Matt Domsch wrote:
I would like to propose blocking packages at the F15 alpha compose
point if they have not resolved their FTBFS from F14 or earlier. The
lists may be broken down by when they last did build. With 3
exceptions, these 110 bugs are all still in NEW state as well, so they
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 09:07:17 +1000
Jeff Fearn jfe...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 13:56 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 18:03:04 +0400
Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) fo...@hubbitus.com.ru wrote:
In most cases I try sync all branches if
Chuck Anderson wrote:
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 09:23:24AM +1000, Jeffrey Fearn wrote:
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 09:07:17 +1000
Jeff Fearn jfe...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 13:56 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 18:03:04 +0400
Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan
Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 09:32:15AM +1000, Jeffrey Fearn wrote:
What do you mean leave it alone? The people using it WANT the changes.
Why are you telling them how they can use their system?
Because by pushing updates you're also potentially making it impossible
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 09:32:15 +1000
Jeffrey Fearn jfe...@redhat.com wrote:
What do you mean leave it alone? The people using it WANT the
changes. Why are you telling them how they can use their system?
Not at all. :)
They want the changes, it's trivial for me to give
Tom spot Callaway wrote:
Maintainers should look at the bottom of this email for the list.
[jfearn] publican: publican-doc-2.1-0.fc14.noarch
publican-doc includes fdl.txt in it's %files, which is the GFDL 1.2 text
previously sourced from http://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl.txt
Cheers, Jeff.
--
Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
Hello,
as you might noticed, perl was pushed into rawhide. Test buildroot will
be deleted, so since now all changes go to rawhide. It looks like
nothing was broken, at least no new missing requirements or build
requirements.
Feel free to test and file bugs ;-)
