Re: octave 4.2 update in rawhide

Thanks for your work. Hope we will see Octave 4.2 in f24, f25 too. ср, 7 дек. 2016 г. в 8:51, Orion Poplawski : > The hdf5 update prompted me to (perhaps too hastily) update octave to > 4.2 in rawhide as well. This unfortunately has led to the need to > rework the octave

Re: mutter broken in Rawhide

On Wed, 2016-12-07 at 06:21 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Kamil Paral wrote: > > This serves as a nice example why we need to tweak how Rawhide works if we > > want people actually running on it. > > And why do we need that? Rawhide is a place to do development, not a rolling > release distro. >

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Fedora 26 C/C++ Compilation Flags Updates - warning

On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 9:01 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 12/06/2016 08:27 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >> >> On 12/06/2016 04:44 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: >> >>> I've run into a reasonable number of failures of (custom) configure >>> checks due to this. Mainly calling exit()

Re: Dealing with the toolchain detection issue breaking Rawhide (#1401231)

Colin Walters wrote: > What I've been doing for years now is to carry a baseline set of > "warnings that must be errors" in my projects, like: > > https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/blob/master/configure.ac#L19 This makes sense, but: ewww, -Werror=declaration-after-statement, do you really

Re: Dealing with the toolchain detection issue breaking Rawhide (#1401231)

Adam Williamson wrote: > Yes, it's really bad. Look at the list of bugs marked as depending on > it: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1393164 (owncloud) > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401172 (libldb) > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401175 (libtdb) >

octave 4.2 update in rawhide

The hdf5 update prompted me to (perhaps too hastily) update octave to 4.2 in rawhide as well. This unfortunately has led to the need to rework the octave package build/install macros. I have what I hope is a fix building now (octave-4.2.0-2). I've tested it with a simple octave package on

Re: My package has stopped building on rawhide

On Wed, 2016-12-07 at 06:08 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Jerry James wrote: > > This means that you've run afoul of > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Fedora26CFlags. I suspect that > > a lot of configure scripts are going to break due to that change. To > > fix it, patch that configure

[Bug 1379566] perl-Razor-Agent-2.85-23.fc26 FTBFS randomly: Can' t write-open blib/man5/razor-agent.conf.5: No such file or directory

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379566 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1400755] perl-Pod-Simple-3.35 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1400755 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

Re: mutter broken in Rawhide

Kamil Paral wrote: > This serves as a nice example why we need to tweak how Rawhide works if we > want people actually running on it. And why do we need that? Rawhide is a place to do development, not a rolling release distro. > So, we either need: > a) updates-testing for Rawhide - e.g. with

Re: My package has stopped building on rawhide

Jerry James wrote: > This means that you've run afoul of > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Fedora26CFlags. I suspect that > a lot of configure scripts are going to break due to that change. To > fix it, patch that configure test to include whichever header file > declares

Re: Fedora captive portal page changed output :(

On Sun, 4 Dec 2016 19:44:22 -0500 (EST) Paul Wouters wrote: > On Sun, 4 Dec 2016, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 21:42:07 -0600 > > Eric Sandeen wrote: > > > >> On 12/2/16 7:10 PM, Paul Wouters wrote: > >>> > >>> Fedora runs a captive portal

Re: Announcement: DNF port of livecd-creator

On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 10:22 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Adam Williamson wrote: >> Dennis has untagged this from Rawhide for now, as it broke ARM disk >> image composes. > > That is probably Neal's fix to make -foo actually exclude foo from the > compose. That is required to

Re: Announcement: DNF port of livecd-creator

Adam Williamson wrote: > Dennis has untagged this from Rawhide for now, as it broke ARM disk > image composes. That is probably Neal's fix to make -foo actually exclude foo from the compose. That is required to make -foo work with weak dependencies, i.e., for when something Recommends: foo or

[Bug 1400185] perl-Mail-JMAPTalk-0.04 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1400185 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Mail-JMAPTalk-0.06-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1401923] perl-Mail-JMAPTalk-0.06 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401923 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Mail-JMAPTalk-0.06-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1400185] perl-Mail-JMAPTalk-0.04 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1400185 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1385005] Upgrade perl-Proc-PID-File to 1.28

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385005 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1401923] perl-Mail-JMAPTalk-0.06 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401923 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1384999] Upgrade perl-Net-IMAP-Simple to 1.2207

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1384999 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

Re: Dealing with the toolchain detection issue breaking Rawhide (#1401231)

On Tue, Dec 6, 2016, at 08:26 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > An alternative proposal: add a opt-out/opt-in flag (similar to > _hardened_build) > %global _strict_c_flags 0/1 What I've been doing for years now is to carry a baseline set of "warnings that must be errors" in my projects,

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 517 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031 python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6 511 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168 rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6 442

Re: Dealing with the toolchain detection issue breaking Rawhide (#1401231)

On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 11:24:41AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > So, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401231 seems to be > basically breaking everything in Rawhide at present. > > Rather than having a bug where people are trying to figure out on the > fly how to deal with the RPM

Re: C++ build errors

Thanks! I'll take a look into the port guide. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1402179] New: perl-Term-ProgressBar-2.18 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1402179 Bug ID: 1402179 Summary: perl-Term-ProgressBar-2.18 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Term-ProgressBar Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1400921] [perl-Text-BibTeX] test failures on s390x

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1400921 --- Comment #2 from Colin Macdonald --- I looked at this a bit but I'm stumped so filed upstream https://github.com/ambs/Text-BibTeX/issues/16 This bit is suspicious: Wide character in print at

Re: Fedora Rawhide-20161203.n.0 compose check report

On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 10:08:29PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Installed system changes in test x86_64 Everything-boot-iso > > install_default: > > 11 packages(s) added since previous compose: audit-libs-python, > > checkpolicy, firewalld-selinux, libcgroup, libselinux-python, > >

Re: Announcement: DNF port of livecd-creator

On Tue, 2016-12-06 at 11:55 -0800, Brian C. Lane wrote: > Thanks to Kevin and Neal for their work on this. Builds for rawhide are > done. If folks could give 'em a test drive and see if there are any > glitches that'd be good. I'll backport the build to 25 and 24 later this > week if nothing

cbm pushed to biber (master). "add BR"

From 8f9f3adfcf9c0b668f190819e27dbc5d6c8b769c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Colin B. Macdonald" Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 15:28:21 -0800 Subject: add BR --- biber.spec | 6 -- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/biber.spec b/biber.spec index

Re: Some preliminary Fedora 25 stats — and future release scheduling

On Tue, 2016-12-06 at 16:47 -0500, Gerald Henriksen wrote: > So you restrict a .1 release to anything critical to the running of > the OS, and let the apps upgrade as they want. You say that like it's something trivial, rather than something we've spent (by my count) about 4 years trying to

Re: future of official optical media support in Fedora

On Tue, 2016-12-06 at 23:57 +0100, Michal Schorm wrote: > It sounds reasonable to take a while and think about, who use wich media, > and why we make it. > > 1) As was said, ask server images users, how they prefer and how they > actually install Fedora and make decision based on it. > > 2) Just

Re: future of official optical media support in Fedora

It sounds reasonable to take a while and think about, who use wich media, and why we make it. 1) As was said, ask server images users, how they prefer and how they actually install Fedora and make decision based on it. 2) Just a thought - would it be more efficient to test ISOs in VMs to some

[EPEL-devel] %_pkgdocdir in EPEL

%_pkgdocdir was added in RHEL7.3, but incorrectly - see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392354 I've added a fixed version to epel-rpm-macros - https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/epel-rpm-macros-7-11 And went ahead and added it for EPEL6 as well:

Re: Dealing with the toolchain detection issue breaking Rawhide (#1401231)

On Tue, 2016-12-06 at 23:02 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 12/06/2016 09:28 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > Well, assuming you're including ldb and tdb in 'samba', no, I don't > > think we know that yet. > > libldb and libtdb use waf, the Samba build system, and are closely > related to

Re: Fedora Rawhide-20161203.n.0 compose check report

On Sun, 2016-12-04 at 22:08 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sat, 2016-12-03 at 13:56 +, Fedora compose checker wrote: > > > > Installed system changes in test x86_64 Everything-boot-iso > > install_default: > > 11 packages(s) added since previous compose: audit-libs-python, > >

Re: Dealing with the toolchain detection issue breaking Rawhide (#1401231)

On 12/06/2016 09:28 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: Well, assuming you're including ldb and tdb in 'samba', no, I don't think we know that yet. libldb and libtdb use waf, the Samba build system, and are closely related to Samba. If it were just Samba, fixing Samba would be the right course of

cbm pushed to biber (master). "Noticed another test dependency when building on rawhide VM"

From 52f5a1ec78c44a7939b2b35675e7f30017e19518 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Colin B. Macdonald" Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 12:54:37 -0800 Subject: Noticed another test dependency when building on rawhide VM --- biber.spec | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git

cbm pushed to biber (master). "Another hash change in test"

From 5b453e5a12c098b374a0406135e7358d582f3f71 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Colin B. Macdonald" Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 12:54:23 -0800 Subject: Another hash change in test --- biber-updated-u-c-which-needed-test-updates.patch | 9 + 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) diff

Re: Some preliminary Fedora 25 stats — and future release scheduling

On 6 December 2016 at 09:00, Kamil Paral wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 05:01:24PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: >> > There is another problem with .0...N releases. As soon as you version >> > your main release like that, everyone assumes .0 is unstable or broken >> > and they

Re: Release validation NG: planning thoughts

On Mon, 2016-12-05 at 11:39 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > One interesting thought I had, though - should we store the *test > cases* in the middleware 'validate/report' thing I've been describing > here, or should we store them in ResultsDB? Er, sorry, to be clear here, by 'store the test

Re: Dealing with the toolchain detection issue breaking Rawhide (#1401231)

On Tue, 2016-12-06 at 21:15 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1393164 (owncloud) > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401172 (libldb) > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401175 (libtdb) > >

Re: Some preliminary Fedora 25 stats — and future release scheduling

On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 09:00:35AM -0500, Kamil Paral wrote: > With my QA hat on, I believe using decimal releases (integers, > characters or anything else) is a bad idea. The reason is that people > don't remember it. Most people remember whether they have Fedora Assuming we're generally leading

Re: Dealing with the toolchain detection issue breaking Rawhide (#1401231)

On 12/06/2016 08:50 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Tue, 2016-12-06 at 20:41 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: On 12/06/2016 08:36 PM, James Hogarth wrote: On 6 December 2016 at 19:24, Adam Williamson wrote: So, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401231 seems

Re: Some preliminary Fedora 25 stats — and future release scheduling

On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 09:11:06AM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > I expect we'd also rebase the virtualization stack in any .1 release, > or even in the middle of a release if Fedora switched to a yearly > major release cycle. 6+ months is already a long time to wait to push > out new features

Re: Announcement: DNF port of livecd-creator

Thanks to Kevin and Neal for their work on this. Builds for rawhide are done. If folks could give 'em a test drive and see if there are any glitches that'd be good. I'll backport the build to 25 and 24 later this week if nothing serious shows up. -- Brian C. Lane (PST8PDT)

[Bug 1367848] razor2 check failed, invalid argument since upgrade to FC24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367848 --- Comment #9 from Adam Williamson --- razor seems to work fine on F25 with selinux-policy from updates-testing, for me. maillog shows lots of RAZOR2_* checks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

Re: Dealing with the toolchain detection issue breaking Rawhide (#1401231)

On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 08:41:46PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 12/06/2016 08:36 PM, James Hogarth wrote: > >On 6 December 2016 at 19:24, Adam Williamson > >wrote: > >>So, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401231 seems to be > >>basically breaking

Re: Dealing with the toolchain detection issue breaking Rawhide (#1401231)

On Tue, 2016-12-06 at 20:41 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 12/06/2016 08:36 PM, James Hogarth wrote: > > On 6 December 2016 at 19:24, Adam Williamson > > wrote: > > > So, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401231 seems to be > > > basically breaking

[Bug 1367848] razor2 check failed, invalid argument since upgrade to FC24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367848 d...@islenet.com changed: What|Removed |Added Version|24 |25 --- Comment #8 from

Re: future of official optical media support in Fedora

Hello all, I would favour to make optical media issues blockers for beta so they'll be (hopefully) solved by the time of the final release. My 2 cents. Sylvia On 06/12/16 16:28, Matthew Miller wrote: On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 09:43:18AM -0500, Kamil Paral wrote: So, I wonder whether

Re: Dealing with the toolchain detection issue breaking Rawhide (#1401231)

On 12/06/2016 08:36 PM, James Hogarth wrote: On 6 December 2016 at 19:24, Adam Williamson wrote: So, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401231 seems to be basically breaking everything in Rawhide at present. Rather than having a bug where people are

Re: Dealing with the toolchain detection issue breaking Rawhide (#1401231)

On 6 December 2016 at 19:24, Adam Williamson wrote: > So, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401231 seems to be > basically breaking everything in Rawhide at present. > > Rather than having a bug where people are trying to figure out on the > fly how to deal

cbm pushed to biber (master). "Cherry-pick upstream commit for #1401750"

From 6b4bb3627e9bfd01c8fb91fd16de7d4e83c214f8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Colin B. Macdonald" Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 11:33:23 -0800 Subject: Cherry-pick upstream commit for #1401750 --- biber-updated-u-c-which-needed-test-updates.patch | 1414 + biber.spec

Dealing with the toolchain detection issue breaking Rawhide (#1401231)

So, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401231 seems to be basically breaking everything in Rawhide at present. Rather than having a bug where people are trying to figure out on the fly how to deal with the RPM macro change, and probably more packages are getting rebuilt and broken all

[Bug 1401731] perl-Business-ISMN-1.131 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401731 --- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- cbm's perl-Business-ISMN-1.131-1.fc26 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=823282 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1401732] perl-Business-ISSN-1.002 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401732 --- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- cbm's perl-Business-ISSN-1.002-1.fc26 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=823279 -- You are receiving this mail

cbm pushed to perl-Business-ISMN (master). "Version bump, #1401731"

From f2ad8c641e0d9e658241a3e8a5ecbc3a03a4430a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Colin B. Macdonald" Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 11:07:19 -0800 Subject: Version bump, #1401731 --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Business-ISMN.spec | 12 sources | 2 +-

cbm uploaded Business-ISMN-1.131.tar.gz for perl-Business-ISMN

87e36c8ccc9a9434494a849b7cf2fcc5 Business-ISMN-1.131.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Business-ISMN/Business-ISMN-1.131.tar.gz/md5/87e36c8ccc9a9434494a849b7cf2fcc5/Business-ISMN-1.131.tar.gz ___ perl-devel mailing list

cbm pushed to perl-Business-ISSN (master). "Version bump, #1401732, #1400099"

From 1a7a07e11b8ce83d7ae1585b85a2daa025d2ca25 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Colin B. Macdonald" Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 10:55:35 -0800 Subject: Version bump, #1401732, #1400099 --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Business-ISSN.spec | 7 +-- sources | 2 +-

cbm uploaded Business-ISSN-1.002.tar.gz for perl-Business-ISSN

c226db6cdb9dfe77d17ad1d540b49f47 Business-ISSN-1.002.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Business-ISSN/Business-ISSN-1.002.tar.gz/md5/c226db6cdb9dfe77d17ad1d540b49f47/Business-ISSN-1.002.tar.gz ___ perl-devel mailing list

[EPEL-devel] Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPSCO meeting

Actually with people at LISA and PHX2 I was going to ask if people wanted to skip this weeks meeting. On 6 December 2016 at 13:00, wrote: > Dear all, > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: >EPSCO meeting on 2016-12-07 from 18:00:00 to 19:00:00 GMT >At

Re: future of official optical media support in Fedora

On Tue, 2016-12-06 at 09:20 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > So an alternative to kparal's scheme would be to try and consider this, > and say we test: > > * Workstation live > * Everything netinst > * Server DVD Or we could simply state that required coverage is 'one release- blocking live, one

Re: future of official optical media support in Fedora

On Tue, 2016-12-06 at 10:28 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > > > Idea #2: Do not block on optical media issues for Final release for > > certain flavors/image types (Server, netinst) > >

Re: future of official optical media support in Fedora

On Tue, 2016-12-06 at 15:00 +, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > W dniu 06.12.2016 o 14:43, Kamil Paral pisze: > > > All of that is, of course, motivated by trying to spend QA time more > > effectively. You can see the current coverage e.g. in this table [2], > > overall we burn 6 DVDs and perform

Re: how does Fedora 24 x86_64 boot on EFI-32?

On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 1:56 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Jack Howarth > wrote: >>While evaluating various Linux distributions for repurposing a >> MacBook Pro 2,1 as a Linux box, I was pleasantly

Re: I'd like to take ownership of Orpie

On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 05:47:16PM +, Jared L Wallace wrote: >This package has been retired for some time. I've updated it and gotten it >reviewed and approved. >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382152 > >Kind regards, >JARED L. WALLACE Hi Jared, welcome

Re: Review Swap

I take review as swap: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397089 On 6 December 2016 at 19:18, Greg Hellings wrote: > I'm looking to get a review on this package: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1393947 > > I'm willing to swap with someone if

[Bug 1385005] Upgrade perl-Proc-PID-File to 1.28

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385005 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Proc-PID-File-1.28-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-abbc537002 -- You are receiving this

Review Swap

I'm looking to get a review on this package: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1393947 I'm willing to swap with someone if needed. --Greg ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

jplesnik pushed to perl-Proc-PID-File (f25). "1.28 bump"

From f496bb66e6d7cebe4c6fd31779bf873258d8b7f8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 17:08:18 +0100 Subject: 1.28 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Proc-PID-File.spec | 40 ++-- sources

[Bug 1385005] Upgrade perl-Proc-PID-File to 1.28

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385005 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED

jplesnik pushed to perl-Proc-PID-File (master). "1.28 bump"

From a3e5088f28e52782fe58d5f5c7ab515a9f099271 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 17:08:18 +0100 Subject: 1.28 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Proc-PID-File.spec | 40 ++-- sources

jplesnik uploaded Proc-PID-File-1.28.tar.gz for perl-Proc-PID-File

95eecf95264c6a1d0b3371e3765c68b7 Proc-PID-File-1.28.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Proc-PID-File/Proc-PID-File-1.28.tar.gz/md5/95eecf95264c6a1d0b3371e3765c68b7/Proc-PID-File-1.28.tar.gz ___ perl-devel mailing list --

mitr pushed to perl-IPTables-ChainMgr (perl-IPTables-ChainMgr-1.6-1.fc26). "Update to IPTables-ChainMgr-1.6"

From 2ac2b18a5ee4cb3c8419f88348cdb1405be90ac2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Miloslav=20Trma=C4=8D?= Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 16:51:13 +0100 Subject: Update to IPTables-ChainMgr-1.6 --- .gitignore | 2 ++ perl-IPTables-ChainMgr.spec | 7 +-- sources

mitr pushed to perl-IPTables-ChainMgr (master). "Update to IPTables-ChainMgr-1.6"

From 2ac2b18a5ee4cb3c8419f88348cdb1405be90ac2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Miloslav=20Trma=C4=8D?= Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 16:51:13 +0100 Subject: Update to IPTables-ChainMgr-1.6 --- .gitignore | 2 ++ perl-IPTables-ChainMgr.spec | 7 +-- sources

mitr uploaded IPTables-ChainMgr-1.6.tar.bz2.asc for perl-IPTables-ChainMgr

e051ea4eacc2fb36c41c01a7298c838a IPTables-ChainMgr-1.6.tar.bz2.asc http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-IPTables-ChainMgr/IPTables-ChainMgr-1.6.tar.bz2.asc/md5/e051ea4eacc2fb36c41c01a7298c838a/IPTables-ChainMgr-1.6.tar.bz2.asc ___

mitr uploaded IPTables-ChainMgr-1.6.tar.bz2 for perl-IPTables-ChainMgr

fc8fa67186b9a048ba64bb0d38fbed44 IPTables-ChainMgr-1.6.tar.bz2 http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-IPTables-ChainMgr/IPTables-ChainMgr-1.6.tar.bz2/md5/fc8fa67186b9a048ba64bb0d38fbed44/IPTables-ChainMgr-1.6.tar.bz2 ___ perl-devel

[Bug 1390285] Upgrade perl-Term-ANSIColor to 4.06

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390285 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

Re: hdf5 1.8.18 update in rawhide

On 12/05/2016 07:53 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 12/05/2016 01:47 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: I'm building hdf5 1.8.18 for rawhide now. I'll be rebuilding all dependent packages afterwards. Scratch that - ppc64 test failures again. *sigh* should be sorted now and it is building --

jplesnik pushed to perl-Term-ANSIColor (master). "4.06 bump"

From 4e097412d183de6ee75440424836197f2d934fbb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 16:31:57 +0100 Subject: 4.06 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Term-ANSIColor.spec | 11 +-- sources | 2 +- 3 files

jplesnik uploaded Term-ANSIColor-4.06.tar.gz for perl-Term-ANSIColor

51fb530f0afed4213bd6154b11e421ff Term-ANSIColor-4.06.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Term-ANSIColor/Term-ANSIColor-4.06.tar.gz/md5/51fb530f0afed4213bd6154b11e421ff/Term-ANSIColor-4.06.tar.gz ___ perl-devel mailing list

Re: future of official optical media support in Fedora

On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 09:43:18AM -0500, Kamil Paral wrote: > So, I wonder whether Fedora as a project thinks about de-emphasizing > optical media a bit, and if it does, I'd make appropriate changes > even in our QA processes. Here are a couple of ideas that I consider > could be likely to happen

Re: C++ build errors

On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 02:51:14PM -, Jeremy Newton wrote: > Anyone have any idea what causes these errors? Trying to update a package and > it failed during a local test build in mock (f25): > > In file included from /usr/include/c++/6.2.1/stdlib.h:36:0, > from expr.ypp:5:

[Bug 1383672] perl-Dancer2-0.204001 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383672 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

[Bug 1384999] Upgrade perl-Net-IMAP-Simple to 1.2207

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1384999 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Net-IMAP-Simple-1.2207-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-ade5aedd9e -- You are receiving

jplesnik pushed to perl-Net-IMAP-Simple (f25). "1.2207 bump"

From d42c287081d46c006b771e7f96f58921769c8147 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 15:51:48 +0100 Subject: 1.2207 bump --- .gitignore| 1 + perl-Net-IMAP-Simple.spec | 7 +-- sources | 2 +- 3 files

[Bug 1384999] Upgrade perl-Net-IMAP-Simple to 1.2207

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1384999 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED

Re: future of official optical media support in Fedora

W dniu 06.12.2016 o 14:43, Kamil Paral pisze: > All of that is, of course, motivated by trying to spend QA time more > effectively. You can see the current coverage e.g. in this table [2], > overall we burn 6 DVDs and perform 12 optical installation (BIOS + > UEFI) for every release candidate

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Enable coredumpctl by default

On Tue, 2016-12-06 at 12:28 +0100, jfi...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > Thank you. The service watching journald for coredumps saved by > systemd-coredump already exists: > > http://abrt.readthedocs.io/en/latest/examples.html#getting-core-files > -from-systemd-coredumctl This. The change page does

jplesnik pushed to perl-Net-IMAP-Simple (master). "1.2207 bump"

From 739217171dfff99199a4e758f016fc7c2748099c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 15:51:48 +0100 Subject: 1.2207 bump --- .gitignore| 1 + perl-Net-IMAP-Simple.spec | 7 +-- sources | 2 +- 3 files

jplesnik uploaded Net-IMAP-Simple-1.2207.tar.gz for perl-Net-IMAP-Simple

6457a8eadad12c123baac365c3a79429 Net-IMAP-Simple-1.2207.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Net-IMAP-Simple/Net-IMAP-Simple-1.2207.tar.gz/md5/6457a8eadad12c123baac365c3a79429/Net-IMAP-Simple-1.2207.tar.gz ___ perl-devel

C++ build errors

Anyone have any idea what causes these errors? Trying to update a package and it failed during a local test build in mock (f25): In file included from /usr/include/c++/6.2.1/stdlib.h:36:0, from expr.ypp:5: /usr/include/c++/6.2.1/cstdlib:124:11: error: '::div_t' has not been

future of official optical media support in Fedora

Now that Fedora 25 is out of the door, I'd like to start a discussion about the future of officially-supported (meaning rigorously tested) optical media for future Fedora releases. Since I'm QA, I'm mainly interested in changes to our release criteria [1]. Let's start by saying I'm not asking

Re: failure of f24 to f25 upgrade

> Dependencies resolved. > === > = >  Package  Arch   VersionRepository > Size > === > = > Removing: >  

Re: mutter broken in Rawhide

> To all Rawhide users, be careful with update of mutter. It seems that > mutter-3.23.2-2.fc26 is broken [1], which prevents you from log in to > your system. Downgrade to mutter-3.23.1-2.fc26.x86_64 workarounded the > issues for me. > > > Vít > > > [1]

Re: Some preliminary Fedora 25 stats — and future release scheduling

> On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 05:01:24PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > > There is another problem with .0...N releases. As soon as you version > > your main release like that, everyone assumes .0 is unstable or broken > > and they wait for .1. Some wait for .2 (which doesn't exist in your > > proposal

Un-retiring QCad

Hi all. This is an un-retiring request for QCad on Fedora (https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/qcad/). Now upstream provides an open-source community edition version of QCad including files with following licenses: ## Main license: GPLv3 ## ## 3rd parties licenses: ## dxflib:

[Bug 1400185] perl-Mail-JMAPTalk-0.04 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1400185 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Mail-JMAPTalk-0.06-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-12ee3f5a1c -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1401923] perl-Mail-JMAPTalk-0.06 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401923 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Mail-JMAPTalk-0.06-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-ab2416ecdb -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1400185] perl-Mail-JMAPTalk-0.04 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1400185 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Mail-JMAPTalk-0.06-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-ab2416ecdb -- You are receiving this

  1   2   >