On Mon, 3 Jan 2022 at 18:35, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 03. 01. 22 19:16, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > Testing rpm-specs/hibernate-jpa-2.0-api.spec
> > No terminal defined for 'E' at line 1 col 2
> >
> > EPL and BSD
> >
> > What is the problem with this one ?
>
> There is no EPL in
On Tue, 21 Dec 2021 at 14:35, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
>
> I picked up wsdl4j to prevent actions which would lead to tomcat, Dogtag, and
> FreeIPA being orphaned over Christmas break.
>
Have you tried building tomcat without wsdl? I can't see where in the
tomcat source it is used. Is it really a
stem relies on a Java-based
> application server.
>
Well, for whatever reason, upstream fop contains a servlet
implementation (which requires an app server) but we don't even build
or ship this servlet in our fop package.
I removed an unnecessary BR on 'servlet' from the fop package:
https://src.
egenerate it
excluding such?
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-U
or a few years, Greg's article
was well worth the reread. Flatpak has really nailed some of these
points (e.g. targeting all distros with a single build/release
process, binary dependency predictability, etc)... From an ISV
perspective Flatpak is a *much* better value for mone
On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 at 11:12, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
>
> The new version changes API/ABI
Honestly it would be more noteworthy if guava did NOT break its API/ABI ;-)
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
___
devel mailing list --
On Wed, 6 Oct 2021 at 11:02, Peter Boy wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 06.10.2021 um 07:08 schrieb Michal Srb :
>
> Hi folks,
>
> @Matthew Miller Are you still trying to save Fedora from packaging the ocean?
> :)
>
> On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 9:10 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 8:49 PM
On Tue, 5 Oct 2021 at 12:08, Peter Boy wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 04.10.2021 um 15:07 schrieb Mat Booth :
>
> Like many Open Source projects, Fedora is a "do-ocracy“ — ….
>
> A nice phrase with a decent connotation. And it’s true without doubt.
>
> And at the same t
tly or a Java
application you care about is in danger of being removed that would be
a excellent place to start.
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to deve
On Thu, 30 Sept 2021 at 18:40, Ravindra Kumar wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/ is not accessible. How do I add a
> contributor to my project?
>
> Appreciate any help on this.
Wow, PkgDb has been gone a long time now :-) Go to:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/
On Thu, 30 Sept 2021 at 00:23, Mat Booth wrote:
>
> On Wed, 29 Sept 2021 at 23:48, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> >
> > * Peter Boy [29/09/2021 23:29] :
> > >
> > > Any ideas to get it started to fly?
> >
> > The first step should be to empty the group
at finding things that I didn't notice had stopped working
such as bootstapping modes that we don't exercise very often for
example. I've made a bunch of changes based on their reports and
merged a bunch of changes from them too, so kudos to them. They've
historically been active on #fedora-java
who has
been using maven years and years and years), but quite tedious.
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Mon, 27 Sept 2021 at 17:31, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 04:39:03PM +0100, Mat Booth wrote:
> > On Mon, 27 Sept 2021 at 13:31, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536762
> > >
> > >
On Mon, 27 Sept 2021 at 13:31, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 12:15:32PM +0100, Mat Booth wrote:
> > On Mon, 27 Sept 2021 at 12:07, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > >
> > > A question about this which is semi-related to your email.
> > &g
ps://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https:/
On Tue, 14 Sept 2021 at 12:28, Petr Pisar wrote:
>
> V Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 10:01:32AM +0100, Mat Booth napsal(a):
> > It would help if the PDC were not so inscrutable.
> >
> > It was my first thought that the branch was EOL, but I had no idea how
> > to look
le.
It was my first thought that the branch was EOL, but I had no idea how
to look it up Is there some UI I'm not aware of?
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
httpcomponents-client or retired also.
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fe
s of a library (e.g. lucene)
>> > requires changes in Eclipse itself
>>
>> Is this level of backward non-compatibility typical in Java?
>
>
> I would not say in Java overall but in certain projects - YES!
>
>
There appears to be something stuck in my throat
*co
On Wed, 18 Aug 2021 at 09:58, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 18/08/2021 01:32, Mat Booth wrote:
> > Not within the constraints of Fedora's packaging rules.
>
> Bundling is allowed by Fedora's packaging guidelines.
>
Binaries not built from source a
t; achievable with given manpower.
>
> Is it possible to bundle all dependencies into an Eclipse's RPM package?
>
Not within the constraints of Fedora's packaging rules.
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
___
devel mailing list
aintainers of large applications
prefer to distribute via Flatpak.
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct
On Tue, 1 Jun 2021 at 10:14, Richard Fearn wrote:
>
> > Note that your queries did not check for BuildRequires, since you did
> > not enable the foo-source repositories.
> > That would require "--enablerepo fedora-source --enablerepo
> > updates-source", or "--enablerepo rawhide-source" on
nhelpful, and have
> not substantially contributed to Java packages in Fedora in years.
> Even the Modules that were heralded as "the solution" have stagnated.
> On the other hand, Mat Booth and two members of the DogTag PKI team
> have been really helpful, but Mat is busy fighting
st Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
___
devel mai
On Fri, 24 Jul 2020 at 16:10, Mat Booth wrote:
>
> On Fri, 24 Jul 2020 at 13:26, Petr Pisar wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 01:44:07PM +0200, Daniel Mach wrote:
> > > There's a Modularity Improvements Objective draft available[1].
> > >
>
I will once again have to maintain
multiple branches of my whole stack of packages.
Interesting experiment, maybe, but if there's going to be no
commitment to pay the on-going cost of infra maintenance and fix the
design-flaws or whatever serious problem is currently holding back
MBS, then I
e at tomcatjss package shows it is built by ant with no
sauce/target level specified at all, which means it is built with Java
11 bytecode by default.
You should fix this by rebuilding tomcatjss with Java 8 bytecode.
Here's an example where I fixed the same problem in another package:
https://src
On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 at 16:54, Mat Booth wrote:
>
> On Mon, 13 Jul 2020 at 19:14, Jiri Vanek wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > A cursory glance shows that some failed with network problems. E.g.
plexus-velocity failed with this:
> > >
> > > DEBUG
On Mon, 13 Jul 2020 at 19:14, Jiri Vanek wrote:
>
> >
> > A cursory glance shows that some failed with network problems. E.g.
plexus-velocity failed with this:
> >
> > DEBUG util.py:621: Errors during downloading metadata for repository
'build':
> > DEBUG util.py:621:- Curl error (18):
On Sat, 11 Jul 2020 at 09:24, Jiri Vanek wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> toatal packages: 610
> passed: 427
> failed: 176
>
> From the failures, there is 29 which passed in the copr before, and now
are thus failing from two
> reasons - unrelated change, or non-intel64-arch failure. I will put this
to FTBF
in javamail 1.6.3 and later, see:
>
> https://eclipse-ee4j.github.io/mail/docs/COMPAT.txt
>
> The maven coordinates are changed, generally javax -> jakarta. This
> also affects the osgi provides.
>
>
> Regards,
> Jie Kang
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 5:54 AM Mat Booth
On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 at 15:05, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 4:06 PM Jie Kang wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > javamail ursine is using version 1.5.2 while there are some module
> > streams at 1.6.x
> >
> > The upstream project also moved to the eclipse foundation and these
> >
w is a great deal faster. It's often the one that finishes
> > right after x86_64/i686.
>
> even ahead x86_64/i686 sometimes :-)
>
This is great to hear! Until now s390x was the slowest arch for Java by
quite a wide margin; with the special Java 8 JIT package[1] installed, even
32bit arm wa
initely some effort to update...
>
> [1] https://xmlbeans.apache.org/
> [2] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xmlbeans
>
Huh, I thought this project was retired upstream I'm curious what you
need it for
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
_
On Mon, 2 Dec 2019 at 12:56, Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> 3 months ago, Miro opened releng ticket[0] raising question whether
> non-maintainers (of some specific packages) being able to request
> branches.
>
> However, it never went anywhere outside of that ticket.
>
> I'd like to ask
On Fri, 29 Nov 2019 at 07:32, Igor Gnatenko <
ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
> Because it is really hard to run two systems at the same time and keep
them synced?
Then let me rephrase. IMO the replacement system shouldn't have been
commissioned into production before it reached
On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 at 13:06, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Dear maintainers.
>
> Based on the latest fail to build from source package, the following
> packages
> will be retired from Fedora 32 approximately one week before branching
> (February
> 2020).
>
> Policy:
>
>
On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 at 17:21, Pierre-Yves Chibon
wrote:
>
> Good Morning Everyone,
>
> Tomorrow we are planning on deploying a new version of pagure and
> pagure-dist-git on production.
Great stuff. I still don't understand why pkgdb was allowed to go away
before the replacements reached
On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 at 11:17, John M. Harris Jr
wrote:
> I must disagree. That it "works" in RHEL doesn't mean that it should be
done
> in Fedora. The current situation in Fedora, where maven and ant have been
> "moved" to modules has screwed over the Eclipse packagers, for example,
and
> more
python 3.8. Can you offer any clue how to fix it?
Here is the log, you can see that the cython-based debugging extension when
built against python 3.8 is failing:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/5618/37405618/build.log
As a workaround for now, I have disabled the python
On Fri, 9 Aug 2019 at 14:24, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> Hi everybody!
>
> After some discussions, we (the Stewardship SIG) have decided that we
> cannot continue to maintain gradle in fedora.
>
> - the current version packaged in fedora is outdated (4.4.1, from Dec.
> 2017, vs. 5.5.1 from July
" the Java SIG? I would
> like to join.
No, it was just a loose association of packagers who wanted to coordinate
work on the Java stack. It's kinda moribund these days, but one or two of
us still hang out in #fedora-java on Freenode. Please also join the
(low-traffic) java-devel mailing list.
--
list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/EJMYWJ7VILI4RSOUG2R74WJUUT2PTSVD/
Please proceed with the unresponsive maintainer process. By my own
reckoning, he's been AWOL since at least 2017 -- Since then I've been using
my provenpackager powers to keep the packages of his that I need updated.
--
Mat Booth
http
jboss-invocation, jboss-marshalling,
> > bean-validation-api, jboss-interceptors-1.1-api, jboss-logging,
> > jboss-remoting-jmx, jandex, jboss-sasl, jboss-vfs, staxmapper, jboss-msc,
> > jboss-common-core, jboss-jms-1.1-api, h2, jboss-connector-1.7-api,
> > jboss-remoting, jboss-
On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 at 14:14, Robert-André Mauchin
wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, 16 April 2019 02:46:49 CEST Mat Booth wrote:
> >
> > Yes, there is a buildopts section in the yaml file where you can specify
> > rpm macros.
> >
> > Here is the documentation:
> >
my module:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/modules/tycho/blob/df837b8793fe460d2c7e72ab6d638a0f6e9f47a7/f/tycho.yaml#_76
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an em
On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 at 15:29, Mat Booth wrote:
> The Eclipse Platform upstream is in the process of dropping all support
> for 32bit arches.
>
> The current state is that upstream are no longer building for 32bit arches
> upstream for 4.10 (release 2018-12) onwards. I expec
On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 at 15:29, Mat Booth wrote:
> The Eclipse Platform upstream is in the process of dropping all support
> for 32bit arches.
>
> The current state is that upstream are no longer building for 32bit arches
> upstream for 4.10 (release 2018-12) onwards. I expec
The message about Ceph [1] reminded me that we should probably make the
same notification for Eclipse Platform.
The Eclipse Platform upstream is in the process of dropping all support for
32bit arches.
The current state is that upstream are no longer building for 32bit arches
upstream for 4.10
default windowing system... So I suppose you take
ownership of it at your own peril.
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.or
edora user since 2004 and I'm never contribute to a open source
> project before now. I create a pull request for openjfx package (see
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1644712 and
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/openjfx).
>
> My sponsor is Mat Booth, I hope :-)
>
m maintain those packages in
the most efficient way he can.
It's not about forcing modules onto users, it's about not forcing more work
than necessary onto already overstretched maintainers.
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
___
devel mailing
Hi all,
I orphaned/retired the following low-level Eclipse packages, because they
are no longer needed by the plug-ins I maintain:
eclipse-emf-transaction
eclipse-emf-query
eclipse-emf-validation
eclipse-mdt-ocl
eclipse-mdt-uml2
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
5OZG/
>
>
Same for eclipse-xtext-antlr-generator, which was a build dep of
xtext/xpand mentioned above.
I also orphaned eclipse-emf-transaction as it was not needed by any other
Eclipse plugin.
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
_
On 9 July 2018 at 13:36, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> I've just orphaned not-yet-commons-ssl [1]. It is a dependency of
> eclipse-fedorapackager but I'm not sure how useful this dependency still is
> I haven't used it lately. The library has a dependency on
> jakarta-commons-httpclient which has
ICU4J is now covered by the Unicode License (with MIT and BSD licensed
contributed parts.)
The Unicode license is very similar to the previous MIT-style ICU license.
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
___
devel-announce mailing list
ICU4J is now covered by the Unicode License (with MIT and BSD licensed
contributed parts.)
The Unicode license is very similar to the previous MIT-style ICU license.
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
___
devel-announce mailing list
the coming year. I don't plan to announce
each change individually so if you are interested in Eclipse Platform or
plug-in licensing, please pay special attention going forward.
Thanks
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
___
devel-announce
t; 2.fc28.noarch
>
>
These individual jackson packages were merged upstream into fewer repos
(and correspondingly fewer source RPMs in Fedora)
jackson-dataformat-{cbor,smile,csv,yaml} and jackson-module-jaxb-annotations
should all be retired.
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
_
On 4 October 2017 at 10:15, Petr Šabata <con...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 10:04:16AM +0100, Mat Booth wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The venerable "recordmydesktop" application does not work with Wayland
> and
> > stopped workin
good
built-in screencast recording functionality.
I plan to retire this package from Fedora shortly.
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email t
On 7 August 2017 at 15:35, Dennis Gilmore <den...@ausil.us> wrote:
> [3] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f27-failures.html
>
This file seems suspiciously small... I somehow don't believe that there
were "0 failed builds" :-)
--
Mat Booth
http://fedora
topic. Note that added topics may be deferred until
> the following meeting.
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
I will not be at today's meeting
--
t; To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
Ticket is still has "need info" status -- if the info is provided, the
status should be set to "discuss at next meeting"
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
_
On 15 October 2016 at 13:21, Gerard Ryan <gali...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
>
I adopted these guys:
- eclipse-webtools
- uddi4j
- wsil4j
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedor
kdaniel, rgrunber
>
eclipse-mylyn will be fixed once the right updates land in stable, but I
have no intention to fix eclipse-jbosstools.
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Summary: Eclipse Launchbar plug-in
> > RPMs: eclipse-launchbar
> > Size: 181382 bytes
> > Size change: -57708 bytes
> > Changelog:
> > * Thu Mar 10 2016 Mat Booth <mat.bo...@redhat.com> -
> 1:1.0.1-1.gitedd5f69
> > - Take a
e=How_to_create_an_RPM_package=435832=432092
Now it links to a document that tells you how test package builds using
mock.
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 22 February 2016 at 16:31, Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 15:02:45 +0000
> Mat Booth <fed...@matbooth.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > Wow, that "HOWTO" is a really old page -- not changed since being
> > imported from the old moi
ate an RPM package" page should be updated.
Here is the official guideline:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRequires_2 --
basically, we just got out of the business of keeping track of what the
minimum buildroot contains.
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-
il
> the following meeting.
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Apologies, I am not able to make it to today's meeting.
--
)204-9103
> Email: swilker...@nagios.com
> Web:www.nagios.com
>
>
Did you try IRC?
Keiran can usually be found on IRC in the #fedora-uk channel on Freenode,
username "Affix"
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.f
On 8 July 2015 at 22:55, opensou...@till.name wrote:
Depending on: mysql-connector-java (288), status change: 2014-05-14 (60
weeks ago)a
This one is fixed.
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
/code-of-conduct
Apologies in advance, in all likelihood I will not be able to make the
meeting this week.
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http
of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
I took ownership of netty31 so that I can retire it. I will do so in the
next couple of days unless there is severe objection.
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
On 24 June 2015 at 00:48, Jan Kurik jku...@redhat.com wrote:
While npm 2 is a major version number update, it contains little in the
way of major changes.
Why is this worth more than a sentence or two in the release note beats?
You must enjoy the extra bureaucracy :-)
--
Mat Booth
http
meeting.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Apologies, I will not be able to make it to this week's meeting.
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
to be the canonical reference because no-one was maintaining the list
the wiki.
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
many java packages.
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
was retired due to lack of maintainership.
No one from Java SIG was interested in keeping it alive any longer -- it
was only here to support VisualVM, IIRC, but that is also now retired.
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Unfortunately due to a prior commitment I will not be able to attend the
meeting this week.
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
/mailman/listinfo/packaging
--
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
Mat Booth
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
Apologies, I will be unable to attend today's FPC meeting.
--
devel mailing list
devel
this mean we need to rename all Java subpackages?
All language binding sub-packages are named this way, no? (subversion-perl,
plplot-ada, xen-ocaml, etc)
But doesn't this guideline refer to naming the base package, not
sub-packages? Does it need clarifying further?
--
Mat Booth
http
of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Hi James!
Do you have a link to your package review request?
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct
.noarch
jetty-osgi-boot-warurl-0:9.2.1-1.fc21.noarch
xbean-0:3.17-2.fc21.noarch
Maybe I'm misunderstanding the problem, but AFAICT none of these packages
contain any symlinks to jars provided by eclipse-equinox-osgi.
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel
was appears to be slow
IIRC, NetworkManager's DBus API should be able to give you that information.
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http
On 20 June 2014 11:50, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 20.06.2014 12:36, schrieb Mat Booth:
On 20 June 2014 11:19, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net mailto:
h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 20.06.2014 11:57, schrieb Mat Booth:
On 20 June 2014 10:19
On 20 June 2014 12:04, Mat Booth fed...@matbooth.co.uk wrote:
On 20 June 2014 11:50, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 20.06.2014 12:36, schrieb Mat Booth:
On 20 June 2014 11:19, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net mailto:
h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am
On 29 May 2014 14:43, Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
eclipse-subclipse orphan,
kdaniel, swagiaal
This affects some of my packages, taking.
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel
-apis.)
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
.
You can't just pull packages. You'll have to properly Obsoletes:
lasso-java it. I am attaching a patch which worked for me (including a
scratchbuild with openjdk). I haven't actually tested the code, but I
guess it should work (it's JNI though so...meh)
Not Requires: java-headless ?
--
Mat
be retired and dependent packages should be ported to solr4. I
think there is only one package that still requires solr3:
$ repoquery --repoid=rawhide --whatrequires solr3
hibernate-search-0:4.5.0-1.fc21.noarch
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel
On 5 March 2014 10:23, Alexander Todorov atodo...@redhat.com wrote:
На 4.03.2014 20:36, Mat Booth написа:
On 25 February 2014 11:19, Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com wrote:
On 02/25/2014 11:45 AM, Alexander Todorov wrote:
3) Another proposal (sorry don't remember who proposed
that adds very little value to anyone
familiar with Java packages. Wouldn't it be easier to change the whatever
tool is generating this report to accommodate for this? If package invokes
%mvn_build then don't expect there to be a %check section seems like a
reasonable heuristic to me.
--
Mat Booth
-devel
It is low volume, but it is where most Java-specific things are announced
and discussed.
Regards,
Mat Booth (mbooth)
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code
://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
From the README: The package reports all fail on CheckBuildInMock and
CheckBuildRequires.
I'd rather you didn't send out a mass email until I can filter these out
see just the genuine failures.
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
--
devel
.fc20
This is a BR, I reported it here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887166
and blocked maven2-common-poms again.
Deps on maven2-common-poms are redundant, I thought they had all been
removed by now -- sorry about that, I will fix the remaining ones.
--
Mat Booth
http
with the investment of some effort?
Here's my favourite bugbear: https://fedorahosted.org/packagedb/ticket/243
I have no idea why the package retirement process needs intervention from
rel-eng.
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
1 - 100 of 176 matches
Mail list logo
