Hello Guys
My first post here is to present a small utility that maybe will
be useful for people building rpms on your machine locally and want to avoid
all the usual flags and directories needed to use rpmbuild directly.
bm,
buildManager is a small python tool created several years ago in the
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 11:38:59PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
I would take over gdal and grass if nobody else steps forward to do so
(I'd rather have someone with more knowledge in the field of gis be
the maintainer).
You can talk to the existing co-maintainers and see what you/they would
On 07/30/2010 04:09 AM, Helio Chissini de Castro wrote:
Hello Guys
My first post here is to present a small utility that maybe will
be useful for people building rpms on your machine locally and want to avoid
all the usual flags and directories needed to use rpmbuild directly.
...
Hope
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-4.fc13.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
On i386:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-4.fc13.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
Please resolve this as soon
perl-Config-Model has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Config-Model-1.205-2.fc14.noarch requires perl(YAML::Any) =
0:0.303
On i386:
perl-Config-Model-1.205-2.fc14.noarch requires perl(YAML::Any) =
0:0.303
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Data-Alias-1.07-6.fc13.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
On i386:
perl-Data-Alias-1.07-6.fc13.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora
Andrew,
SELinux is very configurable, and its various protections can be
turned on and off for each individual case.
That's interesting, I think the last problem I ran into was having to
set a boolean to get Picasa3 to run. This wasn't the whole fix, just
one step. I was under the impression
Because of the Python 2.7 transition, it's not possible at the moment
to install fedora-packager (or for me to fix the problems, because I
can't check in stuff).
It appears there are only 1 package which is causing all the issues:
$ sudo yum --enablerepo=koji --exclude=*.i686 install
Richard W.M. Jones wrote, at 07/30/2010 09:22 PM +9:00:
Because of the Python 2.7 transition, it's not possible at the moment
to install fedora-packager (or for me to fix the problems, because I
can't check in stuff).
It appears there are only 1 package which is causing all the issues:
$
commit 96ee09303372884a6f3c8a845a0221195b782d1f
Author: Paul Howarth pghm...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Mon Jun 14 08:10:38 2010 +
- Incorporate package review suggestions (#602597)
- Use %{?perl_default_filter}
- Use DESTDIR instead of PERL_INSTALL_ROOT
perl-Package-Stash.spec |
commit 14916ab1cc95c9907b7104db66fe0b72bd8270c9
Author: Paul Howarth pghm...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Mon Jun 14 13:52:53 2010 +
- Update to 0.04 (get_package_symbol now doesn't autovivify stash entries;
a new method get_or_add_package_symbol can now be used for that
commit 7b013cf8f75931b78621b0f2d5da2a9e24d55409
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Fri Jul 30 12:46:56 2010 +0100
Update patch for old Test::More versions
Changes in the test suite between versions 0.03 and 0.04 resulted in
the need to update the patch to get the test
commit c8b7003d7f57572d1864fa20ba29b61753a5252b
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Fri Jul 30 12:59:01 2010 +0100
Update to 0.05
Update to current upstream release 0.05:
- Bump Test::More requirement for done_testing
- Update packaging stuff
BR:
Mamoru Tasaka wrote, at 07/30/2010 09:30 PM +9:00:
Richard W.M. Jones wrote, at 07/30/2010 09:22 PM +9:00:
Because of the Python 2.7 transition, it's not possible at the moment
to install fedora-packager (or for me to fix the problems, because I
can't check in stuff).
It appears there are
Em Sexta-feira 30 Julho 2010, às 09:02:34, você escreveu:
On
07/30/2010
04:09 AM, Helio Chissini de Castro wrote:
Hello Guys
My first
post here is to present a small utility that maybe will
be
useful for
people building rpms on your machine locally and want to
avoid all the
usual flags
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
Richard W.M. Jones wrote, at 07/30/2010 09:22 PM +9:00:
Because of the Python 2.7 transition, it's not possible at the moment
to install fedora-packager (or for me to fix the problems, because I
can't check in stuff).
It appears there
On 07/30/2010 05:55 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
starts to spread ( https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Using_Fedora_GIT is a
good start ).
I made:
fedpkg clone python-debian
cd python-debian
fedpkg switch-branch f14
edit spec file
fedpkg commit -m 'edit changelog entry' -p
fedpkg push
And the last
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 09:30:52PM +0900, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
Richard W.M. Jones wrote, at 07/30/2010 09:22 PM +9:00:
Because of the Python 2.7 transition, it's not possible at the moment
to install fedora-packager (or for me to fix the problems, because I
can't check in stuff).
It
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 01:43:54PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I put an extremely grotty patch into this scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2358551
erm, which failed ...
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat
Jesse Keating said the following on 07/29/2010 09:03 PM Pacific Time:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Branch_Freeze_Policy
I know it's been a rough couple of days here, python-2.7 and boost
rebuilds creating build havoc, systemd creating some
On 07/29/2010 07:38 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:39:02 +0200
Sven Lankess...@lank.es wrote:
Can we please orphan his packages?:
I'm ok with it as a FESCo member. There's a 3 day objection time now in
the policy...
packages with co-maintainers:
[... snip ...]
openlayers
Orcan Ogetbil wrote, at 07/30/2010 09:36 PM +9:00:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
Richard W.M. Jones wrote, at 07/30/2010 09:22 PM +9:00:
Because of the Python 2.7 transition, it's not possible at the moment
to install fedora-packager (or for me to fix the problems,
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 03:01:11PM +0200, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
First, I must say that Christian has usually not been very responsive to
emails I wrote him, but it seems he just is usually very busy, as when
he actually responded, he would respond several of my emails in a row.
I have the
2010/7/30 Patrice Dumas pertu...@free.fr:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 03:01:11PM +0200, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
First, I must say that Christian has usually not been very responsive to
emails I wrote him, but it seems he just is usually very busy, as when
he actually responded, he would respond
On 07/29/2010 05:46 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, Mike McGrath wrote:
Maybe baby steps? Small incremental changes. Sure some features will be
missing that kopers will provide. But perhaps we could just create a
Fedora-13-devel tag in koji, push it to it's own repo or to
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 21:13:21 +0800, Chen wrote:
It seems a considerable amount of packages in fedora don't update for
years.
If you find any, open a ticket and mention the new release.
I think we should add some policy to address those unmaintained
packages,
There is the non-responsive
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 12:41 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
Any particular reason we are using gitweb at
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/. Cgit is used in freedesktop.org
is much more faster and resource efficient.
With my fd.o hat on: Our experience with cgit hasn't been completely
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 12:41 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
Any particular reason we are using gitweb at
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/. Cgit is used in freedesktop.org
is much more faster and resource efficient.
With my fd.o hat on:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/30/2010 04:51 AM, Alexander Boström wrote:
fre 2010-07-30 klockan 12:51 +0530 skrev Rahul Sundaram:
On 07/30/2010 12:47 PM, Camilo Mesias wrote:
The use cases in case anyone's interested: Install Picasa3 (which uses
its own wine version*)
commit eea5f13649de57dbf34f24353ba12255ceadcc7e
Author: steve st...@beta6.work
Date: Fri Jul 30 17:52:59 2010 +0200
* Tue Jun 22 2010 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 0.33-9
- Rebuild against libtorque-2.4.8
perl-PBS-0.33-obsolete.patch | 213 ++
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 12:41 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
Any particular reason we are using gitweb at
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/. Cgit is used in freedesktop.org
is much more
On 07/30/2010 02:43 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
On 07/30/2010 05:55 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
starts to spread ( https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Using_Fedora_GIT is a
good start ).
I made:
fedpkg clone python-debian
cd python-debian
fedpkg switch-branch f14
edit spec file
fedpkg commit
commit 562c43842baa1183ef7ca7e00f49b3766d1ef783
Author: steve st...@beta6.work
Date: Fri Jul 30 17:54:02 2010 +0200
Add clog file.
clog |2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/clog b/clog
new file mode 100644
index 000..d5e79a9
--- /dev/null
+++
commit 9349fb073696032ca1813d87e8c79aa5eaa23486
Author: steve st...@beta6.work
Date: Fri Jul 30 17:55:14 2010 +0200
nothing
perl-PBS-0.33-obsolete.patch |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-PBS-0.33-obsolete.patch b/perl-PBS-0.33-obsolete.patch
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 12:41 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
Any particular reason we are using gitweb at
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:01:47 -0500 (CDT)
Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 12:41 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 10:19:08AM +0200, Felix Kaechele wrote:
Hi there,
I had a short glimpse at the review request for dojo (#609817) today and
saw that it explicitly requires httpd. Well, dojo is a collection of
static JavaScript files so I feel that there is no reason why it should
I am trying to update one of my packages with git for the first time.
Works good, but fedpkg build fails for me.
It complains that it can't retrieve the sources:
http://koji.stg.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2239266name=root.logoffset=-4000
When I open the URL open with firefox/curl they
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 06:00:43AM -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
Jesse Keating said the following on 07/29/2010 09:03 PM Pacific Time:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Branch_Freeze_Policy
I know it's been a rough couple of days here,
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 09:51:05 -0400,
Daniel J Walsh dwa...@redhat.com wrote:
I decided to respond to these emails about Google Applications in a blog
entry
The link to Drepper's stuff should be:
http://people.redhat.com/drepper/selinux-mem.html
Your link has a ~ and a trailing space.
--
Many thanks!
--
Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org
Departamento de InformaticaFono: +56 32 2654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 2654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile 234 Fax: +56 32 2797513
--
devel
Excerpts from Christof Damian's message of Fri Jul 30 16:10:44 +0200 2010:
I am trying to update one of my packages with git for the first time.
Works good, but fedpkg build fails for me.
It complains that it can't retrieve the sources:
Daniel,
I had a quick look at your post... I wanted to point out that I installed
Picasa3 and Chrome not only with rpm but via Google's very convenient yum
repos. I got wine from yum too and installed Spotify by running a Windows
binary...
I suppose that means that if there are fine grained
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 03:28:42PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
I think we should add some policy to address those unmaintained
packages,
There is the non-responsive maintainer policy already.
That policy isn't the easiest one to follow though. I understand that
taking someones packages
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
FYI, git-svn is for users who want to continue to use Subversion on
the server but interact using Git from clients. It is not a tool
for conversion. It is a common mistake.
Not so much. Many folks use git-svn to convert from svn to git. Once
you have cloned an svn
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 16:18, Stanislav Ochotnicky
sochotni...@redhat.com wrote:
Excerpts from Christof Damian's message of Fri Jul 30 16:10:44 +0200 2010:
I am trying to update one of my packages with git for the first time.
Works good, but fedpkg build fails for me.
It complains that it
On 07/30/2010 09:45 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
The use cases in case anyone's interested: Install Picasa3 (which uses
its own wine version*) and install Spotify (for Windows) using the
'native' Wine.
I might have a look at Picasa3.
I just installed it from
Hi,
On 07/30/2010 01:12 PM, Camilo Mesias wrote:
SELinux is very configurable, and its various protections can be
turned on and off for each individual case.
That's interesting, I think the last problem I ran into was having to
set a boolean to get Picasa3 to run. This wasn't the whole
On 07/30/2010 03:16 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
So I just created:
http://repos.fedorapeople.org/
Anyone want to help me test the steps and process before we announce and
deploy it? Anyone already got Firefox 4 built for F13 for example? Let
me know or stop by #fedora-admin on
On 07/30/2010 09:03 AM, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
Well, workaround added in notify-python-0.1.1-13.fc1{4,5}. For F-14
I submitted push request.
Thank you. FWIW I tried to fix this yesterday but I couldn't work in CVS
because it was locked and I couldn't switch to the new git system, a
Le 30/07/2010 17:10, Rahul Sundaram a écrit :
On 07/30/2010 03:16 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
So I just created:
http://repos.fedorapeople.org/
Anyone want to help me test the steps and process before we announce and
deploy it? Anyone already got Firefox 4 built for F13 for example? Let
me
On 07/30/2010 11:10 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 07/30/2010 03:16 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
So I just created:
http://repos.fedorapeople.org/
Anyone want to help me test the steps and process before we announce and
deploy it? Anyone already got Firefox 4 built for F13 for example? Let
me
On 07/30/2010 08:55 PM, Remi Collet wrote:
Of course I could push my firefox4 build on fedorapeople.org, but my
backport repository is about 12Gio (mainly mozilla stuff, lamp stack and
some experimental rpm like mysql-workbench)
Could I just added something to be (a link) on the list ?
I
On 07/30/2010 08:58 PM, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
I'm also working on a set of Firefox 4 packages (split between firefox4
and xulrunner) that more closely match the Fedora firefox packages, but
are able to be installed without conflicts.
At the moment, I'm just targeting F-14.
That's really
On 07/30/2010 09:06 PM, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
To be fair, I just moved to the format that Mike McGrath set up for
repos.fedoraproject.org, so, please don't accuse me of not backing
standardization. ;)
The point is not to accuse anyone of course. Merely was providing a
suggestion on how we
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 21:03 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 07/30/2010 08:58 PM, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
I'm also working on a set of Firefox 4 packages (split between firefox4
and xulrunner) that more closely match the Fedora firefox packages, but
are able to be installed without
On Friday, July 30, 2010 07:22:45 am Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Because of the Python 2.7 transition, it's not possible at the moment
to install fedora-packager (or for me to fix the problems, because I
can't check in stuff).
It appears there are only 1 package which is causing all the
On 07/30/2010 09:08 PM, seth vidal wrote:
in yum-utils upstream you can do:
yum-config-manager --add-repo=http://baseurl/some/place
or
yum-config-manager --add-repo=http://path/to/some/foo.repo
either will add the repo you want.
That's almost what I want. Can we add a default shortcut
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 21:11 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 07/30/2010 09:08 PM, seth vidal wrote:
in yum-utils upstream you can do:
yum-config-manager --add-repo=http://baseurl/some/place
or
yum-config-manager --add-repo=http://path/to/some/foo.repo
either will add the repo you
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 11:51 -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On 07/30/2010 11:49 AM, seth vidal wrote:
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 21:11 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 07/30/2010 09:08 PM, seth vidal wrote:
in yum-utils upstream you can do:
yum-config-manager
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Tom spot Callaway
tcall...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/30/2010 11:49 AM, seth vidal wrote:
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 21:11 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 07/30/2010 09:08 PM, seth vidal wrote:
in yum-utils upstream you can do:
yum-config-manager
On 07/30/2010 11:53 AM, drago01 wrote:
Not even with a note like
The fedora project has no control about this repos use at your own
risk etc. pp ?
No. Not even with a note like that.
~spot
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Thanks for dist-git -- one step closer to banishing CVS from my life! :)
A git trick I'd like fedpkg to learn is to use separate url/pushurl,
e.g. in .git/config:
[remote origin]
fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*
url = git://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/foo
pushurl =
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/30/2010 09:40 PM, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On 07/30/2010 11:53 AM, drago01 wrote:
Not even with a note like
The fedora project has no control about this repos use at your own
risk etc. pp ?
No. Not even with a
Rahul Sundaram (methe...@gmail.com) said:
The fedora project has no control about this repos use at your own
risk etc. pp ?
No. Not even with a note like that.
Instead of a static list of preincluded repos, would it be possible to
discover repos automatically from a neutral domain and
On 07/30/2010 10:09 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Well, there's a massive trojan waiting to happen.
More seriously, can you please stop these constant pleas of 'how can I
make Fedora do contributory infringement'? It's getting tiresome to have
new 'can we do this? how about this? maybe this?'
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 11:49 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 21:11 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 07/30/2010 09:08 PM, seth vidal wrote:
in yum-utils upstream you can do:
yum-config-manager --add-repo=http://baseurl/some/place
or
yum-config-manager
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 18:50 +0200, Hans Ulrich Niedermann wrote:
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 11:49 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 21:11 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 07/30/2010 09:08 PM, seth vidal wrote:
in yum-utils upstream you can do:
yum-config-manager
On 07/30/2010 10:05 PM, drago01 wrot
How is pointing to a domain that points to rpmfusion any different
than pointing to rpmfusion?
IANAL but if we can't do the later we can't do the former either ...
There is a precedent in some sense. A level of indirection can make a
difference. It
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/30/2010 06:00 AM, John Poelstra wrote:
Jesse Keating said the following on 07/29/2010 09:03 PM Pacific Time:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Branch_Freeze_Policy
I know it's been a rough couple
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 10:00, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/30/2010 06:00 AM, John Poelstra wrote:
Jesse Keating said the following on 07/29/2010 09:03 PM Pacific Time:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/30/2010 03:06 AM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
Great news!
Few questions still remains unanswered for me:
* Should I use git now?
Yes.
* May I still use cvs?
read-only
* If I'll add some changes right now using git/cvs will they be
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 10:45, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
On Friday, July 30, 2010 12:24:06 pm darrell pfeifer wrote:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 10:00, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/30/2010 06:00 AM, John
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Konstantin Ryabitsev
i...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Hmm... Doesn't seem to be working at all for me.
$ fedpkg co verbiste
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/fedpkg, line 959, in module
args.command(args)
File /usr/bin/fedpkg, line 409, in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/30/2010 05:43 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
On 07/30/2010 05:55 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
starts to spread ( https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Using_Fedora_GIT is a
good start ).
I made:
fedpkg clone python-debian
cd python-debian
fedpkg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/30/2010 10:24 AM, darrell pfeifer wrote:
Are the koji static repos coming back soon? Current rawhide is mid-way
through the boost/python havoc.
er... they never went away... What are you seeing?
- --
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 10:45, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
On Friday, July 30, 2010 12:24:06 pm darrell pfeifer wrote:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 10:00, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/30/2010 06:00 AM, John
Tried to do a commit and seem to be in a bad state:
[or...@orca paraview]$ fedpkg commit -p
[master 6f6d9c7] Add patch to support python 2.7
2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 paraview-3.8.0-py27.patch
Warning: No xauth data; using fake authentication data
Rahul Sundaram (methe...@gmail.com) said:
dramatically. Even in this thread, I have talked about a standard way of
accessing repositories to make it easier for users, asking remi to make
Firefox 4 available in repo etc which has nothing to do with RPM Fusion.
Example 1:
Warning -
On 7/30/2010 1:57 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Tried to do a commit and seem to be in a bad state:
[or...@orca paraview]$ fedpkg commit -p
[master 6f6d9c7] Add patch to support python 2.7
2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 paraview-3.8.0-py27.patch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/30/2010 02:13 AM, Martin Sourada wrote:
Ok, so trying to update a package (libass) I've noticed a tiny problem:
the fedpkg switch-branch does not seem to set up proper tracking of
remote branches which then results in (uhm, I'm using git
Minutes:http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-
meeting/2010-07-30/fedora-releng.2010-07-30-17.04.html
Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-
meeting/2010-07-30/fedora-releng.2010-07-30-17.04.txt
Log:http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 11:55 PM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
Once again I want to thank everybody who helped out and for all the
(continued) patience! I'll be available via email and IRC as much as
possible the next few days to help anybody with dist-git issues. Look
for Oxf13
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/30/2010 01:02 AM, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
On Friday 30 of July 2010 05:55:09 Jesse Keating wrote:
... Wiki
pages
will get filled out as knowledge of how to interact with dist-git
starts
to spread (
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 10:50 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Everything I've seen you ask about repos stems from an apparent end goal
of 'get rpmfusion onto Fedora systems as much as possible', and consists
of attempting to either have Fedora make changes to accomplish that, or
to language
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/30/2010 08:52 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
fedpkg build
fedpkg build
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/fedpkg, line 959, in module
args.command(args)
File /usr/bin/fedpkg, line 297, in build
On 07/30/2010 11:28 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Implication: your goal is to get more people on rpmfusion, and you want to
take any legal loopholes you can find to get there
The wording here makes it seem twisted and I don't think it is. There
are legal constrains in doing certain things and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/30/2010 10:53 AM, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Konstantin Ryabitsev
i...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Hmm... Doesn't seem to be working at all for me.
$ fedpkg co verbiste
Traceback (most recent call last):
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/30/2010 01:49 AM, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
One thing I've never got around to working out how to do in git which
is different from previous is dealing with branches. Where previously
it was as simple as changing directories to deal with
Rahul Sundaram (methe...@gmail.com) said:
More seriously, can you please stop these constant pleas of 'how can I
make Fedora do contributory infringement'? It's getting tiresome to have
new 'can we do this? how about this? maybe this?' ideas every couple
of weeks.
That's just twisting
On Friday, July 30, 2010 12:24:06 pm darrell pfeifer wrote:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 10:00, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/30/2010 06:00 AM, John Poelstra wrote:
Jesse Keating said the following on 07/29/2010 09:03 PM
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 10:50 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Everything I've seen you ask about repos stems from an apparent end goal
of 'get rpmfusion onto Fedora systems as much as possible', and consists
of attempting
On 07/30/2010 11:52 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
Regardless, — you have frequently come off as presenting a
wink-wink-nod-nod kind of approach towards these issues, and I think
it reflects poorly on the fedora project. I hope you'll discontinue
it.
Again, I have to disagree. My questions
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 11:15 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
On 07/30/2010 09:14 AM, Josh Stone wrote:
A git trick I'd like fedpkg to learn is to use separate url/pushurl,
e.g. in .git/config:
[remote origin]
fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*
url =
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/30/2010 10:57 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Tried to do a commit and seem to be in a bad state:
[or...@orca paraview]$ fedpkg commit -p
[master 6f6d9c7] Add patch to support python 2.7
2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
On 07/30/2010 11:36 AM, Hans Ulrich Niedermann wrote:
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 11:15 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
On 07/30/2010 09:14 AM, Josh Stone wrote:
A git trick I'd like fedpkg to learn is to use separate url/pushurl,
e.g. in .git/config:
[remote origin]
fetch =
On 07/30/2010 08:58 PM, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
I'm also working on a set of Firefox 4 packages (split between firefox4
and xulrunner) that more closely match the Fedora firefox packages, but
are able to be installed without conflicts.
At the moment, I'm just targeting F-14.
Thanks.
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/30/2010 08:58 PM, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
I'm also working on a set of Firefox 4 packages (split between firefox4
and xulrunner) that more closely match the Fedora firefox packages, but
are able to be
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 11:52 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 11:51 -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On 07/30/2010 11:49 AM, seth vidal wrote:
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 21:11 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 07/30/2010 09:08 PM, seth vidal wrote:
in yum-utils upstream you can
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 2:11 PM, seth vidal skvi...@fedoraproject.orgwrote:
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 11:52 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 11:51 -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On 07/30/2010 11:49 AM, seth vidal wrote:
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 21:11 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
1 - 100 of 211 matches
Mail list logo
