On 14 Jan 2014 06:04, David Airlie airl...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi all,
I've gotten a build tag f21-llvm for attempting to rebase rawhide to llvm
3.4
Assuming there aren't any major stumbling blocks, are there any plans to
back port llvm 3.4 to f20 (like was done for llvm 3.3 in f19)?
I need
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:54 PM, David Airlie airl...@redhat.com wrote:
On 14 Jan 2014 06:04, David Airlie airl...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi all,
I've gotten a build tag f21-llvm for attempting to rebase rawhide to
llvm
3.4
Assuming there aren't any major stumbling
On 15 Jan 2014 02:11, David Airlie airl...@redhat.com wrote:
On 14 Jan 2014 06:04, David Airlie airl...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi all,
I've gotten a build tag f21-llvm for attempting to rebase rawhide
to llvm
3.4
Assuming there aren't any major stumbling blocks, are
On 2 May 2013 15:15, John Reiser jrei...@bitwagon.com wrote:
On 05/01/2013 06:37 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
Why are we tied to DVD-5, 4.7GB (4.3GiB) at all?
Do we distribute DVDs?
Yes. Check with Fedora Ambassadors in EMEA.
If so couldn't we use a newer DVD standard?
That would reduce
On 2 May 2013 16:59, Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net wrote:
Once upon a time, John5342 john5...@gmail.com said:
I think USB sticks will become much more usable when Fedora allows
booting
from iso images like some other distributions already do. Currently the
standard way involves completely
On 15 Apr 2013 14:16, Pierre-Yves Chibon pin...@pingoured.fr wrote:
On Mon, 2013-04-15 at 07:43 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
Richard Hughes wrote:
Is there any guidance as when to trim %changelog down to size? Some
packages have thousands of lines of spec file dating back over 15
years
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Eugene Pivnev ti.eug...@gmail.com wrote:
I can't find lightd, package in Fedora - just lightdm greeters:
http://img687.imageshack.us/img687/679/screenshotac1e1cb8.png
I'm wrong?
When you search for Applications (the default) the results only show
certain user
On 28 Feb 2013 14:48, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
domi...@greysector.net wrote:
On Wednesday, 13 February 2013 at 15:26, John5342 wrote:
On 13 Feb 2013 09:37, Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
I spend a little time recently working on the llvm package trying
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Christoph Wickert
christoph.wick...@gmail.com wrote:
Am Montag, den 18.02.2013, 23:34 + schrieb John5342:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Christoph Wickert
christoph.wick...@gmail.com wrote:
Despite of the question whether it's right or wrong it's
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com wrote:
Are there any plans to bring this to F18?
Good question
There was talk about bringing 3.1 to F17 including some support from
the Mesa guys but then nothing actually happened. I would really
like it if I could go
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Christoph Wickert
christoph.wick...@gmail.com wrote:
Despite of the question whether it's right or wrong it's a manual
process and we cannot rely it really happens. On the other hand changing
the script to not close any bugs which are ON_QA is easy.
So what
On 13 Feb 2013 09:37, Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
I spend a little time recently working on the llvm package trying
to fix a few Fedora bugs that have been open for a while...
I also think we should really get llvm-3.2 into Fedora 19.
I have done a few tests and scratch
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Jamie Nguyen j...@jamielinux.com wrote:
Hi all,
Having some trouble for this package review request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877705
It has been approved, but I can't set the fedora-cvs flag. This has
worked in the past, but maybe
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 10:16 PM, John5342 john5...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Jamie Nguyen j...@jamielinux.com wrote:
Hi all,
Having some trouble for this package review request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877705
It has been approved, but I can't
On Oct 27, 2012 7:46 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim sali...@fedoraproject.org
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
(originally posted to test@; Adam Williamson suggested it might be
more appropriate here)
Ever since I started tracking Fedora 18, Google Music Manager is no
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Paul Wouters pwout...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, John5342 wrote:
Why is redhat-rpm-config not a dependancy dragged in by rpm-build?
I imagine because rpmbuild is in fact useful for building packages
other than for Fedora.
But then those
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:14 PM, Paul Wouters pwout...@redhat.com wrote:
I was building a package and not getting any debuginfo packages, and
luckily rdieter was around to tell me (again) that I was missing the
redhat-rpm-config package.
Why is redhat-rpm-config not a dependancy dragged in
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote:
You know what was the painless part of this re-install? After firing up
google
chrome, I didn't need to reinstall anything for it. It's all synced with
gmail.
I find myself wishing that all my fedora packages could
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 15:33, Jamie Nguyen ja...@tomoyolinux.co.uk wrote:
Yes. Since the emails don't necessarily match up, I don't think you
can rely on querying the database. Not only is it less efficient, it
can break too! (In most cases the emails probably will match up
anyway, but you
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 13:54, Nils Philippsen n...@redhat.com wrote:
This disables normal non-programmable tab-completion for me.
Also, if you want the (other) default settings, you need to
$include /etc/inputrc on the first line of ~/.inputrc. It would really
help if we shipped
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 03:34, Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote:
A bad autocomplete can cause you to sit 3-4 minutes
as DNS or other things time out.
Ctrl+C will cancel the command and the completion with it. It's not
ideal if you are typing a long command but it certainly avoids
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 19:33, Steve Grubb sgr...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sunday, November 20, 2011 02:14:09 PM drago01 wrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Steve Grubb wrote:
For example, if a 32 bit library is installed, which application is left
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 15:27, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Anything that directly or indirectly uses QtWebKit or QtScript also requires
execmem, unless we disable the JavaScript JIT, which we used to do, but got
users complaining about the slowness.
See also:
On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 15:31, valent.turko...@gmail.com
valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 4:28 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com
valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi KDE devels,
I can't find kdeedu and marble in KDE websvn, have I missed something?
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 14:47, Jeffrey Ollie j...@ocjtech.us wrote:
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 2:16 AM, Christoph Frieben
christoph.frie...@googlemail.com wrote:
2011/9/8 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
On behalf of the systemd convertion team Just wanted to say thanks to
Tom Spot Callaway he's been on
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 14:23, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 14:37:16 +0100,
Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 08:09:51AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 14:26:39 +0100,
Matthew Garrett
I don't use this package, I only took it over in order to get another
package in which has since become irrelevant and most importantly
although i know plenty about java (and ant) i have no clue at all
about maven so this package could really do with a better owner.
The package currently has only
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 21:12, Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net wrote:
In any case, instead of arguing semantics, can you answer my actual
question? How many systems hang when floppy.ko is loaded? If it is a
large number, it should be easy to point to lots of data.
Ok, just some very
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 18:22, Nathan O. ndowen...@gmail.com wrote:
I am not able to submit packages as an update through bodhi web interface
nor via fedpkg update. I have the package in F15, but I am trying to send it
to F16 and both ways give me the error that newlisp not tagged as an update
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 03:29, Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
In the cmake version residing in rawhide, the UseSWIG.cmake file is
broken. Upstream is aware of this. I've also filed a bug with fedora
here[1].
I'd like to find a temporary solution to this. gdcm cannot build
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 02:06, Petrus de Calguarium pguec...@gmail.com wrote:
John5342 wrote:
I forget which one exactly contains the mp3 plugin
gstreamer-plugins-ugly, I believe
i just install all of them and then i don't have to worry about any
other format i may one day come across
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 19:02, Petrus de Calguarium pguec...@gmail.comwrote:
Kevin Kofler wrote:
there's one third-party KDE-Platform-based application still using
xine-lib for the foreseeable future: Kaffeine.
kaffeine has begun to look kind of shabby. I always installed it, as xine
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 22:59, Petrus de Calguarium pguec...@gmail.com wrote:
John5342 wrote:
Hence xine-lib-extras-freeworld should make no difference to amarok when
using the default backend anyway. You probably want gstreamer-plugins-* in
f15+ (or whenever phonon-backend-gstreamer
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 23:37, Dave Jones da...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 02:00:57PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 08:01:06PM +1000, Chris Jones wrote:
I agree. As virtualization technology becomes more and more involved
and frequent on users
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 23:37, William Cohen wco...@redhat.com wrote:
I am attempting to rebuild oprofile for fedora 13. However koji is
converting the following in the spec file:
BuildRequires: qt-devel
into a dependency on the qt3-devel rpm, which is wrong. There is a qt-devel
for qt4
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 23:45, John5342 john5...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 23:37, William Cohen wco...@redhat.com wrote:
I am attempting to rebuild oprofile for fedora 13. However koji is
converting the following in the spec file:
BuildRequires: qt-devel
into a dependency
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 19:19, Adam Litke a...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Hello all. I am a new Fedora packager and am following the process to
create a new package. The associated bugzilla is 638647 [1]. At this
point I am trying to request a new SCM module for my package and have
followed the
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 00:05, Paul F. Johnson
p...@all-the-johnsons.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
It's been a while since I've done any sort of uploading and in that time
my box died, has been rebuilt and is running happily on rawhide.
Problem is my scripts for uploading have gone! I've followed the
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 23:17, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote:
Repository : :ext:nbec...@cvs.fedoraproject.org:/cvs/pkgs
Module : rpms/mercurial/devel
Working dir: ~/fedora/mercurial/devel/
In directory .:
Message: cvs [commit aborted]: correct above errors first!
Message:
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 20:52, Zach Carter z.car...@f5.com wrote:
On Friday 16 July 2010 00:36:31 Andreas Schwab wrote:
Any insight, tips or pointers would be much appreciated.
You could modify the spec file to cat the config.log file on error,
which should give you more clues.
Thanks for
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 21:29, Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com wrote:
[john5342] ebook-tools: ebook-tools-libs-0.1.1-5.fc12.x86_64
False positive: libs subpackage contains license file and all other
ebook-tools.srpm derived packages depend on it.
--
There are 10 kinds of people
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 19:36, Mohammed Morsi mmo...@redhat.com wrote:
Howdy,
I've been scratching my head over this problem for the last few days and
figured it was time to get some help.
I'm trying to build Ruby on Rails v2.3.8 against Fedora 13 but am running
into dependency issues.
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 21:47, Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Am Tue, 22 Jun 2010 11:02:40 -0400
schrieb David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com:
Hmm, I just tried to write a little script for that (based on the one
from above), but I had some problems with bodhi.
e.g. 'repoquery
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 16:35, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 05:27:32PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
We don't generate deltas for packages with a size of = 100MB
which kind of makes it useless for this case but it seems that delta
generation is to expensive
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 01:03, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
Unblocked orphan moodbar
I'll take this one. Amarok should be getting support for it again soon.
--
There are 10 kinds of people in the world: Those who understand binary
and those who don't...
--
devel mailing list
45 matches
Mail list logo
