Meld directory compare still broken in f36

Hi, meld directory compare in f36 is broken. I opened a bug report last month: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091377 Some days later, kiilerix provided a PR to fix this issue: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/meld/pull-request/6 The PR has been accepted but a new package

Re: [cdparanoia] License field fix awaiting to be merged

> > The issue here is that there's not a way to describe the SRPM license > separate from the binary RPM license. So that information is important > for SRPM distribution. > But Licensing Guidelines make clear that the License: field refers to the binary packages not source ones. BR, Andrea

Re: [cdparanoia] License field fix awaiting to be merged

I believe this patch is not correct. "The License: field refers to the licenses of the contents of the *binary* rpm." https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/ In the README file there is writted: "cdparanoia (the command line tool) is released under the

gcompris-qt license change

gcompris-qt changed license from GPLv3+ to AGPLv3 in version 1.1 because they used a library for analog electricity activity under AGPLv3 causing the whole software to be licensed under it. Regards, Andrea ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Error creating the package RPM: make:*** No rule to make target 'install'.

Hi! On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 1:15 PM Helg Green via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > The program is installed in the folder > /opt/simplest_studio/bin/simplest_studio > > A strange error also appeared: > . > . > . > RPM build errors: > Empty %files file >

Re: Pinta failed to build on f33/armv7hl

Il lun 17 ago 2020, 19:55 Jeff Law ha scritto: > On Fri, 2020-08-14 at 12:03 +0200, Andrea Musuruane wrote: > > Hi guys, > >I tried to update pinta to the latest upstream version. It built fine > except than on f33/armv7hl: > > > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject

Pinta failed to build on f33/armv7hl

Hi guys, I tried to update pinta to the latest upstream version. It built fine except than on f33/armv7hl: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/1530/49241530/build.log I have no idea why. Can someone please help? Thanks! Andrea ___ devel

Re: Still problems with s390x builds

On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 11:28 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > I submitted another build. It failed with the same error: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=48924234 > > There was some upstream to us work in the iad2 datacenter today: > >

Re: Still problems with s390x builds

On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 5:46 PM José Abílio Matos wrote: > On Saturday, 8 August 2020 16.26.39 WEST Andrea Musuruane wrote: > > > Can someone please check? > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > Andrea > > > > When that happens I issue

Still problems with s390x builds

Hi guys, I was updating gcompris-qt for the newer cmake but I got this error on the s390x builder: GenericError: Downloaded rpm http://kojipkgs-cache01.s390.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/4182/48924182/gcompris-qt-0.97-6.fc33.src.rpm is corrupted: rpm's header can't be extracted:

Re: s390x weirdness during mass rebuild

Hi guys, at least one of the packages I maintain was also affected. Fedora Release Engineering has opened a bug against the package for this issue. Can you please avoid that? Moreover, would my package be orphaned in 8 weeks because it cannot be built for a builder issue on s390x?

Re: Please BuildRequire python3-setuptools explicitly

On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 6:26 PM Tomas Hrnciar wrote: > Hello everyone, > > there are plenty of Python packages in Fedora currently using setuptools at > buildtime but not all of them are BuildRequiring it explicitly. This only > works > because python3-devel (transitively) depends on

FEDORA-2019-b55ed79892 ejected from the push

Hi guys, can someone please tell me what's going on? https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-b55ed79892 Thanks! Andrea ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: List of Python 2 packages to be removed mid-November

HI! On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 4:25 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > Dear maintainers, > here is a list of packages that (transitively, at build or run time) > require > Python 2 and have not yet got a FESCo exception to do so. > If you were bcced on this e-mail, it affects one or more of your packages. >

Re: Dependency issues with mono on F31?

On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 4:40 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 11:37:28AM +0200, Andrea Musuruane wrote: > > Hi all, > > recently it has been opened a bug against pinta: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1755274 > > > > It s

Dependency issues with mono on F31?

Hi all, recently it has been opened a bug against pinta: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1755274 It seems that for some unknown reason, in F31, the build process is no longer able to determine mono dependencies correctly. Do someone have some hint for this? Thanks! Andrea

Re: Fwd: gcompris-qt: help needed

Hi! On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 6:02 PM, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > I've Searched for bugs at our ArchLinux fellows and they mentioned this: > > https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/57542?project=0=id=desc > %5B0%5D=closed=gcompris-qt > > It seems caused by this change: >

Fwd: gcompris-qt: help needed

Hi! I'm forwarding this request for help here since it seems there is no one available on Fedora games. The strange thing about this issue is that on F27 everything is fine (the spec file is the same). Thanks in advance, Andrea -- Forwarded message -- From: Andrea

Re: Packages which call install-info in scriptlets

Hi, On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 2:46 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > As of Fedora 28, the 'info' package has gained a file trigger > (%transfiletrigger) which will automatically rebuild the info directory > node when any file is installed into %_infodir. Thus it is no longer > necessary for

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

Hi On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 6:09 PM, Igor Gnatenko < ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Over this weekend I've performed scratch-mass-rebuild without having gcc > and > gcc-c++ in buildroot of all Fedora packages, many of which failed

Re: Empty debugsourcefiles.list when building out of source

On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 11:45 AM, David Demelier wrote: > Is there a place where you see that we must use this variable? > > Anyway, it worked, I changed the CMake invocation to: > > cmake ... \ > -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS="${RPM_OPT_FLAGS}" \ >

Re: Raising requirement for application icons in GNOME Software

Hi, On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 9:12 PM, Richard Hughes wrote: > Hi all, > > At the moment the appstream-builder requires a 48x48px application > icon[1] to be included in the AppStream metadata. I'm sure it's no > surprise that 48x48 padded to 64x64 and then interpolated up to

Re: Review swap

Hi Volerk, Hello Andrea! > > Please add it to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GIS > Added!! Bye, Andrea ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review swap

Hi, On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Alexander Ploumistos < alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Andrea, > > I've taken it, but my ISP is giving me some trouble at the moment, > they said they'll get things sorted out within the hour. > > I don't have a package ready for review yet, but I

Review swap

Hi! I'm looking for a reviewer for osmctools - Tools to manipulate OpenStreetMap files: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1464777 Maybe some other OSM mapper is interested? I'm happy to exchange reviews. Thanks in advance. Bye, Andrea

Re: Package suggestions

On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 11:11 PM, rugk wrote: > FYI, the game's name I could not remember was "Which way is up". See > https://packages.debian.org/stretch/whichwayisup. > Nice game. I didn't know it. I packaged it and it's available for review:

Re: Unretiring Onboard (on screen keyboard)

Hi Nemanja, On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 10:26 PM, Nemanja Milosevic < nmilo...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I would like to request admin access to the package Onboard. Onboard is an > onscreen keyboard which I am using on my BayTrail tablet and it works > really well. > > The

Re: Self Introduction: Ron Olson

On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 2:53 AM, Ron Olson wrote: > Aloha all- > > I’m Ron Olson, with the nickname tachoknight. I have been using Unix since > 1989 and Linux since about 1992, when we somehow got an early version to run > on a Gateway2000 machine. Welcome! > I have

Re: [Guidelines change] Changes to the packaging guidelines

On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Andrea Musuruane <musur...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 8:25 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III <ti...@math.uh.edu> > wrote: >> >> Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines. >> >> - >&

Re: [Guidelines change] Changes to the packaging guidelines

On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 8:25 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines. > > - > > The Filesystem Layout section of the guidelines was simplified and > outdated information was removed. > > *

Re: Policy change on emulators

On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 12:07 AM, Tom Callaway <tcall...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 05/04/2016 05:20 AM, Andrea Musuruane wrote: > > Does this mean that most console emulators (i.e. > > NES/SNES/MasterSystem/Genesis emulators) are now acceptable in Fedora? > > Subject t

Re: Policy change on emulators

On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 8:55 PM, Tom Callaway wrote: > Some emulators (applications which emulate another platform) are not > permitted for inclusion in Fedora. These rules will help you determine > whether an emulator is acceptable for Fedora. > > * Emulators which depend on

Tecnoballz

Hi all, I am Tecnoballz maintainer. Currently Tecnoballz is failing to build in rawhide: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1308179 There is a new upstream version (0.93.1) and it builds without problems. I also added Debian/upstream patches. In order to allow a shared scoreboard

Re: Koji timeout

On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 6:23 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: seems it's the mono compiler process that gets stuck, now to find out why ... Would it help if I open a bug for this issue? Probibly, but not sure where makes the most sense. ;( Can you try another build now? I

Re: Koji timeout

On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: On Sun, 9 Nov 2014 16:48:03 +0100 Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com wrote: I could build for F20 (I think a lucky strike) but I couldn't for rawhide. This is the task: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo

Re: Koji timeout

On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Dan Horák d...@danny.cz wrote: On Tue, 4 Nov 2014 14:45:43 +0100 Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com

Re: Koji timeout

On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 9:02 AM, Dan Horák d...@danny.cz wrote: hm, it's not the first case where Mono enters a deadlock or endless loop ... What is your host system and what is the kernel version? $ cat /etc/redhat-release Fedora release 20 (Heisenbug) $ uname -r 3.16.6-200.fc20.x86_64 Bye,

Re: Koji timeout

On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Dan Horák d...@danny.cz wrote: the builders have 3.16.3-200.fc20.x86_64, could you retry the local mock rebuild with this kernel installed? I know it won't solve the problem, but might lead to having a reproducer. Eventually also with the same mock config as

Re: Koji timeout

On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com wrote: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8009403 Hi, Please try again with make directly instead of make %{?_smp_mflags}. I tried

Koji timeout

Hi, I'm trying to build pinta but it fails due to timeout on F20 and F22: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8009403 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8009471 It built fine for F19 and F21 though. And it builds fine using mock. I resubmitted the two failed

Re: The trouble with metadata-extractor

On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky If it helps, if it makes things easier, I can release the ownership of metadata-extractor and someone else can have good care. I just packaged it because, as an openstreetmap mapper, I longed to have JOSM in Fedora Libraries should

Re: The trouble with metadata-extractor

I send again the following post. I can't believe not to get an opinion :) Bye, Andrea. On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 11:37 PM, Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.comwrote: Hi all, last April the following bug report was opened: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947457 As I stated

The trouble with metadata-extractor

Hi all, last April the following bug report was opened: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947457 As I stated on bugzilla, metadata-extractor was just needed by JOSM. Updating metadata-extractor would break JOSM. Anyway I suggested to patch JOSM to use a newer version of

Re: Proposal: AppData files in all application packages?

Hi Richard, On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all. I'm the developer for PackageKit and gnome-software, the latter being the new software center we're hopefully including as a technical preview in Fedora 20. [...] At the moment, we use the

Re: Customizing Firefox Search.

On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Daniel J Walsh dwa...@redhat.com wrote: Any know of a way to build a customized search into firefox. Basically I want to setup a search pull down which is hard coded to a particular site. Probably this is what you want: http://www.opensearch.org/Home Bye,

Re: Oldest package review resolved

On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Mario Ceresa mrcer...@gmail.com wrote: I deeply admire Lee's perseverance! My oldest was 3 years and I felt trapped in the Neverending Story :) Out of curiosity, could you post a link to the oldest one? It seems this one is even older:

Re: another upgrade, another disaster

On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 7:57 AM, Jan Synacek jsyna...@redhat.com wrote:   yum groupinstall GNOME Desktop Environment This alone unfortunately doesn't do the trick. You will probably have to    yum groupinstall X Window System as well as some drivers for your graphic card to get it working.

Re: another upgrade, another disaster

On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: * 3rd attempt: Same as options as the 2nd attempt but this time I chose to enable only the F17 remote repositories and I disabled the Install repo so I presume all the packages were downloaded from the net. At about 85%

Re: another upgrade, another disaster

On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote: Basically the same kind of failure as the last several times I did updates. This time f16-f17.  Used preupgrade. I'd like to share with you my

Re: another upgrade, another disaster

On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote: Basically the same kind of failure as the last several times I did updates. This time f16-f17.  Used preupgrade. I'd like to share with you my experience about installing Fedora 17/x86_64. It is a real PITA. No doubts

Re: Rpmbuild unable to recognize used libs?

On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Panu Matilainen pmati...@laiskiainen.org wrote: On 02/11/2012 02:52 PM, Andrea Musuruane wrote: Hi all,     a reporter just submitted this bug against tecnoballz: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789544 After closer inspection, I see that the RPM

Re: Rpmbuild unable to recognize used libs?

On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com wrote: There still seems to be problems. I rebuilt it locally with an updated F16 and now I get: $ rpm -qp --requires /home/andrea/rpmbuild/SRPMS

Rpmbuild unable to recognize used libs?

Hi all, a reporter just submitted this bug against tecnoballz: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789544 After closer inspection, I see that the RPM doesn't require the needed libraries: $ rpm -q --requires tecnoballz /bin/sh /bin/sh config(tecnoballz) = 0.92-11.fc16

BuildError: No srpms found

Hi all, I continue getting the following error while trying to build tecnoballz for F16 F15: BuildError: No srpms found in /var/lib/mock/f16-build-1198748-191373/root/tmp/scmroot/tecnoballz. Example build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3577090 I really wonder what's

Re: BuildError: No srpms found

On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Did you forget to commit/push that patch? :) It seems so (blush) Thanks, Andrea. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: PDFCrack - empty debuginfo file

On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 3:29 PM, P J P pj.pan...@yahoo.co.in wrote: I'm trying to package the PDFCrack tool for Fedora, Somehow it is creating an empty DebugInfo package. Could someone tell why it is creating an empty debuginfo package? Because it executes strip pdfcrack :) Bye, Andrea. --

Re: package installation statistics

2011/6/3 Björn Persson bj...@xn--rombobjrn-67a.se: There's no reason why Debian's Popcon couldn't be ported to Fedora, but Popcon is something that users enable voluntarily (and it must be, because if it were on by default it would be spyware), so it counts only those users who want to be

F15 and HP printer

Hi all, I just installed F15 over my old F14 (I just kept /home). I tried installing my printer (HP Deskjet 5740) and I failed miserably. First, accessing the printer panel from the system settings was useless. No printer could be detected. Then, I tried to run hp-setup from a root terminal.

Re: F15 and HP printer

On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Mike Chambers m...@miketc.net wrote: On Sun, 2011-05-29 at 10:26 +0200, Andrea Musuruane wrote: Hi all,     I just installed F15 over my old F14 (I just kept /home). I tried installing my printer (HP Deskjet 5740) and I failed miserably. First, I would

Orphaning genesis

Hi all, I'm orphaning genesis (a Graphical frontend to SyncEvolution). Latest upstream release changed focus and now it is on quick access to basic sync operations, leaving configuration tasks and fine-grained control to syncevolution-gtk. Moreover, IMHO it is too strictly linked to Ubuntu

Re: Package rebuilds for gcc bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634757

On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 8:32 AM, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, On 11/24/2010 12:45 AM, Jesse Keating wrote: On 10/5/10 3:27 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: snip Here is a list of the current known potentially bad builds and what action could be or has been taken: wildmidi - my

Retiring genesis

Hi all, I've read some months late the following announcement regarding genesis: https://launchpad.net/genesis-sync/+announcement/5958 Genesis is now strictly linked to Ubuntu development deprecating the system tray altogether and encouraging the use of application indicators. Moreover the

F12/ Cannot update

Hi all, If I try to update F12 I get the following error: # yum update Plugin abilitati:presto, refresh-packagekit Impostazione processo di aggiornamento Risoluzione dipendenze -- Esecuzione del controllo di transazione --- Pacchetto firefox.x86_64 0:3.5.12-1.fc12 settato per essere

Re: The move to git!

On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com wrote: OK. I deleted the current repo and started again. I do have fedora-packager 0.5.1. Now fedora-packager crashes when uploading new sources. $ fedpkg clone zaz Cloning into zaz... [..] Resolving deltas: 100% (11/11

Re: The move to git!

On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Dominic Hopf dma...@googlemail.com wrote: I just yesterday had similar problems and then found out my ~/.fedora.cert was out of date since five days ago. Maybe it's the same for you, did you already had a look there? :) Yes. It will be valid until Dec 7, 2010.

Re: The move to git!

On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Dominic Hopf dma...@googlemail.com wrote: I just yesterday had similar problems and then found out my ~/.fedora.cert was out of date since five days ago. Maybe it's the same for you, did

Re: The move to git!

Hi all, I do not know anything about GIT and I tried to follow this thread and the Using_Fedora_GIT in the wiki to make my first commit The workflow was more or less the following: $ fedpkg clone zaz $ cd zaz/ $ cp -a ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES/zaz-0.8.0.tar.bz2 . $ cp -a ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/zaz.spec .

Re: The move to git!

On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:  On 07/31/2010 03:19 PM, Andrea Musuruane wrote: l    return(int(fedoras[-1].strip('f')) + 1) IndexError: list index out of range Help is really appreciated. Thanks! make sure you update fedora-packager to 0.5.1

Re: New Hatari version: need help

2010/6/19 Alexander Boström a...@root.snowtree.se: lör 2010-06-19 klockan 19:32 +0200 skrev Andrea Musuruane: I do not know how should I threat those internal libraries. How should I package them? Because upstream uses static libraries the dynamic versions cmake creates are not versioned

Re: New Hatari version: need help

On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 7:44 PM, Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com wrote: You can open a RFE report against this package in bugzilla for review. Can you point me to an example? For internal libs, if those libs are not libs from other project, you can simply use %cmake  

New Hatari version: need help

Hi all, a new version of Hatari has recently been released: http://hatari.berlios.de/ The new version drops the old build system based on autotools and now it only support cmake. An (optional) python GUI is now bundled with the emulator. Moreover some static libraries have been introduced

Re: Desktop categories

On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Alain Portal alain.por...@free.fr wrote: I'm sorry, I forgot to answer this :-( And I see that perhaps, I wasn't very clear in my question. I'm talking about the Categories entry. I could see in some desktop files provided by applications that some