https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221022
Bug ID: 2221022
Summary: perl-Business-ISBN-Data-20230707.001 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Business-ISBN-Data
Keywords:
On Thu, Jul 6 2023 at 09:40:59 PM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour
wrote:
It needs to be off by default. See KDE’s telemetry policy
Again, if it's off by default then the data will be garbage. There is
no point in doing opt-in telemetry. I would withdraw the proposal
entirely if we cannot do it
On Fri, Jul 7 2023 at 01:39:24 AM +, Maxwell G
wrote:
I don't see an attachment.
Trying again.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-81803bf20b
chromium-114.0.5735.198-1.el8
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing
apptainer-1.2.0~rc.2-1.el8
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-9dad7fa701
chromium-114.0.5735.198-1.el7
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing
apptainer-1.2.0~rc.2-1.el7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2215546
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Net-HTTP-6.23-1.fc38 |perl-Net-HTTP-6.23-1.fc38
I've orphaned the piper package. This is the GTK GUI to interface with
the libratbag daemon to configure programmable mice. It's up for grabs
now if you want it, first come, first serve and so on.
My personal take is that this should be flatpak only but who am I to
stand in the way of a motivated
On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 8:53 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 6 2023 at 11:08:15 PM +0200, Björn Persson
> wrote:
> > As a non-user of Gnome 3 who normally never runs any Gnome 3 settings
> > programs, I get the impression that Fedora 40 will begin accumulating
> > unused metrics
On 7/6/23 21:17, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 6 2023 at 07:42:47 PM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour
> wrote:
>> Then make the metrics be neither opt-in nor opt-out. Have
>> “Enable telemetry (y/n)?” be a mandatory question in the
>> installer,
>> which the user must answer.
>
> The
On Thu Jul 6, 2023 at 20:17 CDT, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> I'm attaching a screenshot to give an idea of what this would look like
> in gnome-initial-setup. I don't have a gnome-control-center screenshot
> handy, but it would be similar, except there it would default to off.
I don't see an
On Thu, Jul 6 2023 at 07:42:47 PM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour
wrote:
Then make the metrics be neither opt-in nor opt-out. Have
“Enable telemetry (y/n)?” be a mandatory question in the
installer,
which the user must answer.
The problem is if users are expected to answer, they are going to
On Thu, Jul 6 2023 at 11:33:03 PM +0200, Michal Domonkos
wrote:
Given the detailed proposal, it's probably too late now for any
fundamental
changes, but there's a formal research area called Differential
Privacy [1]
that deals with the collection of user data in such a way that it
On Thu, Jul 6 2023 at 11:08:15 PM +0200, Björn Persson
wrote:
As a non-user of Gnome 3 who normally never runs any Gnome 3 settings
programs, I get the impression that Fedora 40 will begin accumulating
unused metrics somewhere in the filesystem. To prevent a constantly
growing waste of
On 7/6/23 15:32, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 6 2023 at 08:19:07 PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
> wrote:
>> All telemetry collection MUST be an opt-in feature (disabled by
>> default). I'm strongly against enabling it by default.
>
> As explained in the proposal document, we
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2220995
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of
perl-HTTP-Date-6.06-1.fc38.src.rpm for rawhide completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=103016412
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2220995
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1974371
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1974371=edit
Update to 6.06 (#2220995)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2220995
Bug ID: 2220995
Summary: perl-HTTP-Date-6.06 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-HTTP-Date
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Florian Weimer writes:
> Today, I pushed a redhat-rpm-config update to rawhide,
> redhat-rpm-config-260-1.fc39. The only expected change is that
> -Wno-complain-wrong-lang now shows up in %optflags (but not
> %build_cflags etc.). It should prevent Fortran compilers from warning
> on
So this change is for workstation iso only?, the other spins wont have this
unwanted change.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Thu, Jul 06, 2023 at 11:33:03PM +0200, Michal Domonkos wrote:
> changes, but there's a formal research area called Differential Privacy [1]
Oops, forgot the link:
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Differential_privacy
--
Michal Domonkos / RPM dev team / Red Hat, Inc.
On Thu, Jul 06, 2023 at 05:10:24PM +0100, Aoife Moloney wrote:
> == Summary ==
>
> The Red Hat Display Systems Team (which develops the desktop) proposes
> to enable limited data collection of anonymous Fedora Workstation
> usage metrics.
Given the detailed proposal, it's probably too late now
As a non-user of Gnome 3 who normally never runs any Gnome 3 settings
programs, I get the impression that Fedora 40 will begin accumulating
unused metrics somewhere in the filesystem. To prevent a constantly
growing waste of storage space, I'll have to run one of two Gnome 3
settings programs –
On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 9:58 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On 06/07/2023 21:32, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > As explained in the proposal document, we know that opt-in metrics are
> > not very useful because few users would opt in, and these users would
> >
On Thu Jul 6, 2023 at 14:32 CDT, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 6 2023 at 08:19:07 PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
> wrote:
> > All telemetry collection MUST be an opt-in feature (disabled by
> > default). I'm strongly against enabling it by default.
>
> As explained in the proposal
On 06/07/2023 21:32, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
As explained in the proposal document, we know that opt-in metrics are
not very useful because few users would opt in, and these users would
not be representative of Fedora users as a whole.
Because Linux users care about their privacy.
We are
n...@neilanthonydesignbuild.com
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List
On Thu, Jul 6 2023 at 08:19:07 PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
All telemetry collection MUST be an opt-in feature (disabled by
default). I'm strongly against enabling it by default.
As explained in the proposal document, we know that opt-in metrics are
not very useful because few
On Thu, Jul 6 2023 at 08:41:03 PM +0200, Simon de Vlieger
wrote:
I don't understand where my reply is supposed to go so here it is on
the mailing list *and* on the forums? Are the change proposal owners
reading both?
In theory, we're supposed to be discussing this on Discourse to make
As an opt-in option I am all for it. It should be turned off by default and
easily removed. The opt-in could even be part of the installation process, adn
if you don't choose to opt-in the necessary packages never get installed.
Without it being deployed as opt-in it would be a huge invasion
I don't understand where my reply is supposed to go so here it is on the
mailing list *and* on the forums? Are the change proposal owners reading both?
--
Perhaps this is implicit in the use of eos-* but I seem to be missing a list of
what metrics would be collected exactly and what is
On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 3:25 AM Luya Tshimbalanga
wrote:
> I confirm I run the same issue once I properly set parameters for building
> on cmake ( -DLLVM_ROOT=%{_libdir}/llvm15 \
>-DLLVM_BC_GENERATOR='clang++' \).
>
I am not sure this is what you'd want to do anyway as you'll be mixing
On 06/07/2023 18:10, Aoife Moloney wrote:
The Red Hat Display Systems Team (which develops the desktop) proposes
to enable limited data collection of anonymous Fedora Workstation
usage metrics.
All telemetry collection MUST be an opt-in feature (disabled by
default). I'm strongly against
On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 11:54 AM Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Jonathan Wakely said:
> > From the change proposal:
> >
> > == Feedback ==
> > In June of 2021, we proposed creating a new tzdata sub-package that
> > would only provide the UTC timezone. As part of the discussion around
>
Is there any interest in providing the full older clang binary instead of just
compat libraries?
In my case, I'm working on an LLVM pass currently targeting LLVM15, and i can
use the llvm15 rpm to build it. But then I don't have a way to compile a C
source into an LLVM15-compatible intermediate
Important process note: we are experimenting with using Fedora
Discussion as part of the Changes process. Change announcements (like
the one you are reading right now) will still be sent to the
devel-announce mailing list, but the conversation about each change
will take place on Fedora Discussion
Important process note: we are experimenting with using Fedora
Discussion as part of the Changes process. Change announcements (like
the one you are reading right now) will still be sent to the
devel-announce mailing list, but the conversation about each change
will take place on Fedora Discussion
On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 4:12 AM Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> This is a status update for
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F39ModernizeTBB
>
> The tbb2020.3 compat package has now been added to rawhide:
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-15ccd1cedb
>
> It doesn't include the
On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 07:42:39AM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> The side tag has been merged:
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-4e8e736635
>
> FTBFS (final):
>
> arbor (not related to fmt, some tests failed on s390x)
> CuraEngine
> bout++
> cachelib
> dolphin-emu
On Thu, Jul 06, 2023 at 10:41:59PM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
>
> So lots of spins got broken... I may investigate these just for interest
> (I am not the maintainer of any spins above),
> however from just a quick glance at this, now fixing these spin breakage
> seems rather
> tough work than
On 06.07.23 16:02, Remi Collet wrote:
Le 06/07/2023 à 15:53, Sandro Mani a écrit :
Hi
I'm updating to geos-3.12.0 in rawhide, which carries a soname bump.
I'm building geos-3.12.0 in f39-build-side-69654 and will rebuild the
following dependencies:
osgearth
vfrnav
mingw-osgearth
It
On Thu, 6 Jul 2023 at 11:46, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> Oops, I meant to CC the package-ow...@fedoraproject.org addresses for
> the packages I'll be changing (see below).
>
> For blender, gazebo, opencascade, and opensubdiv, it's a one line
> change to the spec file, something like:
>
>
Le 06/07/2023 à 15:53, Sandro Mani a écrit :
Hi
I'm updating to geos-3.12.0 in rawhide, which carries a soname bump. I'm
building geos-3.12.0 in f39-build-side-69654 and will rebuild the
following dependencies:
osgearth
vfrnav
mingw-osgearth
It seems you miss some,
On Fedora 37
# dnf
Hi
I'm updating to geos-3.12.0 in rawhide, which carries a soname bump. I'm
building geos-3.12.0 in f39-build-side-69654 and will rebuild the
following dependencies:
osgearth
vfrnav
mingw-osgearth
Thanks
Sandro
___
devel mailing list --
Hi
I'm updating to cgnslib-4.4.0 in rawhide, which carries a soname bump.
I've built cgnslib-4.4.0 in f39-build-side-69646 and will rebuild the
following dependencies:
gmsh
paraview
vtk
Thanks
Sandro
___
devel mailing list --
Fedora Rawhide Report wrote on 2023/07/06 20:45:
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230705.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230706.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 25
Added packages: 17
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 3465
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added
On 06. 07. 23 11:21, Ankur Sinha wrote:
Hi folks,
While looking into the vit FTI bug[1], I ran into this error in the
test:
==
ERROR: vit (unittest.loader._FailedTest.vit)
On Thu, 6 Jul 2023 at 13:29, Felix Wang wrote:
>
> I also had the build error of `BuildrootError: could not init mock buildroot,
> mock exited with status 30`. [1, 2] May I ask how to resubmit the build?
Just repeat exactly the steps you did to submit it the first time.
Probably something like
I also had the build error of `BuildrootError: could not init mock buildroot,
mock exited with status 30`. [1, 2] May I ask how to resubmit the build?
[1]
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/draco/c/d5a8ed8e388001de0f87150b725222be55a4a038?branch=rawhide
[2]
Hey!
> On Sat, 1 Jul 2023 at 20:34, Piotr Szubiakowski wrote:
> > I think we all have a problem understanding what this announcement
> > means. I do believe CentOS Stream is awesome software. It has to be
> > since it's close to what RHEL is. My problem with CentOS Stream is
> > that
> > it's not
On Thu, 6 Jul 2023 at 12:43, Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 5:41 AM Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > Wouldn't it be better to just update OpenCascade to its new upstream
>> > version in that sidetag as well instead of doing a compat package for it?
>>
>> Define better.
>> To
On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 5:41 AM Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >
> > Wouldn't it be better to just update OpenCascade to its new upstream
> version in that sidetag as well instead of doing a compat package for it?
>
> Define better.
> To be clear, I'm not "doing a compat package" for it. I'm just
>
On Thu, 6 Jul 2023 at 11:46, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> Oops, I meant to CC the package-ow...@fedoraproject.org addresses for
> the packages I'll be changing (see below).
Which should be package-matinain...@fedoraproject.org nowadays. Doh.
>
> For blender, gazebo, opencascade, and opensubdiv,
Oops, I meant to CC the package-ow...@fedoraproject.org addresses for
the packages I'll be changing (see below).
For blender, gazebo, opencascade, and opensubdiv, it's a one line
change to the spec file, something like:
-BuildRequires: tbb-devel
+BuildRequires: tbb2020.3-devel
If you're happy
On Thu, 6 Jul 2023 at 11:21, Ian McInerney via devel
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 11:12 AM Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>
>> This is a status update for
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F39ModernizeTBB
>>
>> The tbb2020.3 compat package has now been added to rawhide:
>>
On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 11:12 AM Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> This is a status update for
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F39ModernizeTBB
>
> The tbb2020.3 compat package has now been added to rawhide:
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-15ccd1cedb
>
> It doesn't include
This is a status update for
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F39ModernizeTBB
The tbb2020.3 compat package has now been added to rawhide:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-15ccd1cedb
It doesn't include the docs or python modules (you can use the main
tbb package for
I'm going to retire python-bluepy from Rawhide.
It was an interesting Python interface to Bluetooth LE on Linux; I was
some interests on it when I had time to tinker with Raspberry and
Micro:bit boards.
Currently there are problems building it with Python 3.12 (actually
there were issues also
Hi folks,
While looking into the vit FTI bug[1], I ran into this error in the
test:
> ==
> ERROR: vit (unittest.loader._FailedTest.vit)
> --
> ImportError:
On Sat, 1 Jul 2023 at 20:34, Piotr Szubiakowski wrote:
> I think we all have a problem understanding what this announcement
> means. I do believe CentOS Stream is awesome software. It has to be
> since it's close to what RHEL is. My problem with CentOS Stream is that
> it's not a distribution of
On 7/6/23 01:24, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 01:47:05PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 10:01 AM Paul Howarth wrote:
Whatever this is, it's intermittent and it's still happening. I'm
getting koschei reports about failed builds with this symptom every
day,
60 matches
Mail list logo
