Dne 29.2.2012 20:13, Jesse Keating napsal(a):
unless we move away from using master for rawhide and instead always
have a specific branch for each release.
Please don't do that. Thank you.
Vit
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi Fedora package maintainers
Please pull latest translation for your package, re-package with it and push to
koji for L10N QA test [1] by 2-Mar. We will have a live image to be composed
for this particular test on 5-Mar. The focus is to test translations
availability and accuracy in desktop
Hi all,
due to license change in Ruby, rubygem-main and rubygem-fattr licenses have
been changed (after clarification with the author).
Previous licenses were GPLv2+ or Ruby, current licenses are BSD or Ruby.
The change applies to F17 and rawhide.
--
Regards,
Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda.
--
devel
On Wed, 29.02.12 18:27, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote:
On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 00:17 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 29.02.12 17:51, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote:
On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 10:09 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Feb 29, 2012, at 5:15 AM, drago01 wrote:
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 03:11:53PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Also you should really define 'You' here. Because the issue is that mDNS
in Fedora is inserted by default in the hosts database and IIRC before
DNS, so it get a chance to always reply before a DNS query is made. This
of
On Thu, 01.03.12 15:16, Tomasz Torcz (to...@pipebreaker.pl) wrote:
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 03:11:53PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Also you should really define 'You' here. Because the issue is that mDNS
in Fedora is inserted by default in the hosts database and IIRC before
DNS, so
On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 17:20 +0100, Tore Anderson wrote:
* Jerry James
Interesting. I'm seeing kind of the inverse problem:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771130. Could that be
related to the issues discussed in this thread?
Hard to tell, without (preferably debug-level)
On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 00:34 +0100, Jarosław Górny wrote:
Wiadomość napisana przez Bruno Wolff III w dniu 2012-02-27, o godz. 16:29:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 14:00:51 +,
Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
On 27/02/12 13:52, elison.ni...@gmail.com wrote:
4) Quit on single
On Thu, 1 Mar 2012, Dan Williams wrote:
On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 17:20 +0100, Tore Anderson wrote:
* Jerry James
Interesting. I'm seeing kind of the inverse problem:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771130. Could that be
related to the issues discussed in this thread?
Hard to
Hello everyone,
my name is Franco Comida and I joined this mailing list because I want
to become a maintainer of Luminance HDR for Fedora. I am one of the
developers of the program since 2009 an a Red Hat/Fedora user for a long
time. This is the link of the review request I filed on bugzilla:
As new Fedora release looms ahead, I'd like open discussion about
verifying distribution integrity. In short---where to get public key for
verifying RPM signatures.
If I remember correctly, you are asked to accept new signing key by rpm
while installing fedora-release package from new Fedora
On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 10:52 -0500, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Thu, 1 Mar 2012, Dan Williams wrote:
On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 17:20 +0100, Tore Anderson wrote:
* Jerry James
Interesting. I'm seeing kind of the inverse problem:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771130. Could that be
Dne 1.3.2012 17:52, Petr Pisar napsal(a):
where to get public key for verifying RPM signatures.
The keys are at: https://fedoraproject.org/keys
Michal
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
If I remember correctly, Revisor x86_64 is not working since Fedora 14. At the
time I ended up working with livecd-creator. Today (in F16), however, I was
curious to see if there were improvements in Revisor and find that the same bug
Cannot find anaconda-runtime in /usr/lib/anaconda-runtime is
On 03/01/2012 06:52 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
As new Fedora release looms ahead, I'd like open discussion about
verifying distribution integrity. In short---where to get public key for
verifying RPM signatures.
If I remember correctly, you are asked to accept new signing key by rpm
while installing
On 03/01/2012 04:52 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Thu, 1 Mar 2012, Dan Williams wrote:
On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 17:20 +0100, Tore Anderson wrote:
* Jerry James
Interesting. I'm seeing kind of the inverse problem:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771130. Could that be
related to the
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 06:48:00PM +0100, Thomas Woerner wrote:
On 03/01/2012 04:52 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Thu, 1 Mar 2012, Dan Williams wrote:
On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 17:20 +0100, Tore Anderson wrote:
* Jerry James
Interesting. I'm seeing kind of the inverse problem:
On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 16:39 -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
I believe Fedora 17 has an add user to admin group checkbox when
adding the initial user, not sure if it is checked on or off by default.
Off by default (having just tried it today).
- ajax
signature.asc
Description: This is a
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3844852
failed with:
BuildError: error retrieving sources, mock exited with status 1; see build.log
for more information
Digging deeper:
DEBUG util.py:307: Executing command: ['fedpkg', 'sources']
DEBUG util.py:257: Could not execute
On Thu, 1 Mar 2012 23:17:27 +
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3844852
failed with:
BuildError: error retrieving sources, mock exited with status 1; see
build.log for more information
Digging deeper:
DEBUG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 14:46:44 -0700
Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Rawhide Report
rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
[emacs]
1:emacs-24.0.94-1.fc18.x86_64 requires
libMagickWand.so.4()(64bit)
On Thu, 1 Mar 2012 17:09:43 -0700
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
Yep.
rpkg broke it. I have untagged it. Should be back to working after the
next newrepo.
I re-tagged this back in after a new fedpkg landed. They both needed to
be there to work.
Please shout if you see buildroots
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/01/2012 05:43 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 16:39 -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
I believe Fedora 17 has an add user to admin group checkbox when
adding the initial user, not sure if it is checked on or off by
default.
Giovanni Campagna wrote:
PS: it would be useful to have some GUI tool to configure PolicyKit.
Everytime I clean my system I have to dig through dozens of manual
pages just to get virt-manager without a password for my user.
On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 11:46 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 07:02 -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
I think he's got a point
http://www.osnews.com/story/25659/Torvalds_requiring_root_password_for_mundane_things_is_quot_moronic_quot_
On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 17:43 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 16:39 -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
I believe Fedora 17 has an add user to admin group checkbox when
adding the initial user, not sure if it is checked on or off by default.
Off by default (having just tried it
On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 15:43 -0500, Chuck Anderson wrote:
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 06:48:00PM +0100, Thomas Woerner wrote:
On 03/01/2012 04:52 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Thu, 1 Mar 2012, Dan Williams wrote:
On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 17:20 +0100, Tore Anderson wrote:
* Jerry James
Hi all,
Just as the subject. I did not find this perl module Pod::Plainer.
This module is required by LSB dist test for LSB 4.1. But I did
not find in LSB DB tables.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=795244
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=791078
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=791078
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Dancer-1.3093 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798961
Summary: perl-Dancer-1.3093 is available
Product: Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Glib-Object-Introspection-0.007 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798962
Summary: perl-Glib-Object-Introspection-0.007 is available
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Glib-Object-Introspection:
655f1abee375598319b954b201024247 Glib-Object-Introspection-0.007.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798961
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
commit 097251cefe849537b85203cdceb842065e1a0943
Author: Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Mar 1 12:04:42 2012 +
Update to 0.007 release (rhbz #798962)
perl-Glib-Object-Introspection.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
2 files changed, 6
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Dancer:
b29899c84d96979a25e61d6f19030307 Dancer-1.3093.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 4bf8e234c5f8dc05e208ba9da6aba95aa8c2b141
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Mar 1 13:05:36 2012 +0100
1.3093 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Dancer.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
Summary of changes:
4bf8e23... 1.3093 bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
097251c... Update to 0.007 release (rhbz #798962) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798961
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-01
07:22:41 EST ---
perl-Dancer-1.3093-1.fc17 has
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798962
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-01
07:30:37 EST ---
commit ff0f62c29bb457217079e81081c3a48c6c919c76
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Thu Mar 1 12:48:43 2012 +
Spec clean-up
- Drop -tests subpackage (general lack of interest in this), but include
them as documentation for the main package
- Don't use macros
The lightweight tag 'perl-Readonly-XS-1.05-10.fc18' was created pointing to:
ff0f62c... Spec clean-up
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
ff0f62c... Spec clean-up (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Readonly-XS-1.05-10.fc17' was created pointing to:
ff0f62c... Spec clean-up
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Readonly-1.03-18.fc17' was created pointing to:
fc90843... Spec clean-up
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
The lightweight tag 'perl-Readonly-1.03-18.fc18' was created pointing to:
fc90843... Spec clean-up
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Summary of changes:
fc90843... Spec clean-up (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit fc90843dd02a6202b61c567d2a9b1cb9d71f7bef
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Thu Mar 1 16:39:37 2012 +
Spec clean-up
- Drop -tests subpackage (general lack of interest in this), but include
them as documentation for the main package
- No need to remove
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798961
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798962
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
52 matches
Mail list logo
