https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2225675
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2225674
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
Am 23.07.23 um 00:39 schrieb Neal Gompa:
Actually, why wouldn't this be used everywhere?
Because fwupd only works on a small set of machines?
Ralf
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2223015
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-SNMP-Info-3.93-1.fc39 |perl-SNMP-Info-3.93-1.fc39
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 01:46:19AM +0200, Sandro wrote:
> On 25-07-2023 18:23, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 02:23:00AM +0200, Sandro wrote:
> > > On 24-07-2023 20:30, Samyak Jain wrote:
> > > > 21426 builds have been tagged into f39, there are currently 1017 failed
> > > >
On 25-07-2023 18:23, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 02:23:00AM +0200, Sandro wrote:
On 24-07-2023 20:30, Samyak Jain wrote:
21426 builds have been tagged into f39, there are currently 1017 failed builds
that need to be addressed by the package maintainers. FTBFS bugs will be
filed
On 25-07-2023 04:47, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
Once this lands in F38, Fedora Review Service should be fixed, unless
I'm missing something.
First of all, thanks for bringing fedora-review back. I rely on it quite
a bit reviewing my own packages as well as for official reviews.
I noticed
Hey there,
I plan to orphan these two packages:
python-uamqp
python-azure-eventhub
They were originally packaged to help with azure-cli packaging, but they are no
longer used by the upstream package. I couldn't find any other packages which
depend on these two packages.
--
Major Hayden
Thank you very much Michel for going through the release.
It couldn't be easy.
There is a reported bug in Bodhi, so it will need some minor fixups
but we are close. Really looking forward to it.
Jakub
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 4:48 AM Michel Alexandre Salim
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> On Mon, Jul 17,
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 3:58 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> As far as I can tell, the toolchain proposal was announced on the devel /
> devel-announce lists on July 7 but never submitted to FESCo for a vote. Looks
> like the process broke down somewhere along the way.
I think it was actually a
Access restored. Thanks to all.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023, 21:36 Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Kevin Fenzi:
>
> > ok. How big a problem is this? Do we need to schedule another mass
> > rebuild (and push back the schedule most likely)?
> >
> > Or we can/should just rebuild things that failed due to already fixed
> > issues?
>
> I don't
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 39 Rawhide 20230725.n.1. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
* Kevin Fenzi:
> ok. How big a problem is this? Do we need to schedule another mass
> rebuild (and push back the schedule most likely)?
>
> Or we can/should just rebuild things that failed due to already fixed
> issues?
I don't think it matters. I raised it mainly for accuracy.
We should
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2226087
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Release Engineering ---
Created attachment 1978656
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1978656=edit
build.log
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2226088
Bug ID: 2226088
Summary: perl-Perl-Tags: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f39
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Perl-Tags
Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2226087
Bug ID: 2226087
Summary: perl-Parallel-Prefork: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f39
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Parallel-Prefork
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2226088
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Release Engineering ---
Created attachment 1978661
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1978661=edit
state.log
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2226088
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Release Engineering ---
Created attachment 1978660
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1978660=edit
root.log
file root.log too big, will only attach last 32768 bytes
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2226088
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Release Engineering ---
Created attachment 1978659
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1978659=edit
build.log
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2226087
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Release Engineering ---
Created attachment 1978657
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1978657=edit
root.log
file root.log too big, will only attach last 32768 bytes
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2226085
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Release Engineering ---
Created attachment 1978654
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1978654=edit
root.log
file root.log too big, will only attach last 32768 bytes
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2226087
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Release Engineering ---
Created attachment 1978658
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1978658=edit
state.log
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2226085
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Release Engineering ---
Created attachment 1978655
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1978655=edit
state.log
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2226085
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Release Engineering ---
Created attachment 1978653
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1978653=edit
build.log
file build.log too big, will only attach last 32768 bytes
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2226085
Bug ID: 2226085
Summary: perl-Glib: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f39
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Glib
Assignee: spo...@gmail.com
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 10:39 AM Timothée Ravier
wrote:
>
> > Would these messages show up, for example, if they opened the terminal app?
>
> They only show up on the console / ssh login prompt if I'm not mistaken:
> https://github.com/fwupd/fwupd/tree/main/data/motd
That means they will show
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219862
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-IO-Interactive-1.025-1 |perl-IO-Interactive-1.025-1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221452
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-PerlIO-eol-0.19-1.fc39 |perl-PerlIO-eol-0.19-1.fc39
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219862
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-IO-Interactive-1.025-1 |perl-IO-Interactive-1.025-1
Hi folks! Just wanted to drop a note for anyone who noticed their
Rawhide updates stuck in gating for an unusually long time
yesterday/today.
This is mainly due to the mass rebuild. Merging it in (which was done
without sending anything in it through openQA testing) resulted in two
separate
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221452
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
Hey,
Thanks for raising the issue. It has been addressed and all the dashboards
should now contain up2date data from koschei.
Longer answer: The problem was the enablement of EPEL 9 Next in koschei,
oraculum (the backend for the Packager Dashboard) isn't ready for these
kinds of releases and I
On 25. 07. 23 17:49, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Miro Hrončok:
On 25. 07. 23 16:42, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Miro Hrončok:
glibc32 codonell, fweimer, jakub, mcermak
Is this about FTBFS issues? There isn't any recent build failure in
Koji, so I don't get why
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2225676
Bug ID: 2225676
Summary: perl-IO-Compress-2.206 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-IO-Compress
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
* Peter Robinson:
>> Are bootloaders fully treated as firmware and no longer built by Fedora?
>> At least the shim package does not come with corresponding source code
>> AFAICS. But I expect that there are other 32-bit pre-boot packages that
>> we still rebuild.
>
> There's shim-unsigned* which
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2225678
Bug ID: 2225678
Summary: perl-IO-Socket-IP-0.42 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-IO-Socket-IP
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 12:47:12PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 12:40:15PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > * Samyak Jain:
> >
> > > - GNU Toolchain Update (gcc 13.2, binutils 2.40, glibc 2.38, gdb 13.2)
> >
> > This change has not yet been voted on by Fesco, so it's
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 02:23:00AM +0200, Sandro wrote:
> On 24-07-2023 20:30, Samyak Jain wrote:
> > 21426 builds have been tagged into f39, there are currently 1017 failed
> > builds
> > that need to be addressed by the package maintainers. FTBFS bugs will be
> > filed shortly.
>
> Will all
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2225674
Bug ID: 2225674
Summary: perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.206 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib
Keywords:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2225675
Bug ID: 2225675
Summary: perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.206 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2
Keywords:
On Tue, 25 Jul 2023 at 11:54, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 11:44 AM Florian Weimer
> wrote:
> >
> > * Josh Boyer:
> >
> > > On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 10:53 AM Miro Hrončok
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On 25. 07. 23 16:42, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > >> > * Miro Hrončok:
> > >> >
> > >> >>
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL Steering Committee on 2023-07-26 from 16:00:00 to 17:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat
The meeting will be about:
This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting.
A general agenda is the following:
#topic aloha
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 4:44 PM Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> * Josh Boyer:
>
> > On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 10:53 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >>
> >> On 25. 07. 23 16:42, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >> > * Miro Hrončok:
> >> >
> >> >> glibc32 codonell, fweimer, jakub,
> >>
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 11:44 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> * Josh Boyer:
>
> > On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 10:53 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >>
> >> On 25. 07. 23 16:42, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >> > * Miro Hrončok:
> >> >
> >> >> glibc32 codonell, fweimer, jakub,
> >>
* Miro Hrončok:
> On 25. 07. 23 16:42, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * Miro Hrončok:
>>
>>> glibc32 codonell, fweimer, jakub, mcermak
>> Is this about FTBFS issues? There isn't any recent build failure in
>> Koji, so I don't get why it's on this list?
>
> The build
* Josh Boyer:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 10:53 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>>
>> On 25. 07. 23 16:42, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> > * Miro Hrončok:
>> >
>> >> glibc32 codonell, fweimer, jakub,
>> >> mcermak
>> >
>> > Is this about FTBFS issues? There isn't any recent
On Tue, 25 Jul 2023, Scott Talbert wrote:
libotf was just bumped from libotf.so.0 to libotf.so.1.
$ dnf repoquery --whatrequires 'libotf.so.0()(64bit)' --disablerepo='*'
--enablerepo=rawhide
emacs-1:28.2-6.fc39.x86_64
emacs-lucid-1:28.2-6.fc39.x86_64
libotf-devel-0:0.9.13-22.fc38.x86_64
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 10:53 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 25. 07. 23 16:42, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > * Miro Hrončok:
> >
> >> glibc32 codonell, fweimer, jakub, mcermak
> >
> > Is this about FTBFS issues? There isn't any recent build failure in
> > Koji, so I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217268
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217268
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from
On 25. 07. 23 16:42, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Miro Hrončok:
glibc32 codonell, fweimer, jakub, mcermak
Is this about FTBFS issues? There isn't any recent build failure in
Koji, so I don't get why it's on this list?
The build currently in Rawhide was done on
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 10:51:04AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> I don't think Fedora would reject those changes, because in general
> we don't reject things unless they really break stuff for other people.
> Nevertheless, I agree with what Daniel P. Berrangé wrote in another reply:
* Miro Hrončok:
> glibc32 codonell, fweimer, jakub, mcermak
Is this about FTBFS issues? There isn't any recent build failure in
Koji, so I don't get why it's on this list?
Thanks,
Florian
___
devel mailing list --
> Would these messages show up, for example, if they opened the terminal app?
They only show up on the console / ssh login prompt if I'm not mistaken:
https://github.com/fwupd/fwupd/tree/main/data/motd
___
devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2225475
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-SNMP-Info-3.94-1.fc39
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217268
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|athoscribe...@gmail.com |jples...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2225475
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from
Am 25.07.23 um 13:29 schrieb Michael Schwendt:
Trying to figure out what has changed in Fedora land that causes NTFS
corruption for some time. This is with default workstation with GNOME
Shell auto-mounting external storage media when plugging them in.
A ticket in bugzilla suggests there has
Hi,
On 7/25/23 15:52, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 2:48 PM Hans de Goede wrote:
>
>>> xmvn-connector-ivymizdebsk
>>
>> This one has a long long list of deps which will break if it is
>> retired and there is a pull-req here fixing the FTBFS:
>>
>>
libotf was just bumped from libotf.so.0 to libotf.so.1.
$ dnf repoquery --whatrequires 'libotf.so.0()(64bit)' --disablerepo='*'
--enablerepo=rawhide
emacs-1:28.2-6.fc39.x86_64
emacs-lucid-1:28.2-6.fc39.x86_64
libotf-devel-0:0.9.13-22.fc38.x86_64
m17n-lib-tools-0:1.8.2-1.fc39.x86_64
Please
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 2:48 PM Hans de Goede wrote:
> > xmvn-connector-ivymizdebsk
>
> This one has a long long list of deps which will break if it is
> retired and there is a pull-req here fixing the FTBFS:
>
>
On 25. 07. 23 14:48, Hans de Goede wrote:
Miro can you hold of on retiring xmvn-connector-ivy please ?
ack
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Hi All,
jansi-native depends on hawtjni which is unmaintained and will no longer build
after the maven2 to moven3 upgrade. Not having jansi-native will also break
jansi1 -> jline2 -> bsh all of which are currently maintained by me.
I no longer have a need for any of these pkgs so I'm orphaning
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 8:52 AM Timothée Ravier wrote:
>
> > Actually, why wouldn't this be used everywhere? I could see this be
> > useful when people remote into workstations and apply updates. I know
> > of plenty of people that split their desktops between local and remote
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
> Actually, why wouldn't this be used everywhere? I could see this be
> useful when people remote into workstations and apply updates. I know
> of plenty of people that split their desktops between local and remote
> access/administration.
We could enable it everywhere but we've not reached out
Hi all,
On 7/25/23 14:24, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Dear maintainers.
>
> Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
> should be retired from Fedora 39 approximately one week before branching.
>
> 5 weekly reminders are required, hence the retirement will happen
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2223450
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
On 25. 07. 23 14:33, Sandro wrote:
On 25-07-2023 14:24, Miro Hrončok wrote:
5 weekly reminders are required, hence the retirement will happen
approximately in 2 weeks, i.e. around 2023-08-01.
1 August is exactly 1 week from now...
Apologies, I forgot to update the number of weeks.
--
Miro
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-File-Listing` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
6.16 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-File-Listing/pull-request/4
___
perl-devel mailing list --
On 25-07-2023 14:24, Miro Hrončok wrote:
5 weekly reminders are required, hence the retirement will happen
approximately in 2 weeks, i.e. around 2023-08-01.
1 August is exactly 1 week from now...
___
devel mailing list --
On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 03:37:27PM +0100, Sebastian Crane wrote:
>
> As someone who does not use the Plasma desktop currently, I am a
> little confused as to why this is a change proposal. If I'm reading it
> correctly, Fedora configured Plasma to run on Wayland, which partially
> broke IBus
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-libwww-perl` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
6.72 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-libwww-perl/pull-request/50
___
perl-devel mailing list --
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-File-Listing` that
you are following:
``
6.16 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-File-Listing/pull-request/4
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
On 20. 07. 23 12:16, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 17. 07. 23 21:09, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hello Pythonistas,
apparently, Cython 3.0.0 final was released today.
I plan to make it build somehow in
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/Cython/pull-request/41 and once it does,
I'll update the package in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2225475
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of
perl-SNMP-Info-3.94-1.fc38.src.rpm for rawhide completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=103887702
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2225475
Bug ID: 2225475
Summary: perl-SNMP-Info-3.94 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-SNMP-Info
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2225475
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1977468
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1977468=edit
Update to 3.94 (#2225475)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-libwww-perl` that
you are following:
``
6.72 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-libwww-perl/pull-request/50
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2223450
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224540
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Config-Model-2.153-1.f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224540
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
Trying to figure out what has changed in Fedora land that causes NTFS
corruption for some time. This is with default workstation with GNOME
Shell auto-mounting external storage media when plugging them in.
A ticket in bugzilla suggests there has been a changed from ntfs-3g to ntfs3:
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-SGMLSpm` that you
are following:
``
Update license to SPDX format
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-SGMLSpm/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221511
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-LWP-Protocol-https-6.1
On 25/07/2023 12:35, Hans de Goede wrote:
How do I proceed with this ? Should I run "fedpkg retire" for these 4,
or is orphaning them preferred ?
Orphaned packages will be retired automatically if no one adopts them
after 4 weeks.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224540
Bug 2224540 depends on bug 2225405, which changed state.
Bug 2225405 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Synopsis-Expectation - Test that
SYNOPSIS code produces expected results
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2225405
On 25/07/2023 10:18, Martin Gansser wrote:
that is, remove the jar files from the speed-dreams package and link to the
Fedora jar files in the spec file.
JAR files must be compiled from sources. Bundled precompiled files must
be removed in %prep.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2225452
Bug ID: 2225452
Summary: perl-Mail-Box-IMAP4-3.007-12.fc39 FTBFS: tests fail
with perl-Mail-Message-3.013: unexpected "utf-8"
charset
Product: Fedora
Version:
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 07:36:41AM -0700, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 08:20:21AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 07:40:08AM -0700, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > > Now, since this is clearly not a libvirt-specific issue, I believe
> > > this
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 12:40:15PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Samyak Jain:
>
> > - GNU Toolchain Update (gcc 13.2, binutils 2.40, glibc 2.38, gdb 13.2)
>
> This change has not yet been voted on by Fesco, so it's largely not
> included in the rebuild: gcc was still using a 13.1 version,
* Samyak Jain:
> - GNU Toolchain Update (gcc 13.2, binutils 2.40, glibc 2.38, gdb 13.2)
This change has not yet been voted on by Fesco, so it's largely not
included in the rebuild: gcc was still using a 13.1 version, glibc was
at a 2.38 pre-release (not much we can do about that given the
Hi all,
On 7/17/23 20:48, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
> that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
>
The vhostmd package was mistakenly tagged as GPLv2+, and has
been corrected to LGPL-2.1-or-later during the SPDX conversion.
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o-https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o-
Am Di., 25. Juli 2023 um 10:19 Uhr schrieb Martin Gansser
:
>
> Hi,
>
> i want to package the current version of speed-dreams 2.3.0, but i noticed
> that jar files for the trackeditor are included in the package, but they
> already exist in the system.
Not really, there are two different things
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854
--- Comment #2 from Paul Howarth ---
Well, Fedora 38 also has valgrind 3.21.0 and that still builds OK, so it looks
like it's the combination of Perl 5.38 and valgrind 3.21.0 that's the problem.
Or maybe even something else, like the compiler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224540
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224540
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||2225405
Referenced Bugs:
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
