Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-12 Thread Gerd Hoffmann
On 10/11/10 19:31, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 11:41:13 +0100, Richard W.M. Jonesrjo...@redhat.com wrote: Some of the things it does which are IMHO better: - starts disk formatting / copying / installing in parallel with asking user questions I think that is a

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-12 Thread Gerd Hoffmann
Hi, Striving for usability and pleasantness for the untechnical users certainly is a good thing. It gets problematic when you choose to make things technically inferior just to please those kind of users. We don't have to make things inferior to improve usability. To stick with the

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-12 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le Lun 11 octobre 2010 23:44, Farkas Levente a écrit : imho, the never drop any feature since raid, lvm, iscsi are important (what's more i use them:-), BUT most user don't ie. 80% of the users never use them. If you fail one way or another 20% of users you fail period. That's not an

Re: REVIEW/RFC: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kevin/Updates_Policy_Draft

2010-10-12 Thread Michal Schmidt
On Wed, 6 Oct 2010 12:50:00 -0600 Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 09:19:08 +0200 Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com wrote: In the policy I do not see as clear distinction between F(n) (current stable) and F(n-1) (old stable) as Jaroslav proposes. The closest to it is this sentence:

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-12 Thread Farkas Levente
On 10/12/2010 09:53 AM, Gilboa Davara wrote: the other point of richards is what the whole fedora community and redhat should have to understand: most users like ubuntu rather then fedora/redhat. why? because: -... better is what most user like. period. Following your simplistic logic,

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-12 Thread Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
On 10/12/2010 10:28 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: Hi, Striving for usability and pleasantness for the untechnical users certainly is a good thing. It gets problematic when you choose to make things technically inferior just to please those kind of users. We don't have to make things

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-12 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 10/12/2010 02:16 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: On 10/12/2010 10:28 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: Hi, Striving for usability and pleasantness for the untechnical users certainly is a good thing. It gets problematic when you choose to make things technically inferior just to please

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-12 Thread Jean-Francois Saucier
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn denni...@conversis.de wrote: On 10/12/2010 10:28 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:     Hi, Striving for usability and pleasantness for the untechnical users certainly is a good thing. It gets problematic when you choose to make things

rawhide report: 20101012 changes

2010-10-12 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Tue Oct 12 08:15:31 UTC 2010 Broken deps for x86_64 -- Inventor-2.1.5-39.fc14.i686 requires /usr/share/fonts/liberation/LiberationMono-Regular.ttf Inventor-2.1.5-39.fc14.i686 requires

Re: REVIEW/RFC: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kevin/Updates_Policy_Draft

2010-10-12 Thread Brandon Lozza
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 6:17 AM, Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com wrote:  - remove any features Michal How do you guys update Gnome then? ;) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: REVIEW/RFC: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kevin/Updates_Policy_Draft

2010-10-12 Thread Michal Schmidt
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 09:43:16 -0400 Brandon Lozza wrote: On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 6:17 AM, Michal Schmidt wrote:  - remove any features Michal How do you guys update Gnome then? ;) Perhaps you're confusing me with someone else. I have nothing to do with Gnome. But did Gnome ever

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-12 Thread Chris Lumens
Anaconda goes though everything step-by-step instead, asking one question after another, doing some work inbetween (partitining), asking more questions (packages to install) ... We have worked a little to reduce this over time, too. If you remember we used to have a confirmation screen

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-12 Thread Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
On 10/12/2010 02:57 PM, Jean-Francois Saucier wrote: On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn denni...@conversis.de wrote: On 10/12/2010 10:28 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: Hi, Striving for usability and pleasantness for the untechnical users certainly is a good thing. It

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-12 Thread Rudolf Kastl
2010/10/11 Gilboa Davara gilb...@gmail.com: On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 12:09 -0400, Jon Masters wrote: On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 17:39 +0200, Gilboa Davara wrote: Comparing the Ubuntu 10.04 DVD installer (which I use a couple of weeks ago) to Fedora 13 DVD installer is like comparing the Cessna to a

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-12 Thread Matthew Miller
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 02:16:49PM +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: The only way to accomplish this without actually removing the features is to have two anaconda modes one for easy desktop installation and one full featured mode. This mode should be chosen not by the user but by the spin

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-12 Thread Neal Becker
Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: On 10/12/2010 10:28 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: Hi, Striving for usability and pleasantness for the untechnical users certainly is a good thing. It gets problematic when you choose to make things technically inferior just to please those kind of users. We

Re: REVIEW/RFC: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kevin/Updates_Policy_Draft

2010-10-12 Thread Brandon Lozza
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 09:43:16 -0400 Brandon Lozza wrote: On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 6:17 AM, Michal Schmidt wrote:  - remove any features Gnome is known for removing features, it was a joke. Perhaps you're confusing me

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-12 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 11:11 -0400, Chris Lumens wrote: - downloads updates in parallel too Package updates? - uses IP geolocation to guess the user's timezone and keyboard settings (it's been 100% correct for me each time) We can do this, it's just never really been brought up.

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-12 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 11:41 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: I installed and played with Ubuntu 10.10 over the weekend (in a VM), and I have to say that their installer is very smooth indeed. It's starting to make anaconda look distinctly clunky. Some of the things it does which are IMHO

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-12 Thread Máirín Duffy
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 19:23 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 15:44 -0400, Jon Masters wrote: Sadly enough, this means that a shiny Ubuntu installer is to the whole distribution what GNOME shell is to the GNOME project. It doesn't matter if you've got a lot of bells and

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-12 Thread Jesse Keating
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/12/10 7:20 AM, Rudolf Kastl wrote: I am doing the same setup, nice to see someone else with those requirements. actually without kickstart setting up softraid in anaconda was broken (try it manually without precreated partitions... it will

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-12 Thread Jesse Keating
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/12/10 7:20 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 02:16:49PM +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: The only way to accomplish this without actually removing the features is to have two anaconda modes one for easy desktop

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-12 Thread Chuck Anderson
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 08:06:59AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/12/10 7:20 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 02:16:49PM +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: The only way to accomplish this without actually removing the

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-12 Thread Jesse Keating
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/12/10 8:13 AM, Chuck Anderson wrote: Making advanced only a choice at the beginning of a 10 step process is a non-starter and leads to the problem you describe above. If instead there were Advanced Options... in each step along the way

F-14 Branched report: 20101012 changes

2010-10-12 Thread Branched Report
Compose started at Tue Oct 12 13:15:43 UTC 2010 Broken deps for x86_64 -- antlr3-python-3.1.2-7.fc14.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:2.6 gnome-pilot-conduits-2.0.17-4.fc13.x86_64 requires libgpilotdconduit.so.2()(64bit)

[perl-Net-SSH-Perl] Created tag perl-Net-SSH-Perl-1.34-8.fc14

2010-10-12 Thread Paul Howarth
The lightweight tag 'perl-Net-SSH-Perl-1.34-8.fc14' was created pointing to: aabdbf4... Use hunspell back-end for spell check test -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-Math-GMP] Created tag perl-Math-GMP-2.06-5.fc14

2010-10-12 Thread Paul Howarth
The lightweight tag 'perl-Math-GMP-2.06-5.fc14' was created pointing to: 4f8e760... Use hunspell dictionary for spell check test -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Four Days to Fix Remaining Fedora 14 Blocker Bugs

2010-10-12 Thread John Poelstra
Hello Fedora 14 Blocker Bug Owners (all copied on this message), The list of bugs below are currently blocking the final release of Fedora 14. These bugs MUST be fixed by this coming Monday, 2010-10-18 (Final Change Deadline) or Release Engineering will be unable to create the Final Release

[Test-Announce] Fedora 14 ON_QA Blocker bugs needing verification

2010-10-12 Thread James Laska
Greetings testers! The bugs listed below are Fedora 14 Blocker bugs that are believed to be fixed. Help is needed to ensure Fedora 14 ships on time! You can follow the list of ON_QA bugs at http://bit.ly/bLdmof To get started, for each bug ... 1. Confirm reported bug is fixed, then change

Re: Git commit in all available branches

2010-10-12 Thread Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)
Unfortunately it is not what I initially ask :( 12.10.2010 19:14, matt_dom...@dell.com wrote: Correct, it's simply a git merge specifying the merge method, to ensure there are no merge conflicts - just make an exact copy of the origin/master branch onto the current branch. You must still

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-12 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 16:40 +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: On 10/12/2010 04:20 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 02:16:49PM +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: The only way to accomplish this without actually removing the features is to have two anaconda modes one for

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-12 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 10:53 -0400, Neal Becker wrote: I don't agree. There's nothing unusual about a dumbed-down interface for novices, with an 'advanced' tab hiding more options. As someone else has pointed out, a lot of usability experts consider this a bad idea, for two reasons: 1)

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-12 Thread drago01
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 6:30 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 10:53 -0400, Neal Becker wrote: I don't agree.  There's nothing unusual about a dumbed-down interface for novices, with an 'advanced' tab hiding more options. As someone else has pointed out, a

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-12 Thread Jos Vos
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 09:30:45AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: 2) it creates a confusing decision point for *everyone*: how do you know if you need the 'advanced' options? You can't really know without looking at them, so you have to look at them to decide if you need them, so essentially

libgpod 0.8.0 in F13

2010-10-12 Thread Nathaniel McCallum
I've just tagged libgpod 0.8.0 for F13 updates-testing. This is the first step to an updated Banshee (1.8.0) in F13 as well as better iPhone/iPad support in the existing Rhythmbox. I'd really like to get some testing on this, so please, if you are using updates-testing and have any Apple-brand

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-12 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 18:34 +0200, drago01 wrote: On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 6:30 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 10:53 -0400, Neal Becker wrote: I don't agree. There's nothing unusual about a dumbed-down interface for novices, with an 'advanced' tab

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-12 Thread drago01
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 18:34 +0200, drago01 wrote: On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 6:30 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 10:53 -0400, Neal Becker wrote: I don't agree.  There's nothing

Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-12 Thread Evan Dandrea
On Mon Oct 11 15:39:44 UTC 2010, Gilboa Davara wrote: Comparing the Ubuntu 10.04 DVD installer (which I use a couple of weeks ago) to Fedora 13 DVD installer is like comparing the Cessna to a Boeing 747. Sure, both can accomplish the same task. Read: transporting people from one airport to

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-12 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 19:15 +0200, drago01 wrote: As I recall, several distros have done usability studies and found that this isn't actually true. People have been *trained* to just press next, next, next under specific circumstances - like Windows software installation - but it's not

Re: 'milkymist' group in comps?

2010-10-12 Thread Chitlesh GOORAH
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 9:42 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote: 1) When you added this to F14/F15/EL6, you added a typo; this broke the F-14 branched compose and the EPEL updates push. *Please* verify your changes before pushing. Sorry I missed it 2) Aside from that... how does

Selinux: SSH broken after F-13 -- F-14 upgrade

2010-10-12 Thread Michal Hlavinka
Hi all, I've recently upgraded my system, but after that I was not able to connect through ssh. More things are wrong (from my POV): 1)SELinux blocks all nondefault ports for ssh I have ssh confugured to use different port than 22 for security reasons and I think there is a lot of people doing

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-12 Thread Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
On 10/12/2010 05:13 PM, Chuck Anderson wrote: On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 08:06:59AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/12/10 7:20 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 02:16:49PM +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: The only way to

Re: Selinux: SSH broken after F-13 -- F-14 upgrade

2010-10-12 Thread Daniel J Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/12/2010 01:49 PM, Michal Hlavinka wrote: Hi all, I've recently upgraded my system, but after that I was not able to connect through ssh. More things are wrong (from my POV): 1)SELinux blocks all nondefault ports for ssh I have ssh

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-12 Thread James Antill
On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 16:00 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 11:11 -0400, Chris Lumens wrote: - suggests a username and hostname based on the user's real name (Mac OS X's installer also does this -- it's a nice touch) If DNS knows a hostname, we will suggest that.

Re: Selinux: SSH broken after F-13 -- F-14 upgrade

2010-10-12 Thread Michal Hlavinka
- Daniel J Walsh dwa...@redhat.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/12/2010 01:49 PM, Michal Hlavinka wrote: Hi all, I've recently upgraded my system, but after that I was not able to connect through ssh. More things are wrong (from my POV): 1)SELinux

A comps group for the Design Suite

2010-10-12 Thread Ankur Sinha
Hello, Since the design team is using a design suite, would it be possible to please create a group in comps for the purpose? It would make installation of the design suite much easier for end users. The alternative is to create a meta package which isn't welcomed. This[1] is the tentative

Something similar to http://susestudio.com/

2010-10-12 Thread Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)
Subject. Have Fedora/RHEL service similar http://susestudio.com/ ? May be plans to create it? Just for information. -- With best wishes, Pavel Alexeev aka Pahan-Hubbitus. For fast contact with me you could use Jabber: hubbi...@jabber.ru -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: 'milkymist' group in comps?

2010-10-12 Thread Bill Nottingham
Chitlesh GOORAH (chitlesh.goo...@gmail.com) said: Milkymist community builds and enhance their own toolchain (currently not fully supported by Fedora). They have contributors who contribute for tools such as gcc, qemu, other libraries (too software for FEL goals). They have many patches that

Re: A comps group for the Design Suite

2010-10-12 Thread Bill Nottingham
Ankur Sinha (sanjay.an...@gmail.com) said: Since the design team is using a design suite, would it be possible to please create a group in comps for the purpose? It would make installation of the design suite much easier for end users. The alternative is to create a meta package which

Re: Selinux: SSH broken after F-13 -- F-14 upgrade

2010-10-12 Thread Daniel J Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/12/2010 02:10 PM, Michal Hlavinka wrote: - Daniel J Walsh dwa...@redhat.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/12/2010 01:49 PM, Michal Hlavinka wrote: Hi all, I've recently upgraded my system, but after

Re: Selinux: SSH broken after F-13 -- F-14 upgrade

2010-10-12 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 13:49:41 -0400 (EDT), Michal wrote: Hi all, I've recently upgraded my system, but after that I was not able to connect through ssh. More things are wrong (from my POV): 1)SELinux blocks all nondefault ports for ssh I have ssh confugured to use different port than 22

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-12 Thread Jeff Spaleta
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Evan Dandrea e...@ubuntu.com wrote: You can follow the path to the different desktop CDs from here: http://www.ubuntu.com/desktop/get-ubuntu/download The alternate CD can be found under the alternative downloads link, with an explanation that it is suited

Re: 'milkymist' group in comps?

2010-10-12 Thread Chitlesh GOORAH
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: OK, that's clear. But I am worried that if we go down this road, we'll eventually have 20 or 30 groups for different SoCs for embedded use, and that seems like it will eventually be problematic. Is there some generic moniker that could

Re: 'milkymist' group in comps?

2010-10-12 Thread Przemek Klosowski
On 10/12/2010 02:23 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: Chitlesh GOORAH (chitlesh.goo...@gmail.com) said: Milkymist community builds and enhance their own toolchain (currently not fully supported by Fedora). ... OK, that's clear. But I am worried that if we go down this road, we'll eventually have 20

Re: 'milkymist' group in comps?

2010-10-12 Thread Bill Nottingham
Chitlesh GOORAH (chitlesh.goo...@gmail.com) said: OK, that's clear. But I am worried that if we go down this road, we'll eventually have 20 or 30 groups for different SoCs for embedded use, and that seems like it will eventually be problematic. Is there some generic moniker that could be

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-12 Thread Evan Dandrea
I honestly have no idea. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-12 Thread Evan Dandrea
On Mon Oct 11 21:34:08 UTC 2010 Lars Seipel wrote: It may be nice usability-wise but it lacks support for LVM2, LUKS disk encryption and practically everything more advanced. It can't be automated using some equivalent to kickstart and it fails at all the stuff Anaconda subsumes unter advanced

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-12 Thread Manuel Escudero
2010/10/12 James Antill ja...@fedoraproject.org On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 16:00 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 11:11 -0400, Chris Lumens wrote: - suggests a username and hostname based on the user's real name (Mac OS X's installer also does this -- it's a nice

Fedora 14 QA retrospective - feedback requested

2010-10-12 Thread James Laska
Greetings folks, I'd like to draw attention to the QA retrospective wiki page for Fedora 14. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_14_QA_Retrospective As we did for Fedora 13 [1], I'd like to document any gotchas/hiccups/awesome issues as they happen during a release. I don't know about you,

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-12 Thread Manuel Wolfshant
On 10/12/2010 10:35 PM, Manuel Escudero wrote: 2010/10/12 James Antill ja...@fedoraproject.org mailto:ja...@fedoraproject.org On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 16:00 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 11:11 -0400, Chris Lumens wrote: - suggests a username and hostname

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-12 Thread Jeff Spaleta
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Evan Dandrea e...@ubuntu.com wrote: I honestly have no idea. Hmm. That's unfortunate. It appears from the web pages that the preferred way to get the alternative images is the torrent ticket (as it appears ahead of the mirror urls). If users are meant to bump

Re: 'milkymist' group in comps?

2010-10-12 Thread Bill Nottingham
James Laska (jla...@redhat.com) said: 1) When you added this to F14/F15/EL6, you added a typo; this broke the F-14 branched compose and the EPEL updates push. *Please* verify your changes before pushing. How did the compose break? The comps file in git failed to parse, such that the

Re: 'milkymist' group in comps?

2010-10-12 Thread James Laska
On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 16:54 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: James Laska (jla...@redhat.com) said: 1) When you added this to F14/F15/EL6, you added a typo; this broke the F-14 branched compose and the EPEL updates push. *Please* verify your changes before pushing. How did the compose

Re: 'milkymist' group in comps?

2010-10-12 Thread Bill Nottingham
James Laska (jla...@redhat.com) said: No, this is well before the tree gets to that state. It would need to be implemented as a check on git push. We attempt to validate comps in this test using the comps.rng in git (see results logs posted earlier). I'm not tremendously familiar with

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo meeting (2010-10-12)

2010-10-12 Thread Kevin Fenzi
=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2010-10-12) === Meeting started by nirik at 19:30:01 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-10-12/fesco.2010-10-12-19.30.log.html Meeting summary

Re: Selinux: SSH broken after F-13 -- F-14 upgrade

2010-10-12 Thread yersinia
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Daniel J Walsh dwa...@redhat.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/12/2010 01:49 PM, Michal Hlavinka wrote: Hi all, I've recently upgraded my system, but after that I was not able to connect through ssh. More things are wrong (from

Re: OpenLayers update?

2010-10-12 Thread Jesse Keating
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/8/10 11:58 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote: (no one uses rawhide for development btw,) That's a pretty broad and unhelpful and untrue statement. I know of plenty of people who use rawhide for development. Continuing to perpetuate that rawhide is

It's been a while, but I could do with a hand...

2010-10-12 Thread Paul F. Johnson
Hi, It's been a while since I've done any sort of uploading and in that time my box died, has been rebuilt and is running happily on rawhide. Problem is my scripts for uploading have gone! I've followed the information on the wiki but when I try to upload, I'm getting [p...@pb3 common]$

Re: Git commit in all available branches

2010-10-12 Thread Jesse Keating
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/8/10 7:03 AM, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote: In most cases I try sync all branches if there no real reasons to make differences. After made some changes in origin/master and commit is I also must do for each available branches

Re: Chain builds for non-rawhide

2010-10-12 Thread Jesse Keating
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/7/10 11:59 PM, Thomas Spura wrote: How about let bodhi do the tagging? When there is an update, you could click on tag this package, and bodhi will do the rest. If the update is deleted or obsoleted by another one, the tag will be deleted

Re: It's been a while, but I could do with a hand...

2010-10-12 Thread John5342
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 00:05, Paul F. Johnson p...@all-the-johnsons.co.uk wrote: Hi, It's been a while since I've done any sort of uploading and in that time my box died, has been rebuilt and is running happily on rawhide. Problem is my scripts for uploading have gone! I've followed the

ethtool not in default system anymore?

2010-10-12 Thread Chris Adams
I noticed that ethtool is not in the default install anymore (probably for a release or so, but I didn't notice it until now). Why is that? It is the only tool that can show and configure a variety of network device options, such as speed/duplex negotiation, wake-on-LAN, and TCP offloading.

Re: ethtool not in default system anymore?

2010-10-12 Thread Gregory Maxwell
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net wrote: I noticed that ethtool is not in the default install anymore (probably for a release or so, but I didn't notice it until now).  Why is that? It is the only tool that can show and configure a variety of network device

Re: ethtool not in default system anymore?

2010-10-12 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 19:37 -0400, Gregory Maxwell wrote: On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net wrote: I noticed that ethtool is not in the default install anymore [...] mii-tool. The mii-tool man page claims it is deprecated in favor of ethtool. In fact, neither

Re: ethtool not in default system anymore?

2010-10-12 Thread Jesse Keating
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/12/10 4:28 PM, Chris Adams wrote: I noticed that ethtool is not in the default install anymore (probably for a release or so, but I didn't notice it until now). Why is that? It is the only tool that can show and configure a variety of

Re: ethtool not in default system anymore?

2010-10-12 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Gregory Maxwell gmaxw...@gmail.com said: On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net wrote: I noticed that ethtool is not in the default install anymore (probably for a release or so, but I didn't notice it until now).  Why is that? It is the only tool

Re: ethtool not in default system anymore?

2010-10-12 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Chris Adams wrote: Maybe ethtool should be added to @Base? Or patch initscripts to use ethtool instead of deprecated cruft. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: ethtool not in default system anymore?

2010-10-12 Thread Gregory Maxwell
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net wrote: Once upon a time, Gregory Maxwell gmaxw...@gmail.com said: On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net wrote: I noticed that ethtool is not in the default install anymore (probably for a release or so,

Re: ethtool not in default system anymore?

2010-10-12 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com said: Chris Adams wrote: Maybe ethtool should be added to @Base? Or patch initscripts to use ethtool instead of deprecated cruft. You cut out the part of my email where I quoted the changelog showing that had already been done. The

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-12 Thread Jeff Spaleta
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Jeff Spaleta jspal...@gmail.com wrote: The low activity on the Ubuntu torrent server generally really leaves me scratching my head as to how to evaluate the applicability of the alternative image approach. Just to provide some closure on this. I watched the

[Test-Announce] Fedora 14 Final TC1 Available Now!

2010-10-12 Thread Andre Robatino
Fedora 14 Final TC1 is now available [1]. Please refer to the following pages for download links and testing instructions. Installation: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test Desktop: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test Ideally,

Re: ethtool not in default system anymore?

2010-10-12 Thread Matthew Miller
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 07:06:50PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: It looks like up through F12, initscripts required ethtool (so it was definately installed by default). I see this in the RPM changelog: Still the case in RHEL5, FWIW. -- Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org Senior Systems Architect --

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 14 Final TC1 Available Now! (Live images not yet)

2010-10-12 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 20:47 -0400, Andre Robatino wrote: Fedora 14 Final TC1 is now available [1]. Please refer to the following pages for download links and testing instructions. Installation: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test Desktop:

Re: Git commit in all available branches

2010-10-12 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 01:08:17PM +1000, Jeffrey Fearn wrote: Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 09:32:15 +1000 Jeffrey Fearn jfe...@redhat.com wrote: What do you mean leave it alone? The people using it WANT the changes. Why are you telling them how they can use their system?

Re: A comps group for the Design Suite

2010-10-12 Thread Nicu Buculei
On 10/12/2010 09:25 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: Ankur Sinha (sanjay.an...@gmail.com) said: Since the design team is using a design suite, would it be possible to please create a group in comps for the purpose? It would make installation of the design suite much easier for end users. The

[Bug 571192] $ENV{HTTP_TRANSFER_ENCODING} may be undefined in SOAP::Transport::HTTP

2010-10-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571192 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 571192] $ENV{HTTP_TRANSFER_ENCODING} may be undefined in SOAP::Transport::HTTP

2010-10-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571192 --- Comment #4 from Joel Uckelman uckel...@nomic.net 2010-10-12 04:56:26 EDT --- rvalue: no, I'm not using mod_perl. Paul:

[Bug 357641] EL branches perl-Tk

2010-10-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=357641 Mark Chappell trem...@tremble.org.uk changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 640752] Broken dependency: perl-Test-Simple-tests-0.94-2.fc14.noarch requires perl-Test-Simple = 0:0.94-2.fc14

2010-10-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=640752 Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added