Hey, folks.
Just to keep everyone in the loop on F18 status: RC2 looks about 99.99%
good. The only blocker found so far is that it's lacking the final cut
of the release notes. We will therefore be getting an RC3 build in the
morning, but the only difference from RC2 will be a new
On 01/09/2013 12:18 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 11:17:35PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 01/08/2013 08:15 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
So, what do folks think? Workable? Crazy? Crazy enough to work?
And we are supposed to QA this how?
Like any software?
I'm not sure
Le 08/01/2013 16:34, Jaroslav Reznik a écrit :
= Features/Php55 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Php55
If someone need to test this new version on f17/f18, I have already some
build available from PHP upstream daily snapshot:
On 08/01/13 20:49, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
Not much different than e.g. Python's easy_install/pip and RPM. You
can install packages using both RPM/yum and npm, and `npm install -g`
can possibly get you into trouble just like `easy_install` outside a
virtualenv can.
With pip (run as normal
On 01/09/2013 04:34 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 19:18:36 -0500
Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 11:17:35PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
wrote:
On 01/08/2013 08:15 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
So, what do folks think? Workable? Crazy? Crazy enough
On 01/09/2013 06:39 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hey, folks.
Just to keep everyone in the loop on F18 status: RC2 looks about 99.99%
good. The only blocker found so far is that it's lacking the final cut
of the release notes. We will therefore be getting an RC3 build in the
morning, but the
On 01/08/2013 07:15 PM, Peter Jones wrote:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 11:04:30AM -0500, Steve Clark wrote:
What about repins? I want to add my own custom package that is not signed and
create a new CD with a custom ks.cfg.
How would that work?
You'd generate your own key, and people using your
On 9 January 2013 04:10, Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/08/2013 09:15 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Greetings.
I've whipped up the early ideas of a way to replace (most) spins with
something that is more generic and useful. I have signed up for a
fudcon session to brainstorm
On 9 January 2013 12:23, Ian Malone ibmal...@gmail.com wrote:
Down-sides, there'd no longer be a live-cd/dvd as a 'demo' system. You
could only try out the formula on an installed system. It looks though
like people are already suggesting overlaying a formula somehow to
create traditional
On 01/09/2013 01:27 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
On 9 January 2013 12:23, Ian Malone ibmal...@gmail.com wrote:
Down-sides, there'd no longer be a live-cd/dvd as a 'demo' system. You
could only try out the formula on an installed system. It looks though
like people are already suggesting overlaying a
On 01/08/2013 04:25 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
Following the implementation of Features/SecureBoot, we can extend the Secure
Boot keys as a root of trust provided by the hardware against which we can
verify a signature on our key files, thus guaranteeing that they're from the
same source as the
Hello!
Could someone please review guayadeque - Audio player and organizer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853553
Thanks for any support!
Martin
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 01:52:05PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
It just occurred to me that this has zero chance of working because
an attacker can always take the already-signed boot path from the
F18 installer and use that to boot a modified F19 installation
image. We cannot retroactively
Compose started at Wed Jan 9 09:15:32 UTC 2013
Updated Packages:
anaconda-18.37.11-1.fc18
* Mon Jan 07 2013 Brian C. Lane b...@redhat.com - 18.37.11-1
- Fix Quit button in standalone network spoke (#892120) (rvykydal)
- Force disk selection for interactive
From: Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com
Thats not to say perhaps we couldn't think of a clever way to somehow
generate images based on them, but it would probibly take some way to
take an existing machine and make a live image from it. Not sure how
easy that is to do.
I think that's quite
On 01/09/2013 02:34 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 01:52:05PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
It just occurred to me that this has zero chance of working because
an attacker can always take the already-signed boot path from the
F18 installer and use that to boot a modified F19
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 10:39:53PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
QA:Testcase_EC2_AMI_Validation - ditto for EC2, I think Tim or Dennis
should be able to check this
I have done this and it is good with RC1. Will need to retest with the final
RC, of course.
--
Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 03:08:51PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
I start with the F18 TC3 image, which boots on Secure Boot systems,
replace the boot artwork (which is not cryptographically protected),
the F18 kernel, and use most of the F19 installation environment.
The F18 boot loader and
On 01/09/2013 08:55 AM, Matej Cepl wrote:
On 08/01/13 20:49, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
Not much different than e.g. Python's easy_install/pip and RPM. You
can install packages using both RPM/yum and npm, and `npm install -g`
can possibly get you into trouble just like `easy_install` outside a
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 01:15:29PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Setup a infrastructure/framework around a collection of ansible
playbooks to allow our users to simply download a formula for what they
want to do and have a curated setup made for them using Fedora
packages.
I think this is great
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 05:15:02AM +0100, Brendan Jones wrote:
no way (according to current packaging guidelines) to alter files owned
by other packages. In the future we might like to choose different
pulseaudio modules to load, ALSA config based on hardware etc. I don't
This is probably not
On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 14:15 +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 03:08:51PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
I start with the F18 TC3 image, which boots on Secure Boot systems,
replace the boot artwork (which is not cryptographically protected),
the F18 kernel, and use most
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 07:36:06AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
I'm not sure I understand the question, actually. Can you elaborate?
So you want us in the QA community to go through basically a copy
concept of puppets/chefs and QA any Formula that has been
submitted there?
I didn't say
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 08:20:58AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
From that response I gather it is something user setup/install after
installing Fedora basically you seem to be then just duplicating and
or trying to come up with a better app installer then already exists
is that the
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 11:55:42AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 01/08/2013 07:15 PM, Peter Jones wrote:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 11:04:30AM -0500, Steve Clark wrote:
What about repins? I want to add my own custom package that is not signed
and create a new CD with a custom ks.cfg.
How
- Original Message -
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 10:39:53PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
QA:Testcase_EC2_AMI_Validation - ditto for EC2, I think Tim or
Dennis
should be able to check this
I have done this and it is good with RC1. Will need to retest with
the final
RC, of course.
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 03:20:16PM +0100, Tomas Mraz wrote:
On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 14:15 +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Yes, if you boot an installer that doesn't verify signatures, you won't
verify signatures.
But then what's the difference from distrusting the contents of an
On 01/09/2013 03:26 PM, Peter Jones wrote:
You've misunderstood the mechanism at work. dhowell's current kernel
patch set allows you to add keys which are wrapped (in a well defined
way) in a pecoff binary that's signed by already trusted keys. This is
what I'm referring to above when I say
I am upgrading a package to the new version of its upstream source for
2013. The corresponding correctness tests have built and run fine for
the master, f18, and f17 branches.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=4848365name=build.log
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 03:39:42PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 01/09/2013 03:26 PM, Peter Jones wrote:
You've misunderstood the mechanism at work. dhowell's current kernel
patch set allows you to add keys which are wrapped (in a well defined
way) in a pecoff binary that's signed by
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 10:36:18AM -0600, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
Is there someplace to get updated video drivers for Windows 7?
I think what you are looking for is here, under Windows guest tools:
http://spice-space.org/download.html
I remember when I did this a while back I had to find the
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 01:52:05PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 01/08/2013 04:25 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
Following the implementation of Features/SecureBoot, we can extend the Secure
Boot keys as a root of trust provided by the hardware against which we can
verify a signature on our key
Brad Bell wrote:
I and ran into the following message while building the el6 branch
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=4850629name=build.log
[3%] Building CXX object
[multi_thread/pthread/CMakeFiles/pthread_test.dir/team_pthread.cpp.o
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 09:28:01AM -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
Dennis
should be able to check this
I have done this and it is good with RC1. Will need to retest with
the final
RC, of course.
RC3 seems to be already available
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/18-RC3/
Not
Le mercredi 09 janvier 2013 à 09:24 -0500, Matthew Miller a écrit :
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 07:36:06AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
I'm not sure I understand the question, actually. Can you elaborate?
So you want us in the QA community to go through basically a copy
concept of
Spinning of from this, I think there is some mess around the Virtio
drivers; I would be glad if someone could explain that to me.
Sorry for the length of this mail but I could not shorten it.
Let's say I would like to grab the latest virtio drivers and tools for my
Windows guest and the
On 9 January 2013 16:39, Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com wrote:
5) Official RHEL drivers (need an account for this)
- virtio-win-1.5.3-1.el6_3.noarch.rpm
- Contains signed and WHQL drivers for everything.
- Always a bit older than the Fedora ones.
- Follows the same numbering and logs as
As per the Fedora 18 schedule [1], Fedora 18 Final Release Candidate 3
(RC3) is now available for testing. Content information, including
changes, can be found at
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5406#comment:21 . Please see the
following pages for download links (including delta ISOs) and
This weeks Fedora ARM status meeting will take place today (Wednesday Jan 2nd)
in #fedora-meeting-1 on Freenode.
Times in various time zones (please let us know if these do not work):
PDT: 1pm
MDT: 2pm
CDT: 3pm
EDT: 4pm
UTC: 8pm
BST: 9pm
CST: 10pm
Current items on the agenda:
1) Current
On 09/01/13 15:39, Simone Caronni wrote:
- Build also the Spice Agent for 32/64 bit (this is done at
spice-space.org http://spice-space.org as part of the Spice Guest Tools)
Actually that's 32 bit only. I've never found a spice agent for 64 bit
versions of Windows anywhere.
Tom
--
Tom
On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 10:10 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 09:28:01AM -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
Dennis
should be able to check this
I have done this and it is good with RC1. Will need to retest with
the final
RC, of course.
RC3 seems to be already
On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 09:05 +, Phil Dobbin wrote:
On 01/09/2013 06:39 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hey, folks.
Just to keep everyone in the loop on F18 status: RC2 looks about 99.99%
good. The only blocker found so far is that it's lacking the final cut
of the release notes. We
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 09:51:06AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
Right. I'll mark the test as PASS for RC1, RC2 and RC3 with your input,
thanks Matt. I'll check with dgilmore whether fprintd is in the AMI, for
RC4 purposes (see test@ for the RC4 story). Thanks!
It does not contain fprintd.
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 10:39:53PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
QA:Testcase_Boot_Methods_Xen_Para_Virt - we need someone who's set up
for Xen to test this, if Konrad is reading, are you able to check it?
I'll try this soon.
-- Pasi
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
-- 转发的消息 --
发件人：Robert Slowley slow...@ebi.ac.uk
日期：2013-1-10 AM12:24
主题：Pymol version in EPEL
收件人： epel-devel-l...@redhat.com
抄送：
Hi,
The version of Pymol in EPEL is 1.3.3
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/6/x86_64/repoview/pymol.html
The current version of Pymol is 1.5.0.1
On 1/9/13, Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/01/13 20:49, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
Not much different than e.g. Python's easy_install/pip and RPM. You
can install packages using both RPM/yum and npm, and `npm install -g`
can possibly get you into trouble just like `easy_install`
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2013-01-09)
===
Meeting started by jwb at 18:00:38 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2013-01-09/fesco.2013-01-09-18.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
On Sun, 06 Jan 2013 18:56:53 +0100
Christoph Wickert christoph.wick...@gmail.com wrote:
How many DE actually to this? GNOME does, not sure about KDE, Sugar or
Mate, but inhibit support seems to be the exception and not the rule
Xfce and LXDE do not yet support it, so power management on these
On Wed, 9 Jan 2013 09:18:55 -0500
Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 01:15:29PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Setup a infrastructure/framework around a collection of ansible
playbooks to allow our users to simply download a formula for what
they want to do
On Wed, 9 Jan 2013 08:59:35 -0500
john.flor...@dart.biz wrote:
From: Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com
Thats not to say perhaps we couldn't think of a clever way to
somehow generate images based on them, but it would probibly take
some way to take an existing machine and make a live image from
Hi,
On Ter, 2013-01-08 at 17:05 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
Nothing's using this in F18, and upstream is very much dormant. I don't
want to maintain it and I'd honestly prefer people use gupnp, so I'm
tossing ushare to the wolves. If nobody claims it in a week I'll
deadpackage it.
I had a
On Wed, 9 Jan 2013, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
One of the big questions to answer is distribution. I can see good
arguments on the one hand distributing formulas via RPM and on the
other having an official Git repository for them.
Yep. I am torn here too. rpms get us a lot, but are also
On 01/09/2013 12:26 PM, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Wed, 9 Jan 2013, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
One of the big questions to answer is distribution. I can see good
arguments on the one hand distributing formulas via RPM and on the
other having an official Git repository for them.
Yep. I am torn here
On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 13:50:31 +0100
Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/09/2013 01:27 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
On 9 January 2013 12:23, Ian Malone ibmal...@gmail.com wrote:
Down-sides, there'd no longer be a live-cd/dvd as a 'demo' system.
You could only try out the
Seth Vidal (skvi...@fedoraproject.org) said:
One of the big questions to answer is distribution. I can see good
arguments on the one hand distributing formulas via RPM and on the
other having an official Git repository for them.
Yep. I am torn here too. rpms get us a lot, but are also
On Wed, 9 Jan 2013, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Seth Vidal (skvi...@fedoraproject.org) said:
One of the big questions to answer is distribution. I can see good
arguments on the one hand distributing formulas via RPM and on the
other having an official Git repository for them.
Yep. I am torn
On Jan 9, 2013 12:32 PM, Nathanael D. Noblet nathan...@gnat.ca wrote:
On 01/09/2013 12:26 PM, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Wed, 9 Jan 2013, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
One of the big questions to answer is distribution. I can see good
arguments on the one hand distributing formulas via RPM and on the
Some changes to the Fedora Packaging Guidelines have been made:
---
If a package is exempt from multilib, it may use %{_prefix}/lib instead
of %{_libdir}. Packages that contain architecture specific files that
would ordinarily be installed into %{_libexecdir} are always considered
ineligible for
Hi there,
as every release, we (the Boost maintainers) intend to rebase Boost for
Fedora 19. The targeted release is 1.53.0. The plan is outlined on the
feature page [1].
Boost 1.53 is not out yet (it will be on February 4). Beta is out, but
I don't think it's a good idea to rebase to that.
I already answered this on the epel-devel list. ;)
No need to repost here...
kevin
--
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 02:46:47 +0800
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com wrote:
-- 转发的消息 --
发件人：Robert Slowley slow...@ebi.ac.uk
日期：2013-1-10 AM12:24
主题：Pymol version in EPEL
收件人：
On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 21:34:46 +0100
Petr Machata pmach...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi there,
as every release, we (the Boost maintainers) intend to rebase Boost
for Fedora 19. The targeted release is 1.53.0. The plan is outlined
on the feature page [1].
Boost 1.53 is not out yet (it will be on
As per the Fedora 18 schedule [1], Fedora 18 Final Release Candidate 4
(RC4) is now available for testing. Content information, including
changes, can be found at
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5406#comment:25 . Please see the
following pages for download links (including delta ISOs) and
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 08:36:59PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 10:39:53PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
QA:Testcase_Boot_Methods_Xen_Para_Virt - we need someone who's set up
for Xen to test this, if Konrad is reading, are you able to check it?
I'll try this
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=893768
Bug ID: 893768
Summary: /usr/share/man/man3/App::Cpan.3pm.gz is duplicated
between perl-CPAN and perl-Test-Harness
Product: Fedora
Version: 18
Component:
At the Fedora 18 Go/No-Go Meeting that just occurred, it was
agreed to Go for the Fedora 18. The release is planned for
Tuesday, January 15, 2013 [1]. See meeting minutes [2].
It was agreed that RC3 is GOLD for now, with possibility to
raise the status of RC4 to be the final release based on
(2013/01/07 15:57), Noriko Hosoi wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/537
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/537/0001-Ticket-537-Improvement-of-range-search.patch
Fix description: The index range search function index_range
_read_ext was written to call idl_fetch_ext to
We find ourselves in a bit of an odd position for Fedora 18 - RC3 is
go, but we need to finalize some testing in order to decide whether or
not RC4 will supersede RC3 as the released version of Fedora 18.
To that end, we have some testing to do. Since the change between RC2
and RC4 is so small,
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
Hi,
On Ter, 2013-01-08 at 17:05 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
Nothing's using this in F18, and upstream is very much dormant. I don't
want to maintain it and I'd honestly prefer people use gupnp, so I'm
tossing ushare to the
Good day all,
Thanks to those who were able to join us for the weekly status meeting today.
For those that were unable, the minutes are posted below:
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2013-01-09/fedora-meeting-1.2013-01-09-21.00.html
Minutes (text):
Hi, the GitHub rule is not working, if the name of the package isn't the
same as the name of the repository on GitHub.
%setup -qn %{name}-%{commit}
Should be
%setup -qn $PROJECT-%{commit}
Miro
Dne 9.1.2013 20:37, Tom Callaway napsal(a):
Some changes to the Fedora Packaging Guidelines have
3. dblatex
Currently, dblatex package hasn't been updated to texlive-2012
dependencies, so it cannot be installed due to the incorrect
passivetex requirements.
This is now built for F18 and F19.
Interested DocBook users, please test and if it's all ok give karma to:
Downloading the Live media 64 bit now ... will try an install once
it's pushed to a USB stick. I can also run anything in a VMware 9,
VirtualBox 4.2.6, F18 Virtual Machine Manager or Windows 8 Pro Client
Hyper-V guest. Is Windows 8 Pro Client Hyper-V hosting supported?
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 2:07
It's that time again! New server means new ABI means mass driver
rebuild. If you're using a third-party driver, you naughty person you,
then you'll need to --skip-broken until your repo catches up.
One notable change: the 'nv' driver has been retired. It's effectively
been dead upstream since
A while back I reported corruption of the kernel-devel package when building
dkms modules for kernels = 3.5 - see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860529 . Specifically, the
System.map file in /usr/src/kernels/* for the corresponding kernel is deleted.
It has now stopped happening as of
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen pa...@iki.fi wrote:
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 08:36:59PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 10:39:53PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
QA:Testcase_Boot_Methods_Xen_Para_Virt - we need someone who's set up
for Xen to test this,
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 8:32 PM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky zn...@znmeb.net wrote:
Downloading the Live media 64 bit now ... will try an install once
it's pushed to a USB stick. I can also run anything in a VMware 9,
VirtualBox 4.2.6, F18 Virtual Machine Manager or Windows 8 Pro Client
Hyper-V
On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 22:43 -0800, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen pa...@iki.fi wrote:
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 08:36:59PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 10:39:53PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hey folks! So we are definitely on the final night of Fedora 18 testing
now (everyone, take a drink).
As it's Fedora, we came up with a fudge at the go/no-go meeting today:
we agreed we're definitely shipping either RC3 or RC4. RC3 is RC2 with
the final release notes, and RC4 is RC3 with the
Sorry for the earlier incomplete version of this mail, sent in error.
Damn ctrl-combinations.
Hey folks! So we are definitely on the final night of Fedora 18 testing
now (everyone, take a drink).
As it's Fedora, we came up with a fudge at the go/no-go meeting today:
we agreed we're definitely
On 01/09/13 16:39, Simone Caronni wrote:
6) Yan Vugenfirer's repository
- Contains only source, and is public.
- Does not match with Fedora or RHEL provided drivers.
- Contains only the Virtio drivers, no Spice Agent or QXL driver.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887477
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-XML-Rules-1.16-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887477
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
Product: Fedora EPEL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=893464
Bug ID: 893464
Summary: Upgrade to new upstream version
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: el6
Component: perl-Net-STOMP-Client
Severity: unspecified
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Net-SSLeay:
b885d173d5733b103355658aa4b3c60d Net-SSLeay-1.52.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit f0bb229c2bc8d425875a0901a8e36f9b73658b2a
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Wed Jan 9 14:15:33 2013 +
Update to 1.52
- New upstream release 1.52
- rebuild package with gnu format tar, to prevent problems with unpacking
on
other systems such as
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=176889
Simon Green sgr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=176888
Simon Green sgr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434038
Simon Green sgr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434211
Simon Green sgr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=43
Simon Green sgr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=893703
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/542
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/542/0001-Ticket-542-Cannot-dynamically-set-nsslapd-maxbersize.patch
Fix description: Based on the proposal made by rmegg...@redhat.com
in the ticket #542, this patch sets maxbersize every time before
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/545
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/545/0001-Ticket-545-Segfault-during-initial-LDIF-import-str2e.patch
Bug description: If an attribute type having multiple values exists
in an entry, and any compare function is not associated with the
At the Fedora 18 Go/No-Go Meeting that just occurred, it was
agreed to Go for the Fedora 18. The release is planned for
Tuesday, January 15, 2013 [1]. See meeting minutes [2].
It was agreed that RC3 is GOLD for now, with possibility to
raise the status of RC4 to be the final release based on
94 matches
Mail list logo
