> On 7/17/23 07:39, Jaroslav Mracek wrote:
>
> Hi, I put more details in the fesco ticket:
> https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3039#comment-864686 I believe these are
> commonly known so I did not open any ticket against dnf5.
>
> As said in the comment, I stopped putting effort into making dnf5
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 6:40 AM Jaroslav Mracek wrote:
>
> Except dnf5 broke a number of microdnf usecases with low memory where
> microdnf worked [1].
>
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2214520
Correct but as you can see the issue was not in DNF5 but in libsolv (solver for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638
Fedora Fails To Install changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639
Bug 639 depends on bug 638, which changed state.
Bug 638 Summary: F39FailsToInstall: perl-Tk
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219205
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Module-CoreList-5.2023 |perl-Module-CoreList-5.2023
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219205
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
Hello,
On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 8:49 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> switcheroo-controlorphan 2 weeks ago
Has anyone from the Workstation WG noticed this? Won't losing
switcheroo-control be a considerable usability regression? At the same
time, the upstream
On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 01:58:09PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-07-18 at 13:42 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 05:59:50PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > > As part of the cobbler project testing, we need to test accessing Fedora
> > > releases with various
On Tue, 2023-07-18 at 13:42 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 05:59:50PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > As part of the cobbler project testing, we need to test accessing Fedora
> > releases with various URLs:
> >
> >
On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 05:59:50PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> As part of the cobbler project testing, we need to test accessing Fedora
> releases with various URLs:
>
> "http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/35/Everything/x86_64/os;,
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2223772
Bug ID: 2223772
Summary: perl-Business-ISBN-Data-20230718.001 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Business-ISBN-Data
Keywords:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638
Dan Horák changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d...@danny.cz
--- Comment #3 from Dan
On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 7:28 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2023, 15:22 Maxwell G wrote:
>> --requires --resolve resolves the entire dependency tree of a package.
>> --requires just prints the direct dependencies that are specified in the
>> RPM metadata.
>> I don't know what this
On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 5:41 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> The first error is:
>
> /home/rjones/d/fedora/polymake/rawhide/polymake-4.10/lib/core/src/perl/RefHash.xxs:737:11:
> error: ‘Perl_ck_fun’ was not declared in this scope; did you mean
> ‘Perl_cx_dup’?
> 737 |return
Dne 17. 07. 23 v 20:48 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
rpkg-macros orphan 2 weeks ago
Copr team is taking this one as it is dependence of rpkg. Which is used in Copr.
But we will be actively investigating how to replace rpkg in Copr. Unless somebody will take over the
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL Steering Committee on 2023-07-19 from 16:00:00 to 17:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat
The meeting will be about:
This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting.
A general agenda is the following:
#topic aloha
In response, I have also orphaned python-testing.common.database:
- since python-testing.postgresql was the only package that
depended on it (python-testing.mysqld was never packaged)
- since nothing depends on python-testing.postgresql anymore, and
- since upstream for these
On Tue Jul 18, 2023 at 15:27 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2023, 15:22 Maxwell G wrote:
>
> > On Tue Jul 18, 2023 at 12:38 +0200, Jakub Kadlcik wrote:
> > > Hello Jerry,
> > > I proposed a workaround a few days ago
> > > https://pagure.io/FedoraReview/pull-request/485
> > >
> >
On Tue, Jul 18, 2023, 15:22 Maxwell G wrote:
> On Tue Jul 18, 2023 at 12:38 +0200, Jakub Kadlcik wrote:
> > Hello Jerry,
> > I proposed a workaround a few days ago
> > https://pagure.io/FedoraReview/pull-request/485
> >
> > but your patch looks like a proper fix. I'll try it and merge to the
> >
On Tue Jul 18, 2023 at 13:47 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 4:38 AM Maxwell G wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > It seems the fedora-scm-requests processor is creating the initial
> > repository commits with `releng bot ` as the
> > committer. Does anyone know where this is
On Tue Jul 18, 2023 at 12:38 +0200, Jakub Kadlcik wrote:
> Hello Jerry,
> I proposed a workaround a few days ago
> https://pagure.io/FedoraReview/pull-request/485
>
> but your patch looks like a proper fix. I'll try it and merge to the
> fedora-review codebase.
>
> Does anybody know what was the
On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 4:38 AM Maxwell G wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> It seems the fedora-scm-requests processor is creating the initial
> repository commits with `releng bot ` as the
> committer. Does anyone know where this is coming from? Should it be
> changed to something @fedoraproject.org?
Yeah
On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 08:27:19AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 08:23:54AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 04:13:59PM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> > > The introduction of perl 5.38.0 broke polymake beyond repair. Several
> > > symbols
mspacek closed without merging a pull-request against the project:
`perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10` that you
are following.
Closed pull-request:
``
Fix build with Perl 5.38
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10/pull-request/6
mspacek commented on the pull-request: `Fix build with Perl 5.38` that you are
following:
``
Heh, the same patch, ok :-)
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10/pull-request/6
___
perl-devel
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230717.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230718.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 372
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 1.67 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Hello Jerry,
I proposed a workaround a few days ago
https://pagure.io/FedoraReview/pull-request/485
but your patch looks like a proper fix. I'll try it and merge to the
fedora-review codebase.
Does anybody know what was the purpose of --resolve and if it will be
no problem when we remove it?
> On 7/13/23 23:59, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> +1 for postponing. We have hit issues preparing CI environment via
> ansible and applying workarounds to make dnf5 work is imho not the way
> to go with such core tool. It should be there as opt-in so it can get
> tested but not default.
The
Hello,
> We keep the list of issues tracked here:
> https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/issues/894
> And namely, https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf5/issues/617
> seems like a showstopper ATM. At least as long as we have to check
> GPG signatures at koji buildroot
That's strange, I never noticed this e-mail when doing initial testing
during first deployment on production.
Michal
On 18. 07. 23 5:35, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 02:37:54AM +, Maxwell G wrote:
Hi,
It seems the fedora-scm-requests processor is creating the initial
On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 08:23:54AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 04:13:59PM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> > The introduction of perl 5.38.0 broke polymake beyond repair. Several
> > symbols formerly used by polymake have been marked as internal APIs.
> > They now have
On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 04:13:59PM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> The introduction of perl 5.38.0 broke polymake beyond repair. Several
> symbols formerly used by polymake have been marked as internal APIs.
> They now have the ELF hidden attribute, so we can't even cheat by
> adding prototypes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2223434
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||635
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||2223434
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184301
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2168842
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2223530
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2168842
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2223530
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Link ID||Github
|
On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 04:27:34PM +0200, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> the SWID tag enablement introduced by
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SWID_Tag_Enablement did not lead
> to a wider SWID tag adoption, and other technologies (IMA, SPDX) seem
> to be more relevant for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2223530
Bug ID: 2223530
Summary: perl-MooseX-App: FTBFS with Perl 5.38
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/perl-MooseX-
App
I orphaned
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-testing.postgresql
I do not use it any more. Feel free to grab it.
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno, #fedora-buildsys
___
devel mailing list --
jplesnik commented on the pull-request: `Fix build with Perl 5.38` that you are
following:
``
New version 0.20 [1] appears with the fix was released. It would be better than
patch.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2223434
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||639
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jples...@redhat.com
Doc
43 matches
Mail list logo
