On Sat, Jun 01, 2024 at 08:48:32PM GMT, Jakub Kadlcik wrote:
> I am running a service in Fedora CommuniShift (planning to move it to
> Fedora production OpenShift instance in case it is relevant).
>
> Can anybody please help me understand how to configure some monitoring for
> it? Is it possible
yeah, I've seen this pattern before, but it's not a great way to do
things. ;(
Probibly filing a bug is a good idea.
It looks like there's only 2 packages using the old soname.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
___
devel mailing
On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 06:07:10PM GMT, Björn Persson wrote:
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > I am unaware of any recent auth issues aside this kernel app one.
> > Everything has been working great since we moved the ipsilon servers to
> > f39 on march 27th. If there are, please let
On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 10:45:34AM GMT, Marius Schwarz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> ATM FAS Login is not possible.
For you, to what? anything?
> The ironic part is: you need to login to take part in the infrastructure
> ticket about not able to login ;)
>
>
On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 10:59:12PM GMT, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 20. 05. 24 22:59, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > * AGREED: FESCo will permit the inclusion of binaries provided by
> > upstream Python and FFI exclusively for the purposes of loading the
> > installer on MacOS since we have no
On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 06:44:43PM GMT, Ian McInerney via devel wrote:
> Is there a full log somewhere? I don't see it on
> https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/, and the usual links at the top of the
> summary email aren't there this time.
Yes, this meeting fell prey to the 'multi line' bug in
On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 08:42:12AM GMT, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 05:16:17PM -0300, Pedro Moura wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > We are moving Fedora Planet from the old (python2) software running on
> > fedorapeople.org to a new application that is running in OpenShift.
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 05:27:31PM GMT, Tim Orling wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 5:02 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Today, 2024-05-16, we have removed inactive packagers
> > from the packager group.
> >
> > This is in accordance w
Hi all,
Today, 2024-05-16, we have removed inactive packagers
from the packager group.
This is in accordance with the FESCo policy on inactive packagers:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_inactive_packagers/
If the removed user is 'main admin' for a package, this package
Hi all,
Today, 2024-05-16, we have removed inactive packagers
from the packager group.
This is in accordance with the FESCo policy on inactive packagers:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_inactive_packagers/
If the removed user is 'main admin' for a package, this package
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 12:43:42PM GMT, Manabu Ori wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found fedora:40 container image does not contain util-linux-core.
> Is it intentional?
I don't think so...
> I'd like some commands (findmnt in my case) included in the base image...
>
>
> ## fedora:39 container image has
On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 06:11:15PM GMT, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-05-14 at 14:53 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > When is Fedora 38 going EOL?
> >
> > https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-38/f-38-key-tasks.html say
> > s today
> >
On Wed, May 01, 2024 at 02:15:20PM GMT, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Hey folks.
>
> hiredis 1.2.0 has been out a long while now, and with some prodding I am
> finally looking at updating rawhide to it.
>
> A interested user ran a mass prebuild:
> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org
We have 3 outages scheduled next week for Monday, Tuesday and wed:
OpenShift upgrade
We will be upgrading our production OpenShift cluster that runs many of our
applications.
Normally, this would just be a 0 downtime event, but in this case we are
switching
networking models, so we need to
We have 3 outages scheduled next week for Monday, Tuesday and wed:
OpenShift upgrade
We will be upgrading our production OpenShift cluster that runs many of our
applications.
Normally, this would just be a 0 downtime event, but in this case we are
switching
networking models, so we need to
On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 08:59:26AM GMT, José Relvas via devel wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> `libtsm` was retired because it was orphaned. `kmscon` was retired because it
> relied on this package.
>
> I'm currently not in the "packagers" group, but I'm interested in taking
> ownership of these
On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 02:15:15PM GMT, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote:
> I think for ex-redhatters it may be more appropriate to make a new bz
> account for their new email address?
Yes. I don't think the system will allow you to change emails for a
@redhat.com account.
Just making the new account
On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 01:28:19PM GMT, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-05-02 at 15:41 -0400, Przemek Klosowski via devel wrote:
> > On 5/2/24 14:34, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> > > While I follow the philosophy of updating
> > > regularly, there are likely some who install Fnn, and
> > > never
On Sat, May 04, 2024 at 11:32:21AM GMT, Dominik Wombacher wrote:
> On 5/3/24 8:00 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > So, help would definitely be welcome fixing the matrix/irc issues in the
> > code, and then we could look at mass updating it.
> >
>
> I briefly look
On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 12:24:57PM GMT, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 5:18 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> >
> > Somehow the news that various (some ? all? ) Fedora meetings have
> > moved off IRC, to Matrix passed me by. This is not helped by the
> > official project meeting
Hey folks.
hiredis 1.2.0 has been out a long while now, and with some prodding I am
finally looking at updating rawhide to it.
A interested user ran a mass prebuild:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/v02460/hiredis-1.2.0/packages/
Everything rebuilt fine.
ccache
collectd
coturn
On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 12:20:37PM GMT, Brian C. Lane wrote:
> I screwed up the isomd5sum checksums in the 1.2.4 release while trying
> to fix support for small isos. I've reverted the change and 1.2.4-2 is
> building for rawhide and Fedora 40. Thanks to Jonathan Billings for the
> bug report
On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 11:16:28AM GMT, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2024-04-26 at 08:56 +0200, Jan Kolarik wrote:
> > Hi Kevin,
> >
> > Personally, I think this is a beta requirement.
> > >
> >
> > IIUC the Fedora 41 Beta requirement is to successfully upgrade the system
> > from Fedora
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 11:42:57AM GMT, Jan Kolarik wrote:
> Hello Michael,
>
> Does this mean that distro-upgrade from F41 to F42 is supposed to work
> > at F41 release time (ideally at beta time)?
> >
>
> Yes, the system-upgrade functionality should be available before the Fedora
> 41
>
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 05:48:46AM GMT, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>
> There's also the effort of distribuiting and archiving a few
> additional gigabytes, putting up the links on the website and browsing
> through them, some additional time and and additional step that can
> fail during
On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 09:37:38AM GMT, Igor Kerstges wrote:
> Those questions regarding privacy are asked and answered to my satisfaction.
> I'd like to understand more implications about this change..
There are none. This proposal was withdrawn.
It may be adjusted and submitted for
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 03:45:40PM -0400, Steve Cossette wrote:
> What about simply blocking access to the git repos/koji/bodhi for those
> without 2fa?
Well, git I suppose could be a hook that checks the status of the user,
but koji and bodhi don't really have any place to hook that in directly.
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 09:47:04AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-04-11 at 19:52 -0700, Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez wrote:
> > I was hesitant to have MFA for a while. Imagine losing a phone with tons
> > of tokens. What a hassle to recover from that. I found it less than
> > ideal
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 03:41:02PM -0500, Michel Lind wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> With the recent EOL of the Django 3.2 LTS series[^1], and Django being a
> key component of our mailing list infra for both Fedora and CentOS, I
> would like to propose the following plan to maintain Django in both
>
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 05:49:27PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2024-04-12 at 00:09 +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> >
> > What is the best way to formally propose
> > that 2FA is required for packagers after
> > some date
>
> There is already a FESCo ticket.
On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 01:55:41PM -0400, David Cantrell wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I am looking for multiple people to help be upstream stewards of the
> rpminspect-data-fedora project. This is a project that contains config files
> and rules for running rpminspect on Fedora builds. It is a
On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 06:19:31PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 06, 2024 at 10:45:52AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > = Discussed and Voted in the Ticket =
> >
> > Change: GNU Toolchain F41
> > https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3
On Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 10:11:56PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 7, 2024 at 10:10 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 7, 2024 at 7:06 PM Antonio T. sagitter
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all.
> > >
> > > Can this update be re-activated or i have to rebuild everything?
> > >
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Monday at 19:30 UTC in #meeting:fedoraproject.org
on Matrix.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2024-04-08 19:30 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 03:07:39PM +, seanmott...@posteo.net wrote:
> Hi devel!
>
> I'm Sean (FAS: seaninspace). I've been working professionally in Linux
> Sysadmin/Engineering positions for over a decade now, and would like to help
> out more :)
>
> I've spent most of my Fedora time in QA
On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 08:11:42PM +0200, Leon Fauster via devel wrote:
>
> One approach that would be at least bring some light into "weak"
> (non technical layer) components (albeit not sure how feasible it is),
> could be:
>
> - Checking the resources of a packaged project.
>Resources in
On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 07:00:13AM +0200, Jan Kolarik wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> the dnf-automatic command will be obsoleted.
> >
>
> Oh, sorry about that. This portion of the text was inadvertently altered
> during the review process. I've already corrected the text on the wiki.
>
> The
On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 05:04:20PM +, Arnie T via devel wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> Thanks for the explanation.
>
> I just caught up with the article at the New York Times,
>
> Did One Guy Just Stop a Huge Cyberattack?
>
On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 01:26:14PM +, Arnie T via devel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just installed Fedora on 2 of my PCs a couple of weeks ago. One version of
> Fedora 39 release and one of Fedora 40 to see where things are going.
>
> I learned about this XZ-hack from Ars Technica & The Economist.
On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 11:57:48AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2024-04-03 at 14:27 -0400, Przemek Klosowski via devel wrote:
> > On 4/3/24 06:36, Aoife Moloney wrote:
> > > the dnf-automatic command will be obsoleted.
> >
> > https://dnf5.readthedocs.io/en/latest/changes.html does not
On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 04:24:08AM +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Why not the opposite:
> >
> > Download Workstation
> >
> > [I'm a linux user and know what I want, just show me the full list of
> > downloads, click here
On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 06:17:59PM +0200, Leon Fauster via devel wrote:
> Am 02.04.24 um 23:32 schrieb Adam Williamson:
> > On Tue, 2024-04-02 at 17:37 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote:
> > >
> > > I am a happy KDE user, since the good old days of version 1.0. I celebrate
> > > this decision! My
On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 07:27:12AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 7:41 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 04:38:25PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 3:55 PM Steve Cossette wrote:
> > >
On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 02:36:07AM +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Ok, thats obvously somewhat tounge in cheek, but if we promote multiple
> > things, we need some way to describe them to uses who might not know the
> > history of things and do
On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 04:06:45PM -0400, Steve Cossette wrote:
> Alright, so a substantial amount of information changed since the original
> submission of the change proposal. We aren't necessarily thinking of
> demoting Gnome. The overall spirit of the CP is that we think KDE, and to
> some
On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 04:38:25PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 3:55 PM Steve Cossette wrote:
> >
> > I personally would very much agree with enforcing the use of 2fa on the
> > Fedora Account System. Maybe take that opportunity to make it a bit more
> > user
On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 02:24:51PM +0200, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 12:39 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> > sting->stable marked updates be still included in
> > stable without having to go through the exception/blocker process?
> >
>
> I was told there would be one more
On Mon, Apr 01, 2024 at 05:07:13PM +, Christopher Klooz wrote:
>
> On 31/03/2024 23.08, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 10:30:23PM +0200, Leon Fauster via devel wrote:
> > > Not sure, if it was already mentioned -> containers. I had here a toolbox
&g
On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 08:55:37PM +, Christopher Klooz wrote:
> The repo files should be the same on Fedora containers, so if the container
> is F40 and the testing repo is enabled, it might have installed the malicious
> build.
Right, if it was dnf updated during the time that the bad
On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 10:30:23PM +0200, Leon Fauster via devel wrote:
>
> Not sure, if it was already mentioned -> containers. I had here a toolbox
> environment with F40. That I had not in my first actions
> on the screen. The last state had 5.6.0-3 installed but not sure
> if the previous
On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 03:52:12PM -0500, Alex Thomas wrote:
> Just to be clear, as I was getting ready to put 40 Beta on a test
> machine, this has been fixed. I do the install and run updates and the
> compromised version of xz is never installed?
Correct.
kevin
signature.asc
Description:
On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 09:12:30AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Thanks Arthur, yes, that was *exactly* the point.
>
> I would argue there's a danger of getting too tied up in very specific
> technical details of this attack. Yes, it's reasonable to think of ways
> to mitigate those specific
On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 07:42:24AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> At this point, I'm used to MFA for stuff (and I use a password manager
> that handles 2FA OTPs too), but the Fedora implementation of MFA is
> uniquely bad because we have to do a lot in the terminal, and our MFA
> implementation
On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 11:12:02PM +0100, Sandro wrote:
>
> From what I understood, F40 Beta, the official Beta release, available from
> the website as of March 26, has updates-testing disabled by default. That
Nope.
> was confirmed by several people in #devel yesterday when the Fedora
Just a reminder that, because Beta used it's 'target date #2'
(ie, today), the gap between the Beta release and Final freeze is only 1
week this time.
So, please take this time to do any last minute testing and bugfixing
and make sure any packages you expect to be in the final f40 base
Just a reminder that, because Beta used it's 'target date #2'
(ie, today), the gap between the Beta release and Final freeze is only 1
week this time.
So, please take this time to do any last minute testing and bugfixing
and make sure any packages you expect to be in the final f40 base
On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 02:24:10PM +, Barry wrote:
> Why is the version of this announcement missing all the details
> here?
> https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/fedora-linux-40-beta-released/109684
I think it was being edited when you looked?
It seems to have the details now? Or is
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 04:36:02PM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> After I requested [1] Celestia project upstream to better define
> licensing of all the textures and 3d models included in upstream data,
> it turned out that at least some content is licensed CC-BY-NC-SA-3.0 [2]
> which
On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 10:59:15PM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 04:50:28PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> >> Keep in mind we also want to make the compose process faster too, I
> >> don't know if it's worth it to spend 20x
On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 04:36:03PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Kevin Fenzi:
>
> > So, seems glibc32 was updated to update license headers?
> >
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-cd577e1535
> >
> > So, it's in f40-updates-testing now.
On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 05:10:52PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Joseph Myers enhanced glibc.spec so that we no longer need the separate
> glibc32 source package which its tarball of pre-built glibc binaries.
>
> As part of the DNF5 adjustment to the removal of filelists, I believe
> some
On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 05:10:52PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Joseph Myers enhanced glibc.spec so that we no longer need the separate
> glibc32 source package which its tarball of pre-built glibc binaries.
>
> As part of the DNF5 adjustment to the removal of filelists, I believe
> some
Planned Outage - fedora.im / chat.fedoraproject.org matrix server - 2024-03-14
07:00 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2024-03-14 07:00UTC,
which will last approximately 1 hour.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
Planned Outage - fedora.im / chat.fedoraproject.org matrix server - 2024-03-14
07:00 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2024-03-14 07:00UTC,
which will last approximately 1 hour.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 07:17:23PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> I have thought about this when proposing the Change to make dropping
> support for i686 easier. What you suggest is probably not as easy as you
> think - the packages that are required for multilib purposes change over
> time,
On Fri, Mar 08, 2024 at 04:19:11PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> For mingw-* packages we (sometimes) have a separate package from the
> native package, eg. libgcrypt vs mingw-libgcrypt. Therefore two
> different packages are sometimes built with the exact same sources.
>
> However I
On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 11:44:51AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> I can't quite point to proper evidence, but I have a feeling that
> email notifications are being lost from Pagure.
I'm guessing from below you mean the src.fedoraproject.org instance?
(pagure.io is the other one, so it's best
On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 11:49:06AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> We were discussing this on IRC, so just to bring the topic up on the
> mailing list ...
>
> (1) Package libxslxwriter (note: "xslx") with only automated activity
> and no builds:
>
All that said, I have filed:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11799
for us to investigate why it's not properly disabling the unresponsive
nodes and look into the underlying unresponsiveness issue.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 04:46:23PM -0500, Christopher wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 4:01 PM Gary Buhrmaster
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 8:20 PM Christopher
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Are there any known issues right now for logging in to
> > > lists.fedoraproject.org or
Greetings. After the outage that just completed, koji has been upgraded
to 1.34.0 plus a few patches from upstream. Some highlights:
* The scheduler has been redone completely, hopefully this will allow
for more complex scheduling adjustments. In the mean time it should be
pretty similar from the
Greetings. After the outage that just completed, koji has been upgraded
to 1.34.0 plus a few patches from upstream. Some highlights:
* The scheduler has been redone completely, hopefully this will allow
for more complex scheduling adjustments. In the mean time it should be
pretty similar from the
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 04:43:26PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> NOTE: This was not sent to individual maintainers, as @fedoraproject.org
> aliases are currently broken
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11768
(Side note: This should now be fixed)
kevin
signature.asc
Description:
On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 12:32:45PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>
> Oh, OK. So it was a misunderstanding on my side. I thought that since e.g. F41
> has a bunch of packages taken from F40 and F39 and earlier, they will be
> signed
> by those respective keys. But we resign them, so
Planned Outage - koji upgrade - 2024-02-21 21:00 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2024-02-21 21:00 UTC,
which will last approximately 3 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2024-02-21 21:00UTC'
Planned Outage - koji upgrade - 2024-02-21 21:00 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2024-02-21 21:00 UTC,
which will last approximately 3 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2024-02-21 21:00UTC'
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 09:37:25AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
...snip...
>
> It should have been. I am not sure where the process failed.
>
> I did generate the fedora-42 key.
FYI, I was lacking coffee or something.
it's there in the rawhide fedora-repos:
https://src.fedoraproj
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 11:12:07AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 06:03:59PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > That won't do it. We need mock to update it's config at exactly the same
> > moment a successfull rawhide compose completes and mirr
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 09:46:05AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Other solution could be if Rawhide lived in rawhide repos instead of f41.
I'm not sure I follow... rawhide is in a rawhide repo?
pub/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/
Or did you mean to sign rawhide with a 'rawhide' key
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 07:57:37PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> It's this time of the year again:
...
>
> Could we please do something so that this doesn't happen?
> Dunno, generate and distribute the keys earlier so that mock
> and https://fedoraproject.org/fedora.gpg get updated
On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 02:57:15AM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > Meeting summary
>
> Do we have the full log somewhere?
html:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-02-12/fesco.2024-02-12-19.30.log.html
plain text:
On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 09:04:25AM -0500, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 at 06:12, Marius Schwarz wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > as die Infrastructure ML did not react ( or could not react ;) ), I
> > requested the removal at that antispam blacklist.
> >
> >
> I did not see any email to
On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 08:43:52PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> One thing that seems to be overlooked in many of the posts on this thread:
>
> Nobody can *force* the KDE Plasma maintainers to do *anything*, just
> like nobody can force *any* packager to do anything. Fedora a
> volunteer-run
There will be an outage starting at 2024-02-07 22:00UTC,
which will last approximately 6 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2024-02-07 22:00UTC'
Reason for outage:
We will be applying updates and
There will be an outage starting at 2024-02-07 22:00UTC,
which will last approximately 6 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2024-02-07 22:00UTC'
Reason for outage:
We will be applying updates and
On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 02:51:54AM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> kevin wrote:
> > distro-sync is nice and all, but it's not a silver bullet.
> > In cases of simple packages a downgrade may not break anything, but in
> > cases where other things already built upon it, where the new one
> >
On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 09:59:23AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 8:15 AM Sergio Pascual wrote:
> >
> > El lun, 1 ene 2024 a las 13:49, Mamoru TASAKA
> > () escribió:
> > >
> > > Sergio Pascual wrote on 2024/01/01 21:36:
> > > > Hello and happy new year.
> > > >
> > > >
On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 11:14:03AM -, Felix Wang wrote:
> I opened an releng issue about this. [1] At the time of writing, I noticed
> that there is probably an similar issue of failure of package creation
> appeared. [2] Hope anyone can help me solve the problem, which maybe the
> cause of
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 08:28:31AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> While I generally agree that a merge request is a more polite and
> elegant solution, if a package is listed as FTBFS (having had a bug
> automatically opened) and some reasonable amount of time (two, three
> weeks?) has
Thanks for working on this Jakub. I think it's quite useful. :)
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code
I'm definitely in favor. I hit this broken step a while back myself. ;(
Hopefully the current maintainers are on board with this?
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 10:13:35AM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> I'd like to start writing a script to synch users/groups from Fedora IPA
> to pagure.io and src.fp.o: both pagure.io and src.fp.o logins are based
> on Fedora accounts, but the Pagure user database is only updated when a
Also... if you meant the scm-commits mailing list, then yeah, that is broken
currently. ;(
https://github.com/fedora-infra/fmn/issues/1024
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 03:13:21PM -0500, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> It could be due to the retirement of the old notifications system earlier
> this month. See the email "intent to retire: fedmsg-irc, old fmn, osbs"
> sent to the mailing list earlier.
>
> FMN is the tool which sends notifications
On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 08:27:47AM +1100, Arthur G wrote:
> I recall a number of years back a proposed gcc upgrade broke many builds.
> This required most maintainers to log in and refactor their source code
> against the new gcc (and new gcc options).
>
> I hadn't logged into Fedora for years
On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 06:34:39PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 08:33:02AM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> > rpms/cairo
> > rpms/createrepo_c
> > rpms/desktop-backgrounds
> > rpms/ed
> > rpms/libcap
> > rpms/vim
>
> Just noting that these packages seem to be
Hi all,
Today, 2023-11-18, we have removed inactive packagers
from the packager group.
This is in accordance with the FESCo policy on inactive packagers:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_inactive_packagers/
If the removed user is 'main admin' for a package, this package
Hi all,
Today, 2023-11-18, we have removed inactive packagers
from the packager group.
This is in accordance with the FESCo policy on inactive packagers:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_inactive_packagers/
If the removed user is 'main admin' for a package, this package
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 07:25:10PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> Yup, I've mentioned that in the bug I filed for python-bcrypt -
> It might be as simple as bumping the dependency on pyo3 from v0.15 to v0.19.
I've made an attempt here:
Planned Outage - pagure.io network switch updates - 2023-11-17 13:00 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2023-11-17 13:00UTC,
which will last approximately 4 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d
1 - 100 of 4870 matches
Mail list logo