On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 03:22:15PM -0500, Chuck Anderson wrote:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 01:29:51PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
-p 0x8035 -j I-vnet0-rarp
Who still uses RARP?
libvirt doesn't really care what protocols guest VMs use
on their network. We're simply providing a
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 05:03:56PM +0100, Thomas Woerner wrote:
Hello,
as discussed some time ago, I worked on the proof of concept
implementation of firewalld. FirewallD is a service daemon with a D-BUS
interface that provides a dynamic managed firewall.
For more information on
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 01:29:51PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
-p 0x8035 -j I-vnet0-rarp
Who still uses RARP?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 17:03 +0100, Thomas Woerner wrote:
Hello,
as discussed some time ago, I worked on the proof of concept
implementation of firewalld. FirewallD is a service daemon with a D-BUS
interface that provides a dynamic managed firewall.
For more information on firewalld,
On 01/02/2011 06:16 AM, Thomas Woerner wrote:
On 12/27/2010 08:42 PM, Casey Dahlin wrote:
Can I ask a stupid question? Does dbus have the kind of performance
necessary to support this type of application?
What kind of performance do you think is necessary? Its just a
configuration
On 01/02/2011 04:57 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
On 01/02/2011 06:16 AM, Thomas Woerner wrote:
On 12/27/2010 08:42 PM, Casey Dahlin wrote:
Can I ask a stupid question? Does dbus have the kind of performance
necessary to support this type of application?
What kind of performance do you think
On 01/02/2011 11:56 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
I switched to iptables-restore and got 2 orders of magnitude speedup
(yes that is indeed over 100 times faster!!) - something to consider.
I think iptables-restore uses libiptc to manipulate the rules. The problem
is that according
On 12/24/2010 11:45 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Thomas Woernertwoer...@redhat.com wrote:
- A simple tray applet (firewall-applet)
Actively deprecated; please consider other interfaces. In this case,
I think a control panel module is just fine.
Is there an
Am Montag, den 27.12.2010, 14:42 +0100 schrieb Thomas Woerner:
On 12/24/2010 11:45 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Thomas Woernertwoer...@redhat.com
wrote:
- A simple tray applet (firewall-applet)
Actively deprecated; please consider other interfaces. In
The project design (code and interface) seems to be very influenced by
NetworkManager, but both code and design wise that project has flaws
that Dan and others have spent a lot of time undoing. I don't want to
see the same mistakes made 5 years later =)
From a UI side, if your first cut is just
On 23/12/10 17:03, Thomas Woerner wrote:
Hello,
as discussed some time ago, I worked on the proof of concept
implementation of firewalld. FirewallD is a service daemon with a D-BUS
interface that provides a dynamic managed firewall.
For more information on firewalld, please have a look at:
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Thomas Woerner twoer...@redhat.com wrote:
- A simple tray applet (firewall-applet)
Actively deprecated; please consider other interfaces. In this case,
I think a control panel module is just fine.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hello,
as discussed some time ago, I worked on the proof of concept
implementation of firewalld. FirewallD is a service daemon with a D-BUS
interface that provides a dynamic managed firewall.
For more information on firewalld, please have a look at:
13 matches
Mail list logo
