Re: HEADS UP: RPM 4.19 soname bump in Rawhide

On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 09:43:30PM +0200, Michal Domonkos wrote: > It did show up on my original list, I just omitted it from the email because I > was going to ask my team to do the rebuild (as I thought we owned it). We also completely forgot about it (that, and scl-utils) before pushing the

Re: HEADS UP: RPM 4.19 soname bump in Rawhide

I wrote: > I may attempt to resolve some of the issues, but if there's > some documentation on the changes it would make it a lot > easier. :) I filed an upstream PR with a couple of commits: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpmlint/pull/1066 This fixes the test suite and works in

Re: HEADS UP: RPM 4.19 soname bump in Rawhide

On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 10:18:25AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > I've no idea why it didn't show up in either version of the list, but > deltarpm should have been on there: It did show up on my original list, I just omitted it from the email because I was going to ask my team to do the rebuild

Re: HEADS UP: RPM 4.19 soname bump in Rawhide

Hi, Michal Domonkos wrote: > We're currently preparing an update to RPM 4.19 ALPHA for Rawhide in a > side-tag. The new version features a soname bump: Is there a porting guide for rpm python users? The rpmlint package has a number of test failures and quite likely other breakages which may

Re: HEADS UP: RPM 4.19 soname bump in Rawhide

On Fri, 2023-05-19 at 22:59 +0200, Michal Domonkos wrote: > On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 05:37:06PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > Nevertheless I do believe if the librpm changed its API then every > > package which _BuildRequires_ rpm-devel should be rebuilt, just to > > check the change doesn't

Re: HEADS UP: RPM 4.19 soname bump in Rawhide

On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 10:59:17PM +0200, Michal Domonkos wrote: > shows a couple of additional packages that weren't covered in this thread so > far: > > fastfetch > gcc > gdb > grub2 > grubby > javapackages-bootstrap > ocaml-dose3 > sblim-cmpi-rpm >

Re: HEADS UP: RPM 4.19 soname bump in Rawhide

On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 10:05:54PM -, Reon Beon via devel wrote: > Will we see this in Fedora 38 or the next version? Fedora 39: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPM-4.19 -- Michal Domonkos / RPM dev team / Red Hat, Inc. ___ devel mailing

Re: HEADS UP: RPM 4.19 soname bump in Rawhide

On Fri May 19, 2023 at 22:59 +0200, Michal Domonkos wrote: > On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 05:37:06PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > Nevertheless I do believe if the librpm changed its API then every > > package which _BuildRequires_ rpm-devel should be rebuilt, just to > > check the change

Re: HEADS UP: RPM 4.19 soname bump in Rawhide

RPM 4.19 release (Q3) final Will we see this in Fedora 38 or the next version? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: HEADS UP: RPM 4.19 soname bump in Rawhide

On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 05:37:06PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Nevertheless I do believe if the librpm changed its API then every > package which _BuildRequires_ rpm-devel should be rebuilt, just to > check the change doesn't affect them. Yes, we were primarily focusing on runtime

Re: HEADS UP: RPM 4.19 soname bump in Rawhide

On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 06:44:16PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: > I rebuild most of the packages > Thank you! Much appreciated. > I left out: > > freeipa - upstream confirmed that no ebuild is needed Yup, nice find. >

Re: HEADS UP: RPM 4.19 soname bump in Rawhide

V Fri, May 19, 2023 at 12:24:15PM +0200, Michal Domonkos napsal(a): > We're currently preparing an update to RPM 4.19 ALPHA for Rawhide in a > side-tag. The new version features a soname bump: > > librpm.so.9 -> librpm.so.10 > librpmio.so.9 -> librpmio.so.10 > > The following packages

Re: HEADS UP: RPM 4.19 soname bump in Rawhide

On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 02:32:19PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 02:13:43PM +0200, Michal Domonkos wrote: > > On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 01:03:43PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > I think you should also consider packages that build require > > >

Re: HEADS UP: RPM 4.19 soname bump in Rawhide

On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 02:13:43PM +0200, Michal Domonkos wrote: > On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 01:03:43PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > I think you should also consider packages that build require > > rpm-devel. libguestfs consumes the librpm API, so I'm not sure why it > > didn't make the

Re: HEADS UP: RPM 4.19 soname bump in Rawhide

On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 02:13:43PM +0200, Michal Domonkos wrote: > On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 01:03:43PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > Anyway I will rebuild supermin & libguestfs into the side tag shortly. > > Thanks! Done: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=101331894

Re: HEADS UP: RPM 4.19 soname bump in Rawhide

On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 02:14:31PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > That is correct, I assumed folks on the packaging-team would be > provenpackagers already, but apparently not so much. Too many (false) assumptions were made when I was starting this thread. One learns by doing, I guess. > > I

Re: HEADS UP: RPM 4.19 soname bump in Rawhide

On 19. 05. 23 13:37, Michal Domonkos wrote: On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 12:33:41PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: rust-rpm-sequoia This has a circular dependency on rpm? Yup, this shouldn't have been on the list, it was an error on my side, addressed in another reply to this thread. We

Re: HEADS UP: RPM 4.19 soname bump in Rawhide

On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 01:03:43PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > I think you should also consider packages that build require > rpm-devel. libguestfs consumes the librpm API, so I'm not sure why it > didn't make the list. Correct, our original query was anything but comprehensible, as it

Re: HEADS UP: RPM 4.19 soname bump in Rawhide

On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 01:02:23PM +0200, Michal Domonkos wrote: > On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 01:00:28PM +0200, Michal Domonkos wrote: > > Yup, I omitted the DNF stack deliberately from the original list as those > > packages we've rebuilt ourselves already in the side-tag. Same goes for > > some >

Re: HEADS UP: RPM 4.19 soname bump in Rawhide

On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 12:28:30PM +0200, Dan Horák wrote: > I guess the list comes from an x86 system, thus it is incomplete. > Please add s390utils there as well. Indeed. I'm going to sent a separate email to s390utils-maintain...@fedoraproject.org. I've just ran the same DNF query for the

Re: HEADS UP: RPM 4.19 soname bump in Rawhide

V Fri, May 19, 2023 at 01:37:11PM +0200, Michal Domonkos napsal(a): > On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 12:33:41PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > We already did scratch builds ourselves and the packages passing against > > > the > > > rawhide target also passed against the side-tag. > > > > Could you

Re: HEADS UP: RPM 4.19 soname bump in Rawhide

On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 12:33:41PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > rust-rpm-sequoia > > This has a circular dependency on rpm? Yup, this shouldn't have been on the list, it was an error on my side, addressed in another reply to this thread. > > We already did scratch builds ourselves and

Re: HEADS UP: RPM 4.19 soname bump in Rawhide

On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 01:05:51PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > Thanks for the clarification! No problem, and again, thanks for bringing it up. I should've included the whole list from the start to avoid confusion :) -- Michal Domonkos / RPM dev team / Red Hat, Inc.

Re: HEADS UP: RPM 4.19 soname bump in Rawhide

On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 1:02 PM Michal Domonkos wrote: > > On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 01:00:28PM +0200, Michal Domonkos wrote: > > Yup, I omitted the DNF stack deliberately from the original list as those > > packages we've rebuilt ourselves already in the side-tag. Same goes for > > some > >

Re: HEADS UP: RPM 4.19 soname bump in Rawhide

On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 01:00:28PM +0200, Michal Domonkos wrote: > Yup, I omitted the DNF stack deliberately from the original list as those > packages we've rebuilt ourselves already in the side-tag. Same goes for some > other packages on the list like drpm which we also own. Oh, and as for

Re: HEADS UP: RPM 4.19 soname bump in Rawhide

On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 12:46:08PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > Notably, this list includes things like libdnf and dnf5, and does > *not* include rust-rpm-sequoia. Yup, I omitted the DNF stack deliberately from the original list as those packages we've rebuilt ourselves already in the

Re: HEADS UP: RPM 4.19 soname bump in Rawhide

On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 12:24 PM Michal Domonkos wrote: > > Hi all, > > We're currently preparing an update to RPM 4.19 ALPHA for Rawhide in a > side-tag. The new version features a soname bump: > > librpm.so.9 -> librpm.so.10 > librpmio.so.9 -> librpmio.so.10 > > The following packages

Re: HEADS UP: RPM 4.19 soname bump in Rawhide

On 19. 05. 23 12:24, Michal Domonkos wrote: Hi all, We're currently preparing an update to RPM 4.19 ALPHA for Rawhide in a side-tag. The new version features a soname bump: librpm.so.9 -> librpm.so.10 librpmio.so.9 -> librpmio.so.10 The following packages link against the above

Re: HEADS UP: RPM 4.19 soname bump in Rawhide

On Fri, 19 May 2023 12:24:15 +0200 Michal Domonkos wrote: > Hi all, > > We're currently preparing an update to RPM 4.19 ALPHA for Rawhide in a > side-tag. The new version features a soname bump: > > librpm.so.9 -> librpm.so.10 > librpmio.so.9 -> librpmio.so.10 > > The following

HEADS UP: RPM 4.19 soname bump in Rawhide

Hi all, We're currently preparing an update to RPM 4.19 ALPHA for Rawhide in a side-tag. The new version features a soname bump: librpm.so.9 -> librpm.so.10 librpmio.so.9 -> librpmio.so.10 The following packages link against the above libraries and thus will need to be rebuilt: