Re: Fedora Workstation 40 aarch64 download -- How to run Live CD installer?

dora/linux/releases/40/Workstation/aarch64/iso/ > > > > That is the experimental osbuild one. There is no official ISO, as it > > failed to build. It affected Fedora KDE and other variants too. :( > > Yes, that. > > Beyond that, Dennis Gilmore has been poking at Fedora on the x13s f

Re: Possible deprecation/removal of Initial Setup from Fedora

On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 6:51 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 01:53:14PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 08:07:06AM -0800, Davide Cavalca wrote: > > > On 2023-11-21 04:34, Jiri Konecny wrote: > > > > Is Anaconda Initial Setup important for

Re: [Anaconda-devel] Re: Possible deprecation/removal of Initial Setup from Fedora

On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 7:53 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 8:13 AM wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2023-11-24 at 15:15 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > On Tue, 2023-11-21 at 13:34 +0100, Jiri Konecny wrote: > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > > > > > Is Anaconda Initial Setup important

Re: Possible deprecation/removal of Initial Setup from Fedora

All of the Arm disk images use initial-setup to configure the image. There would need to a concrete plan on how to manage the transition to something else. Dennis On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 6:35 AM Jiri Konecny wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > We (anaconda team) are considering discontinuation of

Re: PR #47: binutils: drop gold

I think it is fair to say it is a system wide change Dennis On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 1:40 PM Amit Shah wrote: > > > On Wed, 2023-08-02 at 10:50 -0500, Dennis Gilmore via devel wrote: > > Given https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BINUTILS_GOLD and > > https://fedoraproj

Re: PR #47: binutils: drop gold

Given https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BINUTILS_GOLD and https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/GoldLinkerDefault it seems reasonable that to remove the feature we have a change to ensure wide notice and documentation of the change Dennis On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 10:08 AM Amit Shah wrote:

Re: RFC: No koji builds during mass branching and updates-testing enablement

On Thu, Mar 9, 2023 at 7:37 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > Hi all, > > As a follow-up from a recent discussion on Matrix/IRC, I'm proposing > the following change to the development cycle / release schedule: > > "Koji builds are blocked while mass branching and updates-testing > enablement are in

Re: Proposal: drop delta rpms (for real this time)

On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 2:48 PM Matthew Miller wrote: > I was asked to weigh in on https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7215 as a > priority. Last time we talked about this we didn't really get anywhere... > > >

Re: F38 proposal: Unified Kernel Support Phase 1 (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 5:25 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 11:56:32AM -0600, Dennis Gilmore via devel wrote: > > In my case, I have Network Manager config files included in my initrd > > and bootargs to bring up the network so that I

Re: F38 proposal: Unified Kernel Support Phase 1 (System-Wide Change proposal)

In my case, I have Network Manager config files included in my initrd and bootargs to bring up the network so that I get automatic disk decryption while on my home network, and prompted for a password when I am not at home. I think this a reasonable enough use case it should be considered in the

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

# dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37 --enablerepo=updates-testing $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) --assumeno distro-sync Fedora 37 - x86_64 22 MB/s | 81 MB

Re: F37 Change: RetireARMv7 (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Sun, Feb 6, 2022 at 7:55 AM David Bold wrote: > > On 11/15/21 20:15, Ben Cotton wrote: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RetireARMv7 > > > ... > > == Scope == > > > > * Proposal owners: Work with rel-eng to disable the architecture in > > koji, remove all the various pungi pieces and

Re: Any recent changes to the arm builders?

On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 3:11 PM Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Dennis Gilmore: > > > We intentionally never looked at enabling that and always had no plans > > to support multi-lib on Arm > > It's not multilib. Buildroots aren't multilib. > > I'm pretty sure no one

Re: Any recent changes to the arm builders?

On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 12:55 AM Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Kevin Fenzi: > > > On Sun, Aug 15, 2021 at 01:51:16PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > >> * Kevin Fenzi: > >> > >> > Yes. They were mistakenly running the normal kernel (so they had ~3GB > >> > memory available). I moved them back to the

Re: Fedora 35 Mass Rebuild

On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 3:53 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 01:52:26PM +0200, Tomas Hrcka wrote: > > > > > > Can the packagers fix the failures in the f35-rebuild side tag by > > themselves > > while the rebuild is in progress, or do they have to wait on

Re: New RPM submission

some of the changes have just been committed already, or an equivalent. The value you have for the license is incorrect https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main lists the correct values -License:LGPL-2.1 +License:LGPLv2 There is no need to explicitly Require

Re: New RPM submission

you probably sent the same srpm, https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2020 builds just fine, I did make a few changes to the spec file. with a correct changelag entry it should pass review Dennis On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 8:58 AM Joan Moreau via devel wrote: > > Same status :(

Re: New RPM submission

On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 8:48 AM Richard Shaw wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 8:36 AM Joan Moreau via devel > wrote: >> >> When I launch the "koji" comand, build fails because it does not find g++ >> >> (see : >> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/9140/66659140/build.log ) >> >>

Re: RFC: declaring estimated per-builder RAM usage in spec file

perhaps you should look at how ceph has dealt with a similar issue, they set the max number of cpus based on the system ram. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ceph/blob/rawhide/f/ceph.spec#_1246 Dennis On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 7:49 PM Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > > Hi all, > > This idea came

Re: python noarch packaging vs pip install

On Mon, 2021-03-08 at 19:07 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 08. 03. 21 18:33, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > > I'm just wondering: what's the benefit of packaging Python noarch > > projects in Fedora? > > You can use them as requirements for packaged applications. > > > I can see the reason

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F33 to F34

yum distro-sync --releasever 34 Last metadata expiration check: 0:10:11 ago on Wed 24 Feb 2021 11:55:46 AM CST. Error: Problem: package gnome-tour-40~beta-3.fc34.x86_64 obsoletes gnome-getting-started-docs < 3.38.1-2 provided by gnome-getting-started-docs-3.38.0-2.fc34.noarch - package

Reducing noise on devel list

Hi all, I filed https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2512 asking FESCo to move all automated emails to a separate list where people who want to follow can, while I was part of the proliferation of compose reports coming here, there is now a great deal of them, and they no longer seem to trigger any

Re: Repository metadata signing?

It would require https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1768206 to be fixed. Right now the design in dnf for supporting gpg keys is quite user hostile, especially in automated unattended use cases. Dennis On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 6:25 PM Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > > Hello all, > >

Re: [Test-Announce] RIP: Thomas Gilliard (satellit)

This is very sad news, he was a very enthusiastic tester. Dennis On Sun, Aug 2, 2020 at 5:49 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > > Hi, folks. I'm sad to report that Thomas Gilliard (satellit), who was a > valued member of the QA team for many years, passed away last week. His > wife contacted me with

Re: Remove all non UK/USA English spell checker variants from default Fedora installation

Just like there is many different dialects of Spanish, and other languages the same is true of English, many parts of the language are shared, and the most critical part for most people is making sure that things like Paper settings, date, and number formats are correct for their location. It is

system time in Fedora 32

Hi all, before going off an filing a bug, I wanted to gather some input. I added a battery for the RTC to one of my ARM boards, in testing that it was working as expected I booted the system I noticed the following [root@localhost ~]# date Wed 01 Apr 2020 05:24:35 PM UTC [root@localhost ~]#

Re: Koji shows root.log to blame when in fact the error is in build.log

On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 6:30 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > This has happened to me twice this morning, the second time here: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=38048038 > > Rich. koji uses very simple logic in parsing mock return codes

Re: Tagging commit hashes of Koji builds in dist-git

On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 7:11 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 7:53 AM Florian Weimer wrote: > > > > Is there a reason why we do not tag dist-git commits, using a name which > > is derived from the NEVR from a Koji build? > > > > How well does Git scale with thousands of tags? > > >

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal: Disable Root Password Login in SSH

On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 7:24 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 2:54 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DisableRootPasswordLoginInSshd > > > > == Summary == > > The upstream OpenSSH disabled password logins for root back in 2015. > > The

Re: Where are armv7hl, i686 and ppc64le Container tar.xz files?

On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 10:22 AM Jun Aruga wrote: > > Kevin and Clement, thanks for the explanation. > > I am looking forward to seeing the final compose. > > > So, likely we haven't had a armv7 fedora 30 compose recently, and so no > one has updated it. The container sig would be the ones to ask

Re: Maintainer test instances

https://www.openmainframeproject.org/ has some information on getting access to mainframe resources. there is also some information at https://osuosl.org/services/ibm-z/ I believe both of them end up running on hardware at Marist brothers college. there is also some info on how to use Jenkins for

Re: FC30 Mass Rebuild still not finished

On Thu, 2019-02-14 at 02:45 +0100, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > Hi, > > Looks like MR which started two weeks ago still is not fully > finished. Below command has been executed in mirrored rawhide source > packages tree. > > [tkloczko@domek fedora]$ for i in fc{21..30}; do echo "$i $(ls -1 >

Re: Multilib inconsistencies between fedora/updates/updates-testing composes

https://pagure.io/releng/issue/4084 its an issue that has existed for nearly a decade and not been solved. Time was not taken to fixing it after we disabled installing multilib by default as there was no reports of it for years. Dennis El mié, 12-12-2018 a las 11:32 +0100, Florian Weimer

Re: RFC: make fedora-release archful and add some provides

El vie, 14-12-2018 a las 20:33 +0100, Igor Gnatenko escribió: > Hello folks, > > for long time we have problem if you have some arch-specific > BuildRequires, you still get one src.rpm from one of arches (not sure > how koji chooses that one) which might not work for your > architecture. > > For

Re: Proposal: delay F31 release to work out infrastructure and lifecycle challenges

El lun, 26-11-2018 a las 19:44 -0500, Paul Frields escribió: > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 5:47 PM Dennis Gilmore > wrote: > > El lun, 26-11-2018 a las 17:14 -0500, Josh Boyer escribió: > > > Because the people that would be tasked with doing the > > > development are &

Re: Proposal: delay F31 release to work out infrastructure and lifecycle challenges

El lun, 26-11-2018 a las 17:14 -0500, Josh Boyer escribió: > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 5:01 PM Peter Robinson > wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 9:48 PM Matthew Miller < > > mat...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 08:02:26PM +, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > > transactions

Re: Can we change the xz block size in our cloud images?

On Fri, 2018-11-23 at 13:43 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 12:48:30PM +, Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 12:43 PM Richard W.M. Jones < > > rjo...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > It looks like the raw format xz-compressed cloud images that we > > > ship >

Re: mass-removal of LANG=anything-not-C.UTF-8 in packages

El lun, 05-11-2018 a las 23:24 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek escribió: > Dear maintainers, > > I'm working again on implementing > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_glibc-langpacks-all_from_buildroot. > The first step is to replace LC_ALL=en_US.UTF-8 with LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 > (and

Re: Moving on from Council Engineering role

El jue, 11-10-2018 a las 12:53 -0400, Josh Boyer escribió: > Hello Fedora Friends, > > I believe it's time for me to move on from my current role as the > Council Engineering representative. When I resigned from FESCo a bit > ago, I thought I could still fulfill this role. Unfortunately, that >

Re: fedpkg clone doesn*t work

El lun, 10-09-2018 a las 14:58 +, Martin Gansser escribió: > every time I edit my account, the public ssh key is missing. > > the FSA public SSH-key and the key in .ssh/id_rsa.pub are the same. Can you ssh to fedorapeople.org? Dennis signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Make BootLoaderSpec the default

El jue, 14-06-2018 a las 12:06 +0200, Jan Kurik escribió: > = Proposed System Wide Change: Make BootLoaderSpec the default = > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BootLoaderSpecByDefault > > > Owner(s): > * Javier Martinez Canillas > * Peter Jones > > > Use BootLoaderSpec fragment

Re: streamlining fedora-release (again)

see > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproje > ct.org/thread/CIKK4WEF5ACVWZ6EWBKNHSKKKCDTV27C/#CIKK4WEF5ACVWZ6EWBKNH > SKKKCDTV27C > https://pagure.io/fedora-release/pull-request/119 > https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7293 > > I made the changes

Re: FESCo Elections - May 2018 : Results announcement

On Thu, 2018-06-14 at 23:50 +0200, Till Maas wrote: > On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 03:57:36PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 3:53 PM Randy Barlow > > > Downside is that it would be possible (though I'd guess unlikely) > > > for > > > all of FESCo to suddenly change to 9 different

Re: F29 System Wide Change: i686 Is For x86-64

El mar, 05-06-2018 a las 15:59 -0400, Adam Jackson escribió: > On Tue, 2018-06-05 at 13:20 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > > as part of this change I suspect we would need to make kernel > > changes > > to stop building a i686 kernel, and all i686 deliverables would

Re: F29 System Wide Change: i686 Is For x86-64

El mar, 05-06-2018 a las 15:59 -0400, Adam Jackson escribió: > On Tue, 2018-06-05 at 13:20 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > > as part of this change I suspect we would need to make kernel > > changes > > to stop building a i686 kernel, and all i686 deliverables would

Re: F29 System Wide Change: i686 Is For x86-64

as part of this change I suspect we would need to make kernel changes to stop building a i686 kernel, and all i686 deliverables would stop being made. With the current tooling we would never be able to build 32 bit x86 containers, which is not something that is done today. I would also be curious

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2018-06-01)

=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2018-06-01) === Meeting started by dgilmore at 15:00:53 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2018-06-01/fesco.2018- 06-01-15.00.log.html . Meeting

Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2018-06-01)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Friday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2018-06-01 15:00 UTC' Links to all issues below

Re: How to make DNS resolving fail early in mock?

El mié, 30-05-2018 a las 14:33 +0200, Miro Hrončok escribió: > On 30.5.2018 14:09, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > So I decided to test this. I've added the following to the spec: > > > > time curl http://example.com/ > > > > Here are the times: > > > > * my mock: real 0m56.595s Could not

[Fwd: Renaming "docker" references to generic ones like "container" or "OCI']

I am forwarding to devel list as Sushma was not subscribed and it was rejected. Dennis - Mensaje reenviado De: Sushma Gajanur Shivakumar Para: devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org Cc: Ben Breard , den...@ausil.us, Mohan Boddu , Greg

Re: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud

El mar, 03-04-2018 a las 17:07 +, Stephen Gallagher escribió: > On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 12:39 PM Christian Glombek .de> wrote: > > Hello! > > > > I'd be happy to maintain NextCloud!I have already done the > > packaging work for NC v13 and v13.0.1, and various

Re: SSE2 support on PPC/s390/ARM

El sáb, 17-03-2018 a las 17:25 +0100, Antonio Trande escribió: > Hello everyone. > > > Please, can you confirm that SSE2 support is not on those > architectures? > If it's so, i will obliged to exclude new release of Openclonk on > PPC/s390/ARM. sse2 is a intel cpu extention it is only

Re: Goodbye nvr.rsplit('-', 2), hello modularity

El vie, 16-03-2018 a las 15:19 -0700, Adam Williamson escribió: > On Fri, 2018-03-16 at 16:04 -0400, Dennis Gregorovic wrote: > > modules are not RPMs. I would not expect them to necessarily use > > the same > > format as RPMs. If we take koji out of the equation, > > That's an extremely big

Changes in Fedora Release Engineering

Hi all, Today I am writing to announce some changes in Fedora Release Engineering. Effective Friday the 23rd of March 2018 Mohan Boddu will be taking over as the primary person responsible for Release Engineering in Fedora. Mohan has effectively been the primary person since Fedora 26 as he has

Changes in Fedora Release Engineering

Hi all, Today I am writing to announce some changes in Fedora Release Engineering. Effective Friday the 23rd of March 2018 Mohan Boddu will be taking over as the primary person responsible for Release Engineering in Fedora. Mohan has effectively been the primary person since Fedora 26 as he has

Re: F28 FTBFS bugs?

El jue, 15-03-2018 a las 11:01 +0100, Daiki Ueno escribió: > Hello, > > Yesterday I received a couple of new FTBFS bugs, apparently triggered > by > the F28 mass rebuild: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1556047 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1556162 > > As the

Re: Improving the glibc32 situation

El vie, 09-03-2018 a las 14:55 +0100, Florian Weimer escribió: > On 03/09/2018 02:52 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > > > Stepping back a bit, I'm curious why glibc32 would land in the > > composes. It shouldn't... it should only be tagged in the fNN- > > build > > tags, which the composes should not

Re: Broken system upgrade due to rich dependencies

El jue, 08-03-2018 a las 12:55 +0200, Panu Matilainen escribió: > On 03/08/2018 12:42 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote: > > On 03/08/2018 12:21 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > > > > > > > Am 08.03.2018 um 08:53 schrieb Panu Matilainen: > > > > P.P.S. So why didn't yum have anything like that? Because

Re: %{_lib} leads to dir not found, whereas lib works fine (firefox-pkcs11-loader)

El mar, 06-03-2018 a las 17:20 +0100, Germano Massullo escribió: > Il 06/03/2018 16:35, Dennis Gilmore ha scritto: > > El mar, 06-03-2018 a las 15:29 +0100, Germano Massullo escribió: > > > During package firefox-pkcs11-loader build, the following two > > >

Re: %{_lib} leads to dir not found, whereas lib works fine (firefox-pkcs11-loader)

El mar, 06-03-2018 a las 15:29 +0100, Germano Massullo escribió: > During package firefox-pkcs11-loader build, the following two spec > file > lines > > %dir %_prefix/%{_lib}/mozilla/pkcs11-modules/ > %_prefix/%{_lib}/mozilla/pkcs11-modules/onepinopenscpkcs11.json > > and also this variant > >

Re: Critpath karma

El mar, 06-03-2018 a las 08:48 -0500, Randy Barlow escribió: > Greetings! > > Does anybody here know the history and/or purpose behind Bodhi's > critical path karma? A brief grepping of Bodhi's codebase makes me > think > it isn't really used by Bodhi for any purpose other than recording > and >

Re: How do you bump fedora-repos-rawhide to f29?

dnf update --relasever=29 distro-sync --disablerepo=* -- enablerepo=rawhide Dennis El sáb, 03-03-2018 a las 21:15 +, Philip Kovacs escribió: > I would settle for knowledge of where the f29/rawhide gpg keys are > hidden so I import them. > > The "To Rawhide" instructions below are outdated as

Re: Appstream metadata compose failures

El vie, 02-03-2018 a las 11:28 +0100, Kalev Lember escribió: > Hi, > > hughsie just did a new appstream-data compose for F29 and I noticed > there's quite a large number of packages failing in the logs: > > https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/screenshots/f29/failed.html > > Would be awesome if

Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)

El mié, 28-02-2018 a las 12:32 +0100, Ralf Corsepius escribió: > On 02/28/2018 12:21 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > > > > Dne 28.2.2018 v 12:14 Ralf Corsepius napsal(a): > > > On 02/27/2018 07:27 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Adam Williamson > > > >

Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)

El mié, 28-02-2018 a las 10:35 +0100, Vít Ondruch escribió: > Can the logs actually contain timestamps with timezone? > > And was the compose successful today or not. Looking at > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-201 > 80228.n.0/logs/global/pungi.global.log >

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot

El lun, 19-02-2018 a las 10:56 +0100, Vít Ondruch escribió: > > > Dne 19.2.2018 v 00:52 Dennis Gilmore napsal(a): > > El vie, 16-02-2018 a las 12:56 +0100, Jan Kurik escribió: > > > Proposed System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot > > > https

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot

El vie, 16-02-2018 a las 12:56 +0100, Jan Kurik escribió: > Proposed System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_GCC_from_BuildRoot > > > Owner(s): > * Igor Gnatenko > > > Removing gcc and gcc-c++ from default buildroot in Koji and mock. >

Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)

El jue, 15-02-2018 a las 17:34 -0500, Matthew Miller escribió: > As shown at https://www.happyassassin.net/nightlies.html, we haven't > had a successful compose for almost two weeks. AIUI this is mostly > worked out now, but it raises the question: who should be keeping > track > of this and

Re: Mass Rebuild for Fedora 28

El mar, 13-02-2018 a las 20:14 +, Samuel Rakitničan escribió: > Strange error with camotics: > > Error: > Problem: package cairo-devel-1.15.10-2.fc28.x86_64 requires > pkgconfig(gobject-2.0), but none of the providers can be installed > - conflicting requests > - nothing provides

Mass Rebuild for Fedora 28

Hi All, We have now completed the automated part of the Fedora 28 mass rebuild, The details for the scheduled mass rebuild for Fedora 28 can be found here[1]. The failure page for the rebuilds can be found here[3] and the full list of packages that are needing rebuilding can be found here[4].

Re: Fedora Infrastructure manager change

El mié, 17-01-2018 a las 07:00 -0800, Jim Perrin escribió: > Hello Fedora developers, > I know some of you may not be familiar with me[1] unless you’re also > working with CentOS or EPEL, but I’d like to take this opportunity to > introduce myself a bit more formally on the list. > > As of 1

Re: Building Fedora modules on EL [was Re: Python3 will be in next major RHEL release, please adjust %if statements accordingly]

El jue, 18-01-2018 a las 14:33 -0500, Matthew Miller escribió: > On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 02:09:26PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > > > Given that Python 2 is going EOL in about two years, I don't > > > think we > > > want it in EPEL proper. If we do provide it, it should be in a > > > module. > > > >

Re: Pulling in rpmfusion appstream data with weak dependencies?

The only way to really do this would be to make rpmfusion-release require it. However that will mean users have to download and install two packages to make it all work. That may break things for people who intentionally remove gnome-software and PackageKit Dennis El mar, 16-01-2018 a las 18:08

Re: F28 System Wide Change: AArch64 Server Promotion

El lun, 08-01-2018 a las 09:16 -0800, Adam Williamson escribió: > On Mon, 2018-01-08 at 14:40 +0100, Jan Kurik wrote: > > > > == Scope == > > * Proposal owners: > > The general AArch64 support is already in place and is widely and > > actively supported by the Fedora ARM SIG and numerous ARM

Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2017-12-15)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2017-12-15 16:00 UTC' Links to all issues below

Re: streamlining fedora-release

El mar, 05-12-2017 a las 07:31 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek escribió: > On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 12:49:48PM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > El vie, 10-11-2017 a las 09:12 -0500, Neal Gompa escribió: > > > On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > &

Re: streamlining fedora-release

El vie, 10-11-2017 a las 09:12 -0500, Neal Gompa escribió: > On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 02:45:26PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > > The fedora-release package

Re: F26/F27 updates-testing and multilib problems

El dom, 22-10-2017 a las 11:39 -0400, Randy Barlow escribió: > On 10/22/2017 09:04 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > updates does not have composes it has mashes, the behaviour is > > expected > > to be different, the problem boils down to the fact that if a > > package >

Re: F26/F27 updates-testing and multilib problems

El jue, 19-10-2017 a las 19:29 +0200, Florian Weimer escribió: > On 10/19/2017 06:42 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > > There is long standing 8+ year old bugs we have never gotten around > > to > > to ensure multilib is correct in all cases. It is unfortuantly &g

Re: F26/F27 updates-testing and multilib problems

El lun, 16-10-2017 a las 18:06 +0200, Florian Weimer escribió: > Are there currently bugs in composes for x86-64 for F26/F27? We had > one > case for F27 where the compose was demonstrably broken because it > lacked > a required multilib: > >https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7071 > > We

Re: rawhide packages not getting pushed?

El jue, 21-09-2017 a las 07:29 +0200, Florian Weimer escribió: > On 09/20/2017 10:16 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > > There was a signing issue. This is seen by the fact it was tagged > > into > > f28-pending. There's a few reasons this might happen, and depending > > on > > what it is the quickest

Re: Kernel 4.13 rebase plans

El vie, 22-09-2017 a las 15:25 -0500, Michael Catanzaro escribió: > On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 2:21 PM, Chris Adams > wrote: > > On what grounds? There is nothing in the Fedora guidelines that > > makes > > package maintainers beholden to third-party (by definition, not > > part

Re: Is it possible to upload new sources of a package from a URL?

El mar, 26-09-2017 a las 01:49 +0330, Hedayat Vatankhah escribió: > /*Pierre-yves Chibon*/ wrote on Mon, 25 Sep 2017 09:38:39 +0200: > > On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 10:56:45AM +0330, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote: > > > Dear all, > > > Currently, AFAIK, the suggested method to upload new sources for > > > a

Re: Splitting AppStream data into Workstation/Server

El lun, 04-09-2017 a las 12:56 -0400, Neal Gompa escribió: > On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 12:33 PM, Richard Hughes <hughsi...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > On 4 September 2017 at 17:15, Dennis Gilmore <den...@ausil.us> > > wrote: > > > The correct way to deal with appst

Re: Splitting AppStream data into Workstation/Server

El lun, 04-09-2017 a las 17:33 +0100, Richard Hughes escribió: > On 4 September 2017 at 17:15, Dennis Gilmore <den...@ausil.us> wrote: > > The correct way to deal with appstream is to add the appstream data > > to > > rpm headers and then teach createrepo to make t

Re: Splitting AppStream data into Workstation/Server

El vie, 01-09-2017 a las 13:37 +0300, Marius Vollmer escribió: > Hi, > > I hope that soon the first Cockpit add-on appears in the Fedora > repositories. Cockpit can find such add-ons via their AppStream > metainfo data, similar to how GNOME Software finds applications to > install for a desktop

Re: RFC: retiring yum

El vie, 01-09-2017 a las 21:19 +0200, Igor Gnatenko escribió: > On Fri, 2017-09-01 at 13:56 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Igor Gnatenko > > wrote: > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > > Hash: SHA256 > > > > > > So I think

Re: Council Elections - July/August 2017 - Result announcement

El mar, 15-08-2017 a las 22:37 +0200, Jan Kurik escribió: > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 10:22 PM, Dennis Gilmore <den...@ausil.us> > wrote: > > El mar, 15-08-2017 a las 12:36 +0200, Kevin Kofler escribió: > > > Jan Kurik wrote

Re: Council Elections - July/August 2017 - Result announcement

El mar, 15-08-2017 a las 12:36 +0200, Kevin Kofler escribió: > Jan Kurik wrote: > > # votes | name > > - +-- > > 505 | Justin W. Flory (jwf / jflory7) > > - +-- > > No wonder, he is the only candidate who bothered filling out the >

Re: Mass rebuilds update

El lun, 07-08-2017 a las 16:35 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek escribió: > On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 09:35:46AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > [3] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f27-failures.ht > > ml > > [4] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-re

Re: Mass rebuilds update

El lun, 07-08-2017 a las 10:50 -0400, Matthew Miller escribió: > On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 09:35:46AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > We have now completed two mass rebuilds, The first one was the > > scheduled mass rebuild for Fedora 27 details are here[1] the second > > on

Re: debuginfo repository matching f27-build

El lun, 07-08-2017 a las 10:00 +0100, Peter Robinson escribió: > On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Florian Weimer > wrote: > > On 08/01/2017 08:42 AM, den...@ausil.us wrote: > > > There is no debug repos for the buildroot repos. > > > > Can we fix this, please? Or offer a tool

Mass rebuilds update

Hi All, We have now completed two mass rebuilds, The first one was the scheduled mass rebuild for Fedora 27 details are here[1] the second one was all archful packages due to the binutils bug[2] on ppc64le. The failures pages for the two rebuilds can be found here[3] and here[4] Please quickly

Mass rebuilds update

Hi All, We have now completed two mass rebuilds, The first one was the scheduled mass rebuild for Fedora 27 details are here[1] the second one was all archful packages due to the binutils bug[2] on ppc64le. The failures pages for the two rebuilds can be found here[3] and here[4] Please quickly

Re: Two more concrete ideas for what a once-yearly+update schedule would look like

El mar, 01-08-2017 a las 08:26 +0100, Michael Catanzaro escribió: > Keep in mind that GNOME Software already only checks for non-security > updates weekly. So it will actually take as much as two weeks for the > update to reach users once it enters batched, which I suspect may not > have been

Re: No i686 kernel: Can we require SSE2 for i686?

El mar, 11-07-2017 a las 16:03 -0500, Justin Forbes escribió: > > The kernel team quit "supporting" i686 several releases ago, it is > down to community support, which is pretty much nonexistent. Sure, > people file bugs, but rarely do people point to or supply patches for > those bugs. The

Re: F27 Self Contained Change: No More i686 Kernels

El jue, 13-07-2017 a las 11:53 +0200, Florian Weimer escribió: > On 07/13/2017 11:40 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > This is 100% a system wide change, the releng issue linked does not > > exist, however not having a kernel will mean that we have to stop > > making ever

Re: F27 Self Contained Change: No More i686 Kernels

This is 100% a system wide change, the releng issue linked does not exist, however not having a kernel will mean that we have to stop making everything for 32 bit x86. The only thing we could do is make 32 bot x86 containers, which is something we do not do at all today. It makes me want to

Re: F27 Self Contained Change: Decouple system java setting from java command setting

I would like to see some details on how this is going to be implemented. It all seem very vague and handwavy El jue, 08-06-2017 a las 15:55 +0200, Jan Kurik escribió: > = Proposed Self Contained Change: Decouple system java setting from > java command setting = >

Re: The future of the packager group for dist-git

El dom, 04-06-2017 a las 08:52 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon escribió: > On Sat, Jun 03, 2017 at 01:31:50PM +0100, James Hogarth wrote: > >On 3 Jun 2017 8:33 am, "Pierre-Yves Chibon" > > wrote: > > > >I think to abandon the packager group for non-scratch builds > >

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >