Re: Rewriting RPM macros using Lua

* Mark Wielaard: > Hi Florian, > > On Thu, 2021-04-29 at 16:33 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: >> I need to wrap find-debuginfo.sh because there is a single shared >> object >> in my package that must not be stripped. find-debuginfo.sh does not >> support that, and probably never will, at least not

Re: Outreachy Final Application help

Thank you so much Sir ___ qa-devel mailing list -- qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to qa-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List

Re: plocate?

(added mlocate maintainer msekleta in Ccs; hopefully that's a still valid address) Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote on Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 02:06:00PM +: > Debian is apparently switching to plocate as the the default > locate/mlocate provider [0], a bit faster and more disk-efficient. >

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-5b261a2216 nextcloud-client-3.1.3-1.el8 12 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-c18d19cbdc fluidsynth-2.1.8-3.el8 8

[Bug 1953837] perl-PDL-2.041 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953837 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|perl-PDL-2.040 is available |perl-PDL-2.041 is

[Bug 1952398] perl-SVG-2.86 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1952398 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1952135] perl-Module-ScanDeps-1.31 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1952135 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1951972] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20210420 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1951972 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2 |perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2

Fedora-IoT-34-20210429.1 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64), 1/15 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210423.0): ID: 873671 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/873671 Old failures (same test failed in

Re: New RPM submission

(fixed quoting) On Thursday, 29 April 2021 at 21:27, Joan Moreau via devel wrote: > On 2021-04-29 14:51, Qiyu Yan wrote: > > 在 2021-04-29星期四的 13:25 +0100，Joan Moreau via devel写道： > > > > > Concretely, how to "find a sponsor" ? [...] > > FYI: > >

Re: Fedora-Legal-README.txt in installation media outdated?

On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 11:03:08AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 28. 04. 21 22:40, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 02:12:15PM +0800, Qiyu Yan wrote: > > > If you download a Fedora 34 live iso at https://getfedora.org/ > > > with filename: Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-34-1.2.iso

Re: RPM name collisions

Le jeu. 29 avr. 2021 à 22:04, przemek klosowski via devel a écrit : >... > For completness, here are the remaining strange cases: > > openhantek.x86_64 2.06-1.fc31rpmfusion-nonfree > openhantek.x86_64 3.2-1.fc34 fedora I've fixed this one on f35+ for rpmfusion-nonfree. Package moved to

Re: Outreachy Final Application help

Thanks, timeline looks good. On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 3:09 PM Ngulefac Queeniva wrote: > i updated the recent one even more and came up with this. pls review it > sir > > > > Week 1-2 > -Discussion with mentors team members and finalizing the approach of the > project implementation > -Refactor

Re: RPM name collisions

przemek klosowski via devel wrote: > but the recent trend is to loosen up and increase the > repository set: rpmfusion, ROCm, packages-microsoft-com-prod are likely > to be used because they contain useful software. IMHO, everyone using the Microsoft repository is on their own. Isn't the whole

Re: F35 Change: Node.js 16.x by default (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 29. 04. 21 21:14, Ben Cotton wrote: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Nodejs16 == Summary == The latest release of Node.js to carry a 30-month lifecycle is the 16.x series. As with 14.x, 12.x, 10.x and 8.x before it, Fedora 35 will carry 16.x as the default Node.js interpreter for the

Re: The Death of Java (packages)

Hi, On 4/29/21 12:00 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > Hi Hans, > > On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 3:47 PM Hans de Goede wrote: >> Also I hope it is ok if I pick your brain a bit on a java >> packaging issue which I've been having. >> >> I maintain a couple of java leave packages (games) + some deps >>

Re: Rewriting RPM macros using Lua

Hi Florian, On Thu, 2021-04-29 at 16:33 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > I need to wrap find-debuginfo.sh because there is a single shared > object > in my package that must not be stripped. find-debuginfo.sh does not > support that, and probably never will, at least not in its current >

[389-devel] please review: UI - make sure dsconf always uses the LDAPI path and not the server ID

https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/pull/4743 -- 389 Directory Server Development Team ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Intention to dropping the the "Allow SSH root login with password" option from the installer GUI

Hi! At the moment the Anaconda installer used by Fedora contains an option called "Allow SSH root login with password" on the root password configuration screen. This is how it looks like at the moment, on latest Fedora Rawhide installer image:

[Bug 1778698] Non-responsive maintainer check for delete

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1778698 Matías Kreder changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 1778698] Non-responsive maintainer check for delete

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1778698 Matías Kreder changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value ---

RPM name collisions

Few weeks ago we had an announcement of a Python supply chain hack where people supplied libraries with names matching some private library names, which took precedence and overrode those private libraries, giving the hackers control. Now, the name collisions are built-in into RPM, because

Re: New RPM submission

THank you Isn´t there a muh more systemic (and simpler) process to push a RPM in the distribution ? On 2021-04-29 14:51, Qiyu Yan wrote: 在 2021-04-29星期四的 13:25 +0100，Joan Moreau via devel写道： Thank you Concretely, how to "find a sponsor" ? FYI:

F35 Change: Node.js 16.x by default (System-Wide Change proposal)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Nodejs16 == Summary == The latest release of Node.js to carry a 30-month lifecycle is the 16.x series. As with 14.x, 12.x, 10.x and 8.x before it, Fedora 35 will carry 16.x as the default Node.js interpreter for the system. The 14.x and 12.x interpreters

F35 Change: Node.js 16.x by default (System-Wide Change proposal)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Nodejs16 == Summary == The latest release of Node.js to carry a 30-month lifecycle is the 16.x series. As with 14.x, 12.x, 10.x and 8.x before it, Fedora 35 will carry 16.x as the default Node.js interpreter for the system. The 14.x and 12.x interpreters

[Bug 1955258] New: perl-Graphics-TIFF-12 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1955258 Bug ID: 1955258 Summary: perl-Graphics-TIFF-12 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Graphics-TIFF Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1379554] perl-XML-Twig: expand_external_ents option fails to work as documented [fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379554 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Version|32 |34 -- You are receiving this

REMINDER: Fedora Linux 32 End of Life on 2021-05-25

Fedora Linux 32 will reach EOL on Tuesday 25 May 2021. On this day, we will close all of the F32 bugs which remain open. You have a few weeks remaining to submit updates, if you have any, before the Fedora 32 release becomes unsupported. As a reminder, updates that are still in testing when EOL

REMINDER: Fedora Linux 32 End of Life on 2021-05-25

Fedora Linux 32 will reach EOL on Tuesday 25 May 2021. On this day, we will close all of the F32 bugs which remain open. You have a few weeks remaining to submit updates, if you have any, before the Fedora 32 release becomes unsupported. As a reminder, updates that are still in testing when EOL

[Bug 1835359] perl-Email-MIME: rubygem-mail: Out of memory issue through nested MIME parts [fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1835359 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Program Management --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 32 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 32 on 2021-05-25. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug

[Bug 1835354] perl-Email-MIME-ContentType: rubygem-mail: Out of memory issue through nested MIME parts [fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1835354 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Program Management --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 32 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 32 on 2021-05-25. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug

[Bug 1795179] Non-responsive maintainer check for ddick

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795179 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Program Management --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 32 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 32 on 2021-05-25. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug

[Bug 1778699] Non-responsive maintainer check for iarnell

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1778699 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Program Management --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 32 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 32 on 2021-05-25. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug

[Bug 1379554] perl-XML-Twig: expand_external_ents option fails to work as documented [fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379554 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Program Management --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 32 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 32 on 2021-05-25. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug

[Bug 1778698] Non-responsive maintainer check for delete

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1778698 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Program Management --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 32 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 32 on 2021-05-25. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug

[Bug 1887111] SELinux is preventing graph.cgi from read access on the directory cpu.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1887111 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Program Management --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 32 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 32 on 2021-05-25. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug

[Bug 1786000] Perl 5.30 always crashed at Perl__invlist_intersection_maybe_complement_2nd by segfault.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1786000 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Program Management --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 32 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 32 on 2021-05-25. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug

[Bug 1781757] Co-maintainer request (to maintain EPEL8 branch)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1781757 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Program Management --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 32 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 32 on 2021-05-25. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug

Re: Unretiring and maintaining the Fish Fillets NG game

On 4/29/21 11:19 AM, Kamil Paral wrote: On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 3:59 AM Nikolay Nikolov > wrote: What are the next steps for unretiring these two packages and maintaining them? Hey Nikolay, thanks for taking care of Fish Fillets, it's a great game (and also

[Bug 1781734] Co-maintainer request (to maintain EPEL8 branch)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1781734 Matías Kreder changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 1768805] perl-RDF-Trine for EL8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1768805 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On|1769774 | Referenced Bugs:

[Bug 1781205] XML::LibXSLT appears to suffer from latent libxml2's API misuse, only got exposed with libxml2 2.9.10

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1781205 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Program Management --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 32 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 32 on 2021-05-25. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug

[Bug 1781758] Co-maintainer request (to maintain EPEL8 branch)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1781758 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Program Management --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 32 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 32 on 2021-05-25. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug

[Bug 1781741] Co-maintainer request (to maintain EPEL8 branch)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1781741 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Program Management --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 32 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 32 on 2021-05-25. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug

[Bug 1781734] Co-maintainer request (to maintain EPEL8 branch)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1781734 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Program Management --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 32 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 32 on 2021-05-25. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug

[Bug 1748928] perl-PDL-2.19.0-8 FTBFS: proj-nad dependency does not exist

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748928 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Program Management --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 32 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 32 on 2021-05-25. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug

[Bug 1731721] perl-Font-AFM depends on files/directories from non-standard locations

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731721 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Program Management --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 32 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 32 on 2021-05-25. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug

[Bug 1731718] perl-Convert-Color depends on files/directories from non-standard locations

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731718 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Program Management --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 32 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 32 on 2021-05-25. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug

[Bug 1708214] Upgrade perl-Net-DNS-SEC to 1.17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1708214 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Program Management --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 32 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 32 on 2021-05-25. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug

[Bug 1581656] Please remove dependency on a2ps

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1581656 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Program Management --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 32 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 32 on 2021-05-25. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug

Re: mingw-gcc to 11.1 ?

On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 05:22:03PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: > > On 29.04.21 17:14, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > >This patch (attached, slightly different from the one I sent to you > >earlier) builds a package for me using 'fedpkg local'. > > > >What do you think? > > Yep, I also had to add

Re: mingw-gcc to 11.1 ?

On 29.04.21 17:14, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: This patch (attached, slightly different from the one I sent to you earlier) builds a package for me using 'fedpkg local'. What do you think? Yep, I also had to add g++-mapper-server, and the build succeeds. I'm performing a full chain gcc

Re: mingw-gcc to 11.1 ?

This patch (attached, slightly different from the one I sent to you earlier) builds a package for me using 'fedpkg local'. What do you think? Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog:

Rewriting RPM macros using Lua

I need to wrap find-debuginfo.sh because there is a single shared object in my package that must not be stripped. find-debuginfo.sh does not support that, and probably never will, at least not in its current shell-based incarnation. So I came up with this: %{lua: local wrapper =

Re: New RPM submission

在 2021-04-29星期四的 13:25 +0100，Joan Moreau via devel写道： > Thank you > Concretely, how to "find a sponsor" ? FYI: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group -- Qiyu Yan GPG keyid: 0x4FC914F065F2DF12 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed

Re: mingw-gcc to 11.1 ?

On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 02:44:12PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: > Hi Rich > > Last attempt stranded on [1], I haven't tried since but looks like > the bug is still open. If you want to give it a go, please do! Things seem to be going better here. I'm hitting: error: File not found:

Re: Heads-up: RPM 4.17 alpha coming to rawhide near you

On 29. 04. 21 14:23, Panu Matilainen wrote: On 4/29/21 11:58 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 26. 04. 21 12:36, Panu Matilainen wrote: It's spring, it's raining sleet where I live, and it's also the season for new rpm in rawhide. As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPM-4.17. The changes

Re: mingw-gcc to 11.1 ?

Hi Rich Last attempt stranded on [1], I haven't tried since but looks like the bug is still open. If you want to give it a go, please do! Many thanks Sandro [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97618 On 29.04.21 10:07, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: Hi Sandro, Are you planning to

Re: New RPM submission

Thank you Concretely, how to "find a sponsor" ? On 2021-04-27 22:19, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: * Joan Moreau [27/04/2021 20:51] : Hi Emmanuel I am trying my best to foloow the process but I get nowhere Now I get a "koji" error ("AuthError: unable to obtain a session") That looks like a

Re: Heads-up: RPM 4.17 alpha coming to rawhide near you

On 4/29/21 11:58 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 26. 04. 21 12:36, Panu Matilainen wrote: It's spring, it's raining sleet where I live, and it's also the season for new rpm in rawhide. As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPM-4.17. The changes to the macro subsystem internals have been

Re: Outreachy Final Application help

i updated the recent one even more and came up with this. pls review it sir Week 1-2 -Discussion with mentors team members and finalizing the approach of the project implementation -Refactor Code: -making components more reusable, that is : Moving class components to separate files -Make

Re: Spin maintainers attention required! Anaconda keyboard layout switching needs to change

Adding anaconda-devel list too. On Thu, 2021-04-29 at 12:26 +0200, jkone...@redhat.com wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I've just filed a bug with all the details about the topic so we can > start discussion there: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1955025 > > > I gave a short summary

Spin maintainers attention required! Anaconda keyboard layout switching needs to change

Hi everyone, I've just filed a bug with all the details about the topic so we can start discussion there: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1955025 I gave a short summary here. The libxklavier library will be deprecated from a future Fedora (it doesn't mean Fedora 35!). Anaconda and

Re: The Death of Java (packages)

Hi Hans, On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 3:47 PM Hans de Goede wrote: > Also I hope it is ok if I pick your brain a bit on a java > packaging issue which I've been having. > > I maintain a couple of java leave packages (games) + some deps > which AFAIK are only used by these games. > > One of these deps

Fedora-Cloud-32-20210429.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210428.0): ID: 873167 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

Re: Fedora-Legal-README.txt in installation media outdated?

On 28. 04. 21 22:40, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 02:12:15PM +0800, Qiyu Yan wrote: If you download a Fedora 34 live iso at https://getfedora.org/ with filename: Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-34-1.2.iso Mount it and see Fedora-Legal-README.txt in the image. There are many Fedora

Re: Heads-up: RPM 4.17 alpha coming to rawhide near you

On 26. 04. 21 12:36, Panu Matilainen wrote: It's spring, it's raining sleet where I live, and it's also the season for new rpm in rawhide. As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPM-4.17. The changes to the macro subsystem internals have been quite large, and while it's supposed to be

Fedora-IoT-35-20210429.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 3/16 (x86_64), 2/15 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210411.0): ID: 873134 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/873134 ID: 873135 Test: x86_64

[Test-Announce] Fedora-IoT 35 RC 20210429.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora-IoT 35 RC 20210429.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see:

Re: Unretiring and maintaining the Fish Fillets NG game

On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 3:59 AM Nikolay Nikolov wrote: > What are the next steps for unretiring these two packages and > maintaining them? > Hey Nikolay, thanks for taking care of Fish Fillets, it's a great game (and also from my country). Here I found the instructions for unretiring a package:

Fedora-Cloud-33-20210429.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210428.0): ID: 872895 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

mingw-gcc to 11.1 ?

Hi Sandro, Are you planning to update mingw-gcc to 11.1? The main gcc package was updated to this version yesterday: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gcc/commits/rawhide If not, then I would like to do it if you have no objections. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat

Fedora-Rawhide-20210428.n.1 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 11 of 43 required tests failed openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 32/189 (x86_64), 26/127 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in

Re: Where'd my package builds go?

Mamoru TASAKA kirjoitti 29.4.2021 klo 8.55: Greg Hellings wrote on 2021/04/29 14:46: So I built my package a few times for F34 in the Rawhide cycle (e.g. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-90a4c6ba11) It was rebuilt successfully by releng for F34 (e.g.

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 35 Rawhide 20210428.n.1 nightly compose nominated for testing

Workstation live & Server dvd ISOs work Everything boot does not work On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 6:03 AM wrote: > Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event > for Fedora 35 Rawhide 20210428.n.1. Please help run some tests for this > nightly compose if you have time. For