Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

Hi. VirtualGL is built in rawhide and in testing for f33/f32. Thanks. On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 8:24 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > Dear maintainers. > > Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following > packages > will be retired from Fedora 34 approximately one week before

Re: Chromium C++ help needed

On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 7:57 AM Christophe de Dinechin wrote: > > I tried to compile your preprocessed fragment with both clang or gcc. > Interestingly: > > 1) Without your command-line options, I don’t see the same error. > > 2) With your command-line options, I see the error with gcc, but not

VirtualGL license changed

The license in VirtualGL has changed from wxWidgets in version 2.4 to wxWindows in version 2.5.2. Thanks, ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: Kernel 4.13 rebase plans

On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 9:41 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > >> > Pretty sure the last testing I did with the details form Hans's blog[0] > the behaviour was that if the nvidia driver failed then the nouveau driver > was a fallback (rather than the older instructions that

Re: FC1 in archive missing a bunch of RPMs?

On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > I happened to notice last night that: > > > https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/archive/fedora/linux/core/1/x86_64/os/Fedora/RPMS/ > > seems very incomplete - it's like it's truncated, it has everything >

Re: Same comand names in /usr/bin and /usr/sbin

On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Eric Griffith egriffit...@gmail.com wrote: Didn't Arch move /usr/sbin to just be a symlink to /usr/bin? Looks like they did. [gsgatlin@arch64 ~]$ ls -al /usr/sbin lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 Feb 15 16:57 /usr/sbin - bin -- devel mailing list

Re: Is it time to allow Chromium in Fedora?

On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Gerald B. Cox gb...@bzb.us wrote: I realize we have our guidelines and we're not Debian, Suse or Ubuntu... and that's a good thing. But, if we're making exceptions for Firefox because of it's popularity shouldn't we do the same for Chromium. I agree with

Re: [EPEL-devel] problem with epel mirrors?

On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 7:16 PM, Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote: OK we have been seeing reports of this problem but never enough data to pin down what of many problems it could be. Patrick Uiterwijk has written a script which if people could check and run it will help us

Re: [EPEL-devel] problem with epel mirrors?

Can I rebuild python-request-ftp from source on RHEL 6/7 from the fedora 22 SRPM? Didn't read carefully. I see you are using pip to install. Ok. Can do first thing in the morning when I'm back on that network. I'll test it on RHEL 6 and 7. ___

[EPEL-devel] problem with epel mirrors?

I noticed today I cannot yum install any packages from epel 7. I see lots of errors like: http://fedora.westmancom.com/epel/7/x86_64/repodata/6201e922dac4ba1b5b44be2339d61a8b067bdf798dcbae2ded82b14ea6acd644-primary.sqlite.xz: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 404 - Not Found

Re: Heads up: retiring xorg-x11-drv-mouse and xorg-x11-drv-keyboard

On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote: I think the goal _is_ to not add any devices, yes. Bumblebee is basically a second X server to run on the nvidia gpu and pipe the pixels off that to the integrated gpu. So input only ever happens on the integrated gpu's

Re: Heads up: retiring xorg-x11-drv-mouse and xorg-x11-drv-keyboard

On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Gary Gatling gsgat...@ncsu.edu wrote: Thanks a lot for the feedback. I have asked the developers for input. I opened a issue of the github issue tracker here: https://github.com/Bumblebee-Project/Bumblebee/issues/568 After further experimentation

Re: Heads up: retiring xorg-x11-drv-mouse and xorg-x11-drv-keyboard

On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 12:09 AM, Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.netwrote: My plan is to retire these two xorg input drivers in rawhide in a week or two. They are superseded by the evdev driver which is the default driver for input devices in Linux. Speak up now, or forever hold yada

Re: dnf versus yum

On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 8:18 PM, poma pomidorabelis...@gmail.com wrote: Yum has sentimental value and is practically a trademark, so 1. yuma - Yellowdog Updater, Modified Again 2. yum2 - Yellowdog Updater, Modified II 3. yumrelo - Yellowdog Updater, Modified Reloaded 6. yum-ng - Yellowdog

Re: Unremovable packages due to scriptlet failures

On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, It happens from time to time that yum is unable to remove packages when uninstall scriptlets fail. For experienced users, it is just a matter of doing rpm -e --noscripts, but casual users will likely end up with yum

Re: Orphaning: mtpfs (FUSE filesystem for MTP devices like Android tablets)

On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.comwrote: I've orphaned this package. There are various reasons for this: (1) It's buggy: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/bugs/mtpfs (2) Upstream is not responsive. The weight of developer effort seems to have

Re: upstream wants me to rename my package

Hey guys, I decided to ask if he would be willing to add an epoc tag as Ken suggested or be willing to become a maintainer or co-maintainer. I think he just continues to insist that rpm work in a way its not designed... (Have two versions of the same software thing on a box) Here is his response

upstream wants me to rename my package

Hello, I am working on a package called VirtualGL: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834127 After contacting the upstream on their mailing list, they seem obsessed with being able to install their own rprms and my package together at the same time. This seems odd / bad to me since only

Re: upstream wants me to rename my package

On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Dan Williams d...@redhat.com wrote: That's not usually something Fedora does. The package name takes the name of the upstream project, because the package *is* the delivery option for that software in Fedora. We do not care that much about upstream RPMs that

Re: upstream wants me to rename my package

On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com wrote: Well, there are occasions when upstream's priorities are somewhat antithetical to what we're doing in Fedora. And pissing off upstream is never a great idea :) I think the goal is tread carefully, walking the fine line

Re: [Guidelines Change] Change to the Packaging Guidelines

On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.dewrote: Ok, what about this: If your package includes one or more systemd units that shall be enabled by default on package installation, they need to be listed in the default Fedora preset policy. [[

Re: [Guidelines Change] Change to the Packaging Guidelines

On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.dewrote: To enable a service by default after package installation you need permission from FESCO. See the last line of: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Starting_services_by_default If you have permission from FESCO then I

Re: [Guidelines Change] Change to the Packaging Guidelines

On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Miloslav Trmač m...@volny.cz wrote: Note that a package doesn't necessarily have to be explicitly listed on the wiki page to be enabled by default, the page starts with two general rules, the first being the most general one: If a service does not require

Re: Mass rebuild for Fedora 18 Complete

On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild. Hello, VirtualGL fails to build in rawhide due to bugzilla #839060. I can try to rebuild that package as soon as that bug is fixed. I just tried now and its

Re: Introduction regarding VirtualGL and bumblebee review requests

On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:10 AM, Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.comwrote: There's a total different approach slated for inclusion into newer xorg versions by Dave Airlie: http://airlied.livejournal.com/#item76078 That's something that relies on deep changes in the xorg stack. It allows

Re: Introduction regarding VirtualGL and bumblebee review requests

with the review request process until it gets rejected or accepted. Cheers, On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 5:28 AM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Gary Gatling gsgat...@ncsu.edu wrote: On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:10 AM, Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com wrote

Introduction regarding VirtualGL and bumblebee review requests

Hello, As per the instructions at the web page at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers I wanted to give a brief introduction. My name is Gary Gatling and I work at North Carolina State University supporting Linux in the college of engineering. I mainly work

Re: Introduction regarding VirtualGL and bumblebee review requests

, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Gary Gatling gsgat...@ncsu.edu wrote: My name is Gary Gatling and I work at North Carolina State University supporting Linux in the college of engineering. I mainly work with Red Hat Enterprise Linux. Hi Gary, I co-maintain one or two packages Jack Neely @ ncsu.edu in RPM