I noticed on my Fedora 13 box that in the RPM macro %__global_cflags
that -frecord-gcc-switches is missing, which is a nifty compiler
feature that will record the flags passed to gcc in a section in the
object file, thus aiding in the how in the world was this compiled?
problem. An example:
Compose started at Sat Oct 30 08:15:03 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
1:anjuta-2.31.90.0-3.fc15.i686 requires libvala-0.10.so.0
1:anjuta-2.31.90.0-3.fc15.x86_64 requires libvala-0.10.so.0()(64bit)
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 02:24:02AM -0400, Jon Stanley wrote:
I noticed on my Fedora 13 box that in the RPM macro %__global_cflags
that -frecord-gcc-switches is missing, which is a nifty compiler
feature that will record the flags passed to gcc in a section in the
object file, thus aiding in
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 09:27:16AM +, Rawhide Report wrote:
collectd-snmp-4.10.0-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libnetsnmp.so.20()(64bit)
I just started a new build, should be fixed tomorrow.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-df
I have no idea what these messages I've received mean:
root has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
root-unuran-5.26.00e-1.fc15.x86_64 requires libunuran.so.14()(64bit)
On i386:
root-unuran-5.26.00e-1.fc15.i686 requires libunuran.so.14
Please resolve this as soon
On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 07:14:43 -0400
Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote:
I have no idea what these messages I've received mean:
root has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
root-unuran-5.26.00e-1.fc15.x86_64 requires
libunuran.so.14()(64bit) On i386:
On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 15:19:45 +0300, Jussi wrote:
On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 07:14:43 -0400
Neal Becker wrote:
I have no idea what these messages I've received mean:
root has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
root-unuran-5.26.00e-1.fc15.x86_64 requires
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Rawhide Report wrote:
Compose started at Sat Oct 30 08:15:03 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
bibus-1.5.1-3.fc15.x86_64 requires openoffice.org-writer
bibus-1.5.1-3.fc15.x86_64 requires
On Sat, 2010-10-30 at 14:27 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
Will the corresponding Obsoletes/Provides be added to the libreoffice
subpackages, or do we need to modify our Requires?
The libreoffice subpackages have the corresponding Obsoletes. Provides
are not there, mostly because they'd generally
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 08:50:55PM +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Sat, 2010-10-30 at 14:27 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
Will the corresponding Obsoletes/Provides be added to the libreoffice
subpackages, or do we need to modify our Requires?
The libreoffice subpackages have the
On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 21:57:59 +0200, Tomasz wrote:
Could you point us to review of LibreOffice package? According to
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-October/144107.html
you need full process for new package when changing upstream.
See %changelog.
-
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 10:11:17PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 21:57:59 +0200, Tomasz wrote:
Could you point us to review of LibreOffice package? According to
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-October/144107.html
you need full process for new
I found a program that I want to package but it requires Fast Light
Tool Kit (FLTK). The source is a single file with no readme and I'm
not exactly sure how to package the software. Has anyone worked with
FLTK that might be able to help me with this?
Thanks,
Eric
--
devel mailing list
On Sat, 2010-10-30 at 17:05 -0400, Eric Sparks Christensen wrote:
I found a program that I want to package but it requires Fast Light
Tool Kit (FLTK). The source is a single file with no readme and I'm
not exactly sure how to package the software. Has anyone worked with
FLTK that might be
In my opinion I think it WOULD be a good idea to add a warning or make
that the default behavior. I reinstalled due to this and I'm sure
others have had to as well. If someone could point me to the right
direction I could work on it. There are some questions since I'm new to
this.
Is someone
On Sat, 2010-10-30 at 14:03 -0800, Javier Prats wrote:
Where is this info kept on the install image and how would I go about
modifying it locally to start playing? I'd like to learn whether some
one else does this or not.
It's in anaconda. The / and /home specifications are here (line
On Sat, 30 Oct 2010, Eric Sparks Christensen wrote:
I found a program that I want to package but it requires Fast Light
Tool Kit (FLTK). The source is a single file with no readme and I'm
not exactly sure how to package the software. Has anyone worked with
FLTK that might be able to help me
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 21:32, R P Herrold herr...@owlriver.com wrote:
On Sat, 30 Oct 2010, Eric Sparks Christensen wrote:
I found a program that I want to package but it requires Fast Light
Tool Kit (FLTK). The source is a single file with no readme and I'm
not exactly sure how to package
Just before I open a bug report, is this happening to anyone else? I
have a viewvc install in F-14, behind mod_python, that keeps segfaulting
Apache through segfaults in /usr/lib64/libpython2.7.so.1.0.
--
Bojan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Am Samstag, den 30.10.2010, 21:51 -0400 schrieb Eric Sparks
Christensen:
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 21:32, R P Herrold herr...@owlriver.com wrote:
On Sat, 30 Oct 2010, Eric Sparks Christensen wrote:
I found a program that I want to package but it requires Fast Light
Tool Kit (FLTK). The
Martin Stransky wrote:
there's a new Firefox update waiting in Bodhi and we can't push it to
stable because of new rules. We recommend you to update to it ASAP as it
fixes a public critical 0day vulnerability
(https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=607222).
Looks like the F13 build got
On Sun, 31 Oct 2010 13:45:29 +1100
Bojan Smojver bo...@rexursive.com wrote:
Just before I open a bug report, is this happening to anyone else? I
have a viewvc install in F-14, behind mod_python, that keeps
segfaulting Apache through segfaults
in /usr/lib64/libpython2.7.so.1.0.
Possibly
Kevin Fenzi kevin at scrye.com
writes:
Possibly
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.c
gi?id=640432 ?
Thanks. I thought I was going crazy for a
sec there.
--
Bojan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
23 matches
Mail list logo