On Tuesday, 20 June 2023 at 00:01, JT wrote:
> In the original post, I took private to mean its own dedicated list...
> not that it'd be hidden from view from everyone. IMHO everything with
> Fedora should be in the open. Bugs should be reported upstream, so I
> dont see why there would need to
Dominik,
On 2023-06-20 05:32, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
Hello!
With the growing number of multimedia packages in Fedora, mostly owing
to the introduction of ffmpeg package and Legal permission to enable
and ship many popular codecs, I think we've reached the critical mass
of
On Mon, 2023-06-19 at 18:01 -0400, JT wrote:
> In the original post, I took private to mean its own dedicated list... not
> that it'd be hidden
> from view from everyone. IMHO everything with Fedora should be in the open.
> Bugs should be
> reported upstream, so I dont see why there would need
On Mon, 2023-06-19 at 22:36 +, Maxwell G wrote:
> On Mon Jun 19, 2023 at 22:20 +0100, Philip Wyett wrote:
> > On Mon, 2023-06-19 at 21:32 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> > > Hello!
> > >
> > > With the growing number of multimedia packages in Fedora, mostly owing
> > > to the
On Mon Jun 19, 2023 at 22:20 +0100, Philip Wyett wrote:
> On Mon, 2023-06-19 at 21:32 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > With the growing number of multimedia packages in Fedora, mostly owing
> > to the introduction of ffmpeg package and Legal permission to enable
> >
In the original post, I took private to mean its own dedicated list... not
that it'd be hidden from view from everyone. IMHO everything with Fedora
should be in the open. Bugs should be reported upstream, so I dont see why
there would need to be any confidential information dealt with by the
On Mon, 2023-06-19 at 23:39 +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> * Philip Wyett [19/06/2023 22:20] :
> > Private mailing list? No part of this project should have private anything
> > IMHO.
>
> Bug reports can explain security flaws and lead to exploits. They can
> also contain confidentiel
* Philip Wyett [19/06/2023 22:20] :
>
> Private mailing list? No part of this project should have private anything
> IMHO.
Bug reports can explain security flaws and lead to exploits. They can
also contain confidentiel information.
I would suggest a private ml dedicated to bugs and a public one
On Mon, 2023-06-19 at 21:32 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> Hello!
>
> With the growing number of multimedia packages in Fedora, mostly owing
> to the introduction of ffmpeg package and Legal permission to enable
> and ship many popular codecs, I think we've reached the critical
As the current Maintainer of Fedora Jam... I'm on board with this idea.
~JT
On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 3:33 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <
domi...@greysector.net> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> With the growing number of multimedia packages in Fedora, mostly owing
> to the introduction of ffmpeg package
Hello!
With the growing number of multimedia packages in Fedora, mostly owing
to the introduction of ffmpeg package and Legal permission to enable
and ship many popular codecs, I think we've reached the critical mass of
packages and maintainers that warrants the creation of a Multimedia SIG.
I
11 matches
Mail list logo
