[389-devel] Please review: 50493 improve conntable allocation process

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50493 — Sincerely, William Brown Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server SUSE Labs ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 22 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-12f1eb1b1f tomcat-7.0.94-1.el6 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing dmlite-1.13.0-1.el6 gfal2-util-1.5.3-1.el6

[389-devel] Please review (somewhat urgent) 50492 connection allocation failure.

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50492 — Sincerely, William Brown Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server SUSE Labs ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

orphaning: comps-extras, goffice08

comps-extras: required by PackageKit goffice08: required by nip2, cutter Neither has required any significant maintenance if someone wants to pick them up. Bill ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 331 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3c9292b62d condor-8.6.11-1.el7 107 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-d2c1368294 cinnamon-3.6.7-5.el7 73

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2019-07-12 - 96% PASS

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2019/07/12/report-389-ds-base-1.4.1.5-20190711git7f58c06.fc30.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Heads up: No more snap plugin in gnome-software

On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 9:13 PM Robert Ancell wrote: > > Thanks Neal. > > Let me reassure you that we are committed to maintaining the G-S Snap plugin > and snapd-glib. We do want to ensure it’s available for any user of GNOME > Software that wishes to use Snaps, regardless of which distro they

[Bug 1726368] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.36 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1726368 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In

Re: Heads up: No more snap plugin in gnome-software

Thanks Neal. Let me reassure you that we are committed to maintaining the G-S Snap plugin and snapd-glib. We do want to ensure it’s available for any user of GNOME Software that wishes to use Snaps, regardless of which distro they are using. The Snap plugin is enabled in all Ubuntu releases so it

Re: Orphaning moby-engine (Docker)

On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 5:22 PM Olivier Lemasle wrote: > On Wednesday, 3 July 2019 19:56:47 CEST David Michael wrote: > > I have orphaned moby-engine, the community Docker package in Fedora, > > due to no longer working in a role where I can maintain it as part of > > the job. If anyone wants to

Please reconsider build dependency on pylint

Hello Python package maintainers. You might know that we are trying to rebuild the Python packages with Python 3.8. More info at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.8 As is usual with such Python upgrades, packages that parse the AST are imacted by the changes the most and they

Re: Lines disordered in mock's build.log

On 11. 07. 19 22:40, Rex Dieter wrote: Miro Hrončok wrote: Hello, I've noticed that last couple of weeks, I see disordered lines in mock's build.log. This happens constantly in local mock, copr and Koji. Example: Are you using %make_build or at least 'make -O' ? just 'make %{?_smp_mflags}'

Re: Heads up: No more snap plugin in gnome-software

On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 at 21:02, Neal Gompa wrote: > If an update occurs even within stable > releases, I would expect it to have a chance to break. We don't break plugin ABI in stable GNOME releases. e.g. 3.32.1 will be the same internal ABI as 3.32.x. In development releases (e.g. 3.33.x) all

Re: Orphaning moby-engine (Docker)

On 7/11/19 4:32 PM, Olivier Lemasle wrote: > On Wednesday, 3 July 2019 19:56:47 CEST David Michael wrote: >> I have orphaned moby-engine, the community Docker package in Fedora, >> due to no longer working in a role where I can maintain it as part of >> the job. If anyone wants to take it, it is

Re: Lines disordered in mock's build.log

Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hello, > > I've noticed that last couple of weeks, I see disordered lines in mock's > build.log. This happens constantly in local mock, copr and Koji. Example: Are you using %make_build or at least 'make -O' ? just 'make %{?_smp_mflags}' does have chances of getting

Re: Orphaning moby-engine (Docker)

On Wednesday, 3 July 2019 19:56:47 CEST David Michael wrote: > > I have orphaned moby-engine, the community Docker package in Fedora, > due to no longer working in a role where I can maintain it as part of > the job. If anyone wants to take it, it is up to date in F30 and > rawhide branches (F29

Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2019-07-12)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Friday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2019-07-12 15:00 UTC' Links to all issues to be

Re: Heads up: No more snap plugin in gnome-software

On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 2:37 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Thu, 2019-07-11 at 13:14 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 11:34 AM Richard Hughes wrote: > > > On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 at 14:52, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > My understanding of the situation was that Canonical is

Re: Heads up: No more snap plugin in gnome-software

On Thu, 2019-07-11 at 13:14 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 11:34 AM Richard Hughes wrote: > > On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 at 14:52, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > My understanding of the situation was that Canonical is working on a > > > separate experience tailored for Ubuntu because they

Re: Heads up: No more snap plugin in gnome-software

Ideally, this would be submitted as a Change proposal, but I don't think it really matters. I would ask you to file an issue for the Release Notes[1] so it can be communicated to the public (unless someone else steps forward and maintains it so you don't have to). [1]

Re: Heads up: No more snap plugin in gnome-software

On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 11:34 AM Richard Hughes wrote: > > On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 at 14:52, Neal Gompa wrote: > > My understanding of the situation was that Canonical is working on a > > separate experience tailored for Ubuntu because they have extra needs, > > but all of it was built on GNOME

Review swap

Hello, I'd like a review for go2rpm: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1729235 I can do any review in exchange. Best regards, Robert-André ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: RPM building on s390x sometimes is very slow on F-30+

On 7/11/19 4:13 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 at 06:47, Philip Kovacs via devel < > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > >> It's likely the big endian emulation running on little endian machines >> which is killing performance. >> I also have some time sensitive package

Re: [Fedora-spins] roundup of failing images for 2019-07-07

On 7/7/19 9:31 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 1:44 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> >> So, what better way to relax on a sunday than to look at image compose >> failures? :) >> >> 1. The armv7 workstation compose: >> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=36106518 >> >>

Re: Fedora 31 Self-Contained Change proposal: Bundler 2.0

On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 5:09 PM Jun Aruga wrote: > > There are 2 Ruby modules 2.5 and 2.6. > Ruby 2.5 module has rubygem-bundler in it. > How about keeping the rubygem-bundler as 1.X? Guidelines say that if you want multiple versions, unversioned version should be the latest. So rubygem-bundler

Re: Lines disordered in mock's build.log

On 01. 07. 19 15:53, Fabio Valentini wrote: On Mon, Jul 1, 2019, 15:42 Miro Hrončok > wrote: Hello, I've noticed that last couple of weeks, I see disordered lines in mock's build.log. This happens constantly in local mock, copr and Koji. Example:

Re: RPM building on s390x sometimes is very slow on F-30+

On Thu, Jul 11, 2019, 6:06 AM Peter Lemenkov wrote: > Hello All, > Not sure if it's only me but every time I'm trying to build Erlang on > F-30 or Rawhide it takes forever to complete. It's all started > relatively recently (maybe a month or two). See the following logs for > the example. > > *

Re: MPFR 4

On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 4:14 AM James Paul Turner wrote: > That seems appropriate. We need to discuss this with pcahyna. I have > CCd him. Pavel, please see above. > > To avoid this issue in the future, is it possible to have the two > separate packages maintained by separate teams, or is that

Re: Heads up: No more snap plugin in gnome-software

On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 at 14:52, Neal Gompa wrote: > My understanding of the situation was that Canonical is working on a > separate experience tailored for Ubuntu because they have extra needs, > but all of it was built on GNOME Software in the first place. No, it's also a new codebase:

Re: Fedora 31 Self-Contained Change proposal: Bundler 2.0

There are 2 Ruby modules 2.5 and 2.6. Ruby 2.5 module has rubygem-bundler in it. How about keeping the rubygem-bundler as 1.X? -- Jun Aruga | He - His - Him ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Fedora 31 Self-Contained Change proposal: Bundler 2.0

Thanks for clarifying! On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 1:34 PM Pavel Valena wrote: > > - Original Message - > > From: "Vít Ondruch" > > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2019 8:45:12 AM > > Subject: Re: Fedora 31 Self-Contained Change proposal: Bundler 2.0 > > > > >

Re: Heads up: No more snap plugin in gnome-software

On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 8:22 AM Richard Hughes wrote: > > Hi all, > > In Fedora 31 I'll be disabling the snap plugin from GNOME Software. > It's never been enabled in RHEL and so this change only affects > Fedora. It's also not installed by default and so this change should > only affect a few

Re: Fedora 31 Self-Contained Change proposal: Limit Scriptlet Usage of core packages

> I disagree about the user/group creation, at least the way it's being > planned in here. > > The way openSUSE solved this problem probably makes sense for dealing > with issues like needing the users+groups to exist before package is > being installed: > > 1. sysusers are in their own

Re: Fedora 31 Self-Contained Change proposal: Limit Scriptlet Usage of core packages

On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 4:26 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 03:19:43AM -0400, James Antill wrote: > > On Tue, 2019-07-02 at 10:22 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > > > > I love the goal, but this document says very little about the means > > > to

Heads up: No more snap plugin in gnome-software

Hi all, In Fedora 31 I'll be disabling the snap plugin from GNOME Software. It's never been enabled in RHEL and so this change only affects Fedora. It's also not installed by default and so this change should only affect a few people. It's also not really a FutureFeature, it's a RemovalOfFeature

Re: RPM building on s390x sometimes is very slow on F-30+

On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 12:33:58 +0200 Dan Horák wrote: > On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 10:11:40 + (UTC) > Philip Kovacs via devel wrote: > > > It's likely the big endian emulation running on little endian > > machines which is killing performance.  I also have some time > > sensitive package tests

Re: RPM building on s390x sometimes is very slow on F-30+

On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 at 06:47, Philip Kovacs via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > It's likely the big endian emulation running on little endian machines > which is killing performance. > I also have some time sensitive package tests failing on s390x. > I am a bit confused by what

Re: Fedora 31 Self-Contained Change proposal: Bundler 2.0

- Original Message - > From: "Vít Ondruch" > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2019 8:45:12 AM > Subject: Re: Fedora 31 Self-Contained Change proposal: Bundler 2.0 > > > > I think that we will end-up with this slightly edited version of the proposal > :) > >

Re: RPM building on s390x sometimes is very slow on F-30+

On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 10:11:40 + (UTC) Philip Kovacs via devel wrote: > It's likely the big endian emulation running on little endian > machines which is killing performance.  I also have some time > sensitive package tests failing on s390x.   On Thursday, July 11, there is no emulation

Re: RPM building on s390x sometimes is very slow on F-30+

It's likely the big endian emulation running on little endian machines which is killing performance.  I also have some time sensitive package tests failing on s390x.   On Thursday, July 11, 2019, 05:30:28 AM EDT, Peter Lemenkov wrote: Hello All, Not sure if it's only me but every

RPM building on s390x sometimes is very slow on F-30+

Hello All, Not sure if it's only me but every time I'm trying to build Erlang on F-30 or Rawhide it takes forever to complete. It's all started relatively recently (maybe a month or two). See the following logs for the example. * https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=36131019 *

Re: Fedora 31 Self-Contained Change proposal: Limit Scriptlet Usage of core packages

On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 03:19:43AM -0400, James Antill wrote: > On Tue, 2019-07-02 at 10:22 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > > I love the goal, but this document says very little about the means > > to achieve that goal. I would like to see specific solutions > > described for each

Re: Fedora 31 Self-Contained Change proposal: Bundler 2.0

I think that we will end-up with this slightly edited version of the proposal :) > Keep Bundler 1.16 as rubygem-bundler1 subpackage of ruby package. The problem is that Ruby ships with bundled Bundler 1.x and RubyGems depends Bundler 1.x. Although I'm not sure how tight the coupling is :/