On 03/29/2012 10:15 PM, Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Chris Lumens clum...@redhat.com
mailto:clum...@redhat.com wrote:
How is that possible to implement with a:
1. Show GUI, write kickstart.
2. Process kickstart.
design?
We're not
Just out of curiosity: Your description makes me assume that the
installer in the future still don't do things like partitioning,
formating or installing a basic set of packages in the background while
the user (which has a high latency/response time) is asked questions
about the root
Now my understanding of that doesn't include anything about removing
custom partitioning. It's all about splitting up the functionality of
anaconda into two distinct parts - the GUI configuration part, which I
would expect still to contain custom partitioning, and a back-end that
implements
That's my understanding as well so it's not removing functionality but
rather the underlying mechanism and implementation of them. This is good
because it will allow a consistent outcome whether using the GUI, a
kickstart file or something else like media and appliance creator and
likely
Adam Williamson wrote on 27.03.2012 20:14:
[...]
It's worth bearing in mind there's a giant anaconda UI rewrite still
pending, which entirely redesigns the storage configuration GUI. One of
the other major changes is that it makes all installations
kickstart-driven. The GUI will just produce
Am 28.03.2012 09:25, schrieb Thorsten Leemhuis:
Adam Williamson wrote on 27.03.2012 20:14:
[...]
It's worth bearing in mind there's a giant anaconda UI rewrite still
pending, which entirely redesigns the storage configuration GUI. One of
the other major changes is that it makes all
Am 28.03.2012 17:58, schrieb Jared K. Smith:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 4:16 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
if this ever happens anaconda has to be considered as
broken by design
Harald, I've tried to be patient with your recent posts to the devel
list, but you don't seem to
On 03/28/2012 09:46 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
and that is why i wrote the mail to not complain AFTER the fact
like systemd last year - i do not really understand your problem
with this message of me in the context - really!
You keep ranting based on assumptions. Someone has asked a
Am 28.03.2012 18:55, schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
On 03/28/2012 09:46 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
and that is why i wrote the mail to not complain AFTER the fact
like systemd last year - i do not really understand your problem
with this message of me in the context - really!
You keep ranting
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
sorry but WHY do you strip the context of my message
Because my reply wasn't about the content of your message. My reply
was all about the *tone* of your email. I know that language barrier
is part of the problem
Am 28.03.2012 21:09, schrieb Jared K. Smith:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
sorry but WHY do you strip the context of my message
Because my reply wasn't about the content of your message. My reply
was all about the *tone* of your email.
On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 22:16 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 28.03.2012 21:09, schrieb Jared K. Smith:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
sorry but WHY do you strip the context of my message
Because my reply wasn't about the content of your
On 03/28/2012 10:35 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
ah - i am not permitted to say my opinion of a very very bad
idea before i become green light
You are fighting a strawman and being repeatedly obnoxious about it. If
you can't change how you voice your opinions, be silent.
Rahul
--
devel
On 03/29/2012 04:39 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Jared K. Smith wrote:
Because my reply wasn't about the content of your message. My reply
was all about the *tone* of your email. I know that language barrier
is part of the problem here, but the tone of your email messages often
comes across as
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 10:24 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 11:41:18PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Perhaps, like Ubuntu's installer, the graphical part of Anaconda
should concentrate on doing the simple stuff, and leave everything
else
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 21:16 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Umm ... okay.
Any particular reason?
Kickstarts are not very user-friendly nor convenient (unless you have
several machines to install with identical installs, which is what they were
invented for).
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 11:41:18PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Perhaps, like Ubuntu's installer, the graphical part of Anaconda
should concentrate on doing the simple stuff, and leave everything
else to kickstart non-graphical installations.
I don't think that
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 12:08:42PM -0400, Gerry Reno wrote:
You can do all of these things manually outside of anaconda and then
just tell anaconda to use existing setup. But that is not very user
friendly.
I had similar problems trying to set up a basic RAID 1 (not /boot)
guest. I found
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Perhaps, like Ubuntu's installer, the graphical part of Anaconda
should concentrate on doing the simple stuff, and leave everything
else to kickstart non-graphical installations.
I don't think that would be a good idea, at all.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing
On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 19:41 +0100, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
Hallo,
because I have read, that grub2 should be able to boot from LVM. I have
done the
following test in a VM
1.) Fresh install of Fedora 16. Unfortunately, I can't create a disk
which contains olny
a volume group, so I have
David Lehman wrote:
I was able to complete an install of F17-Alpha just now with all lvm. I
had to force the use of MSDOS disklabel instead of GPT (used parted's
mklabel command on tty2 while the anaconda prerelease warning was on
screen on tty6)
Does the anaconda option nogpt no longer exist?
On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 10:19 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
David Lehman wrote:
I was able to complete an install of F17-Alpha just now with all lvm. I
had to force the use of MSDOS disklabel instead of GPT (used parted's
mklabel command on tty2 while the anaconda prerelease warning was
Am 23.03.2012 16:19, schrieb Michael Cronenworth:
David Lehman wrote:
I was able to complete an install of F17-Alpha just now with all lvm. I
had to force the use of MSDOS disklabel instead of GPT (used parted's
mklabel command on tty2 while the anaconda prerelease warning was on
screen on
On 03/23/2012 11:26 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 23.03.2012 16:19, schrieb Michael Cronenworth:
David Lehman wrote:
I was able to complete an install of F17-Alpha just now with all lvm. I
had to force the use of MSDOS disklabel instead of GPT (used parted's
mklabel command on tty2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hallo,
because I have read, that grub2 should be able to boot from LVM. I have
done the
following test in a VM
1.) Fresh install of Fedora 16. Unfortunately, I can't create a disk
which contains olny
a volume group, so I have taken the default
25 matches
Mail list logo
