On Fri, 17 May 2024 13:32:24 +
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > Oh, this is embarrasing. I added two patches but they didn't get
> > applied because %setup not %autosetup. :(
> > I'll push a fixed build in a moment. Sorry for breaking the builds.
> >
>
>
On Thu, 16 May 2024 10:52:29 +
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 11:09:01AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > This looks like you're putting the resolver between a rock and a
> > hard place. :thinking:
> > I don't think I've ever seen packages being *removed* when
pghmcfc merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Compress-Raw-Lzma`
that you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Rebuild against xz 5.6.1
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Lzma/pull-request/2
--
___
perl-devel
On Wed, 27 Dec 2023 15:05:29 +0100
Sandro wrote:
> I could you use some help with ${SUBJECT}. I posted the details in
> discussion [1], but have yet to receive a response. I thought maybe
> folks on the list may have an idea.
>
> I'm kinda lost as to where this is going wrong. Feel free to
On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 12:48:31 -0400
Christopher wrote:
> I'm actually a bit concerned about this thread, because I assumed DNF4
> and DNF5 would check signatures by default today, and that it would
> only skip if `--nogpgcheck` was passed as an option. If it sometimes
> skips the GPG check without
I've just orphaned perl-Fennec, which has been deprecated upstream
since 2018 (in favor of perl-Test2-Suite).
According to fedrq, nothing in Fedora depends on it:
$ fedrq whatrequires-src -X -F source perl-Fennec
(nothing)
This was actually triggered by a test suite failure for the package in
pghmcfc closed without merging a pull-request against the project:
`perl-List-MoreUtils-XS` that you
are following.
Closed pull-request:
``
Disable extra test in RHEL builds
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-List-MoreUtils-XS/pull-request/1
pghmcfc merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Module-Signature` that
you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Remove obsolete dependency to perl-Digest-SHA1
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Module-Signature/pull-request/1
___
pghmcfc merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Crypt-IDEA` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Update license field to new BSD-Systemics SPDX license id
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Crypt-IDEA/pull-request/1
___
pghmcfc merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Crypt-DES` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Update license field to new BSD-Systemics SPDX license i
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Crypt-DES/pull-request/2
___
pghmcfc commented on the pull-request: `Update test requirements` that you are
following:
``
Do you need a new build for this in Rawhide, or is fixing it in git sufficient?
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-CPAN-Meta-Check/pull-request/1
pghmcfc merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-CPAN-Meta-Check` that
you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Update test requirements
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-CPAN-Meta-Check/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list
On Thu, 13 Jul 2023 14:10:37 +0200
Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 10. 07. 23 v 10:38 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > libtomcrypt
> >
>
> So this is the dependency chain:
>
> libtomcrypt <= python3-crypto <= python3-beaker <= python3-mako
I raised
On Tue, 18 Jul 2023 15:27:01 +0200
Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2023, 15:22 Maxwell G wrote:
>
> > On Tue Jul 18, 2023 at 12:38 +0200, Jakub Kadlcik wrote:
> > > Hello Jerry,
> > > I proposed a workaround a few days ago
> > > https://pagure.io/FedoraReview/pull-request/485
> > >
On Sun, 2 Jul 2023 18:02:20 +0200
Matthias Runge wrote:
> On 02/07/2023 17:51, Matthias Runge wrote:
> > Hi there
> >
> > in one of my recent builds, I came across this error on i686 [1].
> >
> > Transaction test succeeded.
> > Running transaction
> > warning: /etc/hosts created as
pghmcfc commented on the pull-request: `Update Source0 URL due to upstream
maintainer change` that you are following:
``
I tend to use the author-independent version for the modules I package myself,
which helps in the case where a module is maintained by multiple people and the
maintainer
pghmcfc commented on the pull-request: `Update Source0 URL due to upstream
maintainer change` that you are following:
``
A better URL would prpbably be
https://cpan.metacpan.org/modules/by-module/HTML/HTML-Scrubber-%{version}.tar.gz
since that does not change when there's a change of
pghmcfc commented on the pull-request: `Disable extra test in RHEL builds` that
you are following:
``
I didn't merge the PR but did something similar based on the usual pattern for
such things in our perl modules.
``
To reply, visit the link below
pghmcfc merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Crypt-CBC` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Update license to SPDX format
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Crypt-CBC/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
pghmcfc merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Crypt-DES` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Fix C99 compatibility issue
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Crypt-DES/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
pghmcfc merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Devel-LexAlias` that
you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Update license to SPDX format
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Devel-LexAlias/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing
pghmcfc commented on the pull-request: `Update license to SPDX format` that you
are following:
``
@mspacek, I just kicked off a build. I'm happy to add you to the package if you
want.
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Convert-BinHex/pull-request/1
pghmcfc merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Convert-BinHex` that
you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Update license to SPDX format
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Convert-BinHex/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing
pghmcfc merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-B-Hooks-EndOfScope`
that you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Update license to SPDX format
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-B-Hooks-EndOfScope/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel
pghmcfc merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Data-Dump` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Update license to SPDX format
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Data-Dump/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
On Sat, 25 Feb 2023 10:41:37 -0800
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 06:00:08AM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Tue, 2023-02-21 at 16:40 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > As of today, F38 Changes should be 100% complete. Change owners
> > > can indicate this by setting the Bugzilla
Hi all,
I recently received a bug report
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2166454) about
proftpd not being able to load a dynamic module (mod_rewrite) that
provides some optional functionality. This module is not used by
default and has to be enabled manually. The ticket was raised
On Mon, 30 Jan 2023 21:13:11 -0700
Orion Poplawski wrote:
> So, I'm wondering if we should have some kind of (at least
> semi-)coordinated plan for updating ansible collections in EPEL?
>
> My initial thought is we would sort of piggy back on to what the
> "ansible" community collection
On Wed, 21 Dec 2022 14:47:38 +
Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Dependencies on glib1 and gtk1 are only bubblemon manedit xconvers ,
> I propose retire it on F38, it's one less burden that we have .
As I've always said when this has come up before, I'll be happy to
retire glib1 and gtk+1
On Tue, 29 Nov 2022 10:27:56 +
Paul Howarth wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Nov 2022 18:20:20 +
> Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
>
> > Il 28/11/22 18:36, Nick Bebout ha scritto:
> >
> > > I've removed a lot of ACLs. See attached log file.
> >
> >
On Mon, 28 Nov 2022 18:20:20 +
Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> Il 28/11/22 18:36, Nick Bebout ha scritto:
>
> > I've removed a lot of ACLs. See attached log file.
>
> Thanks Nick.
>
> From your output I made a list of the orphaned packages which I think
> it's a bit more readable:
>
On Tue, 1 Nov 2022 11:40:45 +0100
Petr Pisar wrote:
> Hello,
>
> just a notification that miniz-3.0.0 will bump libminiz.so.0.2 SONAME
> in Fedora 38. As far as I know there is no other package depending on
> it.
It's used at least by perl-Sereal-{De,En}coder:
$ rpm -qp --requires
On Thu, 6 Oct 2022 14:38:38 +0200
> This is good point. I have already forget the details. So if there
> was embedded just the right amount of information in the main data,
> we would not need the full list (and lazy loading). Currently, the
> data contains e.g. /usr/bin/*, which is useful for
pghmcfc merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Net-Server` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Add support for IPv6
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Net-Server/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
pghmcfc commented on the pull-request: `Add support for IPv6` that you are
following:
``
Looks OK but I would include a reference to the bugzilla ticket, as was done
when the equivalent fix was made in the main branch
(https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Net-Server/c/db820eb).
``
To
On Tue, 10 May 2022 19:36:22 +0200
Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Vitaly Zaitsev via devel:
>
> > On 10/05/2022 15:29, Ben Cotton wrote:
> >> This is initial step to move JDKs to be more like other JDKs, to
> >> build proper transferable images, and to lower certification
> >> burden of each
I took mcrcon. Co-maintainers welcome.
Paul.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Wed, 20 Apr 2022 14:48:47 -0700
Troy Dawson wrote:
> gnucash-2.6.21-1.el72018-04-15 (1466)
Should be safe to unpush this one because gnucash-2.6.21-4.el7 should
be in epel7 stable for 2 years:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-aa8e8965dc
Paul.
perl-Config-General-2.65 in Fedora 37 changed its license from (GPL+ or
Artistic) to Artistic 2.0.
http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=132893
Regards, Paul.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Wed, 23 Mar 2022 11:31:48 +
Paul Howarth wrote:
> Now that we have (or will have shortly) fully CryptX-based versions of
> perl-Net-SSH-Perl in F-36, F-37 and all EPELs, it looks to me that
> there are no remaining dependents of perl-Crypt-RSA in Fedora (other
> than
On Fri, 1 Apr 2022 18:22:47 +0200
Hans de Goede wrote:
> On 4/1/22 18:09, Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
> >> Context switches for maintainers are expensive! And while I don't
> >> personally think the "oops fixup" commits are a problem, a "PR
> >> with CI" workflow doesn't get rid of them by any means.
On Wed, 23 Mar 2022 10:41:52 -0700
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> I wonder... should we stop allowing buildroot overrides?
>
> Or at the very least add a admon to adding a new one in bodhi,
> explaining that you should probibly use a side tag, etc?
They're still very useful when bringing up new EPEL
Now that we have (or will have shortly) fully CryptX-based versions of
perl-Net-SSH-Perl in F-36, F-37 and all EPELs, it looks to me that
there are no remaining dependents of perl-Crypt-RSA in Fedora (other
than the Suggests: for it in perl-Net-SSH-Perl, but I can get rid of
that in due course).
On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 11:48:57 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
> I found quite a big mess today, caused by an attempt to bump perl to
> 5.34.1 in Fedora 36:
>
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-cea638ebd4
>
> Because some packages depend on the exact perl interpreter version,
>
On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 14:32:13 +0100
Fabio Valentini wrote:
> "Forgotten" F36 updates:
>
>
...
>
> - perl-Net-DNS-0:1.33-1.fc35 > perl-Net-DNS-0:1.32-3.fc36
> Version 1.33 was built on F34, F35, F37 / Rawhide, but not F36.
Fixed:
pghmcfc merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-PAR-Packer` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Rebuild for Perl 5.34.1
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-PAR-Packer/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list --
On Tue, 22 Feb 2022 12:00:06 -0500
Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CurlMinimal_as_Default
>
> == Summary ==
> `libcurl-minimal` and `curl-minimal` will be installed by default
> instead of `libcurl` and `curl`.
> The "minimal" variants provide only a subset of
On Thu, 10 Mar 2022 12:26:54 +0100
Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 10/03/2022 11:55, Alex wrote:
> > May I suggest to leave at least the telnet protocol in curl-minimal
> > for debugging purposes.
>
> Telnet is an extremely vulnerable protocol. It must be disable.
>
> If you need it,
On Mon, 07 Mar 2022 10:29:02 -0600
Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 7 2022 at 04:17:09 PM +, Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > In resume glib still required for 20 packages [1],
> > apart of the sweet memories that some package bring to us , any of
> > these packages is needed ? or
Hi Nathanael,
On Mon, 31 Jan 2022 09:28:27 -0700
"Nathanael D. Noblet" wrote:
> I recently gave ownership of w3c-markup-validator to Sérgio Basto
> which reminded me that there are a handful of perl packages that I
> probably created/took a hand in as part of that. I haven't touched
> them in
Hi Nathanael,
On Mon, 31 Jan 2022 09:28:27 -0700
"Nathanael D. Noblet" wrote:
> I recently gave ownership of w3c-markup-validator to Sérgio Basto
> which reminded me that there are a handful of perl packages that I
> probably created/took a hand in as part of that. I haven't touched
> them in
pghmcfc merged a pull-request against the project:
`perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime` that you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Update to 1.79
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel
pghmcfc merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Text-SpellChecker`
that you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Update hunspell directory path
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Text-SpellChecker/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel
Hello all,
I'm the Fedora maintainer of the perl-HTML-Tidy package and its
underlying library, tidyp.
The upstream maintainer of these packages has now stopped work on
tidyp, and has archived the upstream repository in a read-only state:
https://github.com/petdance/tidyp
He has also stopped
I took perl-Test-Fixme.
Paul.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List
On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 07:02:23 -0500
Josh Boyer wrote:
> 2) Moving content to CRB in RHEL is not a silver bullet solution in
> many scenarios. If it's strictly for build dependencies, CRB works
> well. If an EPEL package has a runtime requires on CRB content, that
> is less desirable. RHEL
Hi,
On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 09:21:27 +0100
spike wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I've been trying to contact Fedora's certbot SIG for a while now.
> Back then I wanted to help fix some issues with python-dns-lexicon
> (which are resolved upstream now and an update has trickled down to
> Fedora 35 with
pghmcfc merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Algorithm-C3` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Package tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Algorithm-C3/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
pghmcfc merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Socket6` that you are
following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Remove support of gethostbyname2
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Socket6/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list --
pghmcfc merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Path-Tiny` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Remove runtime depencendy for Digest::MD5
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Path-Tiny/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing
Hi,
I have orphaned python-invoke, whose test suite requires
pytest-relaxed, which requires pytest < 5 and fails to build with
Python 3.10.
I believe this only impacts python-jsonmodels; not sure how big an
impact it is.
Paul.
___
devel mailing list
On Tue, 25 May 2021 17:00:31 -0500
Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Sat, May 22 2021 at 09:23:23 AM +1000, Bob Hepple
> wrote:
> > I have no idea how significant this might be, but perhaps this
> > should be discussed more publicly.
>
> Use containers? Ship your own glib as a static lib? I'm
pghmcfc merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-IO-Socket-INET6` that
you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Patch for bad code in test
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-IO-Socket-INET6/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing
On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 11:17:49 -0400
"Steven A. Falco" wrote:
> This morning "dnf update" brought in bacula 11.0.2-3. Previously I
> had been on 9.6.7-1.
>
> Apparently, the new bacula wants a different database version. I
> have version 16, but it wants 1022.
I was surprised by this myself
Hi Petr,
On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 18:04:34 +0200
Petr Pisar wrote:
> V Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 12:21:46PM +0200, Petr Pisar napsal(a):
> > I found a different role in Red Hat which is incompatible with
> > maintaining hundreds of packages. As a result, I will reassign my
> > packages with a Red Hat's
On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 09:10:32 -0800
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 04:40:54PM +0000, Paul Howarth wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 16:06:40 +0100
> > Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > > Given the lack of communication from the pa
Hi all,
On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 16:06:40 +0100
Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Given the lack of communication from the paramiko/invoke maintainers,
> I've just orphaned python-pytest4. If nobody picks it up, I plan to
> continue maintaining it in Fedora 33 and 34.
The paramiko/invoke maintainers would be
The perl-Crypt-PBKDF2 package was retired about a year ago due to
having been orphaned for 6+ weeks. I'm unretiring it because it's a
dependency for updating perl-Crypt-CBC.
Review request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1928111
Releng ticket:
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/10016
perl-Test-File-1.44.4-1.fc34 changed license from perl (GPL+ or
Artistic) to Artistic 2.0.
Paul.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Wed, 6 Jan 2021 12:11:43 +0100
Marius Schwarz wrote:
> we need an urgent build of 2.3.13 as the CVE-2020-24386 got public.
>
> I saw in Koji that the first build failed on the 4th Jan for F32 and
> F33.
>
> Can someone pls help and invest this, as it's a critical security
> issue.
The test
Hi all,
neither trac-accountmanager-plugin nor trac-spamfilter-plugin work with
the development (1.5.x) build of trac currently in Fedora 33 and
Rawhide. This may change at some point but as I can't use them with
trac on my Fedora 33 server, I've decided to abandon my own use of
trac. Hence I
On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 15:30:43 +0200
Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 03:27:22PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 03:22:46PM +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello, all.
> > >
> > > Ralf C
On Fri, 4 Sep 2020 07:18:31 -0700
Troy Dawson wrote:
> Step 4 - Untag all the things that are "older" in playground
> -- currently that is a releng process. There is no way for a
> maintainer to retire their package from playground.
> -- This needs to happen some time (3 months?) after step 2 is
On Thu, 27 Aug 2020 14:21:03 +0200
Lukas Javorsky wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I've run into the compilation problem in the Galera package
> This problem occurs only on f33 and higher tho.
>
> Here is build performed on Fedora 32:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=50232504
>
>
On Sat, 15 Aug 2020 16:28:47 +0200
Fabio Valentini wrote:
> - autoreconf fails because %build needs a newer shell (protobuf):
>
> /usr/bin/autoconf: This script requires a shell more modern than all
> /usr/bin/autoconf: the shells that I found on your system.
> /usr/bin/autoconf: Please tell
On Tue, 4 Aug 2020 10:55:30 +0200
Christopher Engelhard wrote:
> On 04.08.20 10:47, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > I would even go further and remove the "with multiple user accounts"
> > condition. Even on a singe user system, I'd like to be able to log
> > out and back in again.
>
> +1 on that.
I've just orphaned perl-perl5i
(https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-perl5i).
I can't see any dependencies in Fedora so it shouldn't cause any issues
if it gets retired.
The package is FTBFS since Perl was updated to 5.32 and
perl-Devel-Declare was updated to a version compatible with 5.32:
pghmcfc commented on the pull-request: `Use make macros` that you are following:
``
I did a bigger change that used %{make_install} too.
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Lzma/pull-request/1
___
pghmcfc closed without merging a pull-request against the project:
`perl-Compress-Raw-Lzma` that you
are following.
Closed pull-request:
``
Use make macros
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Lzma/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel
On Tue, 19 May 2020 19:00:25 +0100
Paul Howarth wrote:
> On Tue, 19 May 2020 09:21:46 -0700
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 11:48:04AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, 19 May 2020 at 11:05, Paul Howarth
> > > wrot
On Fri, 3 Jul 2020 11:09:47 -0700
PGNet Dev wrote:
> on F32,
>
> date +FORMAT,
> date +%Y%m%d_%H%M%S
>
> returns
> 20200703_105351
>
>
>
> as expected.
>
> in an rpm .spec, if I define
>
> %define _build_timestamp %( date +%Y%m%d_%H%M%S )
>
> and _use_
On Wed, 20 May 2020 08:10:42 +0200
Petr Pisar wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 04:05:02PM +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
> > On Tue, 19 May 2020 09:07:30 -0400
> > Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 19 May 2020 at 06:05, Paul Howarth
> > > wrote
On Tue, 19 May 2020 10:47:57 -0400
Eric Mesa wrote:
> I noticed that the i3 window manager wasn't available in EPEL8. Before
> trying to go through the process of becoming a package maintainer I
> decided to try and run it via copr to see how much modification was
> needed. For EPEL8 (as opposed
On Tue, 19 May 2020 09:21:46 -0700
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 11:48:04AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > On Tue, 19 May 2020 at 11:05, Paul Howarth
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, 19 May 2020 09:07:30 -0400
> > > Stephen John Smoogen wrot
On Tue, 19 May 2020 09:07:30 -0400
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Tue, 19 May 2020 at 06:05, Paul Howarth wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 18 May 2020 22:29:54 -0600
> > Orion Poplawski wrote:
> >
> > > On 5/17/20 6:34 AM, Paul Howarth wrote:
> > > &
On Mon, 18 May 2020 22:29:54 -0600
Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 5/17/20 6:34 AM, Paul Howarth wrote:
> > I'm trying to do a local build of gtkwave for EPEL-8.
> >
> > A koji scratch build somehow works:
> > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=44609837
I'm trying to do a local build of gtkwave for EPEL-8.
A koji scratch build somehow works:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=44609837
But a local build does not:
$ mock -r epel-8-x86_64 gtkwave-3.3.104-2.fc31.src.rpm
...
Error:
Problem: conflicting requests
- package
On Sat, 16 May 2020 20:23:35 +0200
clime wrote:
> I am co-maintaining an epel-7 package (dist-git) and I wanted to add
> it to epel-8 too. But right now, it wouldn't install because one of
> the dependencies (moreutils) is newly in PowerTools repo
>
On Thu, 14 May 2020 12:31:40 -0700
Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> We're working on validating CentOS 8 for some desktop use cases at
> work, and noticed that after working fine on a machine that's
> installed several months ago, it's now failing on a freshly-installed
> machine.
>
> Turns out
pghmcfc merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check` that
you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Spec file cleanups: Use_make_build and make_install macros, use NO_PACKLIST=1
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check/pull-request/1
pghmcfc commented on the pull-request: `Spec file cleanups: Use_make_build and
make_install macros, use NO_PACKLIST=1` that you are following:
``
Hi Tom, the Perl Tips URL is missing an "r" at the end:
```
<<< https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Perl/Tips#ExtUtils::MakeMake
>>>
Hi Lumir,
On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 07:35:43 +0200
Lumir Balhar wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I'd like to switch python-dns crypto backend from pycryptodomex and
> ecdsa to python-cryptography. Upstream already did the same in master
> branch: https://github.com/rthalley/dnspython/pull/449
>
> But, because
On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 00:23:03 +0200
Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> * Emmanuel Seyman [12/03/2020 21:03] :
> >
> > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8743
>
> Okay, this was done a few weeks ago (sorry for the lag, the world's
> been kind of crazy, these last few weeks).
>
> Does anybody
On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 16:51:04 +0200
Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 4:40 PM Petr Pisar wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 04:27:06PM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos
> > wrote:
> > > The FSF address should be the most straightforward to fix.
> > >
> > Straightforward,
On Fri, 10 Apr 2020 15:17:25 -0700
Troy Dawson wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 3:21 PM Troy Dawson wrote:
> >
> > EPEL Issue #101 [1] has pointed out that our current policy for
> > stalled EPEL requests is fairly in-efficient and can cause some long
> > delays.
> >
> > What do people think the
On Tue, 7 Apr 2020 11:43:26 -0400 (EDT)
Scott Talbert wrote:
> Is there a recommended way for detecting when a package is being
> built under mock? I have a package where some tests fail due to
> various things not being present in a mock container, e.g, /dev/log
> doesn't exist. I can just
pghmcfc commented on the pull-request: `Spec file cleanups: Use make_build and
make_install macros, use NO_PACKLIST=1` that you are following:
``
I merged this locally and fixed the typo in the ExtUtils::MakeMaker reference.
It's now pushed and built in Fedora.
``
To reply, visit the link
pghmcfc closed without merging a pull-request against the project:
`perl-Socket6` that you
are following.
Closed pull-request:
``
Spec file cleanups: Use make_build and make_install macros, use NO_PACKLIST=1
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Socket6/pull-request/1
pghmcfc closed without merging a pull-request against the project:
`perl-String-CRC32` that you
are following.
Closed pull-request:
``
Spec file cleanups: Use make_build and make_install macros, use NO_PACKLIST=1
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-String-CRC32/pull-request/1
pghmcfc commented on the pull-request: `Spec file cleanups: Use make_build and
make_install macros, use NO_PACKLIST=1` that you are following:
``
I merged this locally and fixed the typo in the ExtUtils::MakeMaker reference.
It's now pushed and built in Fedora.
``
To reply, visit the link
1 - 100 of 7874 matches
Mail list logo
