> Maxwell G writes:
> IIRC, we used to have nim in Fedora and then it was retired.
Yes, it was in Fedora 33 but orphaned for some time and then retired.
The last version packaged was 1.0.4. The final spec doesn't look very
complicated but of course it's tough to say how that would apply to
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-4cc86adbd2
chromium-116.0.5845.179-1.el8
2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-9c17eb827f
borgbackup-1.1.18-2.el8
The following
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2215048
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
On Sun Sep 10, 2023 at 22:04 +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I have a package that has begun to use the nimble language in its new
> version:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181693
> https://nim-lang.org/
>
> It isn't packaged for Fedora yet, though. Is anyone using it,
hich involves just blindly trying possible decrements and seeing if
they exist. e.g. if you ask for the compose previous to Fedora-39-
20230911.n.1, it will try 20230911.n.0, if that doesn't exist, it will
try 20230910.n.5 (we start counting backwards from 5 because, hey,
gotta start somewhere, and
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 3:16 PM Fedora Rawhide Report
wrote:
> = ADDED PACKAGES =
[snip]
> Package: python-sphinx_reredirects-0.1.2-2.fc40
> Summary: Handles redirects for moved pages in Sphinx documentation projects
> RPMs:python3-sphinx_reredirects
> Size:21.18 KiB
This appears
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230910.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230911.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:8
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 86
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 485.92 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238414
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238261
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Mail-DKIM-1.20230911-1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238020
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238186
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Doc Type|---
> Am 11.09.2023 um 18:14 schrieb Neal Gompa :
>
> What it did do was make my life harder trying to build up and sustain
> the pagure contributor community.
>
> Thankfully, pagure development *isn't* dead and after the mailman
> stack stuff is sorted out, I can go back to working on Pagure 6.0.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238421
Bug ID: 2238421
Summary: perl-version-0.9930 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-version
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Hi Ankur,
On Sun, Sep 10, 2023 at 10:04:18PM +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I have a package that has begun to use the nimble language in its new
> version:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181693
> https://nim-lang.org/
>
> It isn't packaged for Fedora yet, though. Is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238414
Bug ID: 2238414
Summary: perl-Mojolicious-9.34 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Mojolicious
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
The discussion thread to provide feedback on this proposed change can be found
here
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f40-change-proposal-php-8-3-self-contained/89611/1
___
devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
The discussion thread to provide feedback on this proposed change can be found
here
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f40-change-proposal-php-8-3-self-contained/89611/1
___
devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
Wiki https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/php83
This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by
The discussion thread for feedback on this change proposal can be found here
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f40-change-proposal-passim-peer-to-peer-metadata-self-contained/89608/1
___
devel-announce mailing list --
Wiki https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/php83
This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by
The discussion thread for feedback on this change proposal can be found here
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f40-change-proposal-passim-peer-to-peer-metadata-self-contained/89608/1
___
devel-announce mailing list --
The discussion thread is now available for feedback on this proposed change
here
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f40-change-proposal-switch-pam-userdb-from-berkeleydb-to-gdbm-system-wide/89606/1
___
devel-announce mailing list --
Wiki https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Passim_P2P_Metadata
This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented
The discussion thread is now available for feedback on this proposed change
here
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f40-change-proposal-switch-pam-userdb-from-berkeleydb-to-gdbm-system-wide/89606/1
___
devel-announce mailing list --
Wiki https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Passim_P2P_Metadata
This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented
Wiki https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/PamBerkeleyDBtoGdbm
== Summary ==
pam_userdb was built with support for BerkeleyDB, but this project is
no longer maintained as open source, so it is replaced by GDBM.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:ipedrosa| Iker Pedrosa]] [[User:fjanus| Filip Janus]]
*
The discussion thread is now available for feedback at
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f40-change-proposal-drop-sshd-socket-self-contained/89604/1
___
devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an
Wiki https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/PamBerkeleyDBtoGdbm
== Summary ==
pam_userdb was built with support for BerkeleyDB, but this project is
no longer maintained as open source, so it is replaced by GDBM.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:ipedrosa| Iker Pedrosa]] [[User:fjanus| Filip Janus]]
*
The discussion thread is now available for feedback at
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f40-change-proposal-drop-sshd-socket-self-contained/89604/1
___
devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 03:08:50PM +0200, Tomas Hrcka wrote:
> Sorry for the confusion with work that is already done,
> We can drop the critpath thanks Adam!
>
>
> As it goes for EoL and package retirement we for the past few releases we
> are saving EOL date in bodhi.
> So getting EOL for
== Summary ==
The sshd.socket behavior may cause the remote DoS and require a manual
intervention to make the server accepting the ssh connections back.
sshd.service doesn't have these downsides
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:Dbelyavs| Dmitry Belyavskiy]]
* Email: dbely...@redhat.com
== Detailed
== Summary ==
The sshd.socket behavior may cause the remote DoS and require a manual
intervention to make the server accepting the ssh connections back.
sshd.service doesn't have these downsides
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:Dbelyavs| Dmitry Belyavskiy]]
* Email: dbely...@redhat.com
== Detailed
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 11:43:55AM -0400, Solomon Peachy via devel wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 07:58:03AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > No? All of our packages are on https://src.fedoraproject.org/ and our
> > Fedora-specific source code goes on https://pagure.io/. These are both
> >
On Mon, 2023-09-11 at 11:43 -0400, Solomon Peachy via devel wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 07:58:03AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > No? All of our packages are on https://src.fedoraproject.org/ and our
> > Fedora-specific source code goes on https://pagure.io/. These are both
> > Pagure,
The discussion thread is now available a
thttps://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f40-change-proposal-drop-delta-rpms/89601/1
for feedback
___
devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 11:44 AM Solomon Peachy via devel
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 07:58:03AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > No? All of our packages are on https://src.fedoraproject.org/ and our
> > Fedora-specific source code goes on https://pagure.io/. These are both
> > Pagure,
The discussion thread is now available a
thttps://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f40-change-proposal-drop-delta-rpms/89601/1
for feedback
___
devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238253
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
Wiki https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Drop_Delta_RPMs
== Summary ==
Stop producing Delta RPMs during the compose process, and disable deltarpm
support in the default configuration of DNF / DNF5.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:decathorpe| Fabio Valentini]]
* Email: decatho...@gmail.com
*
Wiki https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Drop_Delta_RPMs
== Summary ==
Stop producing Delta RPMs during the compose process, and disable deltarpm
support in the default configuration of DNF / DNF5.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:decathorpe| Fabio Valentini]]
* Email: decatho...@gmail.com
*
Il 11/09/23 15:08, Tomas Hrcka ha scritto:
> Sorry for the confusion with work that is already done,
> We can drop the critpath thanks Adam!
>
> As it goes for EoL and package retirement we for the past few releases we are
> saving EOL date in bodhi.
> So getting EOL for specific release is not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238253
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 07:58:03AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> No? All of our packages are on https://src.fedoraproject.org/ and our
> Fedora-specific source code goes on https://pagure.io/. These are both
> Pagure, not GitLab. It is open source.
https://lwn.net/Articles/817426/
I corrected perl-CBOR-XS license from:
GPLv3+ and (BSD or GPLv2+)
to:
GPL-1.0-or-later AND (BSD-2-Clause OR GPL-2.0-or-later)
-- Petr
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238253
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|ppi...@redhat.com |
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231263
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Text-CSV-2.03-1.fc40
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231263
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from
On Mo, 21.08.23 11:07, Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) wrote:
> On Do, 17.08.23 08:25, Chris Adams (li...@cmadams.net) wrote:
>
> > Once upon a time, Lennart Poettering said:
> > > Yes, and if this is not what you want, then disable the
> > > ratelimit. That's what I am saying?
> >
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224550
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224550
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Net-CLI-Interact-2.400
Sorry for the confusion with work that is already done,
We can drop the critpath thanks Adam!
As it goes for EoL and package retirement we for the past few releases we
are saving EOL date in bodhi.
So getting EOL for specific release is not a problem once the release is
out.
For storing the
On Mon, Sep 11 2023 at 08:00:29 AM -0400, Solomon Peachy via devel
wrote:
Not to retread old drama, but doesn't Fedora now rely on a proprietary
version of Gitlab?
No? All of our packages are on https://src.fedoraproject.org/ and our
Fedora-specific source code goes on https://pagure.io/.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238261
František Hrdina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224550
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Upgrade |Upgrade
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 04:35:50AM +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> +1, Fedora MUST NOT rely on proprietary infrastructure. IMHO, it is a
> mistake that Red Hat is doing so, and Fedora should not follow that
> unfortunate move.
Not to retread old drama, but doesn't Fedora now rely on a
On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 08:34:59AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 06:06:45AM -0400, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 07:15:42AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > > %systemd_postun_with_restart, so adding
Hello everyone,
Please join us at the next Open NeuroFedora team meeting on Monday 11
September at 1300UTC in #fedora-neuro on IRC (Libera.chat). The meeting
is a public meeting, and open for everyone to attend. You can join us
over:
IRC: https://webchat.libera.chat/?channels=#fedora-neuro
(We
57 matches
Mail list logo
