On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 06:35:38PM -0700, Karsten Wade wrote:
I've never heard of this EPIC repository and google doesn't seem to
know it either. Where can this be found?
It doesn't exist, it's an idea that Robyn has floated semi-seriously
as a way to provide a repo that moves faster than
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
699
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6
128
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-12079/bip-0.8.9-1.el6
46
On 03/21/2014 11:49 AM, Sam Kottler wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com
To: EPEL Development List epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Cc: rberg...@fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 6:25:50 PM
Subject: Re: EPEL EPIC! [was Re: and SCL]
I would like to mention that DE spins are very important with regard to the
ARM7 arch. Gnome shell may or might not be working in arm so kde and the
other DE spins are really important. Mostly kde from a QA perspective. As a
primary architecture I feel this deserve extra considering. Arm QA is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/20/2014 03:33 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Well this bug has reappeared on my machine. openldap depends on
openldap-devel.
$ ll /usr/lib64/libldap*
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 10 Feb 25 22:59 /usr/lib64/libldap-2.4.so.2 -
libldap.so
- Original Message -
On 03/19/2014 01:09 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
There is also a proposal for a Fedora Plasma product based around KDE.
I'm
personally a little skeptical but listening -- I think want a technology
showcase masquerading as a product would miss the point, and I'd
Hi,
So maybe a solution would be to write a libwrap2 instead ?
Don't think this is the solution. Part of the problem is that some of
the functionality is just obsolete in todays world. Trusting IDENT and
DNS for access control maybe made sense in the 90ies. It certainly
doesn't today, and
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 9:22 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.atwrote:
How much breakage will we have to suffer until people finally realize that
SELinux is a horribly flawed idea?
Kevin Kofler
I'm sure you are entitled to your opinion, and it is quite easy to disable
if that's
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Hi,
GHC (Haskell) was broken for (at least) over a year because of a bug in the
workaround for stupid SELinux restrictions:
https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/7629
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1071125
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Config-Validator-1.2-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
On 03/21/2014 10:02 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
- Original Message -
On 03/19/2014 01:09 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
There is also a proposal for a Fedora Plasma product based around KDE.
I'm
personally a little skeptical but listening -- I think want a technology
showcase masquerading as
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 10:36:38PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
because the journal isn't optional in Fedora. And I think I'd combine
mail and sendmail (because the /usr/sbin/sendmail command can be
provided by a lot of alternatives, including the very lightweight
ssmtp).
Yeah, I
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 10:28:26AM +0100, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
I agree with Jaroslav. I was looking forward to have a fourth
product to those three. KDE can help define what is needed for new
product, what must be done by all teams, how much work it will be
... I guess we should speak more
= Proposed System Wide Change: Java 8 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java8
Change owner(s): Omair Majid oma...@redhat.com
Make Java 8 (provided by OpenJDK 8 which is java-1.8.0-openjdk) the default
Java runtime. The current default Java runtime (Java 7, provided by OpenJDK 7,
Hey all-
Can anyone point me to fedora packaging documentation that discusses the
need for API stability in packaged shared libraries? I'm sure we have some
requirement that APIs in a DSO need to be versioned and maintained through a
release, but for the life of me I'm unable to find it.
= Proposed Self Contained Change: Improved Scala Ecosystem Support =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ImprovedScalaEcosystem
Change owner(s): William Benton wi...@redhat.com
Fedora now supports several essential parts of the Scala language ecosystem as
well as building packages with sbt,
- Original Message -
From: Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 12:59:01 PM
Subject: Re: What will happen to XFCE, LXDE, Mate, Cinnemon in Fedora.Next
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014
On 03/21/2014 01:18 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
Can anyone point me to fedora packaging documentation that discusses
the need for API stability in packaged shared libraries? I'm sure we
have some requirement that APIs in a DSO need to be versioned and
maintained through a release, but for the life
2014-03-21 16:07 GMT+04:00 Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org:
It doesn't exist, it's an idea that Robyn has floated semi-seriously
as a way to provide a repo that moves faster than EPEL. Rather than
try to jam fast-moving stuff in to EPEL, the idea was to do an Extra
Packages for
= Proposed Self Contained Change: Apache Spark =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ApacheSpark
Change owner(s): William Benton wi...@redhat.com
Apache Spark is a fast and general engine for large-scale data processing.
This change brings Spark to Fedora, allowing easy deployment and
On Fri, 21.03.14 00:27, Paul Wouters (p...@nohats.ca) wrote:
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014, Lennart Poettering wrote:
I mean, in this day and age we should not consider an ACL language well
designed if it basically pushes users to use IDENT and DNS for
authentication. (And no, don't say the words
= Proposed Self Contained Change: NFS Ganesha File Server =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NFSGanesha
Change owner(s): Jim Lieb l...@sea-troll.net
NFS Ganesha is a user mode file server that supports NFSv3, NFSv4, and NFSv4.1
including pNFS for distributed filesystems. It uses loadable
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 13:11:44 +0100
Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Java 8 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java8
Change owner(s): Omair Majid oma...@redhat.com
Make Java 8 (provided by OpenJDK 8 which is java-1.8.0-openjdk) the
default
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 01:25:52PM +0100, Michal Schmidt wrote:
On 03/21/2014 01:18 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
Can anyone point me to fedora packaging documentation that discusses
the need for API stability in packaged shared libraries? I'm sure we
have some requirement that APIs in a DSO need
nss 3.16 was released this week and is now on Rawhide. Details in the
upstream release notes at
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/NSS/NSS_3.16_release_notes.
It should appear on updated testing for fedora stable branches next week.
Elio
--
devel mailing list
On 21.03.2014 13:24, Christian Schaller wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org
To: Development discussions related to Fedora devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 12:59:01 PM
Subject: Re: What will happen to XFCE, LXDE, Mate,
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 13:11:44 +0100,
Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Java 8 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java8
It may be a good idea to mass rebuild Java packages against OpenJDK 8 to spot
any source incompatibilities earlier. This is
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 06:34:22PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
I wonder whether it wouldn't be time to say goodbye to tcpwrappers in
Fedora. There has been a request in systemd upstream to disable support
I talked to some of the RHEL planning people, and they're okay
with marking it
Summary of changes:
1567260... Initial import (perl-Test-Modern-0.002-3) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Agenda:
- Discuss draft for Tech Spec for Base Design
- Open Floor
Thanks regards, Phil
--
Philipp Knirsch | Tel.: +49-711-96437-470
Manager Core Services| Fax.: +49-711-96437-111
Red Hat GmbH | Email: Phil Knirsch pknir...@redhat.com
Wankelstrasse 5
- Original Message -
Is there an easy way to do test builds against 8 now?
java-1.8.0-openjdk is available in F19 (updates-testing), F20 (updates-testing)
and in rawhide.
It doesn't provide 'java-devel' (which is what yum uses to find JDKs), so Koji
shouldn't use java-1.8.0-openjdk
- Original Message -
From: Dan Horák d...@danny.cz
Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
Make Java 8 (provided by OpenJDK 8 which is java-1.8.0-openjdk) the
default Java runtime. The current default Java runtime (Java 7,
provided by OpenJDK 7, java-1.7.0-openjdk) will be
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 10:24:05 -0400 (EDT)
Omair Majid oma...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Dan Horák d...@danny.cz
Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
Make Java 8 (provided by OpenJDK 8 which is java-1.8.0-openjdk)
the default Java runtime. The current
On Thu, 2014-03-20 at 20:55 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
So offer something with equivalent functionality (and config file
syntax compatibility), with a nice modern clean API and then systemd
and others can be moved over to that 1 by 1, and once we've no more
users left we can kill of the old
Did something recently change with the packaging of NetworkManager?
I’m not finding NetworkManager-glib, just NetworkManager-glib-devel:
[root@builder philipp]# yum update
Loaded plugins: langpacks, refresh-packagekit
adobe-linux-x86_64 | 951 B 00:00
Hi all.
Agenda for today was discussing the tech spec that masta wanted to
write. Unfortunately due to his other workload he wasn't able to
complete it by today, so we postponed the discussion to next week.
In the openfloor session we brought up a topic from jreznik about any
requirements
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014, Lennart Poettering wrote:
we kinda do have dnssec per default. All DNS servers installed per
default do DNSSEC. Installing dnssec-trigger makes that even more
pervasive.
Well, but glibc can't do the DNSSEC client side, can it?
Applications that want to do DNSSEC
On Fri, 21.03.14 12:37, Paul Wouters (p...@nohats.ca) wrote:
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014, Lennart Poettering wrote:
we kinda do have dnssec per default. All DNS servers installed per
default do DNSSEC. Installing dnssec-trigger makes that even more
pervasive.
Well, but glibc can't do the DNSSEC
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014, Lennart Poettering wrote:
As long as -lresolve (i.e. glibc and getaddrinfo()) can't do DNSSEC it's
just not there...
You are proposing changing the api of getaddrinfo()? Could luck with
that?
Yes, applications that want to see DNSSEC results will have to do a little bit
On Fri, 21.03.14 13:05, Paul Wouters (p...@nohats.ca) wrote:
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014, Lennart Poettering wrote:
As long as -lresolve (i.e. glibc and getaddrinfo()) can't do DNSSEC it's
just not there...
You are proposing changing the api of getaddrinfo()? Could luck with
that?
Dunno, it
On Fri, 2014-03-21 at 10:04 -0600, Philip Prindeville wrote:
Did something recently change with the packaging of NetworkManager?
I’m not finding NetworkManager-glib, just NetworkManager-glib-devel:
Outdated mirrors perhaps? It's clearly in the repos:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Philip Prindeville
philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com wrote:
Did something recently change with the packaging of NetworkManager?
I'm not finding NetworkManager-glib, just NetworkManager-glib-devel:
[root@builder philipp]# yum update
Loaded plugins: langpacks,
* Lennart Poettering:
So offer something with equivalent functionality (and config file
syntax compatibility), with a nice modern clean API and then systemd
and others can be moved over to that 1 by 1, and once we've no more
users left we can kill of the old beast ?
Nope. In systemd we
Am 21.03.2014 20:02, schrieb Florian Weimer:
* Lennart Poettering:
So offer something with equivalent functionality (and config file
syntax compatibility), with a nice modern clean API and then systemd
and others can be moved over to that 1 by 1, and once we've no more
users left we can
On 03/21/2014 02:05 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 06:34:22PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
I wonder whether it wouldn't be time to say goodbye to tcpwrappers in
Fedora. There has been a request in systemd upstream to disable support
I talked to some of the RHEL planning
Hey there,
So I’m one of the authors of PEP453, the original implementor of ensurepip, and
a pip maintainer. I know that pip (and other language level package managers)
have a sort of love/hate (sometimes more of one or the other!) relationship
with the downstream Linux packagers. I know that
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 6:16 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com
wrote:
In other words you are telling us that now to get something implemented or
removed in Fedora we have to not only deal with our usual politics and
bureaucracy but also all the downstream distribution to us as
On 03/21/2014 10:30 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 6:16 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com mailto:johan...@gmail.com wrote:
In other words you are telling us that now to get something
implemented or removed in Fedora we have to not only deal with our
Am 21.03.2014 23:16, schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
On 03/21/2014 02:05 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 06:34:22PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
I wonder whether it wouldn't be time to say goodbye to tcpwrappers in
Fedora. There has been a request in systemd upstream to
Am 21.03.2014 23:31, schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
On 03/21/2014 10:30 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 6:16 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com
mailto:johan...@gmail.com wrote:
In other words you are telling us that now to get something implemented
or
Summary of changes:
3f04fa4... Initial import (#1074482). (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 03/21/2014 10:35 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
the author of tcpwrapper is Wietse Venema,
You do realize when he wrote this and what he was trying to overcome at
that time so I have to ask have you spoken to him about how useful he
thinks his creation is today and why he stopped maintaining
Am 21.03.2014 23:37, schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
On 03/21/2014 10:35 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
the author of tcpwrapper is Wietse Venema,
You do realize when he wrote this and what he was trying to overcome at that
time so I have to ask have you spoken
to him about how useful he
2014-03-21 1:00 GMT+01:00 Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de:
On Thu, 20.03.14 13:44, Stephen John Smoogen (smo...@gmail.com) wrote:
And now I need to have X number applications special syntax to
whitelist/blacklist a site. I need to change X files to make that change.
Each of those
2014-03-21 10:02 GMT+01:00 Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com:
KDE should not be a top level Product. In my opinion, Fedora should only
produce the currently listed 3 Products and not more. Otherwise we get
back at square 1 where we have too many offerings and nobody knows what
makes a
2014-03-21 14:46 GMT+01:00 Dennis Jacobfeuerborn denni...@conversis.de:
As I perceive it one of the biggest problems for Fedora as a development
platform for new technologies is that everything is tied to very rigorous
guidelines and controls that tend to be fairly conservative. This is great
On Fri, 21.03.14 20:02, Florian Weimer (f...@deneb.enyo.de) wrote:
* Lennart Poettering:
So offer something with equivalent functionality (and config file
syntax compatibility), with a nice modern clean API and then systemd
and others can be moved over to that 1 by 1, and once we've no
On Fri, 21.03.14 23:35, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
In other words you are telling us that now to get something implemented or
removed in Fedora we have to not only
deal with our usual politics and bureaucracy but also all the downstream
distribution to us as well...
On Fri, 21.03.14 23:46, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
if you believe it or not: there exists code which don't neeed
updates and reweites all te time because it just works and given
You do realize that if software engineering has shown something then
yes, software development is
On Sat, 22.03.14 01:20, Miloslav Trmač (m...@volny.cz) wrote:
Well, if you filter in postfix or ssh, then you have a domain-specific,
powerful language there. You can not only match on source addresses, but
also on user names, groups, authentication methods, connection features
SASL
2014-03-22 3:07 GMT+01:00 Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de:
On Fri, 21.03.14 23:46, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
if you believe it or not: there exists code which don't neeed
updates and reweites all te time because it just works and given
You do realize that if
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 8:07 PM, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.dewrote:
You do realize that if software engineering has shown something then
yes, software development is never finished, it's a process. You do need
maintains for such things.
The software in my microwave oven, coffee
2014-03-22 3:21 GMT+01:00 Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de:
On Sat, 22.03.14 01:20, Miloslav Trmač (m...@volny.cz) wrote:
Well, if you filter in postfix or ssh, then you have a domain-specific,
powerful language there. You can not only match on source addresses,
but
also on
2014-03-22 5:20 GMT+01:00 Miloslav Trmač m...@volny.cz:
I'm participating in this discussion because, as a general rule, I assume
most administrators configuring security, and most users in general, *aren't
idiots*. So, the fairly large number of assumed non-idiots using this
functionality
2014-03-21 13:11 GMT+01:00 Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Java 8 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java8
snip
== Detailed Description ==
OpenJDK8 is much more strict when it comes to building javadocs. Many -
javadoc package in Fedora fail to
2014-03-20 18:59 GMT+01:00 Paul Wouters p...@nohats.ca:
On Thu, 20 Mar 2014, Lennart Poettering wrote:
I wonder whether it wouldn't be time to say goodbye to tcpwrappers in
Fedora.
I'd be happy to see those go.
Those who depend on it though, should see some failed closed
behaviour, so
commit c0a4a0247454e5d290b0b75929e0e00bad77dfb2
Merge: 2287f77 8ab9631
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Fri Mar 21 11:03:22 2014 +0100
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/f20' into f19
.gitignore |2 +-
perl-Class-MethodMaker.spec |5 -
mojomojo has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch requires
perl(HTML::FormFu::Element::reCAPTCHA)
On i386:
mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch requires
perl(HTML::FormFu::Element::reCAPTCHA)
On armhfp:
mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch
Summary of changes:
3f04fa4... Initial import (#1074482). (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 38d5a54a85ed32228cca11cad04c52e050dca145
Author: David Dick dd...@cpan.org
Date: Sat Mar 22 10:05:18 2014 +1100
Initial import (#1077956).
.gitignore|1 +
image_subimagefind_makefile.patch | 49 +++
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-X11-GUITest:
6987e834dbf25734d3aec0014ab89bf6 X11-GUITest-0.28.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077585
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47748
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47748/0001-Ticket-47748-Simultaneous-adding-a-user-and-binding-.2.patch
git patch file (master; take 2) -- fixed mistakes in the previous patch
(Thanks, Rich!!)
Thanks,
--noriko
--
389-devel mailing list
= Proposed Self Contained Change: Improved Scala Ecosystem Support =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ImprovedScalaEcosystem
Change owner(s): William Benton wi...@redhat.com
Fedora now supports several essential parts of the Scala language ecosystem as
well as building packages with sbt,
= Proposed Self Contained Change: Apache Spark =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ApacheSpark
Change owner(s): William Benton wi...@redhat.com
Apache Spark is a fast and general engine for large-scale data processing.
This change brings Spark to Fedora, allowing easy deployment and
75 matches
Mail list logo
