https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149107
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-REST-Client-281-6.el9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173127
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-424636c7cb has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2172670
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-424636c7cb has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173461
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-e5b8a70a07 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
I am not sure whether by "all historical updates" you are only referring to all
updates being listed in updateinfo.xml, or all history generally (including old
packages). But in the latter case, note that keeping all updates massively
inflates the storage requirements for maintaining a copy of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173461
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-3bc4a051a0 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-3bc4a051a0
See also
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173292
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2172742
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173116
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-5e787667c6 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-5e787667c6
See also
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173461
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173127
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from
Dne 28. 02. 23 v 0:26 Jerry James napsal(a):
So I guess the script only checks the first line of the git commit
message, right?
Right. I thought that checking whole commit message may bring more false
positives.
Miroslav
___
devel mailing list --
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 4:23 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/packages-without-spdx-final.txt
>
> say:
>
> gap-pkg-ace warning: valid as old and new and no changelong entry, please
> check
>
> When I check
>
>
Dne 27. 02. 23 v 23:41 Jerry James napsal(a):
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 3:35 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
List by package maintainers is here
https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/packages-without-spdx-final-maintainers.txt
That shows some packages under my name, such as
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 3:35 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> List by package maintainers is here
>
>
> https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/packages-without-spdx-final-maintainers.txt
That shows some packages under my name, such as gap-pkg-ace, where I
pushed git commits mentioning
Two weeks ago we had:
* 23029 spec files in Fedora
* 29405 license tags in all spec files
* 22401 tags have not been converted to SPDX yet
* 8795 tags can be trivially converted using `license-fedora2spdx`
Today we have:
* 23060 spec files in Fedora
* 29449license tags in all spec files
2023-02-23T05:19:37Z Dalton Hubble :
Hey folks,
I'm an engineer working in the Go, cloud, and infrastructure space.
I've been a Linux user for a while, a Fedora user for the last ~8
years, and used to work for CoreOS. I maintain a few open source Go
libraries, maintain a Kubernetes distro,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173738
Bug ID: 2173738
Summary: perl-libwww-perl-6.68 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-libwww-perl
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173731
Bug ID: 2173731
Summary: perl-RT-Client-REST-0.72 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-RT-Client-REST
Keywords: FutureFeature,
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 07:43:58PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 7:36 PM Daniel P. Berrangé
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 06:28:56PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > I've spent the day fixing various issues in qemu on Rawhide, but
> > > there's one
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 7:36 PM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 06:28:56PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > I've spent the day fixing various issues in qemu on Rawhide, but
> > there's one remaining issue. The tests stubbornly fail on i686. It
> > seems as if there is
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 06:28:56PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> I've spent the day fixing various issues in qemu on Rawhide, but
> there's one remaining issue. The tests stubbornly fail on i686. It
> seems as if there is some issue with TLS (is gnutls borked on i686?)
>
>
I've spent the day fixing various issues in qemu on Rawhide, but
there's one remaining issue. The tests stubbornly fail on i686. It
seems as if there is some issue with TLS (is gnutls borked on i686?)
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=98075482
[Ignore the transient aarch64
PR: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/tcpcrypt/pull-request/1
Bugs:
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2159838 (f37)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2095227 (f36)
tl;dr The PR removes firewalld support from the tcpcrypt package. This
integration appears to have never
Yes.
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 12:51 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 26. 02. 23 v 17:07 Jonathan Wakely napsal(a):
> > On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 18:23, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >>
> >> Dne 23. 02. 23 v 12:41 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
> >>> On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 12:28:48PM +0100, Kalev
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731700
--- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts ---
So the perfectly valid (though discouraged) behavior results failed
dependencies unless a non-default configuration option is set. That's 100% a
bug; there's simply no other way to state it.
If this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173683
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of
ack-3.7.0-1.fc36.src.rpm for rawhide completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=98072544
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173683
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1946743
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1946743=edit
Update to 3.7.0 (#2173683)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173683
Bug ID: 2173683
Summary: ack-3.7.0 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: ack
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731700
--- Comment #9 from Petr Pisar ---
It's mainly driven by a configuration option. See bug #2173051 comment #2.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731700
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173510
--- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar ---
a/register storage/volatile storage/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173510
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731700
--- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts ---
Isn't the extra info is only downloaded if you're installing or querying this
very niche leaf package? Or does the mere existence of a file dependency
anywhere in the distribution cause DNF to download
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731700
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppi...@redhat.com
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173461
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-bc4f4c9f71 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-bc4f4c9f71
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173116
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-5e787667c6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-5e787667c6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173461
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-e5b8a70a07 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-e5b8a70a07
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173461
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-3bc4a051a0 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-3bc4a051a0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173461
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173116
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731700
--- Comment #6 from Ralf Corsepius ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #4)
> Still an issue with rt-5.0.3-4.fc38.src.rpm.
This has never been an issue. This BZ is just silly.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 10:04 AM Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2023-02-25 at 10:27 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 25, 2023 at 10:20 AM Sandro wrote:
> > >
> > > Greetings everyone,
> > >
> > > TL;DR
> > > Will there be AVIF (AV1) support for applications using libheif in
> > >
On Sat, 2023-02-25 at 10:27 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2023 at 10:20 AM Sandro wrote:
> >
> > Greetings everyone,
> >
> > TL;DR
> > Will there be AVIF (AV1) support for applications using libheif in
> > Fedora?
> >
> > A while ago I stumbled upon AVIF files not being supported
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173633
Bug ID: 2173633
Summary: perl-DBIx-Safe required package for Bucardo missing in
EPEL9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component: perl-DBIx-Safe
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-SQL-Translator` that
you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
1.63 bump; Package tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-SQL-Translator/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-SQL-Translator`
that you are following:
``
1.63 bump; Package tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-SQL-Translator/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel
On Mon, 27 Feb 2023 at 03:03, Petr Pisar wrote:
> V Sat, Feb 25, 2023 at 09:52:03PM -0800, Gordon Messmer napsal(a):
> > On 2023-02-22 02:47, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > > V Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 11:48:26AM -0800, Gordon Messmer napsal(a):
> > > >
> > > > First, the bug. From these results, it looks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173461
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
OLD: Fedora-38-20230226.n.0
NEW: Fedora-38-20230227.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:110.98 KiB
Size
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173292
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-0c19863c44 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-0c19863c44
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173292
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731700
--- Comment #5 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rt/pull-request/1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731700
zbyszek opened a new pull-request against the project: `rt` that you are
following:
``
Stop using file dependencies
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rt/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
Thanks for your advice. I tried and it can be built with no error, but when
installing built contour package, it shows the following error:
```
Error:
Problem: conflicting requests
- nothing provides libContourTerminalDisplay.so()(64bit) needed by
contour-20230226-1.fc39.x86_64
- nothing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731700
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |NEW
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173292
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
Upstream appears to be disabling position independent code for some reason
in the crispy-core library:
https://github.com/contour-terminal/contour/blob/master/src/crispy/CMakeLists.txt#L100
(although they are using no-pie, which is odd since it is a library and I
would have expected no-pic
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 10:51 AM Paul Howarth wrote:
>
> On Sat, 25 Feb 2023 10:41:37 -0800
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 06:00:08AM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2023-02-21 at 16:40 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > > As of today, F38 Changes should be 100%
On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 9:48 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2023 at 07:53:57PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 25, 2023 at 7:41 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 06:00:08AM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2023-02-21 at 16:40 -0500, Ben
Hello everyone,
Please join us at the next Open NeuroFedora team meeting on Monday 27th
February at 1300UTC in #fedora-neuro on Matrix or IRC
(Libera.chat). The meeting is a public meeting, and open for everyone
to attend. You can join us over:
Matrix:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105085
Bug 2105085 depends on bug 2119270, which changed state.
Bug 2119270 Summary: CVE-2022-31081 perl-HTTP-Daemon: HTTP::Daemon allows
request smuggling [fedora-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119270
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105085
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||2173127
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173127
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2105085 (CVE-2022-31081)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119270
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173127
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-424636c7cb has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-424636c7cb
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
On Sat, 25 Feb 2023 10:41:37 -0800
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 06:00:08AM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Tue, 2023-02-21 at 16:40 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > As of today, F38 Changes should be 100% complete. Change owners
> > > can indicate this by setting the Bugzilla
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230226.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230227.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 50
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:110.98
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Daemon` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
6.16 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Daemon/pull-request/24
___
perl-devel mailing list --
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Daemon` that
you are following:
``
6.16 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Daemon/pull-request/24
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173127
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from
On Fri, 24 Feb 2023 at 08:20, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 24/02/2023 09:06, Benson Muite wrote:
> > No. There are incompatibilities. Maybe it is better to keep the old
> > name, and use Catch2v3 as a new name, so packages can update more easily
> > when they are ready to do so?
>
>
Dne 26. 02. 23 v 17:07 Jonathan Wakely napsal(a):
On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 18:23, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 23. 02. 23 v 12:41 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 12:28:48PM +0100, Kalev Lember wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 12:17 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
V Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 12:08:28PM -0400, Robert Marcano via devel napsal(a):
> On 2/24/23 12:01 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> > Once upon a time, Robert Marcano via devel
> > said:
> > > Does DNF on RHEL for example do something different when --security
> > > is involved? Because the RHEL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2172742
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-3f80d571c6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-3f80d571c6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2172742
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Geo-ShapeFile-3.03-1.f
V Sat, Feb 25, 2023 at 09:52:03PM -0800, Gordon Messmer napsal(a):
> On 2023-02-22 02:47, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > V Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 11:48:26AM -0800, Gordon Messmer napsal(a):
> > >
> > > First, the bug. From these results, it looks like rpminspect is only
> > > comparing the primary package
75 matches
Mail list logo
