Re: Packages looking for new maintainers

The following packages have been orphaned now: - isrcsubmit - mbox2eml - modplugtools - portecle - python-flake8-import-order - vdr-epgfixer - vdr-ttxtsubs - zopfli ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Packages looking for new maintainers

On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 11:24 AM, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote: > If nobody else wants it, I'd take kid3 Transferred, thanks! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Packages looking for new maintainers

On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 10:24 PM, Ville Skyttä <ville.sky...@iki.fi> wrote: > Hello, ...again, updated lists below. The following packages are looking for new maintainers, ping me if you're able to help out. When doing so, please note your FAS account name. 1) No co-maintainers at t

Re: Packages looking for new maintainers

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 1:46 PM, Igor Gnatenko <ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: It's a bit hard to read your message because the lines you wrote are in the middle of quoted ones without any extra empty lines, I hope I got your intent right. > On Mon, 2017-10-23 at 22:24 +03

Re: Packages looking for new maintainers

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Michael Cullen wrote: > I can take ccache if no one else wants it Transferred, thanks! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Packages looking for new maintainers

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Umar Parooq wrote: > username: pyc0d3r, full name: umar abdullahi src.fedoraproject.org doesn't know of such a username, so I'm afraid I'm not able to transfer packages to you. ___ devel mailing

Re: Packages looking for new maintainers

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 7:30 AM, Umar Parooq wrote: > i can take zopfli Thanks, but I'm unable to guess/locate your username in FAS. Could you let me know what it is? (Does a thing exist where I could search FAS users by real name, BTW?)

Re: Packages looking for new maintainers

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 1:43 AM, Francisco J. Tsao Santin wrote: > I review the list again, and I think I also can take reptyr. Transferred, thanks! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Packages looking for new maintainers

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:47 PM, Antonio Trande wrote: > I can take libmodplug and rpmdevtools. libmodplug transferred, thanks! rpmdevtools was already transferred to ngompa, I suggest contacting the current maintainers if you still want to help out.

Re: Packages looking for new maintainers

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:31 PM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: > I can take pyflakes Transferred, thanks! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Packages looking for new maintainers

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 9:56 PM, Jan Pokorný <jpoko...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 23/10/17 22:24 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote: >> [...] >> - jing-trang > > still somewhat interested in that package, would help to keep it in > Fedora if that's not awfully a lot of wo

Re: Packages looking for new maintainers

On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 10:41 PM, Francisco J. Tsao Santin wrote: > I can take netmask :-) Transferred, thanks. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Packages looking for new maintainers

Hello, The following packages are looking for new maintainers, ping me if you're able to help out. 1) No co-maintainers at the moment: - git-bz - isrcsubmit - jing-trang - kid3 - mbox2eml - modplugtools - netmask - portecle - python-flake8-import-order - vdr-epgfixer - vdr-ttxtsubs 2) Needs

Re: Removing myself from packages in pagure?

On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 11:52 PM, Matthew Miller <mat...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 09:53:26PM +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote: >> I would like to remove myself from being a co-maintainer for various >> packages. I cannot find a way to do it in pagure, nor a

rpmlint and rpmdevtools upstream help welcome

Hello, I don't have the time I'd like to have to participate in all my Fedora related activities these days. Therefore, the rpmlint and rpmdevtools upstream projects would benefit from more manpower. Anyone interested? https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpmlint

Removing myself from packages in pagure?

Hello, I would like to remove myself from being a co-maintainer for various packages. I cannot find a way to do it in pagure, nor am I able to locate instructions for doing that in wiki. I cannot access /settings for those projects, because I don't have sufficient rights (I get "Forbidden: You

Re: ImageMagick Unresponsive Maintainer process - hubbitus (Pavel Alexeev)

On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 2:45 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 07/28/2017 04:43 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> On 07/28/2017 07:20 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: >>> On 07/27/2017 09:29 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: ok. I have pushed 6.9.9-3 to rawhide. Hopefully I got all the CVE's

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Bundled Provides Libraries and Versioning

7.7.2017 20.45 "Jason L Tibbitts III" kirjoitti: I would argue that it doesn't remove the ability, but that it does make it more difficult to do in an automated fashion. Basically you can see that something has a bundled library but then you need to do manual inspection to

Re: RFC: Always sourcing /etc/bashrc for interactive mode in bash

On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 4:42 PM, Siteshwar Vashisht wrote: > I am pondering over the idea to source /etc/bashrc by default (see commmit at > [3]) FWIW, I've been recently told that Debian does this. (Well the name there is /etc/bash.bashrc.) > and fix current /etc/bashrc

Re: xorg-x11-drv-dummy for s390x?

On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 9:31 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: > On 2017-05-03, Orion Poplawski wrote: >> I make fairly extensive use or xorg-x11-drv-dummy for running graphical >> tests in koji builds. I see that xorg-x11-drv-dummy is not built for >> s390x, probably

Bunch of vdr* packages orphaned

The following packages have been orphaned and are in need of new main contacts: - vdr - vdr-epgfixer - vdr-epgsearch - vdr-femon - vdr-osdteletext - vdr-remote - vdr-sudoku - vdr-ttxtsubs - vdrsymbol-fonts All of them should be in a good shape for someone to pick up. Some of these have active

Re: fedorahosted.org retired today (2017-03-01)

On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 9:02 PM, Tim Landscheidt wrote: > There are still several hundred binary packages in F25 that > refer to that host: > > | [tim@passepartout ~]$ dnf repoquery --qf '%{url}\t%{name}' | fgrep > fedorahosted | wc -l > | 464 Rawhide numbers would be

Re: Applications with AppData and not visible in the software center

On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Matthew Miller <mat...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 03:41:56PM +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote: >> This one has the too small icon "problem". It only has a 32x32 one, >> and with my (also wearing the Portecle upstream

Re: Applications with AppData and not visible in the software center

On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 3:50 AM, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > Wearing designer hat, I will take a look at making a set of icons for > PorteClé (keychain in english). > Could you submit a request on Fedora Design team page and assign it to > my email? Thanks! Issue filed, but

Re: Applications with AppData and not visible in the software center

On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Richard Hughes wrote: [...] > * portecle [...] > If you want any suggestions or advice, I'm happy to help. This one has the too small icon "problem". It only has a 32x32 one, and with my (also wearing the Portecle upstream hat) graphical

Re: Was perl removed from buildsys-build?

On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > In the RISC-V mass rebuild, some packages fail because Perl is > missing. However they don't have 'BuildRequires: perl'. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Build_Root_Without_Perl > If so I will add a BR:

Re: Upstream Release Monitoring builds for EL7 instead of Rawhide

On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Avram Lubkin wrote: > > I've noticed this a lot lately. I get a bugzilla for a new release in > upstream, but it lists the current version in rawhide as the el7 > distribution. [...] I this something I can fix or is there a problem > with

Re: broken dependencies due to libgexiv2 python subpackages rename

On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Kalev Lember wrote: > > On 08/22/2016 01:56 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > Hello, Kalev. > > It would've been nice if you had contacted the maintainers of affected > > packages before renaming the python subpackages of

Re: hfsplus-tools executables renamed

On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 9:00 AM, Mattia Verga wrote: > it seems that the hfsplus-tools package arbitrary renames its executables. > This prevents kde-partitionmanager to fully support HFS+. > I've opened a bug [1] for this, but I received no answer. > > Anyone knows why

Re: Too fast karma on Bodhi updates

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Raphael Groner wrote: > Why is it possible to give +1 to stable packages? Bodhi may deny or at least > impede such actions, -1 or neutral comments should be still possible though > for users having issues. I disagree with allowing

git-bz config in fedpkg (was: Re: [PATCH] Update to 2.0.2)

On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 9:35 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim <mic...@michel-slm.name> wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 3, 2015, 15:15 Ville Skyttä <ville.sky...@iki.fi> wrote: > > > Once configured, git-bz makes it even easier. My ~/.gitconfig has: > > [bz] > browser

Packages installing files to /etc/tmpfiles.d

The following packages in current rawhide install files to /etc/tmpfiles.d. They should most likely be fixed to install those files to /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d instead. $ dnf -q repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=rawhide --qf=%{NAME} "/etc/tmpfiles.d/*" | sort -u 389-dsgw amplab-tachyon anyterm

Re: meaning of Requires(pre)

On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 8:47 PM, Honza Šilhan wrote: > The maintainers of Fedora components containing > `Requires(pre)` tag and while not having the `Requires` were informed. BTW the thing that detected the use of Requires(pre) in packages seems to have been buggy; I got

Re: introducing curl-minimal and libcurl-minimal RPM packages

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Kamil Dudka wrote: > The curl and libcurl packages, which are both required by dnf, Hm, does dnf really require curl? On my F-23 box: $ rpm -e --test curl error: Failed dependencies: curl is needed by (installed) rpmdevtools-8.6-2.fc23.noarch

Re: ghost compat-gcc-296/32 debuginfo and source packages in rawhide

On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 04:09:55PM +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote: > > Rawhide repos have currently compat-gcc-296 and compat-gcc-32 -debuginfo > > and source packages but the correspond

ghost compat-gcc-296/32 debuginfo and source packages in rawhide

Rawhide repos have currently compat-gcc-296 and compat-gcc-32 -debuginfo and source packages but the corresponding main binary packages are not there. Shouldn't all or none of them be there, something wrong with the compose? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: bash completion dirs

On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 5:11 PM, Ondřej Vašík <ova...@redhat.com> wrote: > Ville Skyttä píše v Po 22. 02. 2016 v 14:12 +0200: >> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Thomas Moschny >> >> Why not. Note however that if going this route, the dirs >> /usr/share/ba

Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26

On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 8:10 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > rpms/zopfli -- Zlib compatible better compressor ( master f24 f23 f22 ) Took this one. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: bash completion dirs

On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Thomas Moschny wrote: > However, for the same reasons, shouldn't the filesystem package also > own the "new" /usr/share/bash-completion/completions location? Why not. Note however that if going this route, the dirs

Re: dnf remove qemu-img uninstall kernel

On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 8:36 PM, Mattia Verga wrote: > Il 12/02/2016 19:22, Sérgio Basto ha scritto: >> On Sex, 2016-02-12 at 19:18 +0100, Mattia Verga wrote: >> >> clean_requirements_on_remove=true >> >> in /etc/dnf/dnf.conf >> > Thanks, setting it to "false" avoid

Re: Should rpmlint warn about misleading indentation?

On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 1:36 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > Insisting that feature requests provide an implementation is a good > way to ensure nobody bothers asking for improvements to a tool. And encouraging filing RFE's for which there is no implementor resources in

Re: Should rpmlint warn about misleading indentation?

On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > I've seen a few spec files with content like this: > > %configure --disable-static --with-imagemagick --with-magickpp \ >--without-libavcodec >CPPFLAGS='-DMagickLib=MagickCore

Re: Needless use of %defattr (in 4464 packages)

On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Michael Schwendt <mschwe...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, 26 Jan 2016 10:48:28 +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Petr Pisar <ppi...@redhat.com> wrote: >> > This can bring bugs because, as noted in the

Re: Needless use of %defattr (in 4464 packages)

On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: > This can bring bugs because, as noted in the orignal message, some > people use to change wrong permissions coming from %install section. Can you give a concrete example where doing this actually accomplishes something with

Re: review swap

On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 5:14 AM, Mark McKinstry wrote: > Can anyone do a review swap for emacs-yaml-mode? It is a very simple > package. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247442 Looks like someone beat me to it, but feel free to return the favor to me with

Re: What to do when upstream doesn't version

On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Björn Esser wrote: > Version: 0.0.0 The dotted zeros don't add any value here, they're just cruft. "Version: 0" works fine. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Specs using %define

On Fri, Dec 25, 2015 at 2:10 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >> "JJ" == Jerry James writes: > > JJ> This uses a %define inside the %check script as a convenient macro, > JJ> used only inside the %check script; i.e., it really is a local > JJ>

[EPEL-devel] Re: Mass rebuild of EPEL6

On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 10:27 PM, Antonio Trande wrote: > On 12/23/2015 09:13 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >> tktable-2.9-13.el6.src.rpm > > This is not current tktable release. It is what's in EPEL 6 at the moment. There are some newer koji builds, but apparently

Re: How to remove old source file?

On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 8:59 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Jan Kratochvil wrote: >> There is also ".gitignore" file which is sometimes unmaintained and huge. > > This is a feature. If you still have old tarballs in your checkout, they > should be ignored as well as the current

Re: Query: %cmake not doing out-of-tree builds?

On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 5:42 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > FWIW - you can pass -m to rpmdev-newspec to get %{buildroot}. That probably > should be the default, but... ...https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256815#c3 You can make it the default with

Re: Query: %cmake not doing out-of-tree builds?

On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 5:03 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: > We don't use %make_build, https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/rpmdevtools.git/commit/?id=dcf1005d2cca7ce2a541718425f84d65fe8b8d00 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Need perl help to remove dpkg dependency on licensecheck (devscripts-minimal)

On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 1:05 PM, Sandro Mani wrote: > can anyone suggest an alternative way to accomplish the same which > does not use spawn from Dpkg::IPC? > > [1] > https://github.com/Debian/devscripts/commit/c0687bcde23108dd42e146573c368b6905e6b8e8 # at top of

Re: Fedora 23 cloud image (and, for that matter, minimal anything) bloat

On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 5:36 AM, Matej Stuchlik wrote: >> >> Also note that it's possibly not just 9MB. For instance python3-boto, also >> on this list, would >> save 4.7MB, python3-pip 2.9MB. In

Re: Fedora 23 cloud image (and, for that matter, minimal anything) bloat

On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 4:13 PM, Matej Stuchlik <mstuc...@redhat.com> wrote: > - Original Message - >> From: "Ville Skyttä" <ville.sky...@iki.fi> >> >> Managed to fiddle around some more and looks like the above is a false >> concern, many

Re: Fedora 23 cloud image (and, for that matter, minimal anything) bloat

On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Matej Stuchlik <mstuc...@redhat.com> wrote: > - Original Message - >> From: "Ville Skyttä" <ville.sky...@iki.fi> >> >> Also, be careful with measuring space savings when working with *.pyo. >> It is a common

Re: Fedora 23 cloud image (and, for that matter, minimal anything) bloat

On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Ville Skyttä <ville.sky...@iki.fi> wrote: > > BTW I just had a peek into some Arch Linux Python 3.5 packages, and it > seems they contain *no* identical *.pyc and corresponding *.opt-1.pyc > files. This is bad news wrt the hardlinking. I haven't f

Re: [Guidelines change] Changes to the packaging guidelines

On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:34 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III ti...@math.uh.edu wrote: The big change is that the Python guidelines have been extensively reorganized and partially rewritten, and new macros are available which simplify packaging by removing some of the boilerplate which was previously

Re: [Guidelines change] Changes to the packaging guidelines

On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 7:22 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: On Wed, 5 Aug 2015 10:11:26 +0300 Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi wrote: On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:34 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III ti...@math.uh.edu wrote: The big change is that the Python guidelines have been extensively

Re: [PATCH] Update to 2.0.2

On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 2:13 AM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote: After spending time on creating that patch, submitting it via http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/mscore would require just a tiny bit of effort. Once configured, git-bz makes it even easier. My ~/.gitconfig has: [bz]

Re: [HEADS UP] rpm-4.12.90 in rawhide

On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com wrote: On 07/28/2015 11:37 AM, Florian Festi wrote: Also we still need to settle to a final syntax for the operators [1]. Unfortunately there is no consensus among the other packaging formats what to use. Right now rpm

Re: [HEADS UP] rpm-4.12.90 in rawhide

On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Florian Festi ffe...@redhat.com wrote: See the draft release notes for details: http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.13.0 Terminate builds on empty files (?_empty_manifest_terminate_build) That should probably read on empty manifest files. Anyway, one effect of

tomcat-native orphaned

I've just released ownership of tomcat-native and there are no co-maintainers, go grab it if you like. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Review request/swap python-lz4

On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 8:40 PM, Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com wrote: I've submitted a review ticket for the python-lz4 package[1]. It should be a straightforward review, and I'll happily swap a review if you have a reasonably simple package in exchange. I'll take it, please

abcde license change

abcde's license has changed in version 2.7 from Public Domain to GPLv2+ and Public Domain. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Right proxy settings detection method

5.5.2015 21.13 alexis jeandet alexis.jean...@member.fsf.org kirjoitti: Does anyone have some hints/docs about the best way to get web proxy settings from apps written with QT, it might be the same problem with others APIs? Don't know about best, but how about libproxy? -- devel mailing list

Re: GraphicsMagick-1.3.21: libGraphicsMagick++ soname bump

On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 6:37 PM, Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu wrote: I'm planning in doing a GraphicsMagick-1.3.21 build for f22 soon (hopefully by the end of this week), which includes a libGraphicsMagick++ soname bump and affects the following packages: [...] vdr I wonder why vdr is

[EPEL-devel] Orphaned some packages in EL5 and EL6

I no longer have access to nor need for EL5 and EL6 boxes so I have orphaned the following packages in those branches: abcde bash-completion ccache colordiff reptyr rpmdevtools tomcat-native ...and I've also orphaned javasqlite in all branches (including Fedora) as I'm not using it any more.

javasqlite orphaned

Hi, I'm not using javasqlite any more so I've orphaned it in all branches (including EPEL). -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Dash as default shell

On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 8:37 AM, Panu Matilainen pmati...@laiskiainen.org wrote: I'm sure rpmlint can (be made to) check for bashisms... https://sourceforge.net/p/rpmlint/tickets/39/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Multiple directory ownership including filesystem package

On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 1:57 AM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote: Hi On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 6:45 AM, Ville Skyttä wrote: On a side note, that's the legacy location for bash completion snippets. The modern one from which they're loaded on demand is: $ pkg-config --variable

Re: Multiple directory ownership including filesystem package

On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote: I noticed that mulitple packages own /etc/bash_completion.d/ [...] On a side note, that's the legacy location for bash completion snippets. The modern one from which they're loaded on demand is: $ pkg-config

Re: Finding all the source packages that include a copy of valgrind.h

On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Mark Wielaard m...@redhat.com wrote: On Sat, 2014-09-13 at 08:49 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote: FWIW, searchcode.com can search through Fedora sources, but I don't know how up to date the sources they use are and the results for __VALGRIND_H aren't

Re: Finding all the source packages that include a copy of valgrind.h

On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 11:44 PM, Mark Wielaard m...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, 2014-09-12 at 11:25 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: You'll have to download all the source and perform a massive grep. Yeah, that is sadly not going to happen. FWIW, searchcode.com can search through Fedora

Re: rawhide report: 20140829 changes

On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 9:58 PM, Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote: FYI, this is a downgrade: $ rpmdev-vercmp mesa-10.4-0.devel.2.80771e47b6c1e47ab55f17311e1d4e227a9eb3d8.fc22.x86_64 mesa-10.4-0.devel.2.1.80771e47b6c1e47ab55f17311e1d4e227a9eb3d8.fc22.x86_64 In this case the above

Re: EPEL libmodplug retirement in

On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Karel Volný kvo...@redhat.com wrote: last week, libmodplug got retired from EPEL (both 5 and 6), see https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5960 But our users seem to miss it, it broke dependencies of qmmp and xine-lib. I know you've orphaned the EPEL

Re: EPEL libmodplug retirement in

On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 6:49 PM, Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote: On 14 August 2014 09:46, Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi wrote: On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Karel Volný kvo...@redhat.com wrote: last week, libmodplug got retired from EPEL (both 5 and 6), see https

Re: Make buildSRPMFromSCM faster?

On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote: However it still takes 6 minutes to perform this step on the ARM builders, which for some reason are usually chosen for buildSRPMFromSCM. ISTR when ARM wasn't yet in the mix but PPC was, it was the PPC builders that

Does Rawhide inherit from F-21?

Does Rawhide inherit packages from F-21 nowadays? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: delta rpms - can we turn them off

On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: but it's just dangerous to assume that will be forever true Agreed with this, but: and as you can see below with gzip you have *always* different results for the same data This is not true, see below.

EPEL EL5 PPC koji builder repo broken?

The EL5 PPC koji builder seems to be unable to find at least some packages at the moment: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=6923025name=mock_output.logoffset=-4000 http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/repo/rhel/rhel-ppc-server-5/getPackage/gnutls-1.4.1-14.el5_10.ppc.rpm: [Errno 14]

Depcheck conflicts should be ignored, but are not

Hello, This update: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tomcat-native-1.1.30-1.fc20 ...has some expected conflicts which are flagged by depcheck: http://autoqa.fedoraproject.org/results/813107-autotest/virt04.qa/depcheck/results/tomcat-native-1.1.30.html Now, according to

Re: Detecting unnecessary build requirements

On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote: I would think you would need to step through the BR:'s get the capabilities of the packages that the -devel package pull in, and then check that against the requires of the resultant packages. BR's don't always

Re: trimming down Fedora installed size

On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Marius A marius1...@gmail.com wrote: 1. remove /usr/share/docs Try this in /etc/rpm/macros.whatever: %_excludedocs 1 But that'll exclude _all_ files marked as docs in packages such as man pages, it's not limited to /usr/share/doc. You might also/instead want

Re: F21 System Wide Change: lbzip2 as default bzip2 implementation

On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 11:27 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote: ** possibly adjust spec files to require or build-require lbzip2 instead of bzip2. Is this necessary? I don't think so. A better way would be to change them to depend on the actual executables they use,

Re: F21 System Wide Change: lbzip2 as default bzip2 implementation

On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com wrote: rpm does use bzip2 *command* To be more precise, I believe only rpmbuild does. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct:

Orphaned: perltidy

I haven't used perltidy in quite a while so I've released its ownership in pkgdb, hopefully someone who does goes and grabs it. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: qmake-qt4 DEFINES issue

On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 4:17 AM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote: Basically, NEVER BuildRequire qt-devel, ALWAYS use qt4-devel instead. Looks like there are quite a few packages that don't do that (nor have the Epoch in the dep). $ repoquery --repoid=rawhide-source --archlist=src \

Re: Java headless bugs

On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Richard Fearn richardfe...@gmail.com wrote: eclipse-findbugs - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1068044 - Eclipse plugin; continue to depend on java FWIW I'd say the whole java* dependency is pretty much superfluous here, eclipse-jdt should be enough.

File Perl-Tidy-20130922.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by scop

A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perltidy: efc831bc9f238ae037dae22c41b6ba31 Perl-Tidy-20130922.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

File perltidy_20130922-1.debian.tar.xz uploaded to lookaside cache by scop

A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perltidy: 0fa0cdb8817f6faf4cb97efa3d3ebb25 perltidy_20130922-1.debian.tar.xz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perltidy/f20] Update to 20130922.

Summary of changes: 411d66e... Update to 20130922. (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perltidy] Update to 20130922.

commit 411d66ecd4f86cddd97a132400236ba374085b8c Author: Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi Date: Wed Mar 12 23:10:51 2014 +0200 Update to 20130922. - Fix for CVE-2014-2277 from Debian (#1074721) + related man page fix. - Fix bogus date in %changelog. perltidy-20130922

[perltidy/f19] (3 commits) ...Update to 20130922.

Summary of changes: 90a5b03... Perl 5.18 rebuild (*) e092b35... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass (*) 411d66e... Update to 20130922. (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

Re: qt-creator arm build timing out

On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Dan Horák d...@danny.cz wrote: can you resubmit with parallel make disabled for ARM? I've seen this suggestion a couple of times. Not sure if it has actually fixed some cases, but if it has and continues to be a recurring fix, sounds to me that _smp_mflags

Re: Packages installing files to /etc/rpm

On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 11:50 PM, Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi wrote: On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote: On 5 February 2014 10:20, Miloslav Trmač m...@volny.cz wrote: Wouldn't it be better to mass-file bugs? I do keep track of the affected

Using pkgs.fedoraproject.org as redhat-rpm-config upstream repo

We (the current redhat-rpm-config maintainers) would like to move the upstream SCM repository for redhat-rpm-config to be the regular pkgs.fedoraproject.org dist-git repository. Rationale: - There is no real release process, all changes made to redhat-rpm-config are immediately destined to

Re: Java headless bugs

On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky sochotni...@redhat.com wrote: Actually we are strongly considering getting rid of javadocs completely[1] mostly due to Java 8 problems. If for whatever reason those problems won't be fixed, I suppose one approach to them is passing the

Re: Java headless bugs

On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky sochotni...@redhat.com wrote: Since javadoc subpackages put files in /usr/share/javadoc they must require package that provides this directory. In my opinion all javadocs should be crosslinked with local JDK's javadocs (+ others as

Re: rpm bug 1065563 affecting httpd / php packages

On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 17/02/2014 10:24, Reindl Harald a écrit : are such changes allowed within a stable release? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065563 As lot of package

Re: Educating packagers about always making changes in devel / rawhide first

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote: 2) Can someone maybe write a script which automatically detects this situation and files bugs with a description text aimed at not only getting the issue fixed, but also educating the packager? I wrote a script to detect

  1   2   3   4   >