-Original Message-
From: Kevin Fenzi [mailto:ke...@scrye.com]
Sent: 3. júní 2013 14:03
To: EPEL Development List
Cc: Finnur Örn Guðmundsson
Subject: Re: EPEL Missing perl-Net-IP
On Mon, 3 Jun 2013 13:20:21 +
Finnur Örn Guðmundsson finnur.gudmunds...@islandsbanki.is wrote:
Hi all,
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
407
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5
302
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-6608/Django-1.1.4-2.el5
108
Christopher Meng wrote on 2013-06-03:
SCM will be ready in a few hours, don't hurry.
BTW a note, I hope you can change some items in the SCM comment.
Description of yours: package for OpenAttestation project
However I think it should be Attestation Service Host Agent based
on
On 2. 6. 2013 at 14:43:15, enclair wrote:
I'd like a tool similar to portaudit in FreeBSD or debscan in Debian. This
tool should list all packages which have a security issue. Currently there
is yum-security-plugin but it lists packages only if an update is
available. The new tool would list
On 06/02/2013 02:43 PM, enclair wrote:
I'd like a tool similar to portaudit in FreeBSD or debscan in Debian.
This tool should list all packages which have a security issue.
I don't know about portaudit, but debsecan works completely out of the
usual software management stack. Part of the
Hi folks,
can anybody make the review request of vim-javabrowser package?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961384
Thank you in advance
--
Best regards / S pozdravem
Petr Hracek
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 02:43:15PM +0200, enclair wrote:
I'd like a tool similar to portaudit in FreeBSD or debscan in Debian. This
tool should list all packages which have a security issue. Currently there
is yum-security-plugin but it lists packages only if an update is
available. The new
On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 05:52:07PM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
I think freedom of the service does matter. The debacles with google
reader and google talk recently should be pointing that up to all of
us.
Don't forget Google Code removing downloads :-(
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization
- Original Message -
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
Actually I was going to ask the opposite question: Do we still need
FedoraHosted?
I have found it a valuable service to provide an upstream home for fedora-
specific projects.
Sure, it's a great home for fedora-specific upstream,
Hello,
I'm following the unresponsive mantainer policy [1] for the package dkms;
I'm at the second week trying to get a response (point 4 of the process).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=965712
Does anyone know any other mail address to contact the mantainer?
In the bug comments
Hello,
following on the mail at:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/179574
I've filed the unresponsive mantainer bug for the bacula package:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970016
No package updates were committed, no commits in the git repositories; no
bugs
Well, he just replied.
Nevermind.
On 3 June 2013 12:42, Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
following on the mail at:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/179574
I've filed the unresponsive mantainer bug for the bacula package:
Hi, my name is Matt Rose and I'm looking for a sponsor for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860249
I've been using one or another version of redhat/fedora for well over 15 years
now, and I'm very comfortable packaging RPMs, having done it for personal and
professional reasons for a
Hello,
any provenpackager willing to push these 2 fixes? One is really trivial and
the other one is simply a typo.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883983
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948613
Thanks regards,
--Simone
--
You cannot discover new oceans unless you have
Hi,
It is compulsory that a package waiting to be reviewed, be submitted with
the latest version in upstream?
--
Best Regards,
Kalpa Welivitigoda
Junior Treasurer | Electrical Engineering Society
Undergraduate | Department of Electrical Engineering
University of Moratuwa
Sri Lanka
On 2013-06-03, 12:19 GMT, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote:
It is compulsory that a package waiting to be reviewed, be submitted
with the latest version in upstream?
Could you elaborate a bit on the particular situation? Why wouldn't you
go with the latest upstream?
Best,
Matěj
--
devel mailing
On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 17:49 +0530, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote:
Hi,
It is compulsory that a package waiting to be reviewed, be submitted
with the latest version in upstream?
--
Best Regards,
Kalpa Welivitigoda
Junior Treasurer | Electrical Engineering Society
Undergraduate |
2013-06-03 13:48, Simone Caronni skrev:
any provenpackager willing to push these 2 fixes? One is really trivial
and the other one is simply a typo.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883983
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948613
I have fixed the Brasero issue; the 2nd
On , Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote:
Hi,
It is compulsory that a package waiting to be reviewed, be submitted
with the latest version in upstream?
Officially, it is a SHOULD (as pointed out by Volker), practically it is
pretty much consider as a MUST unless there is/are valid reason(s) not
to.
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com wrote:
On 2013-06-03, 12:19 GMT, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote:
It is compulsory that a package waiting to be reviewed, be submitted
with the latest version in upstream?
Could you elaborate a bit on the particular situation? Why
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at wrote:
On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 17:49 +0530, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote:
Hi,
It is compulsory that a package waiting to be reviewed, be submitted
with the latest version in upstream?
--
Best Regards,
Kalpa
Does anyone know how to contact Ian Weller?
He has not responded to his gmail account since I e-mailed him last
week. His last fedora activity seems to be about 6 months ago.
He is the owner of the mediawiki-ParserFunctions package, which has now
been merged with the upstream mediawiki package.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970099
Bug ID: 970099
Summary: perl-Pod-Parser-1.61 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Pod-Parser
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Severity: unspecified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970100
Bug ID: 970100
Summary: perl-Pod-Usage-1.63 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Pod-Usage
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Severity: unspecified
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon pin...@pingoured.frwrote:
On , Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote:
Hi,
It is compulsory that a package waiting to be reviewed, be submitted
with the latest version in upstream?
Officially, it is a SHOULD (as pointed out by Volker), practically it
Compose started at Mon Jun 3 08:15:03 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[collectd]
collectd-gmond-5.3.0-2.fc20.x86_64 requires
libganglia-3.5.0.so.0()(64bit)
[dragonegg]
dragonegg-3.1-19.fc19.x86_64 requires gcc =
On 06/03/2013 02:33 PM, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote:
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com
mailto:mc...@redhat.com wrote:
On 2013-06-03, 12:19 GMT, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote:
It is compulsory that a package waiting to be reviewed, be submitted
with the
Compose started at Mon Jun 3 09:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[bochs]
bochs-2.6.1-1.fc19.x86_64 requires vgabios
[deltacloud-core]
deltacloud-core-rhevm-1.1.3-1.fc19.noarch requires rubygem(rbovirt) =
0:0.0.18
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 08:07:41AM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Does anyone know how to contact Ian Weller?
He has not responded to his gmail account since I e-mailed him last
week. His last fedora activity seems to be about 6 months ago.
On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 16:45 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On 31 May 2013 15:19, Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi all,
few days ago I was explaining to someone*, what the Developer Assistant
[0] is.
When I said something like: ...and you project is exported directly to
Ian just posted a comment on my package that he will review it in these days.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970092
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970092
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
On Sun, 2 Jun 2013 18:21:28 -0400
Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
Personally, I value that advantage and have advocated for free
infrastructure and emphasized that while setting up Ask Fedora etc
but the question really is, is that enough of an advantage on its own
to continue
On 6/3/13 11:06 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hi, folks. Just wanted to throw out a random note on something that
often irks me.
Next time you're thinking about cloning a bug: think twice. I've found
that it's rarely the case that cloning a bug is really the right thing
to do.
When you
Hi, folks. Just wanted to throw out a random note on something that
often irks me.
Next time you're thinking about cloning a bug: think twice. I've found
that it's rarely the case that cloning a bug is really the right thing
to do.
When you clone a bug:
* The new bug gets the exact same summary
Thanks to the Fedora Community for submitting 125 awesome talks,
hackfests, sprints and workshops for Flock, our new contributor conference!
We've taken those submissions and put them in the Fedora Elections web
application, and now, it is time for you to give us your feedback. These
proposals
Hi!
Fedora 19 is close (let's hope it's alive) to the release and it's
again the time to start planning for the upcoming version.
For Fedora 20, in coordination with FESCo [1], the new Planning process
was developed to replace the old, not satisfactory Feature process.
In reality, it's pretty
Hello guys!
My name is Axilleas Pipinellis, an undergraduate from Athens Greece, and
I will be joining the packagers team:)
My primary goal is to package some (many :p ) Ruby gems and ultimately
GitLab [0], as this is a project that got accepted in this year's Google
Summer of Code.
You can find
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi!
Fedora 19 is close (let's hope it's alive) to the release and it's
again the time to start planning for the upcoming version.
For Fedora 20, in coordination with FESCo [1], the new Planning process
was developed to
On 06/03/2013 12:52 AM, seth vidal wrote:
- gitlab has(had?) no such concept of public repositories so the idea
of someone forking and contributing a patch was not even in the system
Just a quick note on that. In v5.2 (released this month) there was
introduced a new feature wherelogged-in
On 06/03/2013 10:06 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
Thanks to the Fedora Community for submitting 125 awesome talks,
hackfests, sprints and workshops for Flock, our new contributor conference!
We've taken those submissions and put them in the Fedora Elections web
application, and now, it is time for
Kashyap Chamarthy (kcham...@redhat.com) said:
Tom/Anyone:
Is it purposeful to not have presenter's name next to each talk's Abstract ?
Or is it a
limitation of the talk proposal system ? Or am I just terribly blind ?
From the message you quoted:
...
These submissions are mostly
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 7:04 PM, Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com wrote:
What is a system wide change vs a self contained change vs a new change?
There are two categories only: self-contained and system-wide.
A rule of thumb: If _only_ the owners of the change need to be involved or
informed,
Hi
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
Tom/Anyone:
Is it purposeful to not have presenter's name next to each talk's Abstract
? Or is it a
limitation of the talk proposal system ? Or am I just terribly blind ?
The latter :-)
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Miloslav Trmač m...@volny.cz wrote:
A rule of thumb: If _only_ the owners of the change need to be involved or
informed, it is self-contained. (This can be either because the change is
so small, e.g. update of a single package, or because the number owners
The latter :-)
Thanks Bill, Rahul. Sorry for this noise.
Note to self: *Read* the goddamn email completely (especially at 01:00 AM)
before hitting
the send!
--
/kashyap
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 11:13 -0700, Dan Mashal wrote:
Does not seem to take spins in to account.
Well, there's always been a separate process for proposing, reviewing
and accepting spins; you could have a 'publicity feature' for 'there is
this new spin in FXX', but the actual work of reviewing
Forwarding for the FreeIPA Team:
---
The FreeIPA team is happy to welcome you to a Fedora Test Day that is
being held on Thursday, June 6th.
We invite you to take part in testing of the new OTP authentication
feature that will become available in upcoming
We all know what devel@ does best, so let's fire up the power of the
bikeshedding machine :)
We had https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=965883 on the list of
release blocker candidates that we evaluated at the blocker review
meeting this morning. Attendance at blocker reviews is pretty
On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 18:07 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
As things stand, in Fedora 19, it's basically impossible to configure
remote authentication from the install/firstboot process. If you want to
use remote auth, you'd have to create a local user first and then do it
using whatever tools
On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 21:53 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 18:07 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
As things stand, in Fedora 19, it's basically impossible to configure
remote authentication from the install/firstboot process. If you want to
use remote auth, you'd have to
On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 19:02 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
But yes, in F19 Beta it was broken in g-i-s too, but soon it should not
be. But we have a fully-supported paths...
excuse me just one second, I hear the doorbell...
...
oh, dear. It seems to be my high school English teacher, holding
Don't mess with teachers. They have tenure.
:-)
From: Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Monday, June 3, 2013 7:04 PM
Subject: Re: Call for Bikeshedding: remote auth at
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 06:07:59PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
Whether this is a blocker or not comes down to a judgement call, because
it hinges on whether this is a significant inconvenience for a large
enough number of users. So we need to know from people who use Fedora in
remote auth
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880329
--- Comment #5 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
Upstream states the fix is available in commit:
commit 46ef9124f3149f697455061499ac7cee40930349
Author: Colin Keith colinmke...@gmail.com
Date: Sat May 25 22:56:31 2013 -0400
resolution
commit 52216777fab5f46251a058bbb33864fb972d
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Jun 3 13:31:58 2013 +0200
Correct changelog entry
perl-Dancer.spec |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Dancer.spec b/perl-Dancer.spec
index
commit 6eb544176af7da8e78b357510ead2e157e622c3f
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Jun 3 13:24:45 2013 +0200
Fix CVE-2012-5572 (cookie name CR-LF injection)
Dancer-1.3113-CVE-2012-5572-1.patch | 59 +++
Dancer-1.3113-CVE-2012-5572-2.patch |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880330
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880330
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
commit 0df619f4582ada0daa98ff255a5bec3883e8dcc1
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Jun 3 13:24:45 2013 +0200
Fix CVE-2012-5572 (cookie name CR-LF injection)
Dancer-1.3113-CVE-2012-5572-1.patch | 59 +++
Dancer-1.3113-CVE-2012-5572-2.patch |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880330
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Dancer-1.3111-3.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Dancer-1.3111-3.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail
commit c91f4c020033d2c7a9e233ade12c5afa40f9d24b
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Jun 3 13:24:45 2013 +0200
Fix CVE-2012-5572 (cookie name CR-LF injection)
Dancer-1.3113-CVE-2012-5572-1.patch | 59 +++
Dancer-1.3113-CVE-2012-5572-2.patch |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880330
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Dancer-1.3100-3.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Dancer-1.3100-3.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880330
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Dancer-1.3093-3.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Dancer-1.3093-3.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene has broken dependencies in the F-19 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-17.fc19.noarch requires
perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq)
On i386:
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-17.fc19.noarch requires
perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq)
Please resolve this
perl-Bio-SamTools has broken dependencies in the F-19 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires
perl(Bio::SeqFeature::Lite)
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(Bio::PrimarySeq)
On i386:
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.i686 requires
perl-Bio-SamTools has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires
perl(Bio::SeqFeature::Lite)
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(Bio::PrimarySeq)
On i386:
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.i686 requires
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970092
Bug ID: 970092
Summary: perl-Business-ISBN-2.06 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Business-ISBN
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970095
Bug ID: 970095
Summary: perl-Dancer-1.3114 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Dancer
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Severity: unspecified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970092
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970097
Bug ID: 970097
Summary: perl-Hash-MultiValue-0.15 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Hash-MultiValue
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970101
Bug ID: 970101
Summary: perlbrew-0.64 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perlbrew
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Severity: unspecified
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Business-ISBN:
7348e6da7cb0f87702bd5c4be89baf2f Business-ISBN-2.06.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 4776847b3ffcdf8ec560f3ab08ee585b62ac1741
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Jun 3 16:09:50 2013 +0200
2.06 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Business-ISBN.spec | 55 ++
sources |2 +-
3 files
commit 673cf4448edf0f4daabac46ed70f528a967e6c3e
Author: Jose Pedro Oliveira j...@di.uminho.pt
Date: Mon Jun 3 18:14:50 2013 +0100
* EPEL6: disable tests as they require a recent Test::More
perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3.spec | 10 +++---
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff
See http://jenkins.cloud.fedoraproject.org/job/389-ds-base/19/
--
Started by user Richard Allen Megginson
Building remotely on Fedora18 in workspace
http://jenkins.cloud.fedoraproject.org/job/389-ds-base/ws/
Checkout:389-ds-base /
See http://jenkins.cloud.fedoraproject.org/job/389-ds-base/21/changes
Changes:
[mreynolds] Ticket 47372 - make old-idl tunable
--
Started by an SCM change
Building remotely on Fedora18 in workspace
78 matches
Mail list logo
