Re: Jami (formerly Ring) P2P softphone packaging?

On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 1:58 PM Daniel Pocock wrote: > Has anybody tested the Jami softphone from Savoir-Faire Linux? It was > formerly known as Ring. > I haven't looked at it in a couple of years, but last I looked at it, the packaging was awful, and the interdependencies between sub-packages

Re: Review swap

On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 11:13 AM Jerry James wrote: > MuseScore 3.6 is out, and adds a dependency on another font. Who > would like to swap reviews? I need this one: > I'll review it. I don't need any reviews done in return at this moment. -Jared

Re: End of CentOS Linux: What about Fedora?

On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 8:57 AM Damian Ivanov wrote: > Maybe provide a rolling release fedora as well (which is > suitable for non-debug systems). > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RawhideKernelNodebug -Jared ___ devel mailing list --

Re: video meeting to discuss Matrix/Element and IRC

On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 2:00 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > IMHO editing is fine, as long as it notes it was edited and provides you > a way to see what was changed. I have no idea how the matrix editing > works however. > As I recall, it puts a small "(edited)" notice at the end of the line to let

Re: Unresponsive packagers: wolnei and dturecek

On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 3:44 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > Does anyone know how to contact wolnei? > I reached out to him via LinkedIn, as he had sent me a message there recently. -Jared ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F32 to F33

On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 3:59 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Do you want to make Fedora 33 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time > and try to run: > Error: Problem: problem with installed package mosquitto-1.6.10-1.fc32.x86_64 - mosquitto-1.6.10-1.fc32.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade

Re: Easy Review Swaps For New Packages That Block Rust Stack Updates

On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 5:59 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > I've been working through open bugs in the Rust stack for the past > week, trying to contribute a few package updates. Some are, however, > blocked by new dependencies that aren't packaged yet. > > These new packages are *very simple* and

Re: Review swaps

On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 10:23 AM Jerry James wrote: > Many thanks to Jared Smith, Fabio Valentini, and Ankur Sinha for doing > the first 10 reviews on this list. I appreciate the time all of you put into those reviews. I've still got two to go. Who would like to > swap? > > 11.

Re: Orphaned 215 packages

On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 8:34 PM Sérgio Basto wrote: > I'd like be joined to NodeJS group to be able to fix some nodejs FTBFS > packages. > I have added you to the NodeJS SIG group in FAS. Welcome to the SIG! -Jared ___ devel mailing list --

Re: SELinux question

On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 4:55 AM Iñaki Ucar wrote: > I need some help from a SELinux guru. TL;DR, I've developed a small > service. An app talks to this service, the service does some stuff > and, in the meanwhile, it reports the progress to the app user by > writing some messages into the stderr

Re: Orphaned 215 packages

On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 11:29 AM Ben Rosser wrote: > However... what should we do in the meantime to stop further nodejs > software from being orphaned and retired? > >From my standpoint, the answer to this is around tooling to built/test/audit NodeJS applications with bundled dependencies.

Re: Orphaned 215 packages

On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 3:41 PM Ben Rosser wrote: > So... this is a lot of node.js packages, and I haven't really seen any > discussion of this on the lists. And at least some of these are possibly > important for other nodejs packages-- notably "mocha", which I suspect is > used in at least

Retiring nodejs-marked

I retired nodejs-marked yesterday, as it was a duplicate of the "marked" package, which wasn't caught at the time I packaged it. -- Jared Smith ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Proposal: Revise FESCo voting policy

On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 10:57 AM Kevin Kofler wrote: > Abstaining means "I don't care", not "I feel uncomfortable with this > change". > I'm going to disagree with you here, specifically with regards to the "I don't care" piece. From my time in FESCo, and as the FPL before that -- I can never

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2020-04-13)

On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 11:58 AM Kevin Kofler wrote: > So Fedora is now officially an alpha version of RHEL. :-( > Kevin, your comments like this are not helpful, and not in keeping with our mantra of being excellent to each other. As you're well aware, there's a cooperative relationship

Re: Unannounced SONAME bump in rawhide: libwebsockets.so.15 → libwebsockets.so.16

On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 5:50 PM Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Two ways of fixing us: > 1. Add a BR for 'uthash-devel' to properly de-bundle mosquitto (it has > never been > unbundled). > 2. Add a Provides: bundled(uthash) and remove WITH_BUNDLED_DEPS=no. > Just for kicks and giggles, I tried the

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: pocock

On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 8:10 PM Daniel Pocock wrote: > As mentioned in the RTC thread, here is the review request: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815936 > I've started the review, but I'm running into some issues in compiling the software, as shown in the bug referenced above.

Re: Change proposal discussion - Optimize SquashFS Size

On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 3:30 AM John M. Harris Jr wrote: > As for the software available, that's called choice. I know > it's a relative unknown in the GNOME world, as one option is shoved down > everyones' throat, but it's a key part of the KDE ideology, as well as GNU/ > Linux itself. > John,

Re: Review swaps

On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 3:47 PM Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > Hello, > > > > Can somebody help me with some reviews, the first two > > being more urgent than others. I can swap with anything > > in exchange. > I've reviewed the first two. I'll try to get to the others over the next day or two.

Re: js-jquery - Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February (beta)

I have taken nodejs-raw-body and am pushing an updated version to rawhide now. -Jared On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 2:53 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > According to [1], these are the packages which need to be preserved to > keep js-jquery around: > > > nodejs-grunt-legacy-util > > nodejs-load-grunt-tasks >

Re: Review request: selenium-geckodriver

On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 7:18 AM Kevin Kofler wrote: > Unfortunately, I doubt that Thomas has sufficient packaging experience to > do > a review swap. > One of the things we should always strive for in Fedora is to assume positive intent. In this situation, that would mean assuming it was an

Re: Python 2 exodus is happening now

On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 7:53 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > No, it is not too late. Drop the dependency. I will delay the retirement > until > you do so (or until you stop responding). > Dropping the dependency was much easier than I had anticipated... I have dropped the Python2 dependency in

Re: Python 2 exodus is happening now

On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 8:03 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > If you talked to us (on e-mail or Bugzilla) and think your package is fine > as it > is, but you don't have a FESCo exception (or a request for one), then > there was > a misunderstanding. We're sorry for our side of it. Please request a

Re: List of Python 2 packages to be removed mid-November (= in a week)

On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 7:02 AM Petr Viktorin wrote: > jsmith >asterisk > (→ PY2) > asterisk-* (→ asterisk → PY2) > Asterisk has very few dependencies on Python (just some contributed scripts for use in debugging reference counters in the code, if I recall correctly). That being

Re: Intent to unretire libresample package, needs re-review

On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 8:46 AM Jared K. Smith wrote: > I will open a Rel-Eng ticket for unretirement once the package has been > re-reviewed. > > The package has been re-reviewed and re-approved, and I have opened the rel-eng ticket at https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8891. --

Re: Intent to unretire libresample package, needs re-review

On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 8:57 AM Richard Shaw wrote: > I can take it unless someone gets to it first. I'm in training today and > then have to catch up everything else once I'm done so it may be a few days > :) > Thanks... let me know if you'd like me to review one of your packages in return. --

Intent to unretire libresample package, needs re-review

I intend to unretire the "libresample" package in Fedora, now that I have it building properly from source again. It needs a re-review, which I've asked for at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1759928. I will open a Rel-Eng ticket for unretirement once the package has been

Re: Modularity and the system-upgrade path

On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 3:42 PM John M. Harris, Jr. wrote: > We could simply stop doing projects that throw wildly different versions > of software into a single installation, which causes this issue. > What you don't seem to appreciate, based on your comments in this thread and others over the

Re: Fedora 32 Self-Contained Change proposal: Better Thermal Management for the Workstation

On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 5:51 AM Kevin Kofler wrote: > How about we just reverse-engineer what those blobs do and reimplement > them > as Free Software? > If I'm reading the comments right in the bugzilla report linked above, it sounds like Lenovo is going to do the right thing and put out an

Re: Unretire nodejs-gaze

On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 9:32 AM Jared K. Smith wrote: > I blindly assumed it had been eight weeks already, so I requested a > re-review at RHBZ#1755147. Obviously I'll just close that review request > if we can get this unretired before the deadline. > It looks like this has been un

Re: Unretire nodejs-gaze

On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 10:46 AM Ben Rosser wrote: > About a month ago I requested to unretire some nodejs packages in > order to get the "grunt" stack working again. At least one more > package still needs to be unretired to fix the > nodejs-grunt-contrib-watch package, nodejs-gaze: > >

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31

On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 9:01 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time > and try to run [*]: > > sudo dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31 > --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync > Error: Problem 1: package

Re: translucent gnome top bar gone in F31?

On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 12:41 AM John M. Harris Jr. wrote: > Further, nothing in that email is what I > would describe as "uncivilized". I'm not asking people to necessarily > agree > with me, everyone is welcome to their own opinions, I simply provided mine > and > that of the users I work

Re: Review swaps

On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 2:26 PM Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > Review Request: wgctrl - Control of WireGuard interfaces on multiple > platforms > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1730911 > Done. > Review Request: golang-github-mattn-ieproxy - Detect the proxy settings on > Windows

Re: Wiki page correction: GRUB2

On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 8:01 AM Michal Schorm wrote: > However I'm not confident enought to edit it prior to any discussions, > so that's why I'm writing here. > Be bold and just update the page... it's a wiki, so it keeps a change history, and if someone else has a problem with what you wrote,

Re: Un-orphaned NodeJS packages upgrades in rawhide

On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 7:49 AM Jan Staněk wrote: > Hello, > I have recently (last week) taken on maintenance of several to-be > orphaned nodejs packages. Since the packages were not upgraded for a > while, they are usually a major version behind the upstream release. > I have started to remedy

Re: Review swaps

://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1676544 -Jared On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 6:06 PM Jerry James wrote: > On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 8:09 AM Jared K. Smith > wrote: > > I'm reviewing them now, and will respond with two that I'd like you to > review after I'm done. > > Thank you, Jar

Re: Review swaps

On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 11:01 PM Jerry James wrote: > > I still need one or more reviewers for these packages. > I'm reviewing them now, and will respond with two that I'd like you to review after I'm done. -Jared ___ devel mailing list --

Plan to un-retire some NodeJS packages

I plan to un-retire some NodeJS packages that were retired late last year. I've linked to the relevant package review requests. nodejs-is-plain-obj: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1676540 nodejs-event-stream: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1676544 There will likely be

Schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2018-11-26)

(Apologies for the late notice -- I forgot to do this before the long holiday weekend.) Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 onirc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at

Re: Schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2018-10-01)

I'm in meetings all day today and will be unable to attend the FESCo meeting. I'll attempt to vote in all the tickets in today's agenda. -- Jared Smith On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 10:09 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > Following is the list of topics that will be

Re: Proposal: Add release announcement post to Go/No-Go criteria

On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 4:44 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > We have a proposal to add a fourth criterion for the > Go/No-Go decision, beginning with F29 Final: > > 4. The release announcement post for Fedora Magazine is substantially > complete > I'm torn on this one... I think the release announcement

Re: Blocking criteria proposal for F30+: Printing

On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 8:40 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > I'd like to propose that we add the following criteria to Beta for Fedora > 30+: > * Printing must work on at least one printer available to Fedora QA. > > and this to Final for Fedora 30+: > * Printing must work on at least one

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2018-08-06)

Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-08-06/fesco.2018-08-06-15.04.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-08-06/fesco.2018-08-06-15.04.txt Log:

Schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2018-08-06)

(Apologies for the late announcement.) Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d

License update for nodejs-qunitjs package

I updated the version of nodejs-qunitjs in Rawhide today, and it's license has changed from "MIT and ASL 2.0" to "MIT". Previously, the entire package was under the MIT license, with the exception of the src/diff.js file, which was under the ASL 2.0 license. That file has since been removed, and

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2018-04-27)

Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2018-04-27/fesco.2018-04-27-15.02.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2018-04-27/fesco.2018-04-27-15.02.txt Log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2018-04-27/fesco.2018-04-27-15.02.log.html

Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2018-04-27)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Friday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2018-04-27 15:00 UTC' Links to all issues below

Re: Looking for volunteers to review Golang packages

On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 2:17 PM, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > I'm looking for help to review a lot of Golang packages, 83 in total, that > are > the results of unbundling rclone. They are made with the new standardized > Go > packaging and should be fairly quick to review. >

Re: Review swaps

On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 5:02 PM, Jared K. Smith <jsm...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > I have done all of them except for golang-github-ncw-dropbox-sdk- > unofficial and golang-github-bitly-simplejson . > I've now finished golang-github-ncw-dropbox-sdk-unofficial a

Re: Review swaps

On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 4:38 PM, djb djb wrote: > Jared, which ones have you so far? > I have done all of them except for golang-github-ncw-dropbox-sdk-unofficial and golang-github-bitly-simplejson . > I would like to do: > > Review Request: golang-github-bitly-simplejson

Re: Review swaps

On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 12:53 PM, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > I'm looking for some help to review some Golang packages. These are all > renamed packages to conform with the new Golang guidelines which > standardizes package names. These are super simple devel only package

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2018-03-16)

=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2018-03-16) === Meeting started by jsmith at 15:01:14 UTC. The full logs are available athttps://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2018-03-16/fesco.2018-03-16-15.01.log.html . Meeting summary

Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2018-03-16)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Friday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2018-03-16 15:00 UTC' Links to all issues below

Re: Configuration file migration without scriptlets

On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 12:03 PM, Ondřej Lysoněk wrote: > is there any mechanism in Fedora for config file migration? How would > you make changes to a configuration file (maybe after some config option > has been renamed), or move a config file to a new location, during >

Re: 389-ds-base and freeipa on 32 bit arches

On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 6:39 PM, Jared K. Smith <jsm...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Can you give any more details on 32-bit ARM in particular -- is it just > i686 that is experiencing issues, or have you seen similar memory > corruption issues on 32-bit ARM as well? > Just a

Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)

On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 7:46 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > The requirement to announce soname bumps to begin with is unreasonable > bureaucracy in the first place. If your package shows up in the broken > dependency report, you rebuild it and move on, where is the problem? >

Re: fedora28 and strong crypto settings

On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 10:37 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: > I believe however that we should gather as many data as we can related > to this security update in Fedora28, and decide after F28 beta is > released on whether to back this change off, or to ignore this >

Re: 389-ds-base and freeipa on 32 bit arches

On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 12:32 PM, Jeff Law wrote: > The fact that the 389-ds code works on other architectures does not > allow us to draw any conclusions at this point. > Can you give any more details on 32-bit ARM in particular -- is it just i686 that is experiencing issues,

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 12:09 PM, Igor Gnatenko < ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Over this weekend I've performed scratch-mass-rebuild without having gcc > and > gcc-c++ in buildroot of all Fedora packages, many of which failed due to > random > reasons and I grepped all logs for some

Re: [HEADS UP] Removal of systemd-units

2018-01-25 13:17 GMT-05:00 Jason L Tibbitts III : > For your list of packages, this gives the following two lists, making it > easy for maintainers to see if they have something to fix without > looking for individual package names. (Hence it's now trivial for me to > see that

Re: Wyland is a disaster

On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 6:56 PM, Howard Howell wrote: > Due to that last line, issued su and password and ran it again: > # lshw > Segmentation fault (core dumped) > # > Due to the fact that you're having segfaults in command-line programs as well, I'm tempted to say

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: After suspension

(Apologies for the top-posting -- I'm on a mobile device at the moment.) Interesting... I noticed something similar today, but with a WebDAV external filesystem mounted. Turning off fprintd seemed to stop the delay, however. Does turning off fprintd solve the problem for you as well? -Jared

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2018-01-05)

=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2018-01-05) === Meeting started by jsmith at 16:00:09 UTC. The full logs are available athttps://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2018-01-05/fesco.2018-01-05-16.00.log.html . Meeting summary

Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2018-01-05)

(Sorry for the short notice -- I forgot that I was running the meeting this week.) Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting onirc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at

Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2017-12-08)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting onirc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2017-12-08 16:00 UTC' Links to all issues below

Re: Review swap

On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > Is anyone interested by a review swap? I'd like my package rclone [1] to be > reviewed (it's written in Golang). Except php and Java with which I'm not > familiar, I think I can handle anything else. > You've done

Re: 15 seconds to unlock screen?

On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 7:56 AM, Mads Villadsen wrote: > Is anyone else seeing something similar? > I"m seeing the same thing on Rawhide. -Jared ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an

Re: Schedule for Tomorrow's FESCo Meeting (2017-09-15)

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Adam Miller wrote: > Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the > FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on > irc.freenode.net. > > My apologies for the late notice, but I"m likely going to be gone

Re: Main admin for nodejs packages

On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 6:52 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > Good Morning Everyone, > > I recently found out that some packages were not correctly migrated from > pkgdb > > Looking at a couple of ones in pkgdb, it seem the issue is basically that > a group > has commit

Summary/Minutes from last Friday's FESCo Meeting (2017-08-11)

=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2017-08-04) === Meeting started by jsmith at 16:05:59 UTC. The full logs are available athttps://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2017-08-04/fesco.2017-08-04-16.05.log.html . Meeting summary

Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2017-08-04)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2017-08-04 16:00 UTC' Links to all issues below

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2017-07-28)

We had a short meeting today because we lost quorum part-way through the meeting. === #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2017-07-28) === Meeting started by jsmith at 16:01:24 UTC. The full logs are available

Re: Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2017-07-28)

On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Jared K. Smith <jsm...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the > FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on > irc.freenode.net. > > There was one additional late-breaking

Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2017-07-28)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2017-07-28 16:00 UTC' Links to all issues below

Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2017-06-23)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2017-06-23 16:00 UTC' Links to all issues below

Re: Retiring Packages with Broken Dependencies in branched (2017-06-12)

On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 6:38 PM, wrote: > asterisk jsmith, gtjoseph, itamarjp,83 weeks ago >lbazan, russellb > > I'm actively working on fixing up Asterisk -- it took a while to get systemd support back into

Re: asterisk-dahdi cannot installed on Fedora 25

dahdi-tools was orphaned due to missing systemd support. I've added systemd support and submitted it to be re-reviewed. See RH BZ 1422683 . -- Jared Smith On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 1:30 PM, wrote: > Hi! > >

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2016-12-16)

=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2016-12-16) === Meeting started by jsmith at 16:00:48 UTC. The full logs are available athttps://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2016-12-16/fesco.2016-12-16-16.00.log.html . Meeting summary

Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2016-12-16)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2016-12-16 16:00 UTC' Links to all issues below

Re: Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2016-11-04)

On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Jared K. Smith <jsm...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > For the second week in a row, we didn't have enough FESCo members to > reach a quorum. We'll push the agenda to next week's meeting. > I won't be able to make today's meeting, and since we haven

Re: Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2016-11-04)

On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 11:16 AM, Jared K. Smith <jsm...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in theFESCo meeting > Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting onirc.freenode.net. > > To convert UTC to your local time, take

Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2016-11-04)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in theFESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting onirc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2016-10-28 16:00 UTC' Links to all issues below can

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2016-10-28)

We didn't have a quorum in today's meeting, so we postponed the business until next week's meeting. Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2016-10-28/fesco.2016-10-28-16.00.html Minutes (text):

Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2016-10-28)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting onirc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2016-10-28 16:00 UTC' Links to all issues below

Re: reviewing captagent (HOMER / SIPCapture)

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 5:07 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > Is anybody interested in reviewing captagent? > I was going to take it, but it looks like someone beat me to the punch. -Jared ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Orphaned packages seeking new point of contact

On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 1:21 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > coffee-script (el6) > coffee-script (epel7) > coffee-script (f23) > coffee-script (f24) > coffee-script (f25) > coffee-script (master) > I'll take coffee-script, as it's quite useful for many of the other NodeJS packages I

Re: Request package page: namespace choice

On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Jerry James wrote: > Is it really a good idea for the > default to be "docker"? > I agree -- the default namespace should probably be "rpms", not "docker". -Jared -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2016-07-08)

=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2016-07-08) === Meeting started by jsmith at 16:00:23 UTC. The full logs are available athttps://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2016-07-08/fesco.2016-07-08-16.00.log.html . Meeting summary

Re: licensecheck split-off from devscripts-minimal

On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 6:42 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: > > licensecheck is a glorified grep > oslc (and https://pagure.io/muster) use proper algorithms and a > "database" of full license texts and headers to provide much better > matching accuracy. The Fossology

Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2016-07-08)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2016-07-08 16:00 UTC' Links to all tickets below

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2016-06-10)

#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2016-06-10) Meeting started by jsmith at 16:00:40 UTC. Full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2016-06-10/fesco.2016-06-10-16.00.log.html Meeting summary init process (jsmith, 16:00:40) Follow-ups (jsmith, 16:03:32) #1576

Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2016-06-10)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2016-06-10 16:00 UTC' Links to all tickets below

Re: Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2016-05-20)

My apologies, but I probably won't be able to make today's meeting due to being stuck on an airplane (on the ground, with mechanical troubles) with very limited internet access. -Jared On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 2:52 AM, Parag Nemade wrote: > Following is the list of topics

Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2016-04-29) [NEW TIME]

[Please note that we've moved the meeting to be an hour earlier than last week, due to daylight savings time.] Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at

Re: Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2016-04-22)

On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo > meeting Friday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. > My apologies in advanced, but I'm traveling today and may not be able to make the

Re: GNOME 3.19.92 megaupdate

On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 6:18 AM, Richard Hughes wrote: > I think that would be even more confusing for projects that are not > quite core GNOME, e.g. NetworkManager needing a new glib. We'd have to > get any project depending on the core GNOME stuff to also build in the >

Re: Fedora Rawhide 20160218 compose check report

On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 9:18 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Yet another completely avoidable fatal error caused by SELinux. How many > such show stoppers will it take until people finally realize that enabling > SELinux by default was a horrible idea? > Not to put too fine a

Re: F24 Self Contained Change: Let's Encrypt client now in Fedora

On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 10:55 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > And aren't we supposed to *not* do stuff like this > anymore? > If I had to guess, I'd say that this was proposed as an F24 change to help it get publicity in the release notes, etc. -- Jared Smith -- devel mailing list

Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2016-01-29)

(Apologies for the late schedule.) Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Friday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2016-01-29

  1   2   3   >