On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 4:43 PM Chuck Anderson wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 02:08:25PM -0400, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> > Personally I would have preferred to call this a new tool versus trying to
> > use dnf name still. It makes it clearer that the break is going to happen.
>
> I propose
On 28-07-2023 02:04, Casey Jao via devel wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 at 13:10, James Ralston
How about going back to yum? The yum name never completely went away in RHEL
docs and still lingers in things like yum.repos.d
Let's not re-iterate that discussion. You can read about suggestions for
> On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 at 13:10, James Ralston Personally I would have preferred to call this a new tool versus trying to
> use dnf name still. It makes it clearer that the break is going to happen.
How about going back to yum? The yum name never completely went away in RHEL
docs and still
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 09:05:08AM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 24. 07. 23 v 22:43 Chuck Anderson napsal(a):
> > I propose "qzw". It's so easy to type on a qwerty keyboard layout.
>
> English qwerty layout. Because on Czech layout "z" and "y" are swappe. :)
Oh yeah, we need to find a
On 26-07-2023 09:35, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 09:05:08AM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 24. 07. 23 v 22:43 Chuck Anderson napsal(a):
I propose "qzw". It's so easy to type on a qwerty keyboard layout.
English qwerty layout. Because on Czech layout "z" and
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 09:05:08AM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 24. 07. 23 v 22:43 Chuck Anderson napsal(a):
> > I propose "qzw". It's so easy to type on a qwerty keyboard layout.
>
> English qwerty layout. Because on Czech layout "z" and "y" are swapped. :)
Isn't that called qwertz?
Dne 24. 07. 23 v 22:43 Chuck Anderson napsal(a):
I propose "qzw". It's so easy to type on a qwerty keyboard layout.
English qwerty layout. Because on Czech layout "z" and "y" are swapped. :)
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno, #fedora-buildsys
That would make for somedifficult verbal conversations. What do you
propose for the phonetic version? :D
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 3:43 PM Chuck Anderson wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 02:08:25PM -0400, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> > Personally I would have preferred to call this a new tool
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 02:08:25PM -0400, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> Personally I would have preferred to call this a new tool versus trying to
> use dnf name still. It makes it clearer that the break is going to happen.
I propose "qzw". It's so easy to type on a qwerty keyboard layout.
Frantisek Zatloukal wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 11:58 AM Peter Robinson
> wrote:
>> You can evolve APIs with versioning to ensure backwards compatibility
>> while also evolving the usecases.
>
> Well, this is exactly the case, isn't it? You have dnf4/dnf5, all nice and
> versioned.
It is
On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 at 13:10, James Ralston wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 5:46 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> > Dne 20. 07. 23 v 10:08 Peter Robinson napsal(a):
> >
> > > So everything has to be rewritten across the entire ecosystem to
> > > work with it? Wow, who thinks that's a good idea? It
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 11:58 AM Peter Robinson
wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 10:46 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > "Only dead projects has stable API"
>
> You can evolve APIs with versioning to ensure backwards compatibility
> while also evolving the usecases.
>
Well, this is exactly the
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 5:46 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 20. 07. 23 v 10:08 Peter Robinson napsal(a):
>
> > So everything has to be rewritten across the entire ecosystem to
> > work with it? Wow, who thinks that's a good idea? It took the
> > ecosystem long enough to migrate from the yum
ed, at
least if it was properly designed to begin with. (Things such as
unencapsulated fields can be dealbreakers.)
And besides:
> Subject: DNF5-5.0.1 has a stable API
> "Only dead projects has stable API"
Hence, DNF5-5.0.1 is dead. ;-) So either that statement is true, or one of
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 10:46 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Dne 20. 07. 23 v 10:08 Peter Robinson napsal(a):
> > The dnf5 API has similar primitives (Base, Goal, Package, etc.), but it's
> >> not at all compatible.
>
> It may be worth to add the link to the API:
>
>
Dne 20. 07. 23 v 10:08 Peter Robinson napsal(a):
The dnf5 API has similar primitives (Base, Goal, Package, etc.), but it's
not at all compatible.
It may be worth to add the link to the API:
https://dnf5.readthedocs.io/en/latest/api/index.html
So everything has to be rewritten across the
On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 11:35 PM Maxwell G wrote:
>
>
> 2023-07-19T13:39:57Z Peter Robinson :
>
> > On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 2:20 PM Nicola Sella wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >> Yesterday, DNF5 5.1.0 was released upstream[1] and in rawhide[2]. This
> >> update makes DNF5's API stable. This means
2023-07-19T13:39:57Z Peter Robinson :
On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 2:20 PM Nicola Sella wrote:
Hi all,
Yesterday, DNF5 5.1.0 was released upstream[1] and in rawhide[2]. This
update makes DNF5's API stable. This means that changes to the API
won't happen in stable Fedora releases.
How
On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 2:20 PM Nicola Sella wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> Yesterday, DNF5 5.1.0 was released upstream[1] and in rawhide[2]. This update
> makes DNF5's API stable. This means that changes to the API won't happen in
> stable Fedora releases.
How compatible is this API with the old dnf4
Hi all,
Yesterday, DNF5 5.1.0 was released upstream[1] and in rawhide[2]. This
update makes DNF5's API stable. This means that changes to the API won't
happen in stable Fedora releases.
Cheers,
Nicola
[1]: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf5/releases/tag/5.1.0
[2]:
20 matches
Mail list logo
