On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 9:08 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 8:13 PM Owen Taylor wrote:
> >
> > For years, Red Hat Linux / Fedora systems have had a umask of 0002 for
> > regular users as part of the "user private group" scheme [*]. Basically the
> > idea is that you can set a
On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 8:13 PM Owen Taylor wrote:
>
> For years, Red Hat Linux / Fedora systems have had a umask of 0002 for
> regular users as part of the "user private group" scheme [*]. Basically the
> idea is that you can set a directory group-sticky and use it as a common work
> area for
For years, Red Hat Linux / Fedora systems have had a umask of 0002 for
regular users as part of the "user private group" scheme [*]. Basically the
idea is that you can set a directory group-sticky and use it as a common
work area for a group of users.
A change a couple of years ago seems to have
Hi
I'll build openjpeg2-2.5.0 and gdal-3.5.0 for rawhide in the side tag
f37-build-side-53899. I've switched gdal to the new cmake based build,
and at the same time merged the mingw package with the native one. I'll
rebuild affected packages as listed below.
Thanks
Sandro
---
lizams
bes
Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
7 of 43 required tests failed, 9 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 24/231 (x86_64), 23/161 (aarch64)
New failures
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/15 (x86_64), 3/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20220516.0):
ID: 1274891 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1274891
ID: 1274898 Test: x86_64
rebuilt it asap
ImageMagick soname bump was approved [0] in EPEL Steering Committee
meeting. and I'm continuing with the process for incompatible upgrades
from step 4 forward [1]. and 81 security bugs will be fixed
[0]
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/teams/epel/epel.2022-04-13-20.00.html
[1]
Thank you Hans! Glad Fedora will remain relevant for keeping old hardware
useful. Happy to help any way I can.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of
On Fri, 20 May 2022 13:26:14 +0100
Simon Farnsworth via devel wrote:
> On Thursday, 19 May 2022 04:15:16 BST Hellosway Here via devel wrote:
> > Add `slab_nomerge init_on_alloc=1 init_on_free=1
> > page_alloc.shuffle=1 pti=on randomize_kstack_offset=on
> > vsyscall=none ` as default kernel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088266
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088259
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088264
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Fixed In Version|
On Fri, 20 May 2022 at 08:43, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On 20/05/2022 14:03, Jiri Vanek wrote:
> > As writtten several times - this si not true. It will eb always source
> > codebuilt in koji.
>
> From
On 20/05/2022 14:33, Jiri Vanek wrote:
Who shold hire them. You? Me? Fedoraproject?
Red Hat.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On 20/05/2022 14:28, Jiri Vanek wrote:
wait, what? What do you mean? And waht give you this impression?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MoveFedoraJDKsToBecomePortableJDKs:
> Make the normal rpms to not built jdk, but to repack the portable
rpms with all integration
Or are you already in the
On 20/05/2022 14:46, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
Exactly. So, you implied malicious intent where there was none.
we don't know for sure.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel mailing list --
On Wednesday, 18 May 2022 at 17:18, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 18/05/2022 17:04, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> > It generally means and is interpreted as 'not true with the intention of
> > deceiving'. 'incorrect' is considered 'not true'.
>
> The Oxford English Dictionary gives the
On 5/18/22 18:34, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 18/05/2022 17:51, jiri vanek wrote:
You can not put uncertified JDK to fedora.
Why not?
And we can no longer properly support certified dynamic builds
Hire new maintainers who can.
Who shold hire them. You? Me? Fedoraproject?
--
On 5/18/22 18:36, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 12:33 PM jiri vanek wrote:
Hi Neal!
We are participating on Wakefield too. Why do you think JDK in feora should
miss it ?
It does nto metter if it is static or dynamic one, it will just run correctly
under wayaland. Or do I miss
On 5/18/22 18:32, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 18/05/2022 18:01, Neal Gompa wrote:
At this point, I'd rather have an OpenJDK in Fedora than not. If that
means switching to bundled libraries, then fine. But all bundled
libraries need to be documented in the spec file and that information
On 5/18/22 19:14, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Wed, May 18 2022 at 12:01:33 PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
At this point, I'd rather have an OpenJDK in Fedora than not.
I'll bite: why? Just so that it's easily available via RPM? It's starting to sound like Fedora would be providing very little
On Thursday, 19 May 2022 04:15:16 BST Hellosway Here via devel wrote:
> Add `slab_nomerge init_on_alloc=1 init_on_free=1 page_alloc.shuffle=1 pti=on
> randomize_kstack_offset=on vsyscall=none ` as default kernel command line
> arguments. This can help prevent local exploits by making it harder to
On 20/05/2022 14:03, Jiri Vanek wrote:
As writtten several times - this si not true. It will eb always source
codebuilt in koji.
From https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MoveFedoraJDKsToBecomePortableJDKs:
Make the normal rpms to not built jdk, but to repack the portable rpms with all
On 5/18/22 18:22, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 6:04 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 11:55 AM jiri vanek wrote:
You can imagine TCK as gigantic and pretty good testsuite, runing 24hours with
quite complicated setup. The pull and setup and run is completely
On 5/18/22 18:01, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 11:55 AM jiri vanek wrote:
You can imagine TCK as gigantic and pretty good testsuite, runing 24hours with
quite complicated setup. The pull and setup and run is completely autoamted,
but it is a lot of HW you need (all
Just to repeat i one more times, and maybe a bit more loudly - the rendering
seems to be SAME for both static and dynamic linking.
Please anybody who complains in this thread, can yo have any proof that
dynamic linking really makes yor eyes bleed??
J.
On 5/18/22 15:48, Mario Torre wrote:
On 5/18/22 13:02, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 12:28 PM jiri vanek wrote:
Once, long ago, we were the leader in the Linux Java ecosystem, but
ironically as Red Hat's influence in OpenJDK grew, investment in
Fedora dwindled.
That really is not true. But maybe we were
Btw, I know this because I fixed a gazillion font related bugs in
OpenJDK in the past, most of which in the OpenJDK 6 and 7 era, I
rarely ever had to touch 8 or later.
I make my own IntelliJ packages for my own use that rips out their
Java runtime and uses Fedora's OpenJDK. :)
Idea still
I don't think so. The entire Java ecosystem on Fedora was destroyed by Fedora
Modularity. Volunteers tried several times to revive it but failed due to
opposition.
I personally heavily agree:((( The modularity was great idea, but worst
implementation ever.
And for java it was indeed death
On 5/18/22 17:31, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 11:28 AM Peter Boy wrote:
Am 18.05.2022 um 16:36 schrieb Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
:
On 18/05/2022 11:27, Peter Boy wrote:
We didn’t lost Eclipse, we switched from RPM to another distribution method.
The same with Netbeans.
On 5/18/22 14:40, Felix Schwarz wrote:
Am 18.05.22 um 11:27 schrieb Peter Boy:
We didn’t lost Eclipse, we switched from RPM to another distribution method.
Do you mean the Eclipse flatpak? I tried the flatpak but in the end went back
to upstream's plain binaries as the Flatpak does not
On 5/17/22 00:10, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 4:54 PM Andrew Hughes wrote:
Let me join the train of -1 votes. I consider this a step entirely in the
wrong direction. The JDK should be linked to system libraries wherever
possible just like our other packages. Language
On Sun, 2022-05-08 at 16:16 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-04-29 at 14:52 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > A qui, 28-04-2022 às 15:18 +0100, Sérgio Basto escreveu:
> > > On Thu, 2022-04-28 at 07:09 -0700, Troy Dawson wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 2:57 AM Sérgio
On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 1:42 AM Thomas Stephen Lee wrote:
>
> The package I need is redhat-lsb-core.
We have no plans to add redhat-lsb-core at this time. Most users are
able to port their software to use the fields in /etc/os-release.
josh
> On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 1:57 AM Josh Boyer wrote:
On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 1:42 AM Thomas Stephen Lee wrote:
>
> The package I need is redhat-lsb-core.
We have no plans to add redhat-lsb-core at this time. Most users are
able to port their software to use the fields in /etc/os-release.
josh
> On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 1:57 AM Josh Boyer wrote:
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 37 Rawhide 20220520.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220518.0):
ID: 1274437 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
Hi All,
Now that FESCo has decided (1) that Fedora will keep supporting BIOS
booting, the people working on Fedora's bootloader stack will need
help from the Fedora community to keep Fedora booting on systems which
require Legacy BIOS to boot.
To help with this the Fedora BIOS boot SIG (special
Hi everyone,
This is a weekly report from the CPE (Community Platform Engineering)
Team. If you have any questions or feedback, please respond to this
report or contact us on #redhat-cpe channel on libera.chat
(https://libera.chat/).
Week: 16th May - 20th May 2022
If you wish to read this
39 matches
Mail list logo
