Thanks for the tool, I have never found dnf repoquery to be user
friendly. I will keep it in mind next time I need to query the
repositories.
Very nice that you included man pages and tab completion!
Jonny
--
___
devel mailing list --
Hi everyone,
On 2/11/23 23:31, Maxwell G via devel wrote:
I've been working on a repoquerying tool called fedrq [1] that I'd
like to share with you. Here's the elevator pitch: fedrq provides a
friendly interface to query the Fedora repositories. It makes it
really easy to query across Fedora
On Sun Feb 12, 2023 at 05:31 +, Maxwell G wrote:
> Hi Fedorians,
>
> I've been working on a repoquerying tool called fedrq [1] that I'd
> like to share with you. Here's the elevator pitch: fedrq provides a
> friendly interface to query the Fedora repositories. It makes it
> really easy to
On Mon Feb 13, 2023 at 15:30 CST, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> Ah, in that case I think my best course of action is see if I can use
> fedrq as a library and possibly extend it to be able to override dnf
> options (like where repos are).
There's no need to do that. fedrq can load any .repo
On Mon Feb 13, 2023 at 17:05 +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Maxwell G via devel wrote:
> > ```
> > $ fedrq whatrequires -X -F source $(fedrq subpkgs SRCNAME) # equivalent
> > $ fedrq subpkgs SRCNAME | fedrq whatrequires -X -i -F source # equivalent
> > ```
>
> Since your mail does not
Ah, in that case I think my best course of action is see if I can use fedrq as
a library and possibly extend it to be able to override dnf options (like where
repos are).
Would such PRs be acceptable?
Thanks,
Michel
___
devel mailing list --
Hi Michel,
Thanks for the feedback!
On Mon Feb 13, 2023 at 08:04 CST, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> The subpackages command looks interesting, and potentially something I
> can use in ebranch!
I like it too :).
> Can you use rpmdistro-repoquery's repo definitions? That would allow
> dropping
Maxwell G via devel wrote:
> ```
> $ fedrq whatrequires -X -F source $(fedrq subpkgs SRCNAME) # equivalent
> $ fedrq subpkgs SRCNAME | fedrq whatrequires -X -i -F source # equivalent
> ```
Since your mail does not document what the -X flag does:
Quoting:
The subpackages command looks interesting, and potentially something I can use
in ebranch!
Can you use rpmdistro-repoquery's repo definitions? That would allow dropping
the embedded repo configs
Cheers,
Michel
___
devel mailing list --
On Sun Feb 12, 2023 at 13:40 +, Maxwell G via devel wrote:
> > Though, it would be nice to have an easier subcommand or option just for
> > that, as it will be, I think, the most required use case. Maybe a 'fedrq
> > whatrequires --soname-bump SRCNAME'?
>
> Thanks for trying it out and for the
Il 12/02/23 14:40, Maxwell G ha scritto:
> On Sun Feb 12, 2023 at 08:12 +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
>> Il 12/02/23 06:31, Maxwell G via devel ha scritto:
>>> For reverse dependency rebuilds, you probably want the following
>>> command:
>>>
>>> ```
>>> $ fedrq whatrequires -X -F source
On Sun Feb 12, 2023 at 08:12 +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> Il 12/02/23 06:31, Maxwell G via devel ha scritto:
> > For reverse dependency rebuilds, you probably want the following
> > command:
> >
> > ```
> > $ fedrq whatrequires -X -F source $(fedrq subpkgs SRCNAME) # equivalent
> > $
Il 12/02/23 06:31, Maxwell G via devel ha scritto:
> For reverse dependency rebuilds, you probably want the following
> command:
>
> ```
> $ fedrq whatrequires -X -F source $(fedrq subpkgs SRCNAME) # equivalent
> $ fedrq subpkgs SRCNAME | fedrq whatrequires -X -i -F source # equivalent
> ```
>
>
Hi Fedorians,
I've been working on a repoquerying tool called fedrq [1] that I'd like
to share with you. Here's the elevator pitch: fedrq provides a friendly
interface to query the Fedora repositories. It makes it really easy to
query across Fedora and EPEL branches. It uses the dnf Python
14 matches
Mail list logo
