-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I am setting up a Koji server, and following the instructions given on the
Fedora Koji wiki
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Koji/ServerHowTo
Part way down, there are directions on
Generate a PKCS12 user certificate
This is
This is a reminder of the upcoming QA meeting. Please add any topic
suggestions to the meeting wiki page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20120521
The current proposed agenda is included below.
== Proposed Agenda Topics ==
1. Previous meeting follow-up
2. Fedora 17 Final status
Hi All,
Most of you aware regarding liberation license problem we are facing from
long time. Looks like time came when we can get rid of it.
Google has recently released google-croscore fonts.
- These are from same vendor ascendar with OFL license and more glyph
coverage than existing
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 14:07 +0800, Gregory Hosler wrote:
Part way down, there are directions on
Generate a PKCS12 user certificate
This is for web browser. This is only required for user certificates.
The statement to create such a certificate is:
openssl pkcs12
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/21/2012 02:32 PM, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 14:07 +0800, Gregory Hosler wrote:
Part way down, there are directions on
Generate a PKCS12 user certificate
This is for web browser. This is only required for user
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 09:49:03PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 08:02:23PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
Agreed. changelog and version field conflicts are 90% of my cherry-pick
conflicts.
I would be in favour of no longer maintaining a changelog in the spec file
As
Hi Glen,
Why is the default three connections rather than one? Is a tripling
of the number of connections to a mirror on a Fedora release day
desirable?
$ grep maxconnections /var/cache/yum/*/metalink.xml
/var/cache/yum/fedora/metalink.xml: resources maxconnections=1
- Original Message -
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 07:07:56PM +0200, Remi Collet wrote:
And definitvely, for me, (and probably only for me), git is really
not a good tool for spec maintenance.
Not duplicating the changelog would help. There's little reason to
have a changelog in git
On 05/21/2012 09:56 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
- Original Message -
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 07:07:56PM +0200, Remi Collet wrote:
And definitvely, for me, (and probably only for me), git is really
not a good tool for spec maintenance.
Not duplicating the changelog would help. There's
Sérgio Basto venit, vidit, dixit 18.05.2012 22:25:
On Sex, 2012-05-18 at 18:35 +0200, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
I've been seeing this ugliness more and more to the point where I just
can't keep writing individual emails. Repeat after me: git is not CVS.
When you have 2 branches with
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 10:23 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 05/21/2012 09:56 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
- Original Message -
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 07:07:56PM +0200, Remi Collet wrote:
And definitvely, for me, (and probably only for me), git is really
not a good tool for spec
On 21.5.2012 10:23, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
-1 changelogs are manually written documents and source files.
And your commit messages are written by aliens? You are lucky! I have to
write them myself (and I really hate that I have to write the same
information thrice ... nobody mentioned Bodhi
On 05/21/12 10:23, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 05/21/2012 09:56 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
- Original Message -
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 07:07:56PM +0200, Remi Collet wrote:
And definitvely, for me, (and probably only for me), git is really
not a good tool for spec maintenance.
Not
- Original Message -
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 10:23 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 05/21/2012 09:56 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
- Original Message -
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 07:07:56PM +0200, Remi Collet wrote:
And definitvely, for me, (and probably only for me), git is
The number of concurrent users is now lower because, well, each of
them now completes a yum update in one third of the time.
I think Glen's concerns were that the consumed resources
(flow caches, TCP hash entries, sockets) may scale faster
than the aggregated downloading speed.
I am aware of
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:52:40AM +0200, Michael J Gruber wrote:
Just like we have mandatory packaging guidelines, we should have
mandatory git guidelines simply because it is part of the build system,
yep, and also mailing list guidelines, bugzilla guidelines and
finally fashion police...
On Sun, 20 May 2012 19:56:30 -0700, JC (Jonas) wrote:
Hello all:
I've submitted a bunch of package submissions which need a sponsor.
Packages aren't sponsored, people are. You may want to pay attention to
the yellow box here:
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 12:43 +0200, Karel Zak wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:52:40AM +0200, Michael J Gruber wrote:
Just like we have mandatory packaging guidelines, we should have
mandatory git guidelines simply because it is part of the build system,
yep, and also mailing list
Hello.
I still have a quite large backlog of submitted packages so I'd like
to exchange reviews with someone. I've got these packages for trade:
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/739015 - erlang-riak_sysmon -
Rate-limiting system_monitor event handler for Riak
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/739016 -
Compose started at Mon May 21 08:15:04 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[LuxRender]
LuxRender-blender-0.8.0-13.fc17.x86_64 requires blender(ABI) = 0:2.61
[aeolus-conductor]
aeolus-conductor-0.4.0-2.fc17.noarch requires
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Monday at 17:00UTC (1:00pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Followups =
None as far as I know.
= New business =
On 05/21/2012 12:21 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
On 05/21/12 10:23, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 05/21/2012 09:56 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
- Original Message -
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 07:07:56PM +0200, Remi Collet wrote:
And definitvely, for me, (and probably only for me), git is really
On 05/21/2012 12:27 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
- Original Message -
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 10:23 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 05/21/2012 09:56 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
- Original Message -
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 07:07:56PM +0200, Remi Collet wrote:
And definitvely, for
On Mon, 21 May 2012 13:40:55 +0200
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
On 05/21/2012 12:21 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
On 05/21/12 10:23, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 05/21/2012 09:56 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
- Original Message -
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 07:07:56PM +0200, Remi
On 05/21/2012 01:56 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Technically, the major difference is git recording each and every
detail, which an rpm's user hardly is interested in. The latter audience
is not interested in seeing these details, they are interesting in
summaries.
E.g. they are not interested in
Hello,
I need the p7zip header files for a package I would like to submit for
review; but p7zip does not include them as it does not provide a
p7zip-devel subpackage.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=2715
I need these (taken from the debuginfo pacakge):
On 05/21/2012 02:19 PM, Stijn Hoop wrote:
The reasons you mention are just FUD -- this can happen to whatever
data you specify
No ... I have seen all such cases happen.
People killing git histories in various ways, ... not worth mentioning,
I'd yet have to see one single VCS conversion which
Quoting Michael J Gruber (2012-05-21 11:52:40)
Sérgio Basto venit, vidit, dixit 18.05.2012 22:25:
On Sex, 2012-05-18 at 18:35 +0200, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
I've been seeing this ugliness more and more to the point where I just
can't keep writing individual emails. Repeat after me: git
On Mon, 21 May 2012 14:35:57 +0200, SC (Simone) wrote:
Hello,
I need the p7zip header files for a package I would like to submit for
review; but p7zip does not include them as it does not provide a
p7zip-devel subpackage.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=2715
I
Dne 21.5.2012 12:09, Matej Cepl napsal(a):
On 21.5.2012 10:23, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
-1 changelogs are manually written documents and source files.
And your commit messages are written by aliens? You are lucky! I have
to write them myself (and I really hate that I have to write the same
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 14:21 +0200, Emanuel Rietveld wrote:
On 05/21/2012 01:56 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Technically, the major difference is git recording each and every
detail, which an rpm's user hardly is interested in. The latter audience
is not interested in seeing these details, they
perl-Net-OpenSSH has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Net-OpenSSH-0.57-3.fc18.noarch requires
openssh-clients(%{__isa_name}-%{__isa_bits})
On i386:
perl-Net-OpenSSH-0.57-3.fc18.noarch requires
openssh-clients(%{__isa_name}-%{__isa_bits})
Please resolve
Compose started at Mon May 21 08:15:02 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[389-admin]
389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.i686 requires libicuuc.so.48
389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.i686 requires libicui18n.so.48
2012/5/21 Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com:
Except we do not allow to rewrite history and push -f so you will never
be able to squash everything.
If koji/bodhi were able to tag successful builds within git, we would
be able to allow rewrites, squash commits and the like at least for
commits that
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 4:52 AM, Michael J Gruber
michaeljgruber+gm...@fastmail.fm wrote:
* put compatibility cludges for older releases on their respective
branches (this gets rid of many if's in spec)
i'm not against cleaning up ifs related to end of life/support
releases, but how far are you
On Seg, 2012-05-21 at 12:43 +0200, Karel Zak wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:52:40AM +0200, Michael J Gruber wrote:
Just like we have mandatory packaging guidelines, we should have
mandatory git guidelines simply because it is part of the build system,
yep, and also mailing list
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 7:53 AM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 21 May 2012 14:35:57 +0200, SC (Simone) wrote:
Hello,
I need the p7zip header files for a package I would like to submit for
review; but p7zip does not include them as it does not provide a
p7zip-devel
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 06:27:38AM -0400, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
- Original Message -
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 10:23 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 05/21/2012 09:56 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
- Original Message -
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 07:07:56PM +0200, Remi Collet
Karel Zak venit, vidit, dixit 21.05.2012 12:43:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:52:40AM +0200, Michael J Gruber wrote:
Just like we have mandatory packaging guidelines, we should have
mandatory git guidelines simply because it is part of the build system,
yep, and also mailing list guidelines,
Stanislav Ochotnicky venit, vidit, dixit 21.05.2012 14:49:
Quoting Michael J Gruber (2012-05-21 11:52:40)
Sérgio Basto venit, vidit, dixit 18.05.2012 22:25:
On Sex, 2012-05-18 at 18:35 +0200, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
I've been seeing this ugliness more and more to the point where I just
Greg Swift venit, vidit, dixit 21.05.2012 15:29:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 4:52 AM, Michael J Gruber
michaeljgruber+gm...@fastmail.fm wrote:
* put compatibility cludges for older releases on their respective
branches (this gets rid of many if's in spec)
i'm not against cleaning up ifs related
On 05/21/2012 12:09 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
On 21.5.2012 10:23, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
-1 changelogs are manually written documents and source files.
And your commit messages are written by aliens?
My change logs are inside of the rpm.spec.
You are lucky! I have to
write them myself (and I
On Sat, 2012-05-19 at 10:44 -0700, Richard Vickery wrote:
After having this installed, is it adequate, or acceptable, to ask
what kind of information you want? Is it adequate to offer that I am
prevented from installing software in the add/remove software
(market)? Those that I attempted thus
On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 12:07 -0400, Zdenek Pavlas wrote:
Hi,
A new yum and urlgrabber packages have just hit Rawhide. These releases
include some new features, including parallel downloading of packages and
metadata, and a new mirror selection code. As we plan to include these
features in
On 21.5.2012 17:13, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
... nobody mentioned Bodhi update messages here).
I did not want to reheat previous discussions on Fedora bureaucracy, but
this is part of it.
I wouldn't dare say a word about our update policy (Growing up in the
Communist Czechoslovakia taught me
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 08:33 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 09:49:03PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 08:02:23PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
Agreed. changelog and version field conflicts are 90% of my cherry-pick
conflicts.
I would be in
I'm not sure; how do I test for this? If I have RC1, how do I get RC2? I
can, however, yum the software I need/want, and have since done so.
On May 21, 2012 8:27 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, 2012-05-19 at 10:44 -0700, Richard Vickery wrote:
After having this
Le lundi 21 mai 2012 à 09:01 -0700, Adam Williamson a écrit :
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 08:33 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 09:49:03PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 08:02:23PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
Agreed. changelog and version field
Quoting Ralf Corsepius (2012-05-21 17:13:56)
On 05/21/2012 12:09 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
On 21.5.2012 10:23, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
-1 changelogs are manually written documents and source files.
And your commit messages are written by aliens?
My change logs are inside of the rpm.spec.
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 09:08 -0700, Richard Vickery wrote:
I'm not sure; how do I test for this? If I have RC1, how do I get RC2?
I can, however, yum the software I need/want, and have since done so.
Try using PK again. If it works now, you were probably hitting that bug.
With that bug, once yum
On 05/21/2012 06:08 AM, Thomas Moschny wrote:
2012/5/21 Simo Sorces...@redhat.com:
Except we do not allow to rewrite history and push -f so you will never
be able to squash everything.
If koji/bodhi were able to tag successful builds within git, we would
be able to allow rewrites, squash
Le Lun 21 mai 2012 08:23, pravin@gmail.com a écrit :
- Use base of croscore fonts and apply enhancements available in
liberation and call new entity liberation 2.0
That would be great !
(but please don't add the 2.0 to the name)
--
Nicolas Mailhot
--
devel mailing list
On 05/21/2012 08:34 AM, Matej Cepl wrote:
I give you that, but do you see any alternative which would in let's say
five years replaced git in Fedora? Five years is a long time in computer
industry, but OTOH five years ago (plus how long it has been since we
actually switched to git) it was IMHO
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 12:21 +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
On 05/21/12 10:23, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 05/21/2012 09:56 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
- Original Message -
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 07:07:56PM +0200, Remi Collet wrote:
And definitvely, for me, (and probably only for me),
Do you think I could be provided a link to PK, since, to be hionest, I
don't know what PK stands for - though I will try to find out in the
duration until your reply?
Thanks so much,
Richard
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.comwrote:
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 09:08
* Richard Vickery [21/05/2012 20:20] :
Do you think I could be provided a link to PK, since, to be hionest, I
don't know what PK stands for - though I will try to find out in the
duration until your reply?
PK == PackageKit
Emmanuel
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 20:21 +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
* Richard Vickery [21/05/2012 20:20] :
Do you think I could be provided a link to PK, since, to be hionest, I
don't know what PK stands for - though I will try to find out in the
duration until your reply?
PK == PackageKit
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2012-05-21)
===
Meeting started by t8m at 17:00:37 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-05-21/fesco.2012-05-21-17.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Sys-Virt:
ca6ae250091c9b17354ac3753bb740a2 Sys-Virt-0.9.12.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 383b0465066dc408c5946e0da0d621e5d7efec9e
Author: Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
Date: Mon May 21 19:34:06 2012 +0100
Update to 0.9.12 release
perl-Sys-Virt.spec |7 +--
sources|2 +-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
No problem :-)
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.comwrote:
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 20:21 +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
* Richard Vickery [21/05/2012 20:20] :
Do you think I could be provided a link to PK, since, to be hionest, I
don't know what PK stands
it works!
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Richard Vickery
richard.vicker...@gmail.com wrote:
No problem :-)
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.comwrote:
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 20:21 +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
* Richard Vickery [21/05/2012 20:20] :
Tom Lane wrote:
[ shrug... ] The fact that *you* don't care is not evidence that nobody
else cares, and it is certainly not evidence that nobody else should care.
The fact that many maintainers have been doing this for years and nobody
complained about it is, though.
It just doesn't make
Greg Swift wrote:
i'm not against cleaning up ifs related to end of life/support
releases, but how far are you suggesting that go?
All support for Fedora n should be dropped at Fedora n's end of life.
I know that I've pulled plenty of rawhide packages for build on a RHEL box
when necessary,
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 12:09 -0700, Richard Vickery wrote:
it works!
OK, then I'm guessing you indeed installed RC1 (or an RC1-era package
set from remote repos) and got hit by that PackageKit bug. It should be
fixed in RC2 and RC3 and hence the final release, so nothing to worry
about there.
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
I usually write them once:
editor *.spec
fedpkg clog
fedpkg commit -F clog -p
I also write the logs in the specfile first, but then I middle-click-paste
them into git-cola's commit message textbox.
Am I the only one using git-cola for Fedora dist-git? IMHO, it's much
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 09:48 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
On 05/21/2012 06:08 AM, Thomas Moschny wrote:
2012/5/21 Simo Sorces...@redhat.com:
Except we do not allow to rewrite history and push -f so you will never
be able to squash everything.
If koji/bodhi were able to tag successful
As per the Fedora 17 schedule [1], Fedora 17 Final Release Candidate 3
(RC3) is now available for testing. Content information, including
changes, can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5196 .
Please see the following pages for download links (including delta ISOs)
and testing
On 05/21/2012 01:51 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
re-writing history in a shared git repo is quite rude to all the people
who have it cloned. Not something I'm going to support.
Nothing that can't be easily solved by a git pull --rebase most of the
time.
It's still not a path I would want to go
On Seg, 2012-05-21 at 14:49 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
I just begin with better documentation, git guide lines are in the
end
of something that doesn't look git docs.
I mean, *better* documentation please .
$ git checkout master (or fedpkg switch-branch)
... do a fix, test, commit, build
no problem.
I may know better next time an RC comes out than to bring these up, it is
probably better that I wait until the next RC: I am having issues with the
curser / mouse on this computer and I think I might prevented from viewing
the shows at http://www.thecomedynetwork.ca/ in Canada. If I
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 17:51 -0700, Richard Vickery wrote:
no problem.
I may know better next time an RC comes out than to bring these up, it
is probably better that I wait until the next RC: I am having issues
with the curser / mouse on this computer
You'd need to be much more specific
Hello all,
I've been sitting silently in this mailing list for the past few weeks, but
just this afternoon submitted my first package review request for pdfminer,
a Python library for extracting plaintext, HTML, and images from a pdf
file: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823679
I
On 21/05/2012, at 5:12 PM, Zdenek Pavlas wrote:
Three connections limit is used when the above is not available
(e.g. a baseurl setup with just one mirror). I don't mind lowering
it to just two, as that should work good enough in most cases.
Yes please. Two is better than three from the
Nice to meet u if u want u can start doing reviews on any of my builts:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Alvesadrian
Regards, Adrian.-
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Ben Rosser rosser@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
I've been sitting silently in this mailing list for the past few
My apologies; the links on that were wrong. Big copy/paste error on my
part; not a good start!
The main package, rubygem-chef is at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823352, and the other
packages are linked off of there.
A little bit about myself: I'm a network administrator who has
On Mon, 21 May 2012 18:47:05 +0200, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
i.e. there was no empty line so git chucked them all into subject when
generating mails. Now they do:
line one
- line two
- line three
There is primarily missing the first line:
* Mon May 14 2012 Jan Kratochvil
On 05/21/2012 08:17 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
On Mon, 21 May 2012 18:47:05 +0200, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
i.e. there was no empty line so git chucked them all into subject when
generating mails. Now they do:
line one
- line two
- line three
There is primarily missing the first line:
*
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.comwrote:
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 17:51 -0700, Richard Vickery wrote:
no problem.
I may know better next time an RC comes out than to bring these up, it
is probably better that I wait until the next RC: I am having issues
On 21 May 2012 23:08, Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote:
Le Lun 21 mai 2012 08:23, pravin@gmail.com a écrit :
- Use base of croscore fonts and apply enhancements available in
liberation and call new entity liberation 2.0
That would be great !
(but please don't
I'm slightly uneasy to install this boot.iso as it looks really small.
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Andre Robatino
robat...@fedoraproject.orgwrote:
As per the Fedora 17 schedule [1], Fedora 17 Final Release Candidate 3
(RC3) is now available for testing. Content information, including
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 22:22 -0700, Richard Vickery wrote:
I'm slightly uneasy to install this boot.iso as it looks really small.
It's a network installation image. It retrieves the packages to be
installed from the online repositories. We have always provided such
images for Fedora.
--
Adam
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Plack:
77173acfe974e6967988c397d8a42b04 Plack-0.9988.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 091b5dfec54eb39d3ae128732a0d4b1b3591eabb
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Mon May 21 08:42:56 2012 +0200
Upstream update.
.gitignore |2 +-
perl-Plack.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Summary of changes:
091b5df... Upstream update. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
a2da937... 1.59 (*)
b3d3884... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Mass (*)
5d64e5c... Spec clean-up (*)
c68518d... Update to 1.60 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
The lightweight tag 'perl-URI-1.60-1.fc16' was created pointing to:
c68518d... Update to 1.60
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for
perl-Module-Install-AuthorTests:
f1b95c8385c1284e281a9bc6a5f10532 Module-Install-AuthorTests-0.002.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 7b74a956c1a2fd82ca3bb8a9f7f21f79be0d72cf
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon May 21 09:51:06 2012 +0200
Import
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Module-Install-AuthorTests.spec | 52 ++
sources
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-podlinkcheck:
0fc9848f569d65d570d878e04f32cf27 podlinkcheck-8.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 852d920d60aa3cbb57fdd6fa9c3e631020c92ba7
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon May 21 09:56:52 2012 +0200
Import
.gitignore |1 +
perl-podlinkcheck.spec | 80
sources|1 +
3 files
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-SVG-TT-Graph:
6aeb9642c3919ee048d3d4d8f36e51bb SVG-TT-Graph-0.21.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit a83605c3472ca66655e27720b999a20109f8ed91
Author: Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr
Date: Tue May 22 07:45:15 2012 +0200
Update to 0.21
.gitignore |1 +
perl-SVG-TT-Graph.spec |5 -
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 6
93 matches
Mail list logo
