Thanks Alex - have done now.
On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 21:26, Alexander Malysh wrote:
Hi Alan,
please , please fill Bug report for you patches and attach your patch to it...
so your patches will not be loss or at least start new mail thread with
[PATCH] in subject...
Thanks in advance...
Patch to run_kannel_box to log to syslog.
On Wed, 2003-07-09 at 12:54, Andreas Fink wrote:
On Dienstag, Juli 8, 2003, at 11:13 Uhr, Alan McNatty wrote:
Hello,
run_kannel_box is a strange beast (at least to me). It's
purpose seems
unclear (or more
Alan McNatty wrote:
Can anyone think of a reason why Kannel might give up on a bad
connection after a time (is there something in io_thread in smpp module
that might cause a shutdown without reporting - I can only see, if fail
continue, etc - all looks good).
it may be a memory exhausture.
On Dienstag, Juli 8, 2003, at 09:00 Uhr, Stipe Tolj wrote:
Alan McNatty wrote:
Can anyone think of a reason why Kannel might give up on a bad
connection after a time (is there something in io_thread in smpp module
that might cause a shutdown without reporting - I can only see, if fail
continue,
Hello,
run_kannel_box is a strange beast (at least to me). It's purpose seems
unclear (or more appropriately 'undocumented'). I understand it's part
of the utils directory (out of main source) but it is part of standard
build (eg: debian packages).
Andres could you explain a bit about what it's
On Dienstag, Juli 8, 2003, at 11:13 Uhr, Alan McNatty wrote:
Hello,
run_kannel_box is a strange beast (at least to me). It's purpose seems
unclear (or more appropriately 'undocumented'). I understand it's part
of the utils directory (out of main source) but it is part of standard
build (eg:
Hello,
I have an instance of Kannel running (1.3.1 on debian linux) which
communicates to a single SMSC via SMPP. The SMSC connection in question
can go up and down like a yo-yo. After a recent bout the Kannel smsbox
and bearerbox'es simply vanished without a trace (nothing fatal in
either log).
