On Thu, 27 May 2021 at 11:55, Tom Callaway wrote:
>
> FWIW, I have retired xmms. Upstream is long gone, and it was being held
> together by spider-webs anyways.
Is there any copr where this is somewhat maintained? gtk+ was the best
gtk (yeah just because of xmms), it's sad to see it go.
On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 10:55, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> > I came here with peace. Let's face it. It's always between the two. I
> > respect vim and I learned quite some things in vim. But I'm an emacs
> > user and I find the original decision between vim and emacs for 'git
> > commit' unfair.
>
>
On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 10:40, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Obeying EDITOR is required by POSIX e.g. see
> https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/crontab.html#tag_20_25_08
>
> Note that POSIX says "The default editor shall be vi." But that means
> when EDITOR isn't set. If the
On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 04:16, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> If you're going to say that you have to use vim for it to be unix,
> you're going to start another war with the emacs users. :-)
I came here with peace. Let's face it. It's always between the two. I
respect vim and I learned quite some things in
On Fri, 21 Feb 2020 at 16:49, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> The update to fluidsynth 2.1.0 from a few days ago bumped the SONAME
> of the library as mentioned in $SUBJECT (maintainer in CC).
>
The email title is somewhat misleading. This was mentioned in this
list a few days back.
On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 at 19:40, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> So, I'd say try and duplicate it in a i686 mock chroot on a x86_64
> machine and see if you can gather enough info for a c++ or qt5 bug.
>
> Hope that helps.
Thanks Kevin,
Strangely, as I was attempting to try out what you suggested I got a
In an effort to update the fluidsynth library version, which comes
with a soname bump, in rawhide (F33) I created a side tag
f33-build-side-19396. All but one dependent packages are rebuilt. The
last dependent is the muse package.
I tried to rebuild muse in the side tag three times. In all of the
On Tue, 28 Jan 2020 at 04:04, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> * kill the %changelog
>
> Please, let's kill it, and generate it from the git changelog.
> I'm glad to see there's a proposal to do this.
>
As again... Very strong no. git changelog and spec changelog have
different purposes.
For some
On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 at 05:50, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 05. 11. 19 v 16:03 Ben Cotton napsal(a):
> > When we compile the python3 package on Fedora (prior to this change),
> > we create the libpython3.?.so shared library and the final python3
> > binary (/usr/bin/python3) is dynamically linked
On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 at 13:42, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for
> sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper
> reason:
>
> Orphaned
On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 at 06:53, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> You can build Java apps as modules, yes.
> If we remove the mentioned packages from rawhide, it will be the only way to
> build Java packages.
How are the Java applications that come with C (JNI) extensions
handled in the modules model? How do
On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 at 08:51, Kalev Lember wrote:
>
> Also, I've heard rumours that dnf might get renamed back to yum in the
> future.
>
I just hope that dnf gets renamed to something easier. It doesn't
stick as good as yum, apt or pacman. Anything other than yum will be a
lot of work though.
On Fri, 7 Dec 2018 at 19:37, Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/EnablingPythonGeneratorsByDefault
>
> = Enabling Python Generators by default =
No objection on the change. Yet the "Generators" have a well
established meaning in Python, which is very different than this
On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 at 07:27, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 7:01 AM Michal Schorm wrote:
> >
> > > I'm sending you this HTML email because Google dropped possibility to
> > > send plaintext emails. Sorry =(
> >
> > Gmail
> > -> compose
> > -> options (bottom right)
> > -> plain
n Wed, 5 Sep 2018 at 13:42, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
>
> On mercredi 5 septembre 2018 13:05:06 CEST Jan Grulich wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I haven't been using clementine for a long time and don't have really time
> > looking into clementine issues. This is even more complicated given
> > upstream
On 23 May 2018 at 11:30, Brian C. Lane wrote:
> as a user of python what do you expect
> /usr/bin/pythong to do? You expect it to run the python2 interpreter.
Careful with the generalization. I expect /usr/bin/python to launch
python3 and I get surprised with each Fedora release why it still
On 28 February 2018 at 11:37, Björn Persson wrote:
> Orcan Ogetbil <oget.fed...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Shouldn't we consider having -devel packages Require gcc or gcc-c++?
>> What good is a header package without a compiler anyway?
>> This would also (indirectly) pull i
On 28 February 2018 at 10:03, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le 2018-02-28 15:28, Orcan Ogetbil a écrit :
>>
>> On 28 February 2018 at 09:19, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>
>
>> These are all _very_ edge use-cases.
>
>
> Those are *not* edge-cases.
We have a few thousan
On 28 February 2018 at 09:19, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> My point was *non-C-compilers* can read *C/C++* header files because they
> need to read the ABI definitions to use it from their non C/C++ code.
>
> That makes a C/C++ header file consumable by pretty much any kind of
> compiler, so it's
On 28 February 2018 at 05:28, Rafal Luzynski wrote:
> 28.02.2018 09:33 Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>>
>> Le mercredi 28 février 2018 à 00:11 -0500, Orcan Ogetbil a écrit :
>> >
>> > Shouldn't we consider having -devel packages Require gcc or gcc-c++?
>>
On 18 February 2018 at 12:09, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> Over this weekend I've performed scratch-mass-rebuild without having gcc and
> gcc-c++ in buildroot of all Fedora packages, many of which failed due to
> random
> reasons and I grepped all logs for some common errors found by analyzing
>
2018-02-14 15:59 GMT-05:00 Igor Gnatenko :
>
> Your options:
>
> * Speak up and tell package names I should not touch because … (you should
> complete this sentence).
> * Fix up packages and tell package names I should not touch because you did
> that already.
> * Tell package names you want to
On 22 January 2018 at 22:12, Scott Talbert wrote:
> Yep, bodhi is definitely blocking things now without any way to override that
> I can see. :-(
> I've got a similar situation, I was able to push to batched 5 days ago but
> just now bodhi sent me an email saying "Bodhi is unable to request
On 29 March 2017 at 14:26, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> ---
> Fedora ships numerous executables written in Python. Many of them contain
> the shebang line: #!/usr/bin/env python
>
> However, this makes it difficult to install alternative versions of Python
> on the system. If a user wishes e.g. to
On 16 February 2017 at 07:02, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> libffado has more of these stupid errors that have affected dozens of
> packages because [expletives deleted]:
>
> src/libieee1394/configrom.cpp: In member function 'bool
> ConfigRom::initialize()':
> src/libieee1394/configrom.cpp:179:31:
On 15 February 2017 at 09:12, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> A mockchain build of dbus-c++ libffado and sflphone works with this
> patch. repoquery says nothing else depends on dbus-c++.
>
> Any objections to me committing the patch to dbus-c++ and rebuilding it?
>
> Somebody should also fork dbus-c++
On 7 February 2017 at 16:32, Marek Polacek wrote:
> libffado-2.3.0-1.fc26.src.rpm
> sflphone-1.4.1-20.fc26.src.rpm
> error: no matching function for call to ...
> Invalid code.
I am 99% sure that these 2 errors are due to a bug in dbus-c++. Is the
new compiler attempting to
On 20 September 2016 at 03:00, Thomas Daede wrote:
> For Fedora Workstation, the current limit on mlock()ed memory per user
> is 64kiB, which less than what some applications need.
>
> In particular, Bitcoin Core uses mlock() to prevent private keys from
> being swapped to disk. The total size of
On 16 February 2016 at 13:08, Rex Dieter wrote:
> So, 2 options (not mutually exclusive):
>
> * fix configure to not add /usr/include to ac_incpath
> * fix src/src.pri.in to comment-out (or remove) the line starting with
> INCLUDEPATH += (I don't think it's needed)
>
Yes, I could use those to
On 2 February 2016 at 07:54, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> That said, why does it bother to do such a mess? Does it think the g++
> driver is not able to do that itself?
>
I am not sure why qmake-qt5 doesn't want to trust gcc for the system
include dirs, but well.. it doesn't.
I reduced the problem
On 15 February 2016 at 01:46, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
>
> The new version of qjackctl, which now depends on qt5. We cannot do
> the update without fixing this. As far as I can tell, the qjackctl
> does not use the QMAKE_DEFAULT_INCDIRS directly. The offending flags
> come through
On 14 February 2016 at 18:42, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
>
>> The current (as of this email) qt5-qtbase is built with GCC6, but the
>> issue persists.
>> The builds seem fine with the above QMAKE_DEFAULT_INCDIRS line removed
>> manually. Should this is
On 2 February 2016 at 07:50, Sandro Mani wrote:
> On 02.02.2016 13:38, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 01:32:17PM +0100, Sandro Mani wrote:
>> Don't use -isystem /usr/include for C++, unless you also include first all
>> the C++ include directories as -isystem too. Why do you need
On 24 February 2015 at 10:25, Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 10:46 PM, Orcan Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com wrote:
Can you elaborate on this? gsl has plenty of other routines that have
nothing to do with linear algebra. Is there a technical reason why you
have
On 21 February 2015 at 18:50, Susi Lehtola wrote:
Because libgsl is no longer linked to a CBLAS library, packages linking to
GSL need to also link to a CBLAS library, ATLAS probably being the best
candidate since OpenBLAS is not available for all Fedora architectures.
Can you elaborate on
On 28 December 2014 at 07:57, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 27 December 2014 at 23:17, Reindl Harald wrote:
having choices and options is the reason why people switch to Linux,
http://www.islinuxaboutchoice.com/
Oh please, no need for provocation... I was silently following this
thread but I
On 28 December 2014 at 19:32, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 12/29/2014 12:58 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Alec Leamas
wrote:
Hm... developers which never touches the terminal?! Seems like a
really narrow group (?)
Not really. At a previous workplace, we used
On 2 December 2014 at 10:06, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Mon, 2014-12-01 at 22:36 -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
One related issue is suspend. It stopped working for me (on the same
machine) at around Fedora 12. Just stays on the black screen on
resume.
12? Five years ago?
Yeah pretty much. I
On 1 December 2014 at 19:57, john.tiger wrote:
Obviously priority is now on F21 bugs but looking beyond that
I want to work with someone more knowledgeable on power consumption - it
stinks on Fedora 20.
OSX on mac air gets 11-12 hrs Fedora gets 4
Chrome OS on Chromebook gets 9-10 Fedora
On 30 November 2014 at 05:12, Haïkel wrote:
Not all commits are authored by approved packagers (git am),
and some packagers have relinquished their membership in FAS (yes,
that happened)
But more importantly, not all packagers are developers. Hard to figure
out which packagers actually do
We used to have a nice wiki table at [1], but now it points to a
calendar application [2] which is a royal mess.
I mean... For example, I really don't understand the point of the
anonymous entry
quote
2014-07-26 to 2014-08-02 00:00:00 to 00:00:00 Vacation
/quote
Can we revert or improve this
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 9:24 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sat, 12 Jul 2014 20:41:44 -0400
Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
Can we revert or improve this mechanism?
Absolutely we can impove things. Could you file fedocal ticket(s) with
your suggestions?
Thanks Kevin, here:
https://fedorahosted.org
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
So, sure, we could sign drpms and yum/dnf could check that, but they
still need to assemble the final rpm in order to pass it to rpm.
The question, to my understanding, which may be wrong, is whether the
contents of the assembled rpm need
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 1:07 PM, drago01 wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
yes - simply because the chance that soemone wants to uninstall all
kernels, yum, dnf and finalyl rpm itself is very low
You still did not give a simple case why someone with some sanity
On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
Just run rm -rf / as root, it is much faster way to remove your os ;-)
Bad example. Even rm has protection for /
See rm --help
;)
Orcan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 7:49 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Eric Smith wrote:
IANAL, but multiple lawyers have told me that it is generally a bad idea
to go looking for patents, at least in the US. If they're brought to your
attention, you should probably do whatever is necessary to avoid them, but
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 4:25 AM, drago01 wrote:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 6:17 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 6:59 PM, drago01 wrote:
There is difference between a software developer, a sysadmin and a
user that simply wants to share his music with his family. The latter
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 6:59 PM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
There is difference between a software developer, a sysadmin and a
user that simply wants to share his music with his family. The latter
should not have to learn about computer security to do it,
Why not?
I lock my door every
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 6:02 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 03/22/2014 07:51 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 7:24 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 03/19/2014 10:59 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
And JDK5 might be good enough for the use required. It doesn't claim
to be anything more than
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 7:24 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 03/19/2014 10:59 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
And JDK5 might be good enough for the use required. It doesn't claim
to be anything more than that, so I don't see the harm in leaving it there.
Speaking as the upstream maintainer, I do.
Hi
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
On 03/06/2014 06:41 AM, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 12:03:46PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
pdftk has a hard dependency on GCJ because it's a C++ program that
uses a Java library (iText) through CNI. I once tried to
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
Sorry I am missing something. Why can't we keep the old pdftk that
works with itext2?
Check the whole thread - because of GCJ dependency. iText is second
issue. The first could be fixed by rewrite of offending part of code
to Java but
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 7:33 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
David Sommerseth wrote:
So, I wonder if it can be considered to enable a downgrade path for
bluez and depending packages, as described in the Contingency Plan:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Bluez5
Officially downgrading BlueZ from
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 9:41 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-23 at 21:35 -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
Right. But is it possible to ship a bluez4 package and rebuild the
dependencies against that after the release?
How does that differ, in practice?
Potentially,
- No epoch bump
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Alec Leamas wrote:
Well, IMHO the docs are actually quite clear on that 'all' refers to all
metadata rather than all repositories.
That said, perhaps enough people has been confused by this to make some kind
of improvement motivated.
I am pretty sure if you
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 9:45 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
You can, for example, use C++, which is a stable standard (a new version was
published 2 years ago, but almost all C++98 code compiles unchanged as
C++11), and Qt, which keeps a stable API and ABI throughout a major version
(the interval
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Thu, 2013-12-19 at 09:52 -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
Didn't we have a mass rebuild due to a C++ ABI change 1 or 2 years
ago?
Standard C++ does not specify an ABI. Compilers get to handle that
themselves.
Correct (which can
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 7:36 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Tue, 19 Nov 2013 15:30:46 +0800, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
* Move the headers back to /usr/include, as upstream intended
* Put the event.h header into a libev-libevent-devel subpackage, and
make it Conflicts: libevent-devel (this
I am giving up my maintainership for xmmsctrl, a command line utility
to control xmms.
I still use xmms a lot, but I don't have a need for xmmsctrl anymore.
I was once using it to control xmms from a superkaramba (KDE) widget.
It is stable, with dead upstream. Grab it if you are interested.
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 8:34 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:29 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
It would be good if the next vote would allow none as an option. I
could not vote 'none' on the last election. And I think it is important
to track the percentage of people who want to kill
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 3:27 AM, Bjorn Munch wrote:
On 21/08 17.26, Ken Dreyer wrote:
Are the Oracle employees still around?
Yes we are! Sorry for the long silence. The window for F19 closed so
it became less urgent, then I had vacation, was sick, then others here
were on vacation but we're
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 4:52 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
I would like to avoid creating accounts in gazillion upstream bug trackers,
Aha! Should the package maintainers play the middle man in the
gazillion upstream bug tracker accounts? This sounds neither very
thoughtful nor quite efficient.
so
On Jun 17, 2013 9:04 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 06/17/2013 01:00 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 4:52 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
I would like to avoid creating accounts in gazillion upstream bug
trackers,
Aha! Should the package maintainers play the middle man
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Dan Mashal wrote:
Hi,
In the latest Fedora 19 Beta TC2 install after I got through the
initial steps of the install I started to setup my root password.
To my surprise my password was shown in plain text instead of bullets.
The obvious workaround is to use
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2013-05-05 at 14:07 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Dan Mashal wrote:
Hi,
In the latest Fedora 19 Beta TC2 install after I got through
the
initial steps
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 8:00 PM, poma wrote:
deco grub2-2.00-16.fc19.src.rpm
13020 blocks
[backtrace cut]
Aborted
--
Hmm, the crash does not happen here. How reproducible is this? Can you debug?
Although the extraction is successful, checksums are OK. :)
Thanks for pointing out an
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 6:36 PM, poma wrote:
Shouldn't the default be an '-a'(anonymous) check out via git?
I think it should too. Maybe there are good reasons behind not making so.
Meanwhile you can do
$ yumdownloader --source pkgname
$ deco pkgname*.src.rpm
This should get you the package
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 17.02.2013, 14:46 +0100 schrieb Tadej Janež:
On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 12:02 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote:
I found that a couple of F16 bugs were closed by endoflife@fp.o even
though there were pending updates for F17
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Christoph Wickert
christoph.wick...@gmail.com wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 17.02.2013, 16:12 -0500 schrieb Orcan Ogetbil:
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 17.02.2013, 14:46 +0100 schrieb Tadej Janež:
On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 12
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 7:33 AM, Brendan Jones wrote:
On 02/14/2013 04:26 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
I was still planning on retiring xmms. It has no upstream support. The
volume control has issues that I don't have time to figure out.
esound can be disabled at build time - please do not
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 3:53 AM, Norvald H. Ryeng wrote:
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 08:07:22 +0100, Rahul Sundaram
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 10:26 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
MariaDB WILL replace MySQL on upgrades.
Well, unless Oracle as upstream wants to get involved as downstream
maintainers in
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 4:21 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 02/13/2013 04:26 AM, DJ Delorie wrote:
Hmm, we still have xmms in the repo?
/me is very glad we still have xmms in the repo
Have you tried using Audacious ? You can set it to
classic mode, at which point it user experience
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 8:21 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Could we move this to a gnome/desktop list?
The subject of the thread has been decided...
I don't think it's providing much value to the Fedora devel community
anymore.
+1. Gnome 2 was counterintuitive enough. I can't imagine how Gnome 3
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
You're a new Linux user, you go to our download page, and instead of a
simple big green Download button, it starts asking you questions about
what 'desktop environment' you want?
As I said earlier in this thread, and as the Fedora Board
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 8:32 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 20:14 -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
You're a new Linux user, you go to our download page, and instead of a
simple big green Download button, it starts asking
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 11:37 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 20:35 -0500, Jon VanAlten wrote:
tl'dr: Please leave the straw man new users won't be able to
decide argument at the door, there's a way around it if we can
think about the *best* way to do it, rather than the
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 4:33 AM, Julian Sikorski wrote:
Hi,
I am having issues building mplayer using gcc-4.8. An updated srpm [1]
builds fine in mock for fedora-18-x86_64-rpmfusion_free target (when
chain-built with ffmpeg-1.1.1), but on
fedora-rawhide-x86_64-rpmfusion_free, it fails with
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 10:27 AM, drago01 wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Sandro Mani wrote:
Can't we simply re-organize the fedoraproject website in such way that the
download button points to something similar to the current More options
page, maybe with a small description for
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 3:57 AM, Mario Santagiuliana wrote:
In data sabato 26 gennaio 2013 23:55:34, Orcan Ogetbil ha scritto:
But if I have a .tex file that needs 40 such requirements, I have to
go through the above fix 40 times. Isn't there a way to launch yum
to install all the requirements
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 9:32 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 01/27/2013 12:35 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
My question is more about the basic usage of latex. As a latex user, I
don't want to call yum 40 times just to compile my .tex file.
I think you're misunderstanding. This is only
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 2:59 AM, Jindrich Novy wrote:
Example pdflatex error in log - style missing:
! LaTeX Error: File `upquote.sty' not found.
Type X to quit or RETURN to proceed,
or enter new name. (Default extension: sty)
solution:
# yum install 'tex(upquote.sty)'
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
On 15 November 2012 23:20, Ian Malone wrote:
On 15 November 2012 04:40, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
Hi all,
A few months ago earlier in the F-17 release cycle, we had a problem
with jackd turning verbose, flooding the stdout, even when its
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Jerry James wrote:
Does anybody know if there are licensing issues with itext 5.x? I'd like to
package some software that needs a fairly recent version of itext, but I
know we've had license issues with that package in the past.
Also, FWIW, bouncycastle
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Caterpillar wrote:
Il 23/09/2012 17:06, Kevin Kofler ha scritto:
yum --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2012-14137 update
I strongly agree with Kevin
How easy/involved will it be to make bugzilla transform bodhi's
message into an URL that, when
Due to lack of time, I am dropping my maintainership for the following:
- bouncycastle, bouncycastle-mail, bouncycastle-tsp: New version
available, but not API compatible with the itext version (2.1.7) we
have. I have an almost complete patch for itext-2.1.7 for the API
changes for those who are
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild.
These are fixed:
- hydrogen
- lash
This one did not have any problems. Just a plain rebuild fixed it:
- clementine
This one seems like a bug in doxygen, rather than a bug in the
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Package hexter-dssi (orphan)
comaintained by: oget
I picked the above. I always thought it was mine, and got surprised to
see it orphaned.
Best,
Orcan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 5:06 AM, Brendan Jones wrote:
On 07/10/2012 03:20 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Cosimo Cecchi wrote:
On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 16:55 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Removing: raptor
flickcurl requires libraptor.so.1
flickcurl requires
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Cosimo Cecchi wrote:
On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 16:55 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Removing: raptor
flickcurl requires libraptor.so.1
flickcurl requires raptor-devel = 1.4.21-11.fc17
flickcurl-devel requires raptor-devel = 1.4.21-11.fc17
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Richard Vickery wrote:
Before F-17 I had become accustomed to using the double tab to get a list
of the commands; perhaps you set it bu default at least in the release on
the website. This time I upgraded through the link in the mail. Perhaps I
asked this
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 4:06 AM, Eric Smith wrote:
Jesse Keating wrote:
The point in which you find yourself arguing over the semantics of
Goodwin's law is also a clear indication that the thread has lost any amount
of usefulness.
Godwin's Meta-Law? Or maybe Keating's Corollary to
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:13 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 04:19 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 10:25 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
I am inclined to believe, the spirit behind Linux has changed, changed
away from being
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 5:12 AM, Xavier Bachelot wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone have any pointer on how to fix a multilib conflict with a
doxygen generated pdf file ? I was able to fix the same multilib issue with
the html files by modifying the footer to not include the timestamp, but I
don't find
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 10:57 AM, drago01 wrote:
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Chris Smart wrote:
On 09/06/12 19:34, drago01 wrote:
If Fedora does not implement some form of Secure Boot support, 100% of
Fedora users will still be able
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Peter Jones wrote:
On 06/12/2012 08:10 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
Due to my respect to your request, I thought about it for nearly 72
hours. I still stand behind what I said: People who are incapable of
switching a BIOS setting, which might involve doing
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Chris Smart wrote:
On 09/06/12 19:34, drago01 wrote:
If Fedora does not implement some form of Secure Boot support, 100% of
Fedora users will still be able to install Fedora on new machines, after
they disable Secure Boot, if their computer even has it at
On Jun 5, 2012 12:58 PM, Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Anthony Green gr...@redhat.com wrote:
Fedora developers,
While I brought many of these into Fedora, I have not been an active
maintainer for these packages for a very long time. Most of them
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Anthony Green wrote:
Fedora developers,
While I brought many of these into Fedora, I have not been an active
maintainer for these packages for a very long time. Most of them have very
responsible and active co-maintainers already. I am about to release
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 2:14 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 06/03/2012 12:12 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
At the same time I don't want to be obliged to support something I
don't want to. There are many more important things to deal with in
the distribution than a stupid secure boot feature.
Let's
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 6:26 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
I am more concerned about the package maintenance level. At the
package maintenance level, it does not make sense to patch against the
upstream decision.
It does. If upstream arbitrarily refuses to support a use case we
1 - 100 of 245 matches
Mail list logo
