The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
502
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5
16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11276/ssmtp-2.61-21.el5
11
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
502
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6
21
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11198/filezilla-3.7.3-1.el6
16
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 6:40 PM, Susi Lehtola
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
investigating the FTBFS of ddrescue I noticed that upstream has
switched to releasing tarballs only in .lz compressed format. This is
currently not supported by rpmbuild.
Sure it is, at least in F-18+. It'll
On Thu, 2013-09-05 at 10:17 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Thu, 2013-09-05 at 14:25 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 09/05/2013 02:10 PM, Vratislav Podzimek wrote:
2) regenerate the initrd at the end of the installation
This is what should be done both for live and regular
On Thu, 2013-09-05 at 15:52 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 09/05/2013 02:44 PM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
I concur and say:
1) write out keyboard configuration before packages are installed
1b) write out language configuration before packages are installed
Had we narrowed it down to
On 05.09.2013 16:51, Harald Hoyer wrote:
This Fedora release builds an initramfs tailored especially for your computer
hardware. If you change your machine or partitions or significant hardware,
you
might have to boot with the Rescue boot entry and execute dracut
--regenerate-all. If you
On 16.07.2013 18:53, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 10:41:22AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
After consulting with various teams, release engineering has re-enabled
rawhide composes to create install images again. These images were
dropped as part of the 'no frozen rawhide' proposal
On 09/06/2013 11:05 AM, poma wrote:
On 05.09.2013 16:51, Harald Hoyer wrote:
This Fedora release builds an initramfs tailored especially for your computer
hardware. If you change your machine or partitions or significant hardware,
you
might have to boot with the Rescue boot entry and
Hi all. I'm the developer for PackageKit and gnome-software, the
latter being the new software center we're hopefully including as a
technical preview in Fedora 20.
A few years ago distributions came together and created the AppStream
specification which was designed to be common between all
On 09/06/2013 11:31 AM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
On 09/06/2013 11:05 AM, poma wrote:
On 05.09.2013 16:51, Harald Hoyer wrote:
This Fedora release builds an initramfs tailored especially for your
computer
hardware. If you change your machine or partitions or significant hardware,
you
might
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all. I'm the developer for PackageKit and gnome-software, the
latter being the new software center we're hopefully including as a
technical preview in Fedora 20.
[snip]
Thanks in advance!
Richard
[1]
Harald Hoyer píše v Čt 05. 09. 2013 v 16:51 +0200:
On 09/05/2013 04:10 PM, Vratislav Podzimek wrote:
Hello, everybody,
I'd like to know your opinion on one issue we have hit on live
installations due to the DracutHostOnly feature [1]. Long story short:
1) Anaconda installs the kernel
Hi Richard,
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all. I'm the developer for PackageKit and gnome-software, the
latter being the new software center we're hopefully including as a
technical preview in Fedora 20.
[...]
At the moment, we use the
On 6 September 2013 11:16, Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com wrote:
As a first step to create such a database, can you reuse metadata avalable
on Ohloh?
That's a good idea, but I suspect that mining all the data is a breach
of the acceptable use policy, and the licence of the data collected
2013/9/5 Dennis Jacobfeuerborn denni...@conversis.de
Working fine here.
#v+
[root@p0x ~]# uname -a
Linux p0x 3.10.10-200.fc19.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Aug 29 19:05:45 UTC 2013
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
[root@p0x ~]# dmidecode | grep Product Name
Product Name: Dell System XPS L322X
#v-
On 09/06/2013 10:15 AM, Jiri Eischmann wrote:
Can this not be done automatically? If the system fails to boot because
of significant hardware changes, it's an obvious option to regenerate
initramfs. I can't image a normal user go to the rescue mode and run
dracut --regenerate-all. Not that it's
Hi,
as a few people has asked me for clarification - the schedule is on track,
we are Alpha frozen now from Sep 03. Based on FESCo decision [1], no
earlier than part from official schedules has been already removed.
High level schedule: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/20/Schedule
On 06.09.2013 11:38, Harald Hoyer wrote:
On 09/06/2013 11:31 AM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
On 09/06/2013 11:05 AM, poma wrote:
On 05.09.2013 16:51, Harald Hoyer wrote:
This Fedora release builds an initramfs tailored especially for your
computer
hardware. If you change your machine or
On Sep 5, 2013 7:12 PM, David Beveridge d...@bevhost.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 10:02 PM, Frankie Onuonga
frankie.onuo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Samuel Sieb sam...@sieb.net wrote:
On 09/04/2013 08:07 PM, Frankie Onuonga wrote:
It is irritating to
Am 06.09.2013 05:21, schrieb Matthew Garrett:
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 12:33:40AM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
whay is Fedora starting with this crap exatly with the
release having a short-minded name with special chars
not properly handeled by the whole OS?
You're sending email to the
We seem to be running into an issue with the existing
xfce4-panel-4.8.3-2.el6. We seem to have the panel kernel panic crash
seeming related to xfce4-panel (homedir NFS + panel operation + andmaybe
Xen = random crash) on a fully updated CentOS 6.4. A couple of the (likely)
related bugs with the
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 04:19:27PM -0500, Andrew McNabb wrote:
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 10:13:10PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
In terms of testing or debugging probably the easiest way is to spin up an
image under qemu emulation, it's not the fastest but it works pretty well.
If there's
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 11:24:38AM +0200, poma wrote:
You've probably missed something in the title, so the correct one should be:
Rawhide tree now includes broken install images
Now, if someone is doing it just to fill the tree, for the sake of
formality, thanks but no thanks.
Why don't you
On Fri, 6 Sep 2013 09:44:51 -0600
Andrew McNabb amcn...@mcnabbs.org wrote:
I tried tracking down the problem using an ARM virtual machine using
these instructions, but it was too slow in helping track down the
failed tests (in fact, it had many more failed tests).
As a temporary measure, I
On Fri, 06 Sep 2013 11:24:38 +0200
poma pomidorabelis...@gmail.com wrote:
You've probably missed something in the title, so the correct one
should be: Rawhide tree now includes broken install images
Now, if someone is doing it just to fill the tree, for the sake of
formality, thanks but no
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 11:26:39PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 05.09.2013 23:11, schrieb Darryl L. Pierce:
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 10:11:51PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
* there is *nothing* in this configuration referring to the release name
/boot/grub2/grub.cfg is generated via the
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 04:29:27PM +0200, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 09:04:10AM +0200, Miroslav Suchy wrote:
Compare it to Copr and OBS approach, when package is build in VM and
after that backend will retrieve the results from VM. So on builder
(of OBS and COPR) is no
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Richard Vickery richard.vicker...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sep 5, 2013 7:12 PM, David Beveridge d...@bevhost.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 10:02 PM, Frankie Onuonga
frankie.onuo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Samuel Sieb
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 10:31:55AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
We have these:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/qa-machines
that I can get you access to.
I have some I want to make always available to packagers, but I am
waiting on a firmware upgrade that will allow us to
Le 6 sept. 2013 20:19, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com a écrit :
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 04:29:27PM +0200, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 09:04:10AM +0200, Miroslav Suchy wrote:
Compare it to Copr and OBS approach, when package is build in VM and
after that backend
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 09:10:24PM +0200, 80 wrote:
No, it's less secure than kvm but it still provides better isolation
than a mere chroot.
It doesn't matter if it's more secure than a chroot, because that's
not what we're talking about. This is about whether you want
On Sex, 2013-09-06 at 10:18 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 06.09.2013 05:21, schrieb Matthew Garrett:
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 12:33:40AM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
whay is Fedora starting with this crap exatly with the
release having a short-minded name with special chars
not
On Fri, 6 Sep 2013 09:02:47 +0300
Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi wrote:
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 6:40 PM, Susi Lehtola
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
investigating the FTBFS of ddrescue I noticed that upstream has
switched to releasing tarballs only in .lz compressed format. This
is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/06/2013 03:38 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 09:10:24PM +0200, 80 wrote:
No, it's less secure than kvm but it still provides better isolation than
a mere chroot.
It doesn't matter if it's more secure than a chroot,
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 03:53:50PM -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
VM Wrapped with Svirt (SELinux), running a Container wrapped with SELinux,
running mock...
I see we need another layer in libguestfs :-)
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read
| From: Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
| Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 11:38:21 +0200
| https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3D319901
|
| looks like Redhat based systems are the only remaining
| which does not support EECDHE which is a shame these
| days in context of PRISM and more and
Summary of changes:
bfb8d61... Update to 1.15 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Am 06.09.2013 20:26, schrieb Darryl L. Pierce:
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 11:26:39PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 05.09.2013 23:11, schrieb Darryl L. Pierce:
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 10:11:51PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
* there is *nothing* in this configuration referring to the release name
The lightweight tag 'perl-Path-Tiny-0.032-1.fc21' was created pointing to:
903ae30... Update to 0.032
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
According to this:
http://www.serverwatch.com/server-news/where-is-red-hat-enterprise-linux-7.html
RHEL7 will use XFS for the default boot/root.
I could certainly have been out of town, for a while, and missed this. But,
to the best of my knowledge, Fedora uses ext4 as the default boot/root.
Summary of changes:
a7b2ce5... Perl 5.18 rebuild (*)
d875d86... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass (*)
bde33ab... Update to 1.4.0 (*)
36aa0c5... Update to 1.4.1 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
Hi
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 6:17 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
don't get me wrong but i expect bugs viewable at every single boot
as fixed without a specific report a
http://www.redhat.com/magazine/020jun06/features/bugzilla/
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 2:31 PM, D. Hugh Redelmeier h...@mimosa.com wrote:
| From: Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
| Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 11:38:21 +0200
| https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3D319901
|
| looks like Redhat based systems are the only remaining
| which does not
On Thu, 5 Sep 2013 18:18:47 -0500
Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
Please also be very careful. I will have to update rpkg to know
that .lz files need to be uploaded to the lookaside cache. it has a
list of file extentions to upload to lookaside, if you are not super
careful you could see
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/411
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/411/0001-Ticket-411-RFE-mods-optimizer.patch
--
Mark Reynolds
389 Development Team
Red Hat, Inc
mreyno...@redhat.com
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Once upon a time, Sam Varshavchik mr...@courier-mta.com said:
I could certainly have been out of town, for a while, and missed
this. But, to the best of my knowledge, Fedora uses ext4 as the
default boot/root. Just sounds a bit strange to me, that this is
getting dumped into RHEL without
Hi
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 6:48 PM, Sam Varshavchik mr...@courier-mta.comwrote:
According to this:
http://www.serverwatch.com/**server-news/where-is-red-hat-**
enterprise-linux-7.htmlhttp://www.serverwatch.com/server-news/where-is-red-hat-enterprise-linux-7.html
RHEL7 will use XFS for the
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Chris Adams li...@cmadams.net wrote:
Once upon a time, Sam Varshavchik mr...@courier-mta.com said:
I could certainly have been out of town, for a while, and missed
this. But, to the best of my knowledge, Fedora uses ext4 as the
default boot/root. Just sounds a
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 12:18 AM, Richard Vickery
richard.vicker...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 5, 2013 7:12 PM, David Beveridge d...@bevhost.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 10:02 PM, Frankie Onuonga
frankie.onuo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Samuel Sieb
commit 4fd332384029e87b098625479409ba63b2561844
Author: Ruediger Landmann r.landm...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Sep 6 20:58:50 2013 +1000
new upstream:
.gitignore|1 +
perl-XML-TreeBuilder.spec | 29 -
sources |2 +-
3
perl-IPTables-libiptc has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-IPTables-libiptc-0.52-5.fc19.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-IPTables-libiptc-0.52-5.fc19.i686 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
perl-Alien-ROOT has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On armhfp:
perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.3.1-3.fc20.noarch requires root-core
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-Language-Prolog-Yaswi has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Prolog-Yaswi-0.21-13.fc20.x86_64 requires
libswipl.so.6.2.6()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-Language-Prolog-Yaswi-0.21-13.fc20.i686 requires libswipl.so.6.2.6
On armhfp:
perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes-2.002-2.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes-2.002-2.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
perl-Padre has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0)
On i386:
perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0)
On armhfp:
perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-19.fc20.noarch requires
perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq)
On i386:
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-19.fc20.noarch requires
perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq)
On armhfp:
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
perl-ParseUtil-Domain has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-ParseUtil-Domain-2.22-3.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-ParseUtil-Domain-2.22-3.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
slic3r has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3)
On i386:
slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3)
On armhfp:
slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires
perl-Unix-Statgrab has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Unix-Statgrab-0.04-20.fc20.x86_64 requires
libstatgrab.so.6()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-Unix-Statgrab-0.04-20.fc20.i686 requires libstatgrab.so.6
On armhfp:
perl-Unix-Statgrab-0.04-20.fc20.armv7hl
perl-MIME-Lite-HTML has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-4.fc18.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0)
On i386:
perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-4.fc18.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0)
On armhfp:
perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.x86_64 requires libgd.so.2()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
perl-ParseUtil-Domain has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-ParseUtil-Domain-2.22-3.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-ParseUtil-Domain-2.22-3.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes-2.002-2.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes-2.002-2.fc19.noarch requires
slic3r has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3)
On i386:
slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3)
On armhfp:
slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires
perl-Padre has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0)
On i386:
perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0)
On armhfp:
perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-19.fc20.noarch requires
perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq)
On i386:
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-19.fc20.noarch requires
perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq)
On armhfp:
perl-MIME-Lite-HTML has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-4.fc18.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0)
On i386:
perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-4.fc18.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0)
On armhfp:
perl-Unix-Statgrab has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Unix-Statgrab-0.04-20.fc20.x86_64 requires
libstatgrab.so.6()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-Unix-Statgrab-0.04-20.fc20.i686 requires libstatgrab.so.6
On armhfp:
perl-Unix-Statgrab-0.04-20.fc20.armv7hl
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.x86_64 requires libgd.so.2()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Tree-DAG_Node:
07214e6f12300a29d833b1da7979fb3f Tree-DAG_Node-1.15.tgz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit bfb8d6176d7f4f9c2922fff04bc355a1a61db018
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Fri Sep 6 15:45:31 2013 +0100
Update to 1.15
- New upstream release 1.15
- Replace Path::Tiny with File::Spec, because the former's list of
dependencies is s long :-(
commit 2cddce07dd5fd0342f2f0174c91f8706e42b298c
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Fri Sep 6 16:08:29 2013 +0100
Update to 2.16
- New upstream release 2.16
- Replace Path::Tiny with File::Spec, because the former's list of
dependencies is s long :-( (see
Summary of changes:
2cddce0... Update to 2.16 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Config-Tiny-2.16-1.fc20' was created pointing to:
2cddce0... Update to 2.16
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Config-Tiny-2.16-1.fc21' was created pointing to:
2cddce0... Update to 2.16
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 903ae30ecc6011b39342a0fb1e909b1c3296cf2e
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Fri Sep 6 23:27:14 2013 +0100
Update to 0.032
- New upstream release 0.032
- Removed several test dependencies; Path::Tiny now only needs core
modules,
though some must be
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Path-Tiny:
479c8df99831c83c5addb71e9609819d Path-Tiny-0.032.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
36aa0c5... Update to 1.4.1 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Config-Tiny:
03587c4c0ac6e16ba8a148d93a2e Config-Tiny-2.16.tgz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Tree-DAG_Node-1.15-1.fc20' was created pointing to:
bfb8d61... Update to 1.15
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Tree-DAG_Node-1.15-1.fc21' was created pointing to:
bfb8d61... Update to 1.15
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 07:56:08PM -0600, Rich Megginson wrote:
My earlier fix broke slapi-nis
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47455/0001-Ticket-47455-valgrind-value-mem-leaks-uninit-mem-usa.2.patch
Adding this patch to 389-ds-base-1.3.1.7-1.fc19 makes slapi-nis's
self-tests
Rich Megginson wrote:
Please review and comment:
http://port389.org/wiki/Design/Fine_Grained_ID_List_Size
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
Hi Rich,
A nice design! It looks promising to solve the sticky
On 9/6/2013 3:05 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
Please review and comment:
http://port389.org/wiki/Design/Fine_Grained_ID_List_Size
This looks interesting. I suppose this is similar to a SQL database's
concept of index statistics, and also query hints supplied by the
client. Perhaps more of a
On 9/6/2013 8:49 PM, Nathan Kinder wrote:
This is a good idea, and it is something that we discussed briefly
off-list. The only downside is that we need to change the index
format to keep a count of ids for each key. Implementing this isn't a
big problem, but it does mean that the existing
Hi,
as a few people has asked me for clarification - the schedule is on track,
we are Alpha frozen now from Sep 03. Based on FESCo decision [1], no
earlier than part from official schedules has been already removed.
High level schedule: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/20/Schedule
88 matches
Mail list logo
