TeamGit is a really nice gui to git
2010/6/19, Jarod Wilson ja...@wilsonet.com:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, 2010-06-19 at 01:08 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
Fedpkg should hide the GIT details from you.
But it's a
Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
Fedpkg should hide the GIT details from you.
But it's a command-line tool. Cervisia (what I use on the CVS repos) is a
GUI.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Sat, 2010-06-19 at 01:08 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
Fedpkg should hide the GIT details from you.
But it's a command-line tool. Cervisia (what I use on the CVS repos) is a
GUI.
Kevin Kofler
fedpkg is also a library, where all the interesting things
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 03:59:15PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 01:05:38AM +0530, Rakesh Pandit wrote:
I second that, unless there are some obvious advantages which I cannot
see. In case there are some it would be great if they get mentioned in
Kevin Kofler wrote:
Count me as not excited.
As I already pointed out several times, I don't see anything obviously wrong
with our CVS setup, so I don't see what we have to gain from switching to
one of the hardest to use SCM systems out there.
Linus can tell you everything that is wrong
On Sat, 2010-06-12 at 21:39 +0200, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
It's seems, that this feature is not implemented in the current
fedora-packager package.
when I try to make a fedpkg cloone --branches I will get only
a message which describe the function for this command without
any visible result.
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 23:57, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 17:21 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
Not necessary at all. The current url is
pkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org/package and that works with git:// and
ssh://. One advantage to using fedpkg clone is that if you
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 7:35 AM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, 2010-06-12 at 08:22 +0200, Iain Arnell wrote:
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
The current url is
pkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org/package and that works with git:// and
On Sunday, June 13, 2010 06:54:37 pm Kevin Kofler wrote:
Jesse Keating wrote:
I hope you are all as excited as I am about this!
Count me as not excited.
As I already pointed out several times, I don't see anything obviously
wrong with our CVS setup, so I don't see what we have to gain
On 06/11/2010 03:14 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
It's been a while since I last updated folks on dist-git, and in reality
it's been a while since I last worked on it. Fedora 13 took up all my
time.
Since my last update we've made great progress on fedpkg, the new tool
that will replace the make
Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com writes:
(people with existing clones will have to blow them away and
re-clone),
Doing git fetch and git reset --hard should be enough.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com
GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E
And
Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com writes:
I hadn't planned on it. Is there really a need for this? Read only via
http is do-able, but undesirable. Write via https is going to be a long
shot.
Recent git supports the smart protocol over http/https, both for fetch
and push.
Andreas.
--
Christof Damian chris...@damian.net writes:
One question though: will it be possible to create a git repository
local for packages which are going through the review process (or even
before that for private packages) and then push this to fedora once
the review is approved?
You can probably
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 6:35 AM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, 2010-06-12 at 08:22 +0200, Iain Arnell wrote:
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
The current url is
pkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org/package and that works with git:// and
Peter Robinson wrote, at 06/14/2010 05:58 PM +9:00:
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 6:35 AM, Jesse Keatingjkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, 2010-06-12 at 08:22 +0200, Iain Arnell wrote:
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Jesse Keatingjkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
The current url is
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 09:58:01AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 6:35 AM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, 2010-06-12 at 08:22 +0200, Iain Arnell wrote:
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com
wrote:
The current url is
On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 13:01 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Is the effort to make it easy to build RPM's directly from git tags
related to this or is that a separate project?
That's a different project, and even then we will likely need to
construct a source tarball at some point in the process
Hi Jesse,
On 11 June 2010 22:57, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 17:21 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
Is it necessary to do fedpkg clone ?
Or can regular git be used ?
Not necessary at all. The current url is
pkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org/package and that works
Jesse Keating wrote:
I hope you are all as excited as I am about this!
Count me as not excited.
As I already pointed out several times, I don't see anything obviously wrong
with our CVS setup, so I don't see what we have to gain from switching to
one of the hardest to use SCM systems out
On 13 June 2010 22:24, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Jesse Keating wrote:
I hope you are all as excited as I am about this!
Count me as not excited.
As I already pointed out several times, I don't see anything obviously wrong
with our CVS setup, so I don't see what we have to gain from switching to
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 01:05:38AM +0530, Rakesh Pandit wrote:
I second that, unless there are some obvious advantages which I cannot
see. In case there are some it would be great if they get mentioned in
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Dist_Git_Proposal
Linked from there:
Current Pain
On Sat, 2010-06-12 at 08:22 +0200, Iain Arnell wrote:
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
The current url is
pkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org/package and that works with git:// and
ssh://.
Any chance of making that work with http:// and https:// (for
On Sun, 2010-06-13 at 17:26 +0100, Christopher Brown wrote:
Hi Jesse,
On 11 June 2010 22:57, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 17:21 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
Is it necessary to do fedpkg clone ?
Or can regular git be used ?
Not necessary at all. The
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
The current url is
pkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org/package and that works with git:// and
ssh://.
Any chance of making that work with http:// and https:// (for pushes) too?
--
Iain.
--
devel mailing list
Am 11.06.2010 23:57, schrieb Jesse Keating:
ssh://. One advantage to using fedpkg clone is that if you like the
current directory layout where each release is a subdir, you can do
'fedpkg clone --branches' and you'll get that layout. You can also do
fedpkg clone -b branch and get a checkout
On Thu 10 June 2010 2:44:47 pm Jesse Keating wrote:
It's been a while since I last updated folks on dist-git, and in reality
it's been a while since I last worked on it. Fedora 13 took up all my
time.
Since my last update we've made great progress on fedpkg, the new tool
that will replace
On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 12:46 -0700, Ryan Rix wrote:
How will this affect current packagers' workflow? Will the changes necessary
be documented on the wiki? It doesn't seem straight off the bat that this
would be a drop-in replacement without packagers needing to tweak their
workflow.
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 14:09:41 -0700
Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
With dist-git it's slightly different:
fedpkg clone module
Is it necessary to do fedpkg clone ?
Or can regular git be used ?
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York
--
devel mailing list
On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 17:21 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
Is it necessary to do fedpkg clone ?
Or can regular git be used ?
Not necessary at all. The current url is
pkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org/package and that works with git:// and
ssh://. One advantage to using fedpkg clone is that if you
It's been a while since I last updated folks on dist-git, and in reality
it's been a while since I last worked on it. Fedora 13 took up all my
time.
Since my last update we've made great progress on fedpkg, the new tool
that will replace the make system. It is packaged up with
fedora-packager
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
It's been a while since I last updated folks on dist-git, and in reality
it's been a while since I last worked on it. Fedora 13 took up all my
time.
Since my last update we've made great progress on fedpkg, the new
31 matches
Mail list logo
