On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 11:14 -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
Does it really use TLS with openpgp certificates? If yes, I doubt you
could make 2.8.5 interoperate with gnutls 3.1.20. GnuTLS was modified in
3.1.x to adhere with RFC6091 which was incompatible the previous attempt
to have
On Wed, 2014-04-02 at 10:50 -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
CentOS 6 = gnutls 2.8.5
F20 = gnutls 3.1.20
The server is a python app and sets the priority string as follows:
priority=SECURE256:!CTYPE-X.509:+CTYPE-OPENPGP
this is fed to some gnutls function somewhere in the stack.
Does
On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 16:05 +0200, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
On Wed, 2014-04-02 at 10:50 -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
CentOS 6 = gnutls 2.8.5
F20 = gnutls 3.1.20
The server is a python app and sets the priority string as follows:
Hello,
I'm working on getting a package (mandos) included in Fedora/EPEL.
Currently its heavily focused on debian based distros so I'm not ready
for a review. However I have it working in a few situations but have
some issues in others. I'm hoping someone here may be able to shed light
on what
On Wed, 2014-04-02 at 10:50 -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
Hello,
I'm working on getting a package (mandos) included in Fedora/EPEL.
Currently its heavily focused on debian based distros so I'm not ready
for a review. However I have it working in a few situations but have
some issues
On Wed, 2014-04-02 at 10:15 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
Well, have you tried the 'obvious' - building the newer gnutls on CentOS
6 (or the older on Fedora 20) and building mandos against that, to see
if the issue is in gnutls or somewhere else in the 'base system'? That'd
narrow it down at
On Wed, 2014-04-02 at 11:53 -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
On Wed, 2014-04-02 at 10:15 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
Well, have you tried the 'obvious' - building the newer gnutls on CentOS
6 (or the older on Fedora 20) and building mandos against that, to see
if the issue is in gnutls
