The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-5418332424
chromium-120.0.6099.109-1.el7
2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-33f7b7a10c
unrealircd-6.1.4-1.el7
The following builds
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2252479
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Date-Manip-6.93-1.fc39
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-a79d31df77
chromium-120.0.6099.109-1.el8
2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-4cbae7b5bd
unrealircd-6.1.4-1.el8
0
On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 4:14 PM Brad Smith wrote:
>
> At a minimum, I recommend that the patch include the original values
> for GOPROXY, GOSUMDB, and GOTOOLCHAIN as comments. This makes it
> easier to change back to default values. At the moment, one has to
> visit the relevant web pages.
>
> I
Hi all.
SCons-4.6.0 will be built in Rawhide.
Here there are testing builds if you need to try your packages with it:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sagitter/ForTesting/build/6771118/
Regards.
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter
mailto:
At a minimum, I recommend that the patch include the original values
for GOPROXY, GOSUMDB, and GOTOOLCHAIN as comments. This makes it
easier to change back to default values. At the moment, one has to
visit the relevant web pages.
I lean towards providing upstream defaults in this case with
In my opinion none of these permission changes make any sense for installations
that aren't guided by some mostly much more strict requirements than those for
the Fedora workstations or other general installations of Fedora. They simply
should not be applied.
Removing the setuid bit from the
Hello,
I found myself being the main admin of python-pytzdata.
I have not done this on purpose, somebody must have given the package to me.
I'm orphaning it.
$ repoquery -q --repo=rawhide{,-source} --whatrequires python3-pytzdata
python-maya-0:0.6.1-10.fc39.src
Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho writes:
> Following the recent approval from Fesco, I'm planning to distribute
> zlib-ng-compat packages for Rawhide later this week.
> I hope this will give us enough time to work on the issues before
> Fedora 40 is released. 爛
>
> So, keep in mind this will
On Tue Dec 19, 2023 at 17:33 +0100, Alejandro Saez Morollon wrote:
> TL;DR: Remove a patch we ship in Go that disables GOPROXY and GOSUMDB and
> follow upstream defaults, or keep it?
I support keeping the Google Go module proxy disabled by default. Our
packages should not send telemetry data to
Hi everyone.
TL;DR: Remove a patch we ship in Go that disables GOPROXY and GOSUMDB and
follow upstream defaults, or keep it?
Recently, I had a short conversation in a public forum about two Go
features that we modified in Fedora. GOPROXY and GOSUMDB. As I prepare the
Fedora 40 and Go 1.22
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL Steering Committee on 2023-12-20 from 16:00:00 to 17:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-meet...@chat.fedoraproject.org
The meeting will be about:
https://chat.fedoraproject.org/#/room/#meeting:fedoraproject.org
This is the weekly EPEL Steering
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20231218.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20231219.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 5
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 305
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 30.94 MiB
Size of dropped packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2249049
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Eval-Context-0.09.11-3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2249049
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 10:08 AM Pavel Raiskup wrote:
>
> On pátek 1. prosince 2023 15:04:10 CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > Hello maintainers!
> >
> > Let me announce a new release of Mock Core Configs v39.3, aka
> > the configuration files for Mock, the chroot build environment manager
> > for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2255149
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2255149
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
Hi,
> > > This is IMHO a mistake, the systemd-boot and UKI paths are the perfect
> > > time
> > > to break with shim and require some form of actual fedora/whatever secure
> > > boot key enrollment on the machine.
> >
> > This is not going to fly. There are too many cases where you simply
>
19 matches
Mail list logo
