EPEL epel beta report: 20140420 changes

2014-04-20 Thread EPEL Beta Report
Compose started at Sun Apr 20 08:15:02 UTC 2014 Broken deps for x86_64 -- 2ping-2.0-2.el7.noarch requires perl(Digest::CRC) RemoteBox-1.7-1.el7.noarch requires rdesktop RemoteBox-1.7-1.el7.noarch requires perl-Gtk2

rawhide report: 20140420 changes

2014-04-20 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Broken deps for i386 -- [MegaMek] MegaMek-0.30.11-13.fc20.i686 requires java-gcj-compat MegaMek-0.30.11-13.fc20.i686 requires java-gcj-compat [PyKDE] PyKDE-3.16.6-14.fc20.i686 requires sip-api(10) = 0:10.0 [apper]

Re: F21 System Wide Change: SCL

2014-04-20 Thread Kevin Kofler
Jaroslav Reznik wrote (in his messenger role): SCL - Software Collections - are popular packaging format above rpm. Let's enable them for Fedora. More details on upstream page [1]. And totally destroy all our efforts of complying with the FHS? Yuck! We should continue our work on providing an

Re: F21 Self Contained Change: SDDM as the default KDE display manager instead of KDM

2014-04-20 Thread Kevin Kofler
Josh Boyer wrote: Could you elaborate how this would impact using GDM to boot into a KDE session? The proposal is only about replacing KDM with SDDM by default on KDE installations. It does not affect starting KDE Plasma from non-KDE display managers (such as GDM) at all. And even KDM should

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Ruby193 in SCL

2014-04-20 Thread Kevin Kofler
Bill Nottingham wrote: Is the intent to only provide SCL versions of the older ruby rails, or also the current versions (i.e., move to SCL as the rails delivery mechanism going forward)? (Assuming we really want to support SCLs at all,) the default version should most definitely NOT be an

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Ruby193 in SCL

2014-04-20 Thread Kevin Kofler
Lukas Zapletal wrote: This is a great change that actually allows other teams that heavily relies on Fedoras to put their software on hold for two Fedora releases. And that's a good thing how? Stale software relying on old compatibility libraries is exactly the opposite of what we want (fast

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Workstation: Disable firewall

2014-04-20 Thread Kevin Kofler
Christian Schaller wrote: where we at the same time need to allow each user to have any port they desire opened for traffic to make sure things like DLNA or Chromecast works. Such things MUST NOT be enabled by default. Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Workstation: Enable Software Collections

2014-04-20 Thread Kevin Kofler
Jaroslav Reznik wrote, on behalf of Matthias Clasen: The Software Collections repositories will be enabled by default. So we now allow shipping the configuration for third-party repositories, even enabled by default? Is April 1st still not over yet? If you want those packages in Fedora, they

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Workstation: Disable firewall

2014-04-20 Thread Kevin Kofler
Jaroslav Reznik wrote, on behalf of Matthias Clasen: The firewalld service will not be enabled by default in the workstation product. WTF? So we're going to disable security by default? We are forcing such a PITA as SELinux that breaks applications on all users by default, yet we will let

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Workstation: Disable firewall

2014-04-20 Thread drago01
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 6:53 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote: Christian Schaller wrote: where we at the same time need to allow each user to have any port they desire opened for traffic to make sure things like DLNA or Chromecast works. Such things MUST NOT be enabled by

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Workstation: Disable firewall

2014-04-20 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 20.04.2014 20:19, schrieb drago01: On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 6:53 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote: Christian Schaller wrote: where we at the same time need to allow each user to have any port they desire opened for traffic to make sure things like DLNA or Chromecast works.

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Workstation: Disable firewall

2014-04-20 Thread drago01
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: Am 20.04.2014 20:19, schrieb drago01: On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 6:53 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote: Christian Schaller wrote: where we at the same time need to allow each user to have any port they

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Workstation: Disable firewall

2014-04-20 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 20.04.2014 22:44, schrieb drago01: On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: Am 20.04.2014 20:19, schrieb drago01: On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 6:53 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote: Christian Schaller wrote: where we at the same time need

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Workstation: Disable firewall

2014-04-20 Thread Lars Seipel
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 11:44:58PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote: We don't, actually. *Only* applications running in a session of a member of the wheel group would have that right, and those applications are pretty much root-equivalent anyway. (Many GNOME users probably use such a setup, but

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Workstation: Disable firewall

2014-04-20 Thread Isaac Cortés González
Guys, 1st April was a long time ago, stop this kind of stupidity. How in the earth would be a good idea to have the firewall disabled by default? I mean you're all graduate from college/university, right? You have the capacity to think, am I right? -- devel mailing list

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Workstation: Disable firewall

2014-04-20 Thread drago01
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: after you booted the new installed machine and open ports of possible vulnerable services which needs updatdes it is *too late* to enable the firewall for preventing already happened damaged Do you even know how

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Workstation: Disable firewall

2014-04-20 Thread drago01
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 11:20 PM, Lars Seipel lars.sei...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 11:44:58PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote: We don't, actually. *Only* applications running in a session of a member of the wheel group would have that right, and those applications are pretty much

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Workstation: Disable firewall

2014-04-20 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 20.04.2014 23:44, schrieb drago01: On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: after you booted the new installed machine and open ports of possible vulnerable services which needs updatdes it is *too late* to enable the firewall for preventing already

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Workstation: Disable firewall

2014-04-20 Thread drago01
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: * there are network services enabled by default Again that's a bug and a viloation of the guidelines. Which services are you talking about? Please file bugs. * avahi is one of them You keep listing this as an

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Workstation: Disable firewall

2014-04-20 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 21.04.2014 00:22, schrieb drago01: On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: * there are network services enabled by default Again that's a bug and a viloation of the guidelines. Which services are you talking about? Please file bugs. please

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Workstation: Disable firewall

2014-04-20 Thread drago01
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 12:39 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: There have been other suggestions in this thread that are helpful like the network zones thing (but we still have too many zones) or enabling services should make them work i.e just enable the firewall rules.

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Workstation: Disable firewall

2014-04-20 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 21.04.2014 00:59, schrieb drago01: On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 12:39 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: There have been other suggestions in this thread that are helpful like the network zones thing (but we still have too many zones) or enabling services should make them work

When a yum update sets up an MTA ...

2014-04-20 Thread Lars Seipel
Nicely aligning with the current firewall thread I noticed that one of my machines was running the exim MTA for the last few days, dutifully listening on all interfaces. How did this happen? It turns out that smartmontools intermittently required 'MTA' which (presumably due to its nice and short

Re: When a yum update sets up an MTA ...

2014-04-20 Thread Andrew Lutomirski
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 6:39 PM, Lars Seipel lars.sei...@gmail.com wrote: Nicely aligning with the current firewall thread I noticed that one of my machines was running the exim MTA for the last few days, dutifully listening on all interfaces. How did this happen? It turns out that

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Workstation: Disable firewall

2014-04-20 Thread Liam
Sent from mYphone On Apr 20, 2014 7:02 PM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 12:39 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: There have been other suggestions in this thread that are helpful like the network zones thing (but we still have too many zones) or

Re: When a yum update sets up an MTA ...

2014-04-20 Thread Lars Seipel
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 06:44:53PM -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: I think it's because upgrading installs a new package and uninstalls an old package. Sounds like a bug in exim. Yes, but there was no upgrade of exim. An update of smartmontools pulled it in but exim itself got installed for

Re: When a yum update sets up an MTA ...

2014-04-20 Thread Rahul Sundaram
Hi On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 10:41 PM, Lars Seipel wrote: On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 06:44:53PM -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: I think it's because upgrading installs a new package and uninstalls an old package. Sounds like a bug in exim. Yes, but there was no upgrade of exim. An update of

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Workstation: Disable firewall

2014-04-20 Thread Orcan Ogetbil
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 6:59 PM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote: There is difference between a software developer, a sysadmin and a user that simply wants to share his music with his family. The latter should not have to learn about computer security to do it, Why not? I lock my door every

[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2014-04-21 Fedora QA Meeting

2014-04-20 Thread Adam Williamson
I don't think we have anything that needs to be discussed at a meeting this week, so I'm proposing we cancel the meeting scheduled for today/tomorrow (Monday April 21st). If anyone has objections, speak now or forever hold your peace :) and specify what you'd like to discuss, and we'll run the

File Mojolicious-4.94.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by eseyman

2014-04-20 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Mojolicious: cd70f14d921d82c90d3c847dc100aa97 Mojolicious-4.94.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-Mojolicious] Update to 4.94

2014-04-20 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
commit 9f3db7eebda8516edda48a7126ef67790fca25e8 Author: Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr Date: Sun Apr 20 09:35:47 2014 +0200 Update to 4.94 .gitignore|1 + perl-Mojolicious.spec |5 - sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2

Broken dependencies: perl-PDL

2014-04-20 Thread buildsys
perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the epel-7 tree: On ppc64: perl-PDL-2.7.0-2.el7.1.ppc64 requires perl(PDL::Slatec) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

Broken dependencies: mojomojo

2014-04-20 Thread buildsys
mojomojo has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch requires perl(HTML::FormFu::Element::reCAPTCHA) On i386: mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch requires perl(HTML::FormFu::Element::reCAPTCHA) On armhfp: mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch

Broken dependencies: perl-Language-Expr

2014-04-20 Thread buildsys
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On i386: perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On armhfp:

File Digest-Bcrypt-1.0.1.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ddick

2014-04-20 Thread David Dick
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Digest-Bcrypt: 3b1a32e367b87d7e4831e453f02c6bf7 Digest-Bcrypt-1.0.1.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-Digest-Bcrypt] Initial import (#1089178.)

2014-04-20 Thread David Dick
commit 8e88ee705a76ee505ccb1ded73ee52d7ae6e4dde Author: David Dick dd...@cpan.org Date: Mon Apr 21 11:22:18 2014 +1000 Initial import (#1089178.) .gitignore |1 + perl-Digest-Bcrypt.spec | 55 +++ sources |

[perl-Digest-Bcrypt/f20] Initial import (#1089178.)

2014-04-20 Thread David Dick
Summary of changes: 8e88ee7... Initial import (#1089178.) (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-Digest-Bcrypt/el6] Initial import (#1089178.)

2014-04-20 Thread David Dick
Summary of changes: 8e88ee7... Initial import (#1089178.) (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

File Date-Easter-1.20.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ddick

2014-04-20 Thread David Dick
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Date-Easter: 7f0071866e0a805ca9c8dec92d24f64c Date-Easter-1.20.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-Date-Easter] Initial import (#1082193).

2014-04-20 Thread David Dick
commit 5a1eb94e4e2038e1c390f4b76c6bc6aef5abdb88 Author: David Dick dd...@cpan.org Date: Mon Apr 21 12:01:09 2014 +1000 Initial import (#1082193). .gitignore|1 + perl-Date-Easter.spec | 48 sources |1 +

[perl-Date-Easter/f20] Initial import (#1082193).

2014-04-20 Thread David Dick
Summary of changes: 5a1eb94... Initial import (#1082193). (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-Date-Easter/el6] Initial import (#1082193).

2014-04-20 Thread David Dick
Summary of changes: 5a1eb94... Initial import (#1082193). (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org