On Thu, 28 Mar 2019, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just found that on some minimal system it is not possible to remove some rpm
> subpackages.
>
> * Current state
>
> # rpm -qa | grep rpm
> rpm-libs-4.14.2.1-4.fc30.1.x86_64
> rpm-4.14.2.1-4.fc30.1.x86_64
>
On Fri, 26 Oct 2018, Aaron Gray wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to get Xen working properly on rawhide / F29 Beta.
>
> I had one instillation on F29 that worked straight away with :-
>
> sudo yum groupinstall 'Virtualization' sudo yum install xen
>
> I cannot seem to reproduce this now
On Mon, 24 Sep 2018, Petr Šabata wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 10:02:39AM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I have to admit that I am a bit puzzled about DNF behavior with modularity.
> >
> > I have installed repo files with modularity repos, but all of them are
> > disabled. I have
On Wed, 11 Oct 2017, Martin Stransky wrote:
> On 10/11/2017 03:46 PM, Mátyás Selmeci wrote:
> > On 10/11/17 08:32, Martin Stransky wrote:
> > > On 10/11/2017 03:17 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> > > > Was this on purpose? Fx 57 is BETA, and I was under the impression that
> > > > BETA software was
On Thu, 16 Mar 2017, Juan Orti Alcaine wrote:
> Hi, it looks like the Spice XPI addon no longer works in Firefox 52.
>
> I guess this is going to be forever, as Firefox 52+ disables the NPAPI
> plugins. Do you know any alternative? I manage a RHEV farm and this is going
> to be a big deal.
>
>
On Tue, 8 Mar 2016, Gregorio . wrote:
> I'm new and I'm not an expert. I've Fedora 23 and I tried to upgrade my
> system to Fedora 24.
>
> I used the following command: # dnf system-upgrade download --releasever 24
>
> After this command the system downloads a lot of packages, but there is an
>
On Tue, 8 Oct 2013, Dan Williams wrote:
On Tue, 2013-10-08 at 08:42 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
Do you remember when I ranted about lack of communication between
provenpackagers and the maintainers of the packages they touch [1]?
Here is another case of lack of communication between people
On Wed, 17 Jul 2013, Alexey I. Froloff wrote:
How would /var/log/messages file help in case of a corrupted
filesystem/disk?
You stand a considerably better chance of reading a text file than a
database when it has partial corruption. Of course if the file, filesystem
or disk is completely
On Wed, 17 Jul 2013, Lennart Poettering wrote:
cat /var/log/messages becomes journalctl
tail -f /var/log/messages becomes journalctl -f
tail -n100 /var/log/messages becomes journalctl -n100
grep foobar /var/log/messages becomes journalctl | grep foobar
This isn't complex. You can grep/sed/awk
On Wed, 17 Jul 2013, john.flor...@dart.biz wrote:
From: m.a.yo...@durham.ac.uk
On Wed, 17 Jul 2013, Lennart Poettering wrote:
cat /var/log/messages becomes journalctl
tail -f /var/log/messages becomes journalctl -f
tail -n100 /var/log/messages becomes journalctl -n100
grep foobar
On Wed, 17 Jul 2013, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Maybe we can give another shot of relevance by collecting a list of
packages that depend on syslog (or are useless without /var/log/messages
or other log files in /var/log) ?
I've heard logwatch, logrotate and fail2ban mentioned. Are there
On Wed, 17 Jul 2013, Eric Smith wrote:
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
Allowing editing of log files is a pure security risk...
So is giving a sysadmin the root password, but we do it.
I generally make a copy of a log file and edit the copy,
On Wed, 10 Jul 2013, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 11:32:46AM -0400, Jonathan Masters wrote:
Excellent proposal. I of course think this would be just awesome!
This proposal doesn't address virtualization!
I think this is great, BUT I'd also like to see a widely available
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013, Mátyás Selmeci wrote:
This may be a long shot, but I am interested in repackaging some RPMs (for
example, some of the Globus packages in EPEL, as well as grid software that
my group builds) such that the software in them may be installed by
unprivileged users, or into a
On Mon, 14 Jan 2013, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El Sun, 13 Jan 2013 20:55:16 -0600
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to escribió:
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 12:30:19 -0700,
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
I'll untag it manually.
If I had manually
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 23.10.2012 15:10, Matthew Miller napsal(a):
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 01:57:13PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Lets have puppet-3.x and puppet2 for whoever wants to use old version.
But that doesn't help people running puppet 2.6 _now_, and just
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
pvgrub peeks into the guest disk so it needs to understand the partition
table, the filesystem and the grub config file in the guest. Initially it
didn't handle things like ext4, grub2 and EFI but AFAIK these should be
fine now. I'm not sure
On Wed, 13 Jun 2012, Nikola Pajkovsky wrote:
imo, kernel maintainers should have released 3.3.8 or 3.4.1, not 3.4.0
for f17
I believe the 3.4.0 kernel package was effectively 3.4.1 anyway.
Michael Young
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, 5 Apr 2012, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I still get this error several times a week, and I still have no idea
what it means or how I'm supposed to respond to it (other than
fiddling randomly with packages until it goes away).
The latest one:
# yum install /usr/sbin/libvirtd
[... yum
On Tue, 3 Apr 2012, Chris Adams wrote:
Also, if some user has taken up lots of space in /tmp, you can LART the
user and delete the files; that's no different than a user filling up a
partition by writing to /tmp (no reboot necessary in either case).
That assumes your system is still
On Mon, 2 Apr 2012, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 02.04.12 16:55, Steve Grubb (sgr...@redhat.com) wrote:
What about forensics? Any reboot erases information that might have been needed
to see what happened during a break in.
/tmp is already volatile and cleaned up in regular intervals.
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012, drago01 wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote:
I think he's got a point
http://www.osnews.com/story/25659/Torvalds_requiring_root_password_for_mundane_things_is_quot_moronic_quot_
Yeah but last time we tried this in fedora it got
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
For the longest time, I was able to upgrade an existing system by copying
over the pxeboot vmlinuz and initrd.img, sticking them into menu.lst, and
directing grub to load them.
Up until F14 this worked fine. F15's pxeboot/vmlinuz made me stare at
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011, Chris Adams wrote:
Hmm, also what does this do to PXE booting. IIRC there is a (relatively
low) limit on the size of the initrd loaded by pxelinux.
Most tftp servers can cope with bigger sizes now, but not necessarily in
consistent ways. pxelinux talking to linux tftp
On Wed, 20 Oct 2010, Paul F. Johnson wrote:
Hi,
I've followed the instructions on the fedoraproject website to try and
view a scratch-build result (go to tasks and select the scratch build),
but it's not showing anything for rawhide scratch builds.
Is there some sort of magic I need to
On Thu, 14 Oct 2010, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 17:13 +0200, Petr Lautrbach wrote:
Hello,
systemd will be default init system in Fedora 15 and scripts infrastructure
will be adapted to it.
There is a plan to leave upstart in Fedora as non-official alternative.
Why?
It
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010, drago01 wrote:
I think the main point here wasn't there are bugs #X, #Y and #Z that
can't be fixed in time so we should revert but a we have a bad
feeling / are nervous so lets revert ... the later isn't really a
technical decision basis and can (and here it did) piss of
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010, drago01 wrote:
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 12:27 PM, M A Young wrote:
It isn't a matter of whether all
the known bugs are fixed but whether we can be reasonably confident that
there aren't any more critical bugs that haven't been reported yet or have
been introduced
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010, Lennart Poettering wrote:
How about making the postinstall script in systemd-units detect this
condition (default.target pointing to a nonexistent file) and fix it up
automatically?
Note that version 8-2 waiting in bodhi should now handle upgrades from
the alpha without
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
I would like to know before trying/upgrading F-14 is it still possible
to use upstart instead of systemd in F-14?
Yes, upstart still works. I tried systemd and couldn't get it to work, so
I switched the machine back to upstart. You may need a rescue
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 08/25/2010 05:35 PM, M A Young wrote:
Yes, upstart still works. I tried systemd and couldn't get it to work, so
I switched the machine back to upstart. You may need a rescue disk to make
the switch if your computer doesn't boot with systemd. I
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Steve Dickson wrote:
Also, the kernel that is currently being built from my pnfs-13 branch
fails to install with the following error:
FATAL: Could not load
/lib/modules/2.6.34.5-43.pnfs_all_2.6.35_2010_08_19.fc13.x86_64-pnfs/modules.dep:
No such file or directory
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Steve Dickson wrote:
On 08/24/2010 10:46 AM, M A Young wrote:
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Steve Dickson wrote:
Also, the kernel that is currently being built from my pnfs-13 branch
fails to install with the following error:
FATAL: Could not load
/lib/modules/2.6.34.5-43
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010, Reindl Harald wrote:
Will 2.6.34 pushed to stable?
My question is because there were also some 2.6.30 builds for
F11 which never rolled out and it could possible relax some things
in combination with VMware / open-vm-tools
On Thu, 19 Aug 2010, Roland McGrath wrote:
Here is what I'm doing:
fedpkg clone kernel
fedpkg switch-branch f14
git checkout -b pnfs-all-2.6.35-2010-08-05
Make that 'git checkout --track -b pnfs-blah-blah origin/f14/master'.
Or, equivalently, after the fact, do:
git config
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010, Jesse Keating wrote:
However, since git allows you to create local branches at will without
any restrictions, one has to ask if it is still necessary to have a
remote branch for your work.
I did end up creating a branch in the Fedora system because it was the
only way I
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010, Kevin Kofler wrote:
...
So I'd suggest to use a
currently supported Fedora release (12 or 13) with the unofficial Dom0
kernel RPMs out there (built for F12, I don't know if they work on F13).
The kernel seems to work okay on F13 and even F14, though I haven't tested
it
On Sun, 15 Aug 2010, Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) of Singapore wrote:
May I know whether the upcoming F14 release will include support for Xen
pv-ops Dom0 kernel?
No. The Fedora policy isn't to include dom0 support until it makes it into
the upstream kernel. Some pieces have made it into
On Sun, 8 Aug 2010, Matt McCutchen wrote:
Users should already be reading the existing information, because abrt
provides the link after it makes its changes (adding the user to CC and
adding a comment with the how to reproduce text, if it was nonempty).
The proposal would just be to reverse
On Sat, 7 Aug 2010, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
The Fedora packages histories are kept in git trees. You can get each
one by running:
$ fedpkg clone -B $package
Note that in order to do so you probably need to be a Fedora Packager.
In your case, that would be :
$ fedpkg clone -B kernel
You
What is the policy on creating private branches under fedpkg/git? Can it
be done by anyone with acl commit or do you need special permissions?
My interest is that I had a private branch of the kernel package under CVS
which I used to build pvops enabled kernels so that the more adventurous
I was trying a yum update on F-14 (fedora-release-14-0.7) but was offered
a few F-15 packages. I checked
https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=fedora-14arch=x86_64
and the mirrors it points to are all rawhide rather than the F-14 branch.
Michael Young
--
devel mailing list
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Never mind, turns out this was me trying to use fedpkg 0.5.0 against a
checkout made for 0.4.2 (against the test environment)
Note that fedpkg 0.5.1 is out now.
Michael Young
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
You're going to need to include all applicable license texts, sorry.
I have commited a spec file that puts all the COPYING and LICENSE files
into a new xen-licenses package (I don't what to include that many files
twice). I haven't built it yet as
On Wed, 7 Jul 2010, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
[xen-maint] xen: xen-doc-4.0.0-2.fc14.x86_64
xen-libs-4.0.0-2.fc14.x86_64 xen-hypervisor-4.0.0-2.fc14.x86_64
I am a co-maintainer of the xen package, and I am trying to work out what
the best way to comply with these changes since xen is rather a
On Thu, 1 Jul 2010, Jon Ciesla wrote:
repoquery --repoid=rawhide-source --archlist=src --whatrequires iasl returns
nothing. It looks like we may not need it for anything else, though it may
have value to developers for other things.
For me it finds 3 packages,
iasl-0:20090123-3.fc12.src
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
2010/6/9 Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com:
Competing Obsoletes once again. The packager is playing with fire.
Not in this case.
It seems to me that this is using something that happens to work for yum
(and maybe not for other utilities,
On Wed, 12 May 2010, Clovis Tristao wrote:
How do I increase size the boot partition, with LVM?
My partition:
FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda1 190M 39M 142M 22% /boot
LVM won't help you with a physical partition like that. If the disk space
I don't know if this has already been raised but I notice on the
package-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org list that several Fedora 13
packages keep getting announced, for example, by checking the archives I
see that fedora-release-13-0.6 has been announced 6 times in March and a
further 7
On Mon, 1 Feb 2010, drago01 wrote:
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 9:30 AM, M A Young m.a.yo...@durham.ac.uk wrote:
That doesn't work as nicely as perhaps it should because
yum downgrade firefox
only downgrades firefox and not xulrunner, and as a result the downgraded
firefox refuses to run. You
On Sun, 31 Jan 2010, Wes Shull wrote:
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 1:05 AM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at
wrote:
Wes Shull wrote:
yum --enablerepo=rawhide update firefox
NEVER do that!!!
If you'd taken half a minute to check, you would have seen that it sucks in
a grand total
On Sat, 30 Jan 2010, Wes Shull wrote:
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 1:42 AM, Liu Yu Fei Eric hoveringnowi...@gmail.com
wrote:
So it doesn't have an official one?
I've been running the f13 build out of rawhide for a week now, and it's
worked fine for me... not sure about Java though.
yum
52 matches
Mail list logo
