SMS messages as well? Rene Kluwen Chimit -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mi Reflejo Sent: woensdag 21 juni 2006 16:14 To: Alexander Malysh Cc: devel@kannel.org Subject: Re: resend_try

RE: [PATCH] (sqlbox) gw/sqlbox_pgsql.c

2006-06-20 Thread Rene Kluwen
Patch is VERY MUCH appreciated and committed to the sqlbox CVS. I will be honest now and admit that you saved my face due to the Postgres driver being broken all this time. Also it seems that Latin America hides some very talentfull and helpfull Kannel programmers :) Rene Kluwen Chimit

RE: [PATCH] (sqlbox) sqlbox.patch

2006-06-14 Thread Rene Kluwen
Alex, this is why Kannel needs you :)... Agreeing here. Rene Kluwen Chimit -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Alexander Malysh Sent: woensdag 14 juni 2006 17:37 To: devel@kannel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] (sqlbox) sqlbox.patch Hi, why

RE: [PATCH] (sqlbox) sqlbox.patch

2006-06-14 Thread Rene Kluwen
can raving too far here. But we can even make this a general rule. Taking mutual parameters in group = core when not found in group = smsbox, wapbox, etc. I actually do this in other software. Rene Kluwen Chimit -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf

RE: [PATCH] (sqlbox) sqlbox.patch

2006-06-13 Thread Rene Kluwen
Patch committed to CVS. @Martin: Did you also change configure.in? Rene Kluwen Chimit -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mi Reflejo Sent: woensdag 14 juni 2006 0:08 To: devel@kannel.org Subject: [PATCH] (sqlbox) sqlbox.patch New sqlbox.patch

RE: [PATCH] config definition file hooking (for external modules), ie. sqlbox, mbuni, etc.

2006-06-13 Thread Rene Kluwen
Yes, you convinced me because of 2 reasons: 1. Provided that the API is not going to change when using dlopen() c.s. and 2. Your API doesn't stop anybody from patching cfg.def either way ;) (but I will be good :P) Rene Kluwen Chimit -Original Message- From: Stipe Tolj [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: [PATCH] (sqlbox) sqlbox.patch

2006-06-13 Thread Rene Kluwen
Some comments: - configure SHOULD be included in the patch. Because nobody uses autoconf to build their configure itself. This is way different from .o files... because they are not included in the repository. - Yes, a seperate build tree for sqlbox might be cleaner. But we can only do that if

RE: [PATCH] config definition file hooking (for external modules), ie. sqlbox, mbuni, etc.

2006-06-11 Thread Rene Kluwen
-1 from me. Reason 1: Does this mean add-ons need to temporarily use an interim API and switch to another API when it becomes available? Reason 2: mBuni, sqlbox require patches to the Kannel sources either way. It doesn't matter if such patches also patch cfg.def or not. Rene Kluwen Chimit

RE: [PATCH] allow multiline in config

2006-06-11 Thread Rene Kluwen
+0 from me. I don't have any objections to this particular patch. But shouldn't we wait with new features until at least we have a new stable version? I think that has priority by now. Rene Kluwen Chimit -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf

RE: sqlbox mysql re-connection (question)

2006-06-03 Thread Rene Kluwen
the same way as it is done elsewhere in Kannel. Rene Kluwen Chimit

RE: sqlbox mysql re-connection (question)

2006-06-03 Thread Rene Kluwen
, a dbpool_conn_consume is done. This should ensure, I always have a working connection, according to what you just said. So why doesn't it work? Rene Kluwen Chimit -Original Message- From: Mi Reflejo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: zondag 4 juni 2006 0:09 To: Rene Kluwen Cc: devel

RE: [PATCH] SQLBOX Port Bug

2006-05-30 Thread Rene Kluwen
Patch applied. -Original Message- From: Mi Reflejo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: maandag 29 mei 2006 10:02 To: devel@kannel.org; Rene Kluwen Subject: [PATCH] SQLBOX Port Bug SQLbox is not reading smsbox-port. It is hardcoded to 13005. There is the patch for that issue. M.

<    1   2   3   4   >