Hi folks,
I've received new bugs in the form:
bibus-1...5...2 is available. There's already a bug for 1.5.2. Is
something faulty with the script?
--
Thanks,
Warm regards,
Ankur: FranciscoD
Please only print if necessary.
Looking to contribute to Fedora? Look here:
Hot problems:
ID Components Count
---
186587 kernel 411
186872 kernel 350
185998 gnome-packagekit 212
Compose started at Mon Jan 7 08:15:06 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[bootconf]
bootconf-1.4-6.fc18.noarch requires grub
[dogtag-pki]
dogtag-pki-10.0.0-0.16.b3.fc19.noarch requires dogtag-pki-server-theme
= 0:10.0.0
Compose started at Mon Jan 7 09:17:34 UTC 2013
Removed package: gpxe-1.0.1-7.fc18
Summary:
Added Packages: 0
Removed Packages: 1
Upgraded Packages: 0
Compose finished at Mon Jan 7 13:55:28 UTC 2013
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
2 months ago I have open a bug tracker for all packages with an apache
configuration file, which need to be fixed to work with httpd 2.4.
The current situation, 1 week before release, don't seems really good,
see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=871373hide_resolved=1
16
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891863
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Rose-DB-Object-0.803-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Rose-DB-Object-0.803-1.fc18
--
Summary of changes:
e2a0096... Update to version 0.803 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi,
I plan to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.22.0 at the beginning
of next week.
There are several API changes and 1 soname bump (libpoppler.so.26 to
libpoppler.so.34).
The API changes are mostly new functions but also some removals and
moves of members between public and private
On 2013-01-04, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
getdata-0.7.3-3.fc18.src.rpm
GCC is now more aggresive in turning loops that invoke undefined
behavior into endless loops. In test/get_uint32.c there is:
uint32_t data_data[128];
int fd, n, error, r = 0;
...
On 01/07/2013 02:54 PM, Remi Collet wrote:
2 months ago I have open a bug tracker for all packages with an apache
configuration file, which need to be fixed to work with httpd 2.4.
The current situation, 1 week before release, don't seems really good,
see
Petr Pisar wrote, at 01/08/2013 12:50 AM +9:00:
On 2013-01-04, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
yap-6.2.2-4.fc18.src.rpm
similar to getdata bug:
LAST_FLAG = 23
...
#define NUMBER_OF_YAP_FLAGS LAST_FLAG
...
#define yap_flags
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 03:50:01PM +, Petr Pisar wrote:
yap-6.2.2-4.fc18.src.rpm
similar to getdata bug:
LAST_FLAG = 23
...
#define NUMBER_OF_YAP_FLAGS LAST_FLAG
...
#define yap_flags Yap_heap_regs-yap_flags_field
...
Int
On Mon, 07 Jan 2013 15:54:23 +0100
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com wrote:
2 months ago I have open a bug tracker for all packages with an apache
configuration file, which need to be fixed to work with httpd 2.4.
The current situation, 1 week before release, don't seems really good,
see
Hallo,
Unfortunately, I have an issue to build scala-2.10.0 on rawhide. I have
got the following error message from the buildsystem:
artifact:dependencies] Diagnosis:
[artifact:dependencies]
[artifact:dependencies] Unable to resolve artifact: Missing:
[artifact:dependencies] --
On 01/07/2013 04:50 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
The pre-precessed code is:
for (i = 0; i = LAST_FLAG; i++) {
((all_heap_codes *)(0x1000))-yap_flags_field[i] = 0;
}
I think the number of iterations (24) is one larger than the number of
array elements (23).
--
Florian Weimer / Red
Il 07/01/2013 17:14, Jochen Schmitt ha scritto:
Hallo,
Unfortunately, I have an issue to build scala-2.10.0 on rawhide. I have
got the following error message from the buildsystem:
artifact:dependencies] Diagnosis:
[artifact:dependencies]
[artifact:dependencies] Unable to resolve artifact:
- Original Message -
On Sat, 05.01.13 22:54, alex...@hushmail.com (alex...@hushmail.com)
wrote:
GNOME on F18 takes the lock and handles the lid switch on its own.
You
can verify that with systemd-inhibit --list.
OT
There is almost nothing you can configure with GUI in GNOME and
Il 07/01/2013 18:46, gil ha scritto:
Il 07/01/2013 17:14, Jochen Schmitt ha scritto:
Hallo,
Unfortunately, I have an issue to build scala-2.10.0 on rawhide. I have
got the following error message from the buildsystem:
artifact:dependencies] Diagnosis:
[artifact:dependencies]
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847128
--- Comment #3 from Bill Pemberton wf...@virginia.edu ---
A little bump for this. perl(Convert::NLS_DATE_FORMAT) is in EPEL6 now.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this
On 07/01/2013 at 6:22 PM, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote:
Quite a bit of misinformation in this discussion. Let me clarify
what GNOME 3.6 actually does:
- We take inhibitors to block logind from handling
power/suspend/etc keys, since gnome-settings-daemon handles those
- We don't
- Original Message -
And is it possible to disable suspend on lid close but still have
GNOME lock the screen on lid close? No? Didn't think so...
With the lid closed, your session will go idle, which will eventually cause the
screen to lock.
--
devel mailing list
Summary of changes:
30803ca... Initial import (#876399) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 07/01/2013 at 7:40 PM, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
And is it possible to disable suspend on lid close but still have
GNOME lock the screen on lid close? No? Didn't think so...
With the lid closed, your session will go idle, which will
eventually
On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 02:37:18AM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
What about making this an optional bootloader in F19 (in kickstart and via a
hidden option)?
I don't think there'd be any objection to that - it makes sense for
appliance-type scenarios.
Cool. Feature proposal:
On Mon, 07.01.13 15:23, Matthew Miller (mat...@fedoraproject.org) wrote:
On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 02:37:18AM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
What about making this an optional bootloader in F19 (in kickstart and
via a
hidden option)?
I don't think there'd be any objection to that - it
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892381
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
Package perl-Sys-Syscall-0.25-1.fc18:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror
On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 15:47 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 01/07/2013 02:54 PM, Remi Collet wrote:
2 months ago I have open a bug tracker for all packages with an apache
configuration file, which need to be fixed to work with httpd 2.4.
The current situation, 1 week before
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 08:53:15PM +1100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
I've received new bugs in the form:
bibus-1...5...2 is available. There's already a bug for 1.5.2. Is
something faulty with the script?
yes, there was an incomplete patch added unintentionally to the script.
All faulty bugs
On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 23:23 +0100, Till Maas wrote:
yes, there was an incomplete patch added unintentionally to the
script.
All faulty bugs should be closed and new bugs created if appropriate.
Sorry for the trouble.
No worries. Thank you for the quick fix :)
--
Thanks,
Warm regards,
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 10:13:29PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 07.01.13 15:23, Matthew Miller (mat...@fedoraproject.org) wrote:
Cool. Feature proposal:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SyslinuxOption
Might be cool to have somebody work on gummiboot integration into
On 01/07/2013 10:19 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Why? What can FESCo do about it? We don't need to kick every damn issue
to FESCo, as seems to be a trend lately.
Ah I see but it's ok when you do...
There's no high-level technical
decision to be made here. The bugs just need to get fixed.
On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 01:56 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 01/07/2013 10:19 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Why? What can FESCo do about it? We don't need to kick every damn issue
to FESCo, as seems to be a trend lately.
Ah I see but it's ok when you do...
What have I escalated that
On 01/08/2013 02:10 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 01:56 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 01/07/2013 10:19 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Why? What can FESCo do about it? We don't need to kick every damn issue
to FESCo, as seems to be a trend lately.
Ah I see but it's ok
On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 03:06 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 01/08/2013 02:10 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 01:56 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 01/07/2013 10:19 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Why? What can FESCo do about it? We don't need to kick every damn
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 4:31 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 03:06 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
So the remaining webapps that ship with the broken configuration that we
are about to release into the hands our our enduser base and how they
should be
On Tue, 08 Jan 2013 03:06:14 +
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/08/2013 02:10 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
...snip...
Well, I'm not sure that was a great precedent to set, if we're
going to treat it as a precedent...
What else is it?
A single decision?
I can't
On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 04:48:36 +0100
Miloslav Trmač m...@volny.cz wrote:
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 4:31 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 03:06 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
So the remaining webapps that ship with the broken configuration
that we are
On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 21:02 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 04:48:36 +0100
Miloslav Trmač m...@volny.cz wrote:
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 4:31 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 03:06 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
So the remaining
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 9:31 PM, Johannes Lips johannes.l...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Kalpa Welivitigoda
callka...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Caterpillar caterpilla...@gmail.com
wrote:
Il 23/11/2012 15:33, Johannes Lips ha scritto:
Hi
On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 19:49 +, alex...@hushmail.com wrote:
On 07/01/2013 at 7:40 PM, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
And is it possible to disable suspend on lid close but still have
GNOME lock the screen on lid close? No? Didn't think so...
Summary of changes:
5a50b62... 0.25 bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892381
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Sys-Syscall-0.25-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Sys-Syscall-0.25-1.fc18
--
You are
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Package-Stash:
d85874dc8abada51b8d7870d8728e3b7 Package-Stash-0.34.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 83475be47574ec3397b4a4853d170c09cd815c7a
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Mon Jan 7 11:18:15 2013 +
Update to 0.34
- New upstream release 0.34
- Support anonymous stashes on newer perl versions
- Prevent harmful effects from invalid settings for
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892600
Bug ID: 892600
Summary: mojomojo-1.08 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: mojomojo
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Severity:
The lightweight tag 'perl-Package-Stash-0.33-7.fc19' was created pointing to:
319bda0... Disable author tests on RHEL = 7
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Package-Stash-0.34-1.fc19' was created pointing to:
83475be... Update to 0.34
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for mojomojo:
18ade52c6359cf699ec2ce74bec6629c MojoMojo-1.08.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891863
Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
changed:
What|Removed |Added
commit 26114dea3053e9b15475932090226b33bf5dcd03
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Mon Jan 7 04:42:13 2013 -0700
update to 1.08
.gitignore|1 +
mojomojo.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892600
Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Rose-DB-Object:
dbda75041c96ea582dd6eacd1393db5c Rose-DB-Object-0.803.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit e2a009683a7332690ebb2175aebf9149e05d5377
Author: Bill Pemberton wf...@virginia.edu
Date: Mon Jan 7 09:31:29 2013 -0500
Update to version 0.803
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Rose-DB-Object.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6
Summary of changes:
e2a0096... Update to version 0.803 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890734
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891863
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Rose-DB-Object-0.803-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Rose-DB-Object-0.803-1.fc17
--
Summary of changes:
34fd40c... update to 0.799 (*)
84fa1af... Update to 0.800 (*)
f25f6ff... Update to 0.801 (*)
e2a0096... Update to version 0.803 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890734
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
commit 30803cade893547fde8410883956cec4a86c22e1
Author: Miro Hrončok m...@hroncok.cz
Date: Mon Jan 7 18:58:44 2013 +0100
Initial import (#876399)
.gitignore |1 +
perl-ExtUtils-Typemaps-Default.spec | 65 +++
sources
Product: Security Response
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=884354
Kurt Seifried kseifr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891863
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
Package perl-Rose-DB-Object-0.803-1.fc18:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480129
errata-xmlrpc errata-xml...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/547
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/547/0001-Ticket-547-Incorrect-assumption-in-ndn-cache.patch
Bug Description: In ndn_cache_lookup, to determine the given dn
is already normalized or not, the length is compared with the
normalized dn length.
63 matches
Mail list logo
