On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Brandon Lozza wrote:
el
Fedora shouldn't include software it doesn't have the resources to
maintain.
Fedora doesn't have resources to fork it. Not the same thing at all.
Rahul
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
So according to you any free software with a trademark is non-free
software? Good luck getting anyone including FSF to agree with that
interpretation.
Rahul
I'm sure they will. Trademark restrictions violate one of the
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Brandon Lozza bran...@pwnage.ca wrote:
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
We have been through this before. If you take Fedora and modify it, you
are
not allowed to use the Fedora name either. Trademark cannot be ever
On 04/10/10 14:52, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Trademark cannot be ever free as in freedom.
That's why Fedora should not ship Firefox, but Iceweasel, or Icecat, or
Minefield, or anything else that is not trademarked and isn't impossible
to patch without mozilla's consent.
--
Florent Le Coz
--
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
We have been through this before. If you take Fedora and modify it, you are
not allowed to use the Fedora name either. Trademark cannot be ever free as
in freedom.
Rahul
Exactly the point I brought up Rahul, thanks
The errors below happen several times during the yum update.
Assuming that they must be generated by RPM %post scripts, I had a
look at the affected packages (control-center, evolution-data-server,
cheese, seahorse) and I suspect it's a problem with the
update-mime-database command.
Rich.
On 10/04/2010 10:24 AM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
Anyway, the situation is worser then people believe, because no matter
how many maintainers MoFo apps have in Fedora - they just can't fix
bugs and close tickets, even ones with clean and sane patches
attached.
Unfortunately you forget to attach
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 6:37 AM, Brandon Lozza bran...@pwnage.ca wrote:
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com wrote:
It would be really helpful if instead of calling programs
unmaintainable and similar non-sense you would research a bit what
really is the problem ... take
Peter Lemenkov, Mon, 04 Oct 2010 15:22:24 +0400:
Unfortunately you're talking (and the rest Fedora Mozilla team) about
BTW, just as a way of clarification, my rant was not targeted
specifically at you, but everybody (and it is currently a big fashion)
ranting against “proprietary” MoFo. No
On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 01:52:28PM +0530, Mukund Sivaraman wrote:
Hi all
In reply to Gregory Maxwell:
It's well known around the Internet that to achieve compatibility you
should be conservative in what you send and liberal in what you
accept. Applied to JPEG: Use only Huffman coding
On 04/10/10 09:59, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 27 September 2010 20:31, Richard Hugheshughsi...@gmail.com wrote:
Right, but you could argue it's a regression as the behavior changed.
Could somebody please fix docbook-utils, otherwise all the GNOME koji
builds are going to fail.
All my F14
Richard Hughes wrote:
On 27 September 2010 20:31, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote:
Right, but you could argue it's a regression as the behavior changed.
Could somebody please fix docbook-utils, otherwise all the GNOME koji
builds are going to fail.
All my F14 builds are still
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com wrote:
It would be really helpful if instead of calling programs
unmaintainable and similar non-sense you would research a bit what
really is the problem ... take a look at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/
Compose started at Mon Oct 4 08:15:25 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
almanah-0.7.3-3.fc14.x86_64 requires libedataserverui-1.2.so.10()(64bit)
antlr3-python-3.1.2-7.fc14.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:2.6
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 6:18 PM, Brandon Lozza wrote:
However, Mozilla says that distributing a modified product with their
name violates Trademark law.
We have been through this before. If you take Fedora and modify it, you are
not allowed to use the Fedora name either. Trademark cannot
On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 09:23 -0400, Brandon Lozza wrote:
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
So according to you any free software with a trademark is non-free
software? Good luck getting anyone including FSF to agree with that
interpretation.
Rahul
On 10/04/2010 06:50 PM, Florent Le Coz wrote:
On 04/10/10 14:52, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Trademark cannot be ever free as in freedom.
That's why Fedora should not ship Firefox, but Iceweasel, or Icecat, or
Minefield, or anything else that is not trademarked and isn't impossible
to patch
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Brandon Lozza wrote:
el https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora shouldn't include software it doesn't have the resources to
maintain.
Fedora doesn't have resources to fork it. Not the same thing at all.
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/04/2010 06:53 PM, Brandon Lozza wrote:
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
So according to you any free software with a trademark is non-free
software? Good luck getting anyone including FSF to
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/04/2010 06:53 PM, Brandon Lozza wrote:
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
So according to you any free software with a trademark is non-free
software? Good luck getting anyone including FSF to
2010/10/4 Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com:
Peter Lemenkov, Mon, 04 Oct 2010 12:24:00 +0400:
So no excuse here, please - just allow us fixing bugs.
There is absolutely no permission required.
Unfortunately you're talking (and the rest Fedora Mozilla team) about
different task - you're talking
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Brandon Lozza wrote:
GNU Icecat doesn't tell you something?
You said you are going to ask FSF. How about you just ask them if the
presence of a trademark is enough to call software
On 10/04/2010 06:53 PM, Brandon Lozza wrote:
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
So according to you any free software with a trademark is non-free
software? Good luck getting anyone including FSF to agree with that
interpretation.
Rahul
I'm sure they will. Trademark
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 8:24 AM, Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com wrote:
No need to call it “political reasons” (on the side of MoFo) ... nowhere
in the definition of free software is written, that upstream has to
accept your patches. It may happen upstream (any upstream) disagrees with
your patch,
Hi,
the new release of evolution-data-server 2.91.1 contains API backward
incompatible changes in Camel, thus packages using it might need
adoption. Changes were announced at [1], and even I believe upstream
will take care of these changes, I would like to help with adoption on
modules
On 09/30/2010 08:54 PM, Sven Lankes wrote:
2. The combination of the Mozilla Trademark issue combined with the
strict handling of patches by (corporate|distro)-maintainers (I don't
think that this is a RH/Fedora issue - same with Canonical/Ubuntu)
makes me feel uneasy about ff
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Brandon Lozza wrote:
GNU Icecat doesn't tell you something?
You said you are going to ask FSF. How about you just ask them if the
presence of a trademark is enough to call software non-free and come back.
Icecat was forked for other reasons (ie) for plugins.
Martin Stransky wrote:
Right now, we are in process to redirect firefox/thunderbird crashes
directly to mozilla crash database (http://crash-stats.mozilla.com)
which is handled by mozilla guys, instead of our bugzilla, so they can
help us with all Fedora Firefox/Thunderbird crashes.
And you
Peter Lemenkov, Mon, 04 Oct 2010 12:24:00 +0400:
In fact the backlog for Mozilla-related packages is even bigger, because
(due to the fact that MoFo products are unmaintainable at all) many of
them were closed automatically with new Fedora releases.
It would be really helpful if instead of
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/04/2010 06:50 PM, Florent Le Coz wrote:
On 04/10/10 14:52, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Trademark cannot be ever free as in freedom.
That's why Fedora should not ship Firefox, but Iceweasel, or Icecat, or
Minefield,
On Sat, 2010-10-02 at 23:33 +0200, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
On Sat, 2010-10-02 at 22:14 +0530, Ankur Sinha wrote:
On Sat, 2010-10-02 at 15:21 +0100, Paul F. Johnson wrote:
I have no problems helping package this behemoth!
+1 : I can help out too.
Given that the Fedora OOo maintainer [1]
2010/10/4 Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com:
FIXED UPSTREAM is a correct resolution for the bug, and it has been
fixed by upstream and came to F13 in firefox 3.6.x.
That's an absolutely great tactics to deal with bug reports! And
that's why I call proprietary Mozilla software as
To clear the confusion, there is no change in the RE syntax in
grep-2.7. The old grep silently interprets all these REs the way that
probably nobody intended to, e.g.
The [:space:] match:
ac:eps
You can force grep-2.7 to silently process it (above mentioned way, same as
with older
2010/10/4 Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com:
Please look at this list:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?query_format=advancedbug_status=NEWbug_status=ASSIGNEDcomponent=firefoxproduct=Fedoraclassification=Fedora
2010/10/4 Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com:
On 10/04/2010 10:24 AM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
Anyway, the situation is worser then people believe, because no matter
how many maintainers MoFo apps have in Fedora - they just can't fix
bugs and close tickets, even ones with clean and sane patches
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Date-Manip:
5dde75671b3defd6429c0407ff85e3b1 Date-Manip-6.12.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Am Montag, den 04.10.2010, 11:58 +0100 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones:
The errors below happen several times during the yum update.
Assuming that they must be generated by RPM %post scripts, I had a
look at the affected packages (control-center, evolution-data-server,
cheese, seahorse) and I
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639562
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
commit dbcec327d884084adf53375f62e429f7fdaca8a2
Author: Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Oct 4 13:51:15 2010 +0200
New version, v6.12
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Date-Manip.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Florent Le Coz lo...@louiz.org wrote:
On 04/10/10 15:23, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Ignoring upstream and patching without consent is only feasible if you
have the amount of resources to do a good job with that. Fedora doesn't
have that.
Rahul
I'm not talking
On 10/04/2010 03:34 PM, Brandon Lozza wrote:
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Rahul Sundarammethe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/04/2010 06:53 PM, Brandon Lozza wrote:
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
So according to you any free software with a trademark is non-free
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 01:54:55PM +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
Am Montag, den 04.10.2010, 11:58 +0100 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones:
The errors below happen several times during the yum update.
Assuming that they must be generated by RPM %post scripts, I had a
look at the affected
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639559
Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 14:37 +0200, Michal Schmidt wrote:
On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 14:04:00 +0200 Patrick MONNERAT wrote:
Until now (with upstart), my rawhide system started the network
service but not the NetworkManager service.
With systemd, neither of these are started by default.
You may
The lightweight tag 'perl-Net-SSH-Perl-1.34-8.fc15' was created pointing to:
aabdbf4... Use hunspell back-end for spell check test
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Math-GMP-2.06-5.fc15' was created pointing to:
4f8e760... Use hunspell dictionary for spell check test
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
denni...@conversis.de wrote:
On 10/04/2010 03:34 PM, Brandon Lozza wrote:
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Rahul Sundarammethe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/04/2010 06:53 PM, Brandon Lozza wrote:
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Rahul
Compose started at Mon Oct 4 13:15:36 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
almanah-0.7.3-3.fc14.x86_64 requires libedataserverui-1.2.so.10()(64bit)
antlr3-python-3.1.2-7.fc14.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:2.6
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636518
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2010-10-04 11:14:23 EDT ---
Created attachment 451425
--
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Brandon Lozza wrote:
That's what i've been saying all day. It's only free software if you
change the name, in which case you may loose brand recognition.
Imagine if Linus forbid
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Brandon Lozza bran...@pwnage.ca wrote:
Imagine if Linus forbid people from calling their OS Linux if they
didn't use the binaries provided by him.
As the trademark owner it is his right to do so, but that alone does
not make Linux unfree.
You are confusing
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Brandon Lozza bran...@pwnage.ca wrote:
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Brandon Lozza wrote:
That's what i've been saying all day. It's only free software if you
change the name, in
On Mon, 4 Oct 2010 11:24:30 -0400 Brandon Lozza wrote:
Firefox doesn't just include source code. It includes intellectual
property with specific restrictions on what you're allowed to do with
it.
Did you use the term intellectual property in your query to Richard
too? :-)
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 4 Oct 2010 11:24:30 -0400 Brandon Lozza wrote:
Firefox doesn't just include source code. It includes intellectual
property with specific restrictions on what you're allowed to do with
it.
Did you use the term
Brandon Lozza wrote:
Let's say I recompile Firefox and make a bunch of my own changes and
REFUSE to change the name. How long do you think it'll take for
Mozilla's lawyers to start threatening me with trademark lawsuits?
In that case, Red Hat lawyers should be visiting you soon.
Fedora is a
On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 11:35 -0400, Brandon Lozza wrote:
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 4 Oct 2010 11:24:30 -0400 Brandon Lozza wrote:
Firefox doesn't just include source code. It includes intellectual
property with specific restrictions on
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com wrote:
Brandon Lozza wrote:
Let's say I recompile Firefox and make a bunch of my own changes and
REFUSE to change the name. How long do you think it'll take for
Mozilla's lawyers to start threatening me with trademark
On 10/04/2010 11:35 AM, Brandon Lozza wrote:
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 4 Oct 2010 11:24:30 -0400 Brandon Lozza wrote:
Firefox doesn't just include source code. It includes intellectual
property with specific restrictions on what you're
On 4 October 2010 11:32, Jaroslav Skarvada jskar...@redhat.com wrote:
You can force grep-2.7 to silently process it (above mentioned way, same as
with older greps) by setting POSIXLY_CORRECT
environment variable. But all such REs are probably typos
Dude, that's so not the point. I have a f14
On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 04:30 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
I've tagged docbook-utils-0.6.14-25.fc14 (the update reportedly fixing this)
for the buildroot. Please try your builds now.
f14-build should appear in the Tags line here, right?
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=197223
Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 04:30 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
I've tagged docbook-utils-0.6.14-25.fc14 (the update reportedly fixing
this)
for the buildroot. Please try your builds now.
f14-build should appear in the Tags line here, right?
04.10.2010 14:49, Jan Kaluza wrote:
Hi,
there are over 100 packages which Require: httpd and it looks they are
preconfigured only for httpd. However, Fedora contains more webservers than
apache (httpd) and it's currently impossible (as far as I know) to install
for
example php
Hi guys.. so far since the fix things have been mostly stable. However,
sometimes in the evening things when things are very quiet, i'm getting a
crash, and i come in the next morning and ds is down. This is just an heads
up. Unless there is a known issue and something I should try, I'm going
Gary Morris wrote:
Hi guys.. so far since the fix things have been mostly stable.
However, sometimes in the evening things when things are very quiet,
i'm getting a crash, and i come in the next morning and ds is down.
This is just an heads up. Unless there is a known issue and
I've been trying unsuccessfully for a long to time to try to get this
discussion started. Perhaps this just isn't right place? If not, where?
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane
Hi!
I installed F14B on a 64-bit VM (kvm) to give it a try, and see if some
projects worked fine on it.
One didn't, and while debugging the issue, I found what I believe is a
regression in ldd. That is, it used to work on F13, but now it doesn't.
I asked on #fedora if I should file a bug and
On 10/04/2010 01:01 PM, Alberto Bertogli wrote:
Do you have any idea what may be causing this?
Do you get the same problem if you invoke /usr/bin/ld.bfd instead of just ld?
I'm guessing that you're hitting ld.gold by default and it's behaving slightly
differently than the old binutils linker
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 01:48:53PM -0400, Peter Jones wrote:
On 10/04/2010 01:01 PM, Alberto Bertogli wrote:
Do you have any idea what may be causing this?
Do you get the same problem if you invoke /usr/bin/ld.bfd instead of just
ld?
Yes.
$ ld -o libccheck.so -lc -shared ldd
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting tomorrow at 19:30UTC (3:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
= Followups =
#topic Updates policy
#351 Create a policy for updates - status report on implementation
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/351
File a glibc bug.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi, new to git, and while following the conversion guide [1], I missed
the fact that I had added a new patch, but not added it to git.
So the build failed. I have now: git add x.patch
I'm not sure what is correct procedure to attempt rebuild with the
included patch:
1. fedpkg commit -p
2. fedpkg
David Timms wrote:
Hi, new to git, and while following the conversion guide [1], I missed
the fact that I had added a new patch, but not added it to git.
So the build failed. I have now: git add x.patch
I'm not sure what is correct procedure to attempt rebuild with the
included patch:
1.
Hi, folks. I thought this mail might be helpful just to remind
developers / packagers of a few points regarding the release freeze
process and release blockers.
We start the process of designating and monitoring release blockers
quite a while before final freeze. What that means is that, right
Dne 4.10.2010 18:29, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) napsal(a):
04.10.2010 14:49, Jan Kaluza wrote:
Hi,
there are over 100 packages which Require: httpd and it looks they are
preconfigured only for httpd. However, Fedora contains more webservers than
apache (httpd) and it's currently
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 12:48:20PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
File a glibc bug.
Upstream or in Fedora's bugzilla? (or both?)
Thanks,
Alberto
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/03/2010 07:07 AM, Brandon Lozza wrote:
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 11:05 PM, Gerald Henriksen ghenr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 2 Oct 2010 20:56:21 -0400, you wrote:
Fedora is just going to end up having a million repos for all the
software that
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 12:09 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, 2010-10-02 at 23:10 +0100, Camilo Mesias wrote:
I think the moral of this story is that the input to the process is
fallible. Shit always happens.
Automated systems that filter or delay the 'happening' should
On Sat, 2010-10-02 at 10:12 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 01 Oct 2010 17:44:05 -0700, Jim wrote:
Any application that uses libgdl on F14 segfaults on startup.
Any? That would mean it would have been easy to test whether the update
works at all, but either it has been marked
On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 11:08 -0400, Brandon Lozza wrote:
That's what i've been saying all day. It's only free software if you
change the name, in which case you may loose brand recognition.
Imagine if Linus forbid people from calling their OS Linux if they
didn't use the binaries provided by
On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 10:48 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
I've been trying unsuccessfully for a long to time to try to get this
discussion started. Perhaps this just isn't right place? If not, where?
It's as good a place as any. The X and desktop developers are the people
who can actually
On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 00:14 +0200, drago01 wrote:
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 12:09 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, 2010-10-02 at 23:10 +0100, Camilo Mesias wrote:
I think the moral of this story is that the input to the process is
fallible. Shit always happens.
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Alberto Bertogli
albert...@blitiri.com.ar wrote:
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 12:48:20PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
File a glibc bug.
Upstream or in Fedora's bugzilla? (or both?)
Upstream and link to upstream bug in fedora bug tracker.
--
devel mailing list
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 12:48:20PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
File a glibc bug.
Upstream or in Fedora's bugzilla? (or both?)
Both doesn't hurt, but you can just file in Fedora and let the
package maintainer handle escalating it.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
(2010/09/29 2:29), Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Tuesday, September 28, 2010 12:13:49 am Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
Hello there,
I'm having the following error with some of my packages (iverilog and
perl-Verilog-Perl) since last week, even after updating my certs.
$ fedpkg import
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 11:15:26PM +, Mike Fedyk wrote:
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Alberto Bertogli
albert...@blitiri.com.ar wrote:
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 12:48:20PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
File a glibc bug.
Upstream or in Fedora's bugzilla? (or both?)
Upstream and
On 10/05/2010 12:37 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 11:08 -0400, Brandon Lozza wrote:
That's what i've been saying all day. It's only free software if you
change the name, in which case you may loose brand recognition.
Imagine if Linus forbid people from calling their OS
On 10/4/2010 4:40 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 10:48 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
I've been trying unsuccessfully for a long to time to try to get this
discussion started. Perhaps this just isn't right place? If not, where?
It's as good a place as any. The X and
commit 4675315f369a8d7d439a5d617c86171c294e8297
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Mon Sep 20 13:16:49 2010 +0100
Update to 0.08
New upstream release 0.08
- Test suite doesn't fail in absence of Text::Aspell
Update testsuite patch
.gitignore
The lightweight tag 'perl-Text-SpellChecker-0.08-1.fc15' was created pointing
to:
4675315... Update to 0.08
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=357641
--- Comment #6 from Mark Chappell trem...@tremble.org.uk 2010-10-04 03:48:14
EDT ---
Xavier, it didn't branch because it was in
The lightweight tag 'perl-Text-SpellChecker-0.08-1.fc12' was created pointing
to:
08e2665... Merge remote branch 'origin/master' into f12/master
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639523
Florian La Roche florian.laro...@gmx.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
commit 7c35f445187eb11e4940124a4e914cc21f3ab1f6
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Oct 4 13:47:00 2010 +0200
0.74 bump
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Text-CSV_XS.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff
commit 4f8e760dba48f6998a6d4c8e45757e12a68780c3
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Mon Oct 4 14:58:08 2010 +0100
Use hunspell dictionary for spell check test
- Change BR: aspell-en to hunspell-en now that Text::SpellChecker uses a
hunspell back-end
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Text-CSV_XS:
c30ee0db913fcebc76d707203b905b74 Text-CSV_XS-0.74.tgz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
4f8e760... Use hunspell dictionary for spell check test (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 08e2665dcc14e7d492f50d7f0f140d7b09777663
Merge: 0a2c8fe 4675315
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Mon Oct 4 14:34:23 2010 +0100
Merge remote branch 'origin/master' into f12/master
.gitignore |2 +-
Text-SpellChecker-0.07-dictpath.patch |
The lightweight tag 'perl-Text-SpellChecker-0.08-1.fc13' was created pointing
to:
68fa8d9... Merge remote branch 'origin/master' into f13/master
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Text-SpellChecker-0.08-1.fc14' was created pointing
to:
4675315... Update to 0.08
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639560
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
