On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 15:36:27 -0400,
Dave Jones da...@redhat.com wrote:
So we're thinking of trying this again this thursday with a focus on 16,
(but triage work on older releases is welcomed too).
I have a bug (36242 at the unavailable kernel bugzilla and 684424 in Fedora)
where sound
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 10:38:18 -0400,
Dave Jones da...@redhat.com wrote:
The kernel-debug rpm should have everything you'd need.
But I can't get the system to crash to get a traceback. It just hangs.
I tried using the sysrq commands and NMI timeouts and I haven't been able
to get a dump or
As you can see, suspending is the right thing to do.
1) Not for servers
2) This is todays hardware and with every generation the gap is getting
smaller
between dyn pm savings and suspend savings.
It looks like it also might not be for systems that have encrypted swap.
I think I started
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 11:49:15 -0400,
Jesse Keating jkeat...@j2solutions.net wrote:
Yeah, for some reason it's not seeing the python-gitdb I built up. Odd
because I swore I tested this with the nose tests in GitPython. Oh well,
my fault for building something on a Friday. Doubly my
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 07:47:12 -0500,
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
Unless someone speaks up, with some plan to make the current version work
in the near future, I'll start the retirement process in about a week.
Chess has now been retired (pending processing by releng
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 12:39:46 -0600,
Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 06:47, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
I was hoping to be able to work on a forked version of chess and have it
replace chess in Fedora, but I haven't had time to learn enough
I was hoping to be able to work on a forked version of chess and have it
replace chess in Fedora, but I haven't had time to learn enough about
ogre to do this, and chess is broken enough now that there is no point
in including it any more. So I am looking at retiring it in f16+.
The current
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 14:01:10 +0200,
Nils Philippsen n...@redhat.com wrote:
It's unclear to me why this would need to be the case. Creating a build
root for what we perceive as Rawhide should be just the same as
Chain building is allowed for rawhide to help get groups of packages
built.
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 15:01:06 +0200,
Nils Philippsen n...@redhat.com wrote:
I'd like to see a discussion about how we can ensure -- within
reasonable limits -- that e.g. bumping a library's SONAME is followed by
dependent components being rebuilt and included with the providing
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 11:18:18 -0700,
Jesse Keating jkeat...@j2solutions.net wrote:
One change to make this better might be to move the inheritance point to
updates-testing so that things built from the fresh branch are immediately
inherited into rawhide.
I think this would be a change
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 01:08:56 +0300,
Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com wrote:
As it is right now, it is somewhat difficult to get off the rawhide
track and to continue on Branched. For example, if a person that's
yum downgrade works pretty reasonably if you haven't moved too far past.
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 16:03:38 -0400,
Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com wrote:
Try the 3.1-rc6 kernel sitting in bodhi waiting to be pushed to f16 stable.
While I don't have hard numbers running that kernel seems to help. My rawhide
system was so slow that I rebuilt that kernel (though probably I
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 13:46:40 -0700,
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
They weren't; see my numbers in the related bug
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735268 ). The debug
overhead appears to have gotten much heavier in 3.1.
I added myself to that bug, though I
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 14:16:16 -0700,
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
The 'fix' for the F16 kernel is simply that, with the rc6 build,
debugging has been disabled. debugging is never disabled in Rawhide
kernels, so if debugging overhead is your problem, no Rawhide kernel is
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 17:28:10 -0400,
Dave Jones da...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 03:59:02PM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
I think the degree of slow down now, compared with the past, makes this
issue a bug. If things are like they are now, I won't be running debug
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 22:55:21 -0400,
Tom Lane t...@redhat.com wrote:
(This isn't new with 9.1, btw --- the last version or so of 9.0
for F16 was the same, since we switched over to native systemd
files.)
I don't remember what I did for 9.0. I either found that stuff or I did
a dump and
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 09:57:34 -0600,
Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote:
In reading the long trash each other fest that accompanies pre-release
jitters, could we start on a cleaner plate? What do the people who are
using rawhide day-in/day-out expect out of the channel? What level
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 03:16:47 -0400,
Tom Lane t...@redhat.com wrote:
OK, it's built and filed at
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/postgresql-9.1.0-1.fc16
One thing I noticed is that service postgresql initdb and
service postgresql help no longer work. I was hoping they'd redirect
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 09:43:27 +0100,
Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/09/11 09:33, Jim Meyering wrote:
darrell pfeifer wrote:
Fails for me too, with the same error.
Thanks for confirming that.
I don't mean to be rude or inflammatory, but do have to wonder how such
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 11:13:03 +0200,
Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
2011/7/2 Tom Lane t...@redhat.com:
=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Micha=B3_Piotrowski?= mkkp...@gmail.com writes:
Are there any plans to provide PostgreSQL 9.1 in Fedora 16? PostgreSQL
9.1 is in beta2 now and it's
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 11:27:53 -0400,
Tom Lane t...@redhat.com wrote:
Yeah. I have done test packaging of 9.1rc1 already, so it's pretty much
ready to go on my end. I would be prepared to push 9.1 into f16 on
Monday if there were enough people willing to test and up-karma it
before the
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 14:59:00 +0200,
Michel Alexandre Salim sali...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Dear all,
The following packages are affected by the libgee API change in
Rawhide (from 0.6.1 / gee-1.0.pc to 0.7.0 / gee-0.8.pc). Of the two
packages I randomly tested (rygel and pino), merely
I have submitted a review request for floppy-support:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735554
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 09:27:12 -0600,
Jonathan Corbet corbet...@lwn.net wrote:
Nobody else has griped on the Rawhide front, but, then, I think I may be
about the only Rawhide user left (and people keep telling me that I
shouldn't be there either). If it's only me I'll figure out how to
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 22:41:45 -0500,
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
Below is a proposed specfile for the floppy case. (Analog joystick would be
very similar.) I haven't tested the package for functionality yet, but did
test it with rpmbuild and rpmlint. Is this what we want
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:58:41 +0200,
Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:41:45PM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
%install
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/modules-load.d
echo floppy $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/modules-load.d
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 03:33:04 +0200,
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
No, it means that (unless this was recently fixed) you have to modprobe it
manually (e.g. from rc.local) because nothing bothers trying to modprobe it
for you anymore. IMHO, this is really broken, but the
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 13:41:57 +0100,
Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
ACPI turned out to be full of lies. The real problem is that machines
will report a floppy controller even if they have no floppy drives
attached, and the ACPI function that's supposed to return a list of
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 14:26:39 +0100,
Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
Or just add floppy-support and analog-joystick-support packages that
include appropriate modprobe.conf fragments, and have documentation that
instructs the user to install them.
To make this more precise,
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 14:37:16 +0100,
Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 08:09:51AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 14:26:39 +0100,
Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
Or just add floppy-support and analog-joystick
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 14:50:10 +0100,
Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
On 30/08/11 14:23, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
I'll need to test it. Right now I use explicit modprobe commands in
rc.local, which isn't good for packages. I looked at modprobe.conf
documentation and it doesn't seem
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 13:33:06 -0700,
Jeremiah Summers jmiah...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes Literally I did, but as Adam just pointed out running Live just
dumps the squashfs image to the drive and slaps grud on it. I'm not
It actually dumps the ext4 image on the drive and then resizes it to
fit
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 15:22:21 -0700,
John Reiser jrei...@bitwagon.com wrote:
It would be nice to get rid of the embedded ext4 image now that squashfs
supports special files and extended attributes (needed for selinuix labels),
but there are some other roadblocks that will block that
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 15:22:21 -0700,
John Reiser jrei...@bitwagon.com wrote:
It would be nice to get rid of the embedded ext4 image now that squashfs
supports special files and extended attributes (needed for selinuix labels),
but there are some other roadblocks that will block that
%{_libdir}/modules-load.d
echo floppy $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/modules-load.d/floppy.conf
%files
%{_libdir}/modules-load.d/floppy.conf
%post
/sbin/modprobe floppy
%changelog
* Tue Aug 30 2011 Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to 1.0-1
- Initial package creation
--
devel mailing list
devel
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:41:43 -0600,
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 15:36:14 +
Branched Report rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Compose started at Mon Aug 22 13:15:30 UTC 2011
The repodiff/spam-o-matic failed here, but the compose did finish as
far as I
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 16:02:08 -0600,
Pete Zaitcev zait...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 11:31:55 -0700
John Reiser jrei...@bitwagon.com wrote:
How much memory will anaconda require to install Fedora 16?
Anaconda requires 768MB, and more (=1GB) if there is no swap
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 17:50:21 +0200,
Joachim Backes joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de wrote:
Hi,
since days it's not possible to update my F16 system fully (a lot of
updates are refused because of dependency problems [see BZ 731617]).
Anybody knows if the problem will be solved?
I think
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 11:11:34 -0500,
Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
This is my first time to get a message like this. Do I need to do
anything yet or is this a branching issue that will likely resolve
itself?
I suspect it is something related to the first build of F16. I got
One thing to watch out for is /var/empty. I have had to manually recreate
/var/empty and /var/empty/sshd to get the server to work again. This
might be related to the recent rpm issue, but I am not sure about that.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 20:46:25 +0200,
drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
The proper fix would have been to just use epoch. People can call them
evil all they want they are perfectly suitable for that kind of
problems.
Or just rebuild the old version again. (Which should work unless
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 09:12:54 +0200,
Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
I've been thinking about orphaning monkey-bubble for a while now,
mostly because it is dead upstream and it is using various obsolete
gnome technologies (esound, libgnomeui, bonobo).
Yesterday it came
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 16:15:34 +,
Benjamin Lewis ben.le...@benl.co.uk wrote:
Out of curiosity, how does this affect existing systems which have human
UIDs of 500, 501, etc..?
Do they suddenly become system UIDs or is login.defs left alone then
(and consequently no change happens)?
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 16:54:44 -0500,
Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com wrote:
Farkas Levente wrote:
if you said that this's the current state of btrfs than it's not ready
as a default fs for f16. so please postpone it at least to f17.
If f16 gets kernel 3.1 (or backported stuff into
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 15:28:59 -0400,
Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
Orphan pychess
comaintained by: salimma
I'll take this one. It's a nice enough chess program that I want to keep it.
Orphan: gdk-pixbuf
freetennis requires gdk-pixbuf-devel = 1:0.22.0-38.fc12
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 12:23:21 -0400,
ceco cfunder...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok folks I know everyone is busy but it's time to actually sit down and write
a driver for the ATI Radeon card used in a lot of laptops. This has been a
topic/bug in the forums since 2008 without being resolved and the
On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 08:37:05 +0200,
Eric Tanguy eric.tan...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 09/07/2011 02:47, Bruno Wolff III a écrit :
On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 22:30:01 +0200,
Eric Tanguyeric.tan...@gmail.com wrote:
At the same time qucs-0.0.16 were out a new version of freehdl
appeared 0.0.8
On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 18:50:43 +0200,
Eric Tanguy eric.tan...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 09/07/2011 14:53, Bruno Wolff III a écrit :
If you aren't using fedpkg to do the local build, you might not be passing
the correct config options. I seem to remember that %config passes an
argument
On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 19:30:56 +0200,
Miloslav Trmač m...@volny.cz wrote:
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Eric Tanguy eric.tan...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 09/07/2011 14:53, Bruno Wolff III a écrit :
If you aren't using fedpkg to do the local build, you might not be passing
the correct
On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 22:30:01 +0200,
Eric Tanguy eric.tan...@gmail.com wrote:
At the same time qucs-0.0.16 were out a new version of freehdl
appeared 0.0.8 but when i try to build it i have an error about
rpath and i don't know how to solve it :
Could you help me for this problem also ?
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 13:06:12 +1000,
Amit Saha droid...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 4:23 AM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
I no longer have a need/care for these packages, they are up for grabs:
contacts
inotail
I haven't maintained a package before, but I
On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 20:05:53 +0200,
Eric Tanguy eric.tan...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the suggestion. I have already tried the new version with the
same errors.
I eventually noticed that in the bug report as well. I think not using tr1
to provide complex functions is the way to go in
On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 08:10:25 -0500,
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
the normal complex definitions. But I think I have a simple hack to do
it now. The test build is still running, but if it works I'll post the
patches to the bug.
The test build completed. I didn't actually try
On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 22:30:01 +0200,
Eric Tanguy eric.tan...@gmail.com wrote:
Could you help me for this problem also ?
I can take a look at it, but probably not for a few days.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 10:21:48 -0500,
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 12:22:25 +0200,
Eric Tanguy eric.tan...@gmail.com wrote:
I can't continue to maintain qucs because it FTBS and i'm not able to
solve the problem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 09:54:41 -0400,
Cecil Funderburk cfunder...@gmail.com wrote:
I have release 3.0-0.rc3.git0.3.fc16.x86_64-3.0.0 Version Code 196608
running on a Gateway netbook LT3101u CPU - AMD ATHLON 64 ATI Radeon graphic
card
I am getting Mircocode : CPU0: family 15 not supported
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 03:49:18 -0700,
Eric Smith e...@brouhaha.com wrote:
On 06/23/2011 06:38 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
The sirius project web page has vanished and I haven't been able to find
a new one. Should I comment out the old URL and source0 definitions
and have source0 just
The sirius project web page has vanished and I haven't been able to find
a new one. Should I comment out the old URL and source0 definitions
and have source0 just be the archive name?
Other than needing a DSO linking fix, the game seems to work, so I don't
see a need to drop the package.
--
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:34:10 -0700,
Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
Please reply to this thread if you'd like to take any packages or ping me on
IRC and I'll reply to this thread with what packages have been taken.
(Needed since we aren't orphaning in the pkgdb until Thursday
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 17:02:01 -0700,
Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
sirius
This looks like a reasonable reversi game, so I'll take this one in addition
to the others I claimed.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 08:16:26 +0200,
Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
I've not been able to give scorched3d the attention it deserves lately.
Specifically
it is lagging with upstream for a while now and really needs to be rebased to
upstream latest.
Is anyone willing to
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 08:16:26 +0200,
Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
I've not been able to give scorched3d the attention it deserves lately.
Specifically
it is lagging with upstream for a while now and really needs to be rebased to
upstream latest.
Is anyone willing to
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 18:36:14 +0200,
Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
I think we want the update just for F-15. So that people who prefer to stick
on the conservative side of things, who will likely still be running F-14,
won't
get it.
I have the easy stuff done already. Now I
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 13:11:34 +0100,
Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey All,
Sorry for the late notice but there was a soname bump in gssdp/gupnp that I
missed. Most of the broken packages have now been rebuilt and it should be
cleaned up for the next rawhide run.
I have
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 13:11:34 +0100,
Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey All,
Sorry for the late notice but there was a soname bump in gssdp/gupnp that I
missed. Most of the broken packages have now been rebuilt and it should be
cleaned up for the next rawhide run.
Nevermind
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710646
mdadm needs a fix to work with the new kernel versioning for 3.0 kernels.
Milan Broz has a proposed patch and has asked for commit access to mdadm
and no action has been taken by the package owner in over a week since
the proposed patch has been
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:48:40 +,
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com wrote:
On 2011-06-10, Luke Macken lmac...@redhat.com wrote:
* Buildroot Override Management
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Bodhi/BuildRootOverrides
I mean, I know what's buildroot in Koji and that it can be
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 13:02:29 -0400,
Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
If not, can you point me at the relevant upstream documentation and I'll
write up an SOP for doing this.
If you do something for this, you might want to point to it from
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 20:47:41 +0400,
Lucas macach...@gmail.com wrote:
I use systemd-28-3.fc16.i686 and updated it when it became available, but
still have real problems
with boot.
If it stops it happens definitely in systemd job - when it is starting
services.
And I can't find any
The 3.0 kernels are not working for me. (A cpu lockup is reporting during
boot.) I am wondering if things are broken for everyone where I should
probably just wait for updates and try again, or if I should get a picture
of the traceback and file a bug?
--
devel mailing list
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 15:09:02 -0400,
Clyde E. Kunkel clydekunkel7...@cox.net wrote:
Couldn't tell you about lockups since if root is on anything with raid
underlying, dracut drops to a shell. You are on the bz:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710646
Hopefully, someone
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 20:17:46 +0100,
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
Works very well for me, but:
- Make sure you're running kernel-3.0-0.rc2.git0.2.fc16 with the
ftrace bug fixed (thanks Kyle).
Done.
- Make sure you upgrade module-init-tools *before* installing the 3.0
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 17:01:07 -0600,
Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Tom London seli...@gmail.com wrote:
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711015
Believe updated systemd is building.
Would you believe I scanned the entire list of
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 07:00:11 +0200,
Eric Tanguy eric.tan...@gmail.com wrote:
The only problem with the fedora version of lightning : the
extension is only in english
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504994
Does the F15 version have the same problem? Lightning was dropped and
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 09:22:48 -0400,
Kyle McMartin k...@mcmartin.ca wrote:
Yeah, should be fixed in the next build, koji being out of commission
didn't help get a timely fix pushed.
This build also fixes an issue I had rebuilding dahdi-linux where the
module names were expected to have
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 10:34:38 +0200,
Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tuesday, May 31, 2011 07:32:07 PM Ward, David - 0663 - MITLL wrote:
I'm following the procedure at:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
Does anyone know how to
The license has changed to GPLv2+ (from GPLv2). Unlike boswars itself, the
upstream notice and copyright notices in the data both say version 2 or later,
so I am marking the package that way in Fedora.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
I am co-maintaining boswars-addons which has been setup to not use dist
as part of the versions, since the package is noarch and the same build
is usable accross releases. It's 48 MB, so it has been considered large
enough to be worth not triggering updates when updating between Fedora
releases.
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 00:30:53 -0700,
Garrett Holmstrom gho...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 20:04 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
reserved/system IDs are supposed to be once that has been done we can
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 08:25:21 -0500,
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 00:30:53 -0700,
I can tell you they didn't. I can't login with gdm right now, most likely
because of this. gdm runs but doesn't list any accounts.
gdm should be looking at shells, not uids
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 09:42:26 -0400,
Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com wrote:
If you click 'other' and type in your username it allows you to login
right ?
Does it remember your name once you logout ?
If not I call it a bug in gdm.
I wasn't given the other option. Possibly because I have no
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 10:59:20 -0700,
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 09:53 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
Yeah I noticed as well that it tells you you are already logged in if
you login in a vt. That seem a much more serious bug.
gdm tells you you're
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 09:51:20 -0400,
Clyde E. Kunkel clydekunkel7...@cox.net wrote:
On 05/20/2011 05:35 AM, Rawhide Report wrote:
kernel-2.6.39-0.fc16
* Thu May 19 2011 Dave Jonesda...@redhat.com
- Update to 2.6.39 final.
* Sat May 14 2011 Kyle
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 11:33:35 -0400,
Tom Callaway tcall...@redhat.com wrote:
Lately, I've been trying to resolve as many of these as reasonably
possible. Here's what I know:
sear-0.6.3-14.fc12.x86_64 requires liberis-1.3.so.15()(64bit)
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 08:57:17 -0700,
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
# There must be no known remote code execution vulnerability which could
be exploited during installation or during use of a live image shipped
with the release
Points to consider:
I think there may be
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 18:11:15 -0300,
Sergio Belkin seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Let's say I have package X 1.0 I'd want to upload an srpm of X 1.1 and
make build a newer version of X but
keep the old ones for f13 and f14. Is that similar to upload a new
package, I mean for each branch:
Alexey hasn't been doing a lot of Fedora related stuff recently. I was able
to reach him indirectly a few months ago to get access to some of his
packages that depend on ogre. But more recently I have been trying to get
access to some of his other game related packages in advance of issues,
so
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 00:09:51 -0600,
Philip Prindeville philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com wrote:
It's also not clear why logging goes to the console for mail services:
There was a but for rsyslog updates that left the service disabled. Since
you upgraded from the beta you would have
I noticed that gnome-applets is obsoleted by gnome-panel, but is still in
the F15 repo. It probably shouldn't be. There are at least a few other
gnome-applet related packages in the same boat, so it might be worth doing
a search for all obsoleted packages that are still included in the repo.
--
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 14:54:44 -0600,
Jonathan Corbet corbet...@lwn.net wrote:
On Tue, 10 May 2011 13:07:22 -0400
Even then it occurred to me that, if people are being told to stay away for
six months at a time, all is not as well as it should be. Even just
waiting from the time of that
I just did the build for Ogre 1.7.3 in rawhide. This will necessitate some
rebuilds, but the change is supposed to be just bugfix release; no API
changes.
See http://www.ogre3d.org/2011/05/08/ogre-1-7-3-cthugha-released for more info.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 17:30:25 +0100,
Mat Booth fed...@matbooth.co.uk wrote:
On 28 April 2011 17:24, Steven Yong woong...@gmail.com wrote:
Just click Take Ownership on the package:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/tomboy
Note that you must already be a Fedora
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 16:27:13 +0200,
Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/27/2011 03:10 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
Lots of things are unfortunate. This is software, after all. I regret
not working on this earlier, since it would probably have saved the
effort invested in
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 16:53:00 +0200,
Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com wrote:
Fixed a rare condition that could cause the drive to reset and clear the
data
I begin to wonder if it was the right decision to change main drive to SSD :)
Maybe it's time to start using data=journal
If
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 00:18:24 -0700,
Christopher Aillon cail...@redhat.com wrote:
But not having a set of nightlies based on testing is a problem, and I
think we really really need to fix that. I see no reason we need to
pick one or the other, let's do both!
That's probably an issue
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 18:19:26 -0700,
Christopher Aillon cail...@redhat.com wrote:
I just realized today for the first time that our nightlies are based on
stable, not testing. I think that's something we need to address. It's
probably still useful to have nightlies based on stable,
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 20:43:05 -0400,
Will Woods wwo...@redhat.com wrote:
The only thing broken here is the expectation that testing doesn't
require your assistance, or isn't your problem.
Except this affects more than Tom. Some people aren't getting updates because
of the
I don't remember seeing a soname bump announcement for boost and since
for branched it went from 1.46.0 to 1.46.1 and then back to 1.46.0, I don't
want to start rebuilding stuff if this is going to happen in rawhide too.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 16:18:34 +0200,
Petr Machata pmach...@redhat.com wrote:
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to writes:
I don't remember seeing a soname bump announcement for boost and since
for branched it went from 1.46.0 to 1.46.1 and then back to 1.46.0, I don't
want to start
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 16:57:36 +0200,
Petr Machata pmach...@redhat.com wrote:
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to writes:
So 1.46.1 is there for real, later to be replaced most probably by
1.48.0, or whatever the upstream manages to finish in the mean time.
Thanks for the explanation. I'll
701 - 800 of 1085 matches
Mail list logo
