Hello,
tl;dr, we have just disabled Fedora 38 chroots in Copr.
According to the Fedora wiki [1], Fedora 38 reached the end
of its life [4] and therefore we are disabling it in Copr.
That effectively means that from this moment, it is no longer possible
to submit builds for the following
On sobota 13. dubna 2024 21:04:06, CEST Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 01:38:49PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 01:41:59PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > > On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 1:18 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > >
On neděle 7. dubna 2024 17:15:16 CEST Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm revisting the topic of rpmautospec because I was doing some work
> on various packages, and it's annoying that some packages are using
> rpmautospec and others are not.
>
> All my packages have been
Hello maintainers!
Let me announce a new release of Mock v5.5, the chroot build environment
manager for building RPMs.
First and foremost, this update ships with updated
mock-core-configs v40.1, bringing Fedora 40 configs as "branched"
separately from Fedora Rawhide (Fedora 41 now equals to
praiskup opened a new pull-request against the project: `rt` that you are
following:
``
Don't build-require files outside of permitted directories
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rt/pull-request/3
--
___
perl-devel
On úterý 16. ledna 2024 21:00:14 CET Chuck Anderson wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 08:02:28PM +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > I just want to bump this thread; @kevin updated Fedora Koji today
> > - the Fedora 40+ (current Rawhide) builds are already handled with DNF5.
> &g
On pátek 5. ledna 2024 10:06:34 CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On čtvrtek 4. ledna 2024 19:20:46 CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > On středa 3. ledna 2024 8:46:22 CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > > I just wanted to give you a quick heads-up that I plan to enable the
> > > BuildWit
On čtvrtek 4. ledna 2024 19:20:46 CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On středa 3. ledna 2024 8:46:22 CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > I just wanted to give you a quick heads-up that I plan to enable the
> > BuildWithDNF5 change in Fedora Copr as soon as the new Rawhide compose
> > gets d
On středa 3. ledna 2024 8:46:22 CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> I just wanted to give you a quick heads-up that I plan to enable the
> BuildWithDNF5 change in Fedora Copr as soon as the new Rawhide compose
> gets distributed to mirrors.
This has happened now. Fedora Copr builds F40
On pondělí 18. prosince 2023 10:08:06 CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On pátek 1. prosince 2023 15:04:10 CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > Hello maintainers!
> >
> > Let me announce a new release of Mock Core Configs v39.3, aka
> > the configuration files for Mock, the chroo
On pondělí 18. prosince 2023 11:46:07 CET Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 18. 12. 23 10:08, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > In any case, if you need to - stay with DNF4 for a while - either do
> >
> > $ cat ~/.config/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64.cfg
> > include("/et
On pátek 1. prosince 2023 15:04:10 CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> Hello maintainers!
>
> Let me announce a new release of Mock Core Configs v39.3, aka
> the configuration files for Mock, the chroot build environment manager
> for building RPMs.
>
> The notable change in th
Hello maintainers!
Let me announce a new Mock release v5.3, the chroot build environment
manager for building RPMs.
The notable change in this release is the new rpm autospec plugin (for
generating %autorelease and %autochangelog "in-chroot"), and fixes for
building packages using
file or directory
>>
>> Shouldn't it call dnf5 as a dep if it's going to be using it to make sure
>> that it is installed?
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 8:04 AM Pavel Raiskup wrote:
>>
>>> Hello maintainers!
>>>
>>> Let me announce a new rele
Hello maintainers!
Let me announce a new release of Mock Core Configs v39.3, aka
the configuration files for Mock, the chroot build environment manager
for building RPMs.
The notable change in this release is that we are switching the default
package_manager from DNF4 to DNF5, according to the
On úterý 17. října 2023 22:47:23 CEST Richard Shaw wrote:
> I'm trying to test build packages before actually creating a side tag and
> doing real builds.
>
> I'm using rpkg to do the test builds but openshading language uses
> RPMAutoSpec. I've tried creating empty commits to bump the release
On úterý 24. října 2023 0:31:49 CEST Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On pátek 30. prosince 2022 20:01:55 CEST Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Rpmautospec_by_Default
> >
> > This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> > proc
On pátek 30. prosince 2022 20:01:55 CEST Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Rpmautospec_by_Default
>
> This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
> community feedback. This proposal
On úterý 3. října 2023 21:48:24 CEST Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 10:30:45AM +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> >
> > Well, in what shape is our "layered image" build system? Aren't we able
>
> Terrible, and going to be decomissioned after f39 release
On neděle 20. srpna 2023 11:27:44 CEST Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 14. 08. 23 v 21:30 Michael J Gruber napsal(a):
> > Is this supposed to work now?
> >
> > With mock-5.0-1.fc38.noarch and after scrubbing, the image is pulled but
> > then not used because it is "not marked ready" (rawhide, f39,
Hello again,
just a quick update that Mock 5.1 has been deployed into Fedora Copr,
too. While on it, openSUSE Leap 15.3 is now EOL and 15.5 added.
Happy building!
Pavel
On pátek 15. září 2023 14:05:19 CEST Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> Hello maintainers!
>
> Let me announce a new releas
Hello maintainers!
Let me announce a new release of Mock v5.1 (the chroot build environment
manager for building RPMs).
Mock 5.1 further stabilizes the (now default) --use-bootstrap-image
feature, and adds a "fallback" mechanism which turns the feature OFF
if Podman can not be used. In case of
On úterý 8. srpna 2023 19:12:36 CEST Tomas Hrcka wrote:
> Fedora Linux 39 is going to be branched in the upcoming hours as per
> the previous discussion[1] we are going to disable new koji builds for
> the duration of this event.
>
> All builds that will be running at that time for the rawhide
On úterý 8. srpna 2023 19:12:36 CEST Tomas Hrcka wrote:
> Fedora Linux 39 is going to be branched in the upcoming hours as per
> the previous discussion[1] we are going to disable new koji builds for
> the duration of this event.
>
> All builds that will be running at that time for the rawhide
Hello maintainers!
Let me announce a new release of Mock v5.0 (the chroot build environment
manager for building RPMs).
This release release brings lots of changes, though the one that I'd
like to underline is that we turned --use-bootstrap-image ON by default.
This effectively means that Mock
There's a potentially problematic patch (or maybe we are only
overcautious?). If you belong to the $Subject group, we'd appreciate
if you could help us with testing of a pre-release Mock from
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/pull/1103
Steps for testing are mentioned there.
On pondělí 17. července 2023 20:39:11 CEST Jerry James wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 10:54 AM Jerry James wrote:
> > Like many of you, I have been quite inconvenienced because of
> > dnf5-related breakage of fedora-review. I've been monkeying with it
> > today and finally got a successful run
On pátek 14. července 2023 14:30:03 CEST Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 14. 07. 23 v 2:11 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
> > On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 12:26:27AM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> >> Dne 13. 07. 23 v 23:59 Fabio Valentini napsal(a):
> >>> - rawhide mock / koji builds still default to dnf-3 (DNF 4)
On středa 14. června 2023 12:37:24 CEST Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On čtvrtek 8. června 2023 17:42:13 CEST Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > Hello maintainers!
> >
> > Copr builders have been updated to Fedora 38 today (some old builders
> > might still be running F37 ATM, but
On čtvrtek 8. června 2023 17:42:13 CEST Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> Hello maintainers!
>
> Copr builders have been updated to Fedora 38 today (some old builders
> might still be running F37 ATM, but when they finish the task(s) they
> work on, they will be deleted). Our testsuite is pa
not only for EL6... See
> > https://docs.rs/sequoia-policy-config/latest/sequoia_policy_config/#hash-functions
> > ...
> > On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 5:42 PM Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> >
> > Hello maintainers!
> >
> > Copr builders have been updated to Fedora 38 toda
On sobota 10. června 2023 22:36:08 CEST Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > I'm not strongly against anything; but rather than weaker policy for
> > everything I slightly prefer keeping the _stricter default policy_ with
> > _disabled gpgcheck for EL6_ (w
not only for EL6... See
> > https://docs.rs/sequoia-policy-config/latest/sequoia_policy_config/#hash-functions
> > ...
> > On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 5:42 PM Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> >
> > Hello maintainers!
> >
> > Copr builders have been updated to Fedora 38 toda
entirely anyway
since it's long time EOL, but we still keep it for the distro upgrade
team(s)). This is up to the community to decide, let us know in our
issue tracker if you are concerned.
Pavel
> On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 5:42 PM Pavel Raiskup wrote:
>
> > Hello maintainers!
> &
Hello maintainers!
Copr builders have been updated to Fedora 38 today (some old builders
might still be running F37 ATM, but when they finish the task(s) they
work on, they will be deleted). Our testsuite is passing just fine, so
you _should_ be fine too :-). Please let us know if you have some
On neděle 4. června 2023 4:21:54 CEST Todd Zullinger wrote:
> bradb...@seanet.com wrote:
> > I misspelled centos as contos Now fedpkg mockbuild works with the proper
> > links:
> >
> >>ls -l $HOME/.config/mock
> > total 8
> > lrwxrwxrwx. 1 bradbell bradbell 41 Jun 3 19:09 epel-8-x86_64.cfg ->
On úterý 6. června 2023 22:04:26 CEST Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 06. 06. 23 v 18:32 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
> > On 05. 06. 23 10:39, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> >> - Mock doesn't "Requires:" DNF anymore, just Suggests
> >
> > So how does this actually work?
>
8]: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-424b655bb6
Pavel
On pondělí 22. května 2023 15:44:32 CEST Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> Hello maintainers!
>
> I'm glad I can announce that we have a new release of Mock v4.0 (the chroot
> build environment manager for building RPMs). There are
On pondělí 29. května 2023 13:58:08 CEST Julian Sikorski wrote
> Am 18.05.23 um 00:41 schrieb Julian Sikorski:
> > Am 17.05.23 um 23:35 schrieb Julian Sikorski:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I tried building a signed 6.3 kernel today after a while (6.1
> >> timeframe). Unfortunately, it appears that I am
Hello maintainers!
I'm glad I can announce that we have a new release of Mock v4.0 (the chroot
build environment manager for building RPMs). There are two rather big things
in this release, therefore the bump of the major version:
- There's a new support for the DNF5 package manager (which
Thank you for the info!
On úterý 2. května 2023 22:17:13 CEST Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings everyone.
>
> Fedora Release engineering was made aware recently that some real builds
> seemed to have been done from commits not in any branch in the main
> repository for the package. All cases we are
Hello all!
Do we have HaveIBeenPwned database of hashes somewhere in Fedora, as a
file or service (regularly updated)? I'd prefer checking my passwords
manually, without actually giving the passwords to the
https://haveibeenpwned.com service. Speaking of that, I really dislike
that the service
Just a heads-up for a wider audience about two upcoming Copr changes.
We already have AppStream metadata disabled by default for new projects,
but there are many old projects where having this enabled causes
problems here and there. So we plan to disable it manually even for old
projects:
On pátek 10. února 2023 11:38:25 CET Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Feb 2023 at 11:35, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 10:27 AM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, 10 Feb 2023 at 09:44, Jakub Kadlcik wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hello Tomas,
> > > > thank you for the
praiskup merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-DBD-Pg` that you are
following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Rebuild for PostgreSQL 15 (side-tag)
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-DBD-Pg/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
praiskup commented on the pull-request: `Rebuild for PostgreSQL 15 (side-tag)`
that you are following:
``
Going to merge now, and build against PostgreSQL 15 (proven packager action).
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-DBD-Pg/pull-request/1
Hello maintainers!
I'm glad I can announce that we have a new release of Mock v3.4. There
are just two small new things, a better --forcearch check and
the device-mapper control file is exposed in chroot. Full release notes:
https://rpm-software-management.github.io/mock/Release-Notes-3.4
Hello maintainers!
I'm glad I can announce that we have a new release of Mock v3.2.
The -–list-chroots option is now faster, directories in /var/cached and /var/lib
dropped SGID bit, rpmbuild --noclean (cleanup_on_success=False) is not used
while building for EL6 chroots. See full release
Hello maintainers!
I'm glad I can announce that we have a new release of Mock v3.1. This is
a small release with several minor fixes. Most of the work has been done
in mock-core-configs package (mock configuration). See full release notes:
Hello maintainers!
I'm glad I can announce that we have a new release of Mock v3.0. Even
though we bumped the major version here, this is just a normal update that
brings a few new features and shouldn't bring any troubles or backward
incompatibilities. The reason we bumped the version this way
On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 3:28:30 PM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> Hello folks.
>
> I know the current Mock+configs Bodhi updates have not meet stable so far.
>
> The main problem being resolved is that 'fedpkg mockbuild' on 'epel8'
> checked-out branch doesn't wor
On Sunday, February 6, 2022 8:35:15 PM CET Roman Inflianskas via devel wrote:
> Sorry, I've forgotten to reply yesterday.
>
> I've installed these updates, but I still get this error:
> mockbuild.exception.ConfigError: Could not find included config file:
>
On Wednesday, February 9, 2022 10:46:44 AM CET Dave Love wrote:
> Pavel Raiskup writes:
>
> > I'd encourage anyone to update to the latest fedpkg (v1.42):
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?packages=fedpkg
> >
> > And Mock (configs v36.6):
> > htt
On Monday, February 7, 2022 11:45:12 AM CET Dave Love wrote:
> > What do you need to do these days to run an epel-8 mock build?
> > fedpkg mockbuild fails for me with
> >
> > Error: Error downloading packages:
> > Status code: 403 for
> >
On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 4:50:59 PM CET Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 02/02/2022 16:35, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > And if not specified, mock tries to
> > pick the mock configuration according the host system (so it uses
> > '-r fedora-35-x86_64' on a fedora-
On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 4:18:29 PM CET Ankur Sinha wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 16:07:38 +0100, Alain Vigne wrote:
> > Can someone explain to me why my .srpm [1]
> > is not building in mock ?
> >
> > I ran
> > > mock filename.srpm
>
> Have you had a chance to look at the mock man page,
On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 4:07:38 PM CET Alain Vigne wrote:
> Can someone explain to me why my .srpm [1]
> is not building in mock ?
>
> I ran
> > mock filename.srpm
You did not provide the build logs.
> Will it work in COPR, Koji ?
>
> [1]
mail below), but in the meantime we shipped Mock in EPEL 9, so
there's the update link [2].
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049024
[2] [EPEL 9] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-ccce8805ef
Pavel
On Thursday, December 16, 2021 7:25:12 PM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> Hello!
&g
17, 2022 2:18:04 PM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> Hello all!
>
> Red Hat subscribed builders (for EPEL 8) have been deployed to production.
> So any EPEL 8 build in Fedora Copr is now done against RHEL 8 + EPEL 8. As
> always, please report back any issues.
>
> There's though
17, 2022 2:18:04 PM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> Hello all!
>
> Red Hat subscribed builders (for EPEL 8) have been deployed to production.
> So any EPEL 8 build in Fedora Copr is now done against RHEL 8 + EPEL 8. As
> always, please report back any issues.
>
> There's though
Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> Hello maintainers.
>
> Currently, we build all EPEL variants against CentOS "base" in Fedora
> Copr, i.e. epel-* configs means CentOS+EPEL. By the end of January 2022
> CentOS 8 mirrors will start disappearing, pushing us to change the configs
Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> Hello maintainers.
>
> Currently, we build all EPEL variants against CentOS "base" in Fedora
> Copr, i.e. epel-* configs means CentOS+EPEL. By the end of January 2022
> CentOS 8 mirrors will start disappearing, pushing us to change the configs
On Monday, January 10, 2022 11:22:03 AM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> **So the plan is to move to RHEL + EPEL next Monday, 2022-01-17.** If
> everything works well at least.
Forgot to mention. This is already deployed to the devel instance. If you want
to give it a try, feel free:
On Monday, January 10, 2022 11:22:03 AM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> **So the plan is to move to RHEL + EPEL next Monday, 2022-01-17.** If
> everything works well at least.
Forgot to mention. This is already deployed to the devel instance. If you want
to give it a try, feel free:
Hello maintainers.
Currently, we build all EPEL variants against CentOS "base" in Fedora
Copr, i.e. epel-* configs means CentOS+EPEL. By the end of January 2022
CentOS 8 mirrors will start disappearing, pushing us to change the configs
to avoid build failures.
We would like to start the
Hello maintainers.
Currently, we build all EPEL variants against CentOS "base" in Fedora
Copr, i.e. epel-* configs means CentOS+EPEL. By the end of January 2022
CentOS 8 mirrors will start disappearing, pushing us to change the configs
to avoid build failures.
We would like to start the
On Tuesday, January 4, 2022 8:51:58 AM CET Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 03. 01. 22 v 22:57 Steven A. Falco napsal(a):
> > On 1/3/22 04:38 PM, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
> >> Here are direct links to the chroots:
> >>>
> >>>
On Monday, January 3, 2022 11:30:42 AM CET Tomas Tomecek wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 3:35 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> >
> >-
> >
> >Statistics:
> >-
> >
> > Copr run 2,900,000 builds.
> > -
> >
> > People created 15 731 new projects.
> >
> >
> Whaaat! The
Hello Sumit, Blaise,
you both seem to be interested in maintaining plantuml, I believe you
could co-maintain that package together? We use the package in our team
to automatically generate some diagrams, so it would be awesome if you
could take care it.
Per docs [1] I think you should go to the
On Wednesday, December 22, 2021 4:22:29 PM CET Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 10:14 AM Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> >
> > On Wednesday, December 22, 2021 9:36:01 AM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, December 21, 2021 5:49:34 PM CET Maxwell G wrote:
> &g
On Wednesday, December 22, 2021 9:36:01 AM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On Tuesday, December 21, 2021 5:49:34 PM CET Maxwell G wrote:
> > On Tuesday, December 21, 2021 8:22:55 AM CST Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > On 19. 12. 21 22:39, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > > > On Sunday,
On Tuesday, December 21, 2021 5:49:34 PM CET Maxwell G wrote:
> On Tuesday, December 21, 2021 8:22:55 AM CST Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 19. 12. 21 22:39, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > > On Sunday, December 19, 2021 10:22:57 PM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > >> So it seems
On Sunday, December 19, 2021 10:22:57 PM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> So it seems that fedpkg doesn't (yet) know there's ~/.config/mock* at all.
Proposed fix: https://pagure.io/rpkg/pull-request/595
Pavel
___
devel mailing list -- de
On Sunday, December 19, 2021 9:56:20 PM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On Sunday, December 19, 2021 4:55:28 PM CET Maxwell G via devel wrote:
> > On Thursday, December 16, 2021 12:25:12 PM CST Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > > Hello!
> > >
> > > I'm glad I can announc
On Sunday, December 19, 2021 4:55:28 PM CET Maxwell G via devel wrote:
> On Thursday, December 16, 2021 12:25:12 PM CST Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > I'm glad I can announce that we have a new release of Mock. See the full
> > release notes [1]. The
Hello!
I'm glad I can announce that we have a new release of Mock. See the full
release notes [1]. The major change that happened is the removal of
'epel-8' config files, as a follow-up for [2] discussion (and of course on
*devel lists, big thanks to everyone for the discussion).
Note that
On Monday, November 29, 2021 4:46:42 PM CET Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 04:38:26PM +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > On Monday, November 29, 2021 4:02:23 PM CET Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 03:24:12PM +0100, Pavel Raiskup wr
On Monday, November 29, 2021 4:02:23 PM CET Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 03:24:12PM +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > anyone had a successful experience with Fedora 35 Cloud images, and
> > guestfish/virt-sysprep?
> >
>
Hello,
anyone had a successful experience with Fedora 35 Cloud images, and
guestfish/virt-sysprep?
Seems like we switched from ext4 or xfs to 'btrfs', and guestfish
doesn't work with the images, am I right? At least I had problems
on EL8 hypervisors so far.
Pavel
Hello Fedora EPEL maintainers!
First I don't feel comfortable announcing this, I'm not happy about the
situation and so I don't want to be the lightning rod :-). But I believe
that we can come to acceptable Copr/Mock solution and this needs to be
discussed... so here we are.
By the end of the
Hello Fedora EPEL maintainers!
First I don't feel comfortable announcing this, I'm not happy about the
situation and so I don't want to be the lightning rod :-). But I believe
that we can come to acceptable Copr/Mock solution and this needs to be
discussed... so here we are.
By the end of the
Hello!
I'm glad I can announce that we have a new release of Mock. Two new
commandline options were added, and several bugs were fixed. For more
info see the upstream release notes:
https://rpm-software-management.github.io/mock/Release-Notes-2.13
Note that this release is likely the last
Hello,
I've just released the new mock-core-configs package:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/releases/tag/mock-core-configs-35-1
Updates are in Bodhi.
The new package ships Fedora 35 configuration; and since we seem to already
have the composes available - I deployed the new
On Friday, July 23, 2021 5:09:57 PM CEST Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 03:25:15PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 04:03:06PM +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > > The ppc64le doesn't seem to build on Power8 hardware we have [2], a
Hi all,
just for the info, we enabled the `centos-stream-9-x86_64` and
`centos-stream-9-aarch64` chroots in Fedora Copr. Note that we build
directly from composes [1] without mirrors (some failures can expected),
and that the packages are not GPG-signed. You have been warned :-)
The ppc64le
Hello!
I'm glad I can announce that we have a new release of Mock + configs.
There are several small bugfixes, and many new configuration files (CentOS
Stream 9, Rocky, EPEL Next 8, Alma AArch64). Release notes:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/wiki/Release-Notes-2.12
Note that
On Saturday, July 17, 2021 3:18:02 PM CEST Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 at 17:59, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> >
> > We touched this topic several times before in our team. Perhaps we should
> > move
> > on and do it... it would simplify a dev
On Saturday, July 17, 2021 3:18:02 PM CEST Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 at 17:59, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> >
> > We touched this topic several times before in our team. Perhaps we should
> > move
> > on and do it... it would simplify a dev
On Saturday, July 17, 2021 9:08:48 PM CEST Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 9:19 AM Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 at 17:59, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > >
> > > We touched this topic several times before in our tea
On Saturday, July 17, 2021 9:08:48 PM CEST Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 9:19 AM Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 at 17:59, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > >
> > > We touched this topic several times before in our tea
We touched this topic several times before in our team. Perhaps we should move
on and do it... it would simplify a development (the yum/dnf hacks,
legacy systemd-nspawn hacks, podman requirement for building Fedora, etc.).
I created an issue [1], can you please vote there if you are concerned?
We touched this topic several times before in our team. Perhaps we should move
on and do it... it would simplify a development (the yum/dnf hacks,
legacy systemd-nspawn hacks, podman requirement for building Fedora, etc.).
I created an issue [1], can you please vote there if you are concerned?
Hello, I'm orphaning the vim-syntastic package as I no longer use that
(I switched to vim-ale a few months back). Feel free to pick that package,
if you happen to use it and you can not migrate - but upstream of syntastic
recommends the migration:
I'm pleased to announce that we have another Mock release:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/wiki/Release-Notes-2.11
There are some bug-fixes, but also new features like the `%_platform_multiplier`
macro and `--install` command support for "external dependencies". See the
release
On Wednesday, May 19, 2021 1:57:17 AM CEST Leon Fauster wrote:
> Dear all, the EPEL build target in COPR build packages based on
> CentOS Linux 8. What happens at EOL of CentOS Linux 8? Any clues?
Copr just uses `mock-core-configs` package, and the `epel-*.cfg` files
there.
I believe that
I'm pleased to announce that we have a new (small) Mock bugfix release. Worth
mentioning is that there are many new config files in `mock-core-configs`
package. Release notes are here:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/wiki/Release-Notes-2.10
Updates:
Fedora 34:
On Friday, April 23, 2021 7:40:14 AM CEST Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> I have been using 2FA with the new Fedora Account system and the UX is ...
> can be improved. The question is how?
>
> If you are not using 2FA yet then you may not know what I am talking about.
> Here:
>
>
On Tuesday, April 13, 2021 3:50:18 PM CEST Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Neal Gompa:
>
> > As I said previously[1], I think doing autoconf upgrades would be less
> > painful if we always did that.
> >
> > [1]:
> >
to rename
'centos-stream' to 'centos-stream-8' very soon.
On Tuesday, March 16, 2021 10:52:38 AM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> There will be an outage starting at:
> $ date --date '2021-03-17 12:15 UTC'
And the outage is over now.
Happy building!
Cop
On Friday, February 12, 2021 7:05:28 PM CET Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 03:33:14PM +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > On Thursday, February 11, 2021 2:24:28 PM CET Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 10:19:2
1 - 100 of 416 matches
Mail list logo
