On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 12:10 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
That's correct. This is frankly a 'realistic' decision, on the basis
that the PackageKit maintainer believes updating packages should be
allowed for a regular user by default and intends to implement this, and
I don't want to dictate
On 16.2.2010 08:47, Peter Hutterer wrote:
I can put a giant warning into the log that if input devices don't work then
the users should have a look at the website above for reconfiguration. How
does that sound? Do you have any better suggestions?
Do we have all currently packaged .fdi files
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 12:16:42PM +0100, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
So you're running an X server? Well, my lad or lass, sit down and let
me tell you about the neverending story of X server input
configuration changes that has hopefully ended now.
I'm just pushing the latest X server
On 16/02/10 06:11, Jesse Keating wrote:
There are still a few orphans which are unblocked due to dep issues.
Please somebody take ownership of these:
Unblocked orphan python-crypto
I've taken this one. Co-maintainers welcome - I notice that there were
already some co-maintainers for this so
On 02/08/2010 06:11 PM, Karel Klic wrote:
On 02/08/2010 02:22 AM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 07.02.2010, 22:26 +0100 schrieb Karel Klic:
IMO all lists should be sorted by package owner. I own ~ 120 packages
and it is a quite lot of work to search all these packages in your
This post suggests I need to be building packages using arch i686
instead of i386 as mock does by default. If so, how do I go about
doing so?
Thanks,
Matt
- Forwarded message from bugzi...@redhat.com -
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 07:23:46 -0500
Subject: [Bug 565074] FTBFS
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 1:15 AM, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala
huzai...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Adam Miller wrote:
Hello all,
Recently glade3 was orphaned and I left it alone for about a week
and nobody had picked it up yet and since I use it I decided
2010/2/16 Chuck Anderson c...@wpi.edu:
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 09:26:54PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 12:16:42PM +0100, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
configuration can be in xorg.conf or in /etc/xorg.conf.d/.
Can it be /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/ instead please? It would suck to
On 16/02/10 13:34, Matt Domsch wrote:
This post suggests I need to be building packages using arch i686
instead of i386 as mock does by default. If so, how do I go about
doing so?
Do you have this in your mock config?
config_opts['target_arch'] = 'i686'
Paul.
--
devel mailing list
On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 16:45 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
As part of no frozen rawhide, we'll have a new tree on the mirrors,
pub/fedora/linux/development/13 That's where we'll be putting things
that are tagged for the release after they get through testing. We
don't yet have a clever name for
On 02/09/10 09:06, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 8 February 2010 22:46, Kevin Koflerkevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
As a result, you'll be causing dozens of FTBFS bugs just before the feature
freeze. I think this is entirely the wrong time in the release cycle to do
such a change, if it is done at
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 03:57:52PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Well. Even pretty fundamental GNOME stuff like gtk2-devel is still
broken. Look here:
[r...@localhost ~]# pkg-config --libs gtk+-2.0
-pthread -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdk-x11-2.0 -latk-1.0 -lgio-2.0 -lpangoft2-1.0
-lgdk_pixbuf-2.0
On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 15:57 +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
On 02/09/10 09:06, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 8 February 2010 22:46, Kevin Koflerkevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
As a result, you'll be causing dozens of FTBFS bugs just before the feature
freeze. I think this is entirely the wrong time
It is 16-Feb today, Software String Freeze.
All Fedora translators are expecting NO more String change in any
Fedora13 packages, and looking at to complete as many translation as
possible from now on till the translation deadline. Please make sure
that POT is up-to-date with latest strings.
On 02/16/10 16:06, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 03:57:52PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Well. Even pretty fundamental GNOME stuff like gtk2-devel is still
broken. Look here:
[r...@localhost ~]# pkg-config --libs gtk+-2.0
-pthread -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdk-x11-2.0 -latk-1.0
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 08:33:29AM +0100, Zoltan Kota wrote:
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/mock-results/x86_64/bazaar-1.4.2-14.fc13.src.rpm/result/build.log
Are we ready to retire this package yet? It's been many years
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564798
--- Comment #7 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2010-02-16 10:44:55
EST ---
Failing scratch build:
Gerd Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com writes:
Well. Even pretty fundamental GNOME stuff like gtk2-devel is still
broken. Look here:
[r...@localhost ~]# pkg-config --libs gtk+-2.0
-pthread -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdk-x11-2.0 -latk-1.0 -lgio-2.0 -lpangoft2-1.0
-lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lpangocairo-1.0 -lcairo
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 03:25:24PM +0100, Thomas Janssen wrote:
2010/2/16 Chuck Anderson c...@wpi.edu:
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 09:26:54PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 12:16:42PM +0100, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
configuration can be in xorg.conf or in /etc/xorg.conf.d/.
2010/2/16 Chuck Anderson c...@wpi.edu:
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 03:25:24PM +0100, Thomas Janssen wrote:
2010/2/16 Chuck Anderson c...@wpi.edu:
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 09:26:54PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 12:16:42PM +0100, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
configuration can
In case its useful, I've hacked together a quick utility to reannotate
abrt traces which had missing debuginfo at the time of report with the
correct source lines according to the debuginfo installed on the
annotator's box. Should be safe for reports from prelinked binaries.
Dear colleagues,
Linux Verification Center at the Institute for System Programming of RAS
and the Linux Foundation have released a free unit test generator for
shared C/C++ library API. It helps to quickly generate simple (sanity
or shallow-quality) tests for all functions from the library API
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Jon Masters j...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 16:45 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
As part of no frozen rawhide, we'll have a new tree on the mirrors,
pub/fedora/linux/development/13 That's where we'll be putting things
that are tagged for the release
This is a report of the weekly KDE-SIG-Meeting with a summary of the
topics that were discussed. If you want to add a comment please reply
to this email or add it to the related meeting page.
--
= Weekly KDE
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010, Paul W. Frields wrote:
Fedora 11: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2010-1696
Fedora 12: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2010-1748
For those interested in some more background information about the
chain of events on the dnssec-conf
On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 16:45 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
As part of no frozen rawhide, we'll have a new tree on the mirrors,
pub/fedora/linux/development/13 That's where we'll be putting things
that are tagged for the release after they get through testing. We
don't yet have a clever name for
On 02/05/10 15:50, Matt Domsch wrote:
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 06:26:39AM +0100, Roberto Bagnara wrote:
Hi there.
I would like to rebuild all the binaries of the current versions
of Fedora 12 packages (that is, only the latest update of each
package). The reason I would like to do that is
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 09:21:35 -0800
Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 16:45 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
As part of no frozen rawhide, we'll have a new tree on the mirrors,
pub/fedora/linux/development/13 That's where we'll be putting
things that are tagged for
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564798
--- Comment #8 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2010-02-16 12:40:56
EST ---
I have no idea about this bug. It seems
On 02/05/10 16:19, Roland Grunberg wrote:
I've had to do mock builds as well on packages in Fedora to see how
things build vs. some new version of a build related tool.
Along with chwang, we used the scripts at this location :
http://rgrunber.fedorapeople.org/mockbuild-tools/
They're
Hi Pavel,
Hope you are doing well.I found your reply.Sorry , I think ,there is
miscommunication/misunderstanding. I think I have sent you below mail , but
not sure about receiving replies from you. So I thought , you are busy with
other activities and didn't mail you further.
This can be
Compose started at Tue Feb 16 08:15:10 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
balsa-2.4.6-3.fc13.i686 requires libgmime-2.4.so.2
blahtexml-0.6-5.fc12.i686 requires libxerces-c.so.28
doodle-0.6.7-5.fc12.i686 requires
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 08:06:16PM +, Rawhide Report wrote:
1:libguestfs-1.0.84-1.fc13.i686 requires
/lib/libdevmapper-event-lvm2snapshot.so.2.02
1:libguestfs-1.0.84-1.fc13.i686 requires /lib/libntfs-3g.so.73
1:libguestfs-1.0.84-1.fc13.i686 requires
how about keyboard layout ?
f-s-keyboard (now system-setup-keyboard) used to send
/etc/sysconfig/keyboard
conf through hal to X
please consider the following points:
we need to specify two layouts with functional switching
(in previous releases we in ojuba.org were forced to hack and patch
many
the package description need to be changed
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/system-setup-keyboard
Hal keyboard layout callout
it should be something like
track system-wide keyboard layout configuration
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 20:09 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 08:06:16PM +, Rawhide Report wrote:
1:libguestfs-1.0.84-1.fc13.i686 requires
/lib/libdevmapper-event-lvm2snapshot.so.2.02
1:libguestfs-1.0.84-1.fc13.i686 requires /lib/libntfs-3g.so.73
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 05:03:24PM +0100, Enrico Scholz wrote:
Gerd Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com writes:
[r...@localhost ~]# pkg-config --libs gtk+-2.0
-pthread -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdk-x11-2.0 -latk-1.0 -lgio-2.0 -lpangoft2-1.0
-lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lpangocairo-1.0 -lcairo -lpango-1.0 -lfreetype
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 12:39:48 -0800,
Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
We don't necessarily have a soname freeze. I kind of wish we did, but
I'm sure that'd be met with lots of loud yelling.
It'd be nice to remind people that soname bumps (typically) create work for
other people
It's Test Day time again!
This Thursday, 2010-02-18, will be Color Management Test Day[1]. There's
some exciting new color management features[2] in Fedora 13. That is to
say, there are color management features in Fedora 13! We've never had
any real color management in Fedora before, so this is
This is to announce that the privilege escalation policy which has been
under discussion and revision in the QA and development groups, and in
FESCo, for the last few weeks has been approved at today's FESCo
meeting[1].
The policy can be found here for now:
Sure? For the libpng case I have a build failure which looks like this
isn't the case (bug 565047):
quote
/usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc/i686-redhat-linux/4.4.3/../../../libpng12.so:
undefined reference to symbol 'crc32'
/usr/bin/ld: note: 'crc32' is defined in DSO /lib/libz.so.1 so try
On 16 February 2010 18:43, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 12:52 +, Mat Booth wrote:
But you can have page aliases in Media Wiki, right?
Aliases? I don't know. MW automatically sets up redirects when you move
a page, but it breaks at more than one level
We're moments away from the CVS outage to branch F13 away from rawhide.
I've just created a wiki page that seeks to explain the branch event and
subsequent freeze for the remainder of the Fedora 13 development
cycle. Please take a moment to review this page and provide any
feedback you may have.
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
There are still a few orphans which are unblocked due to dep issues.
Please somebody take ownership of these:
Unblocked orphan gtk-sharp
Orphan: gtk-sharp
avahi-ui-sharp requires mono(gtk-sharp) = 1.0.0.0
On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 17:40 +0100, Thomas Janssen wrote:
That's how i understand the change. Like do it right and move
everything to /etc/xorg.conf.d/*
Maybe i could have said that in the first place. My bad.
The main reason for continuing to read the monolithic xorg.conf file is
for
On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 20:14 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
There will be a CVS outage starting at 2010-02-17 00:00 UTC, which will
last approximately 3 hours.
This outage is starting now.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
signature.asc
Features/ColorManagement describes per-screen / per-output support. I have a
dual monitor setup here
(potentially even triple-monitor if I could setup SurroundView with on-board
Radeon and discrete
Radeon card). I don't see test case for multi-monitor setups. Is this planned
or supported
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:32:19PM +0200, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
how about keyboard layout ?
f-s-keyboard (now system-setup-keyboard) used to send
/etc/sysconfig/keyboard
conf through hal to X
the package is already updated to create
/etc/xorg.conf.d/00-system-setup-keyboard.conf (instead of
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 12:38:37AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Peter Hutterer wrote:
evdev and synaptics are updated, so those two are converted. I know fpit
has an fdi file and there's some exceptions in x11-input.fdi that need to
be added too. I need to do this tomorrow unless you want to
On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 20:14 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
There will be a CVS outage starting at 2010-02-17 00:00 UTC, which will
last approximately 3 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2010-02-17
That's right folks, we are now branched for Fedora 13. What does this
mean to you? Well that depends on who you are, here are some yous
that we wrote about:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/No_frozen_rawhide_announce_plan#Use_Cases
The real take away here is explained at
Jesse Keating wrote, at 02/17/2010 01:10 PM +9:00:
That's right folks, we are now branched for Fedora 13. What does this
mean to you? Well that depends on who you are, here are some yous
that we wrote about:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/No_frozen_rawhide_announce_plan#Use_Cases
From me
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 13:27 +0900, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
A. How does this affect http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/ ?
static-repos will act as it normally does for a released Fedora. The
repo seen is what is in the buildroot, which is what is tagged for
release, and anything we've
On 02/17/2010 05:10 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
That's right folks, we are now branched for Fedora 13. What does this
mean to you? Well that depends on who you are, here are some yous
that we wrote about:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/No_frozen_rawhide_announce_plan#Use_Cases
The real take
Peter Hutterer wrote:
...
Thanks for the 'Heads Up'. As I had said so long ago, I couldn't possibly read
every
developer's blog to find out what I must do to avoid inevitable doom after
updating
my system and not taking the required configuration measures -- that I would
only
know about,
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/grepmail/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv23852
Modified Files:
grepmail.spec
Added Files:
grepmail-5.3034-date-manip-6.patch
Log Message:
Fix incompatibilities with Date::Manip 6.x (#564839, CPAN RT#54621)
Hello,
the first problem was fixed by applying patch from
https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=54457
but the second bug is still there. I saw the first
problem in more packages so hopefully this fix at least
some of bugs.
- Terje Røsten terje.ros...@ntnu.no wrote:
The F13 FTBFS:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564718
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
perl-Archive-RPM has broken dependencies in the development tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Archive-RPM-0.05-1.fc13.noarch requires
perl(MooseX::Types::DateTimeX)
On i386:
perl-Archive-RPM-0.05-1.fc13.noarch requires
perl(MooseX::Types::DateTimeX)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
perl-Fedora-Bugzilla has broken dependencies in the development tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Fedora-Bugzilla-0.13-2.fc13.noarch requires
perl(MooseX::Types::DateTimeX)
On i386:
perl-Fedora-Bugzilla-0.13-2.fc13.noarch requires
perl(MooseX::Types::DateTimeX)
Please resolve this as soon
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-HTML-Entities-Numbered:
9bc61132c10aa506d2629b37a2012729 HTML-Entities-Numbered-0.04.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Author: xavierb
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-HTML-Entities-Numbered/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv2651/devel
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
import.log perl-HTML-Entities-Numbered.spec
Log Message:
Initial import.
--- NEW FILE
Author: xavierb
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-HTML-Entities-Numbered/EL-5
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6210/EL-5
Modified Files:
sources
Added Files:
perl-HTML-Entities-Numbered.spec
Log Message:
import in F-11, F-12 and EL-5 branches
--- NEW FILE
63 matches
Mail list logo
