On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 09:27:20AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 10:44 +1000, Tony Breeds wrote:
Hi All,
On a related but different note. How hard would it be to get
yum-builddep to take an --arch arg to that we can esily get the 32-bit
builddeps on a 64-bit
Hi,
yum-langpacks has been working pretty well now for a while in Fedora,
but all langpacks are still listed conditionally in comps' language support
groups
in addition to the langpacks meta-section.
So for F17 I'd like to remove them all from comps,
this will simplify comps a lot and if we can
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 10:37:10AM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 09/08/2011 03:44 AM, Tony Breeds wrote:
Hi All,
On a related but different note. How hard would it be to get
yum-builddep to take an --arch arg to that we can esily get the 32-bit
builddeps on a 64-bit system?
On 09/09/2011 10:50 AM, Jens Petersen wrote:
Hi,
yum-langpacks has been working pretty well now for a while in Fedora,
but all langpacks are still listed conditionally in comps' language support
groups
in addition to thelangpacks meta-section.
So for F17 I'd like to remove them all from
2011/9/8 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
On behalf of the systemd convertion team Just wanted to say thanks to
Tom Spot Callaway he's been on fire today packaging submitted unit
files and shipping them.
Your work did not go unoticed!
I do agree in particular with respect to his labour to provide
On 08/09/11 12:23, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 08:52:38PM +1000, Michael Fleming wrote:
On 7/09/2011 4:50 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 02:23:36PM +0100, Khusro Jaleel wrote:
On 06/09/11 06:31, Michael Fleming wrote:
I've released ownership of the
Sorry, you are mixing two things:
1) One is testing environment and it can be probably well defined,
clean, etc.
2) The other thing is maintainer mindset. You can try to convince
yourself to take a different look but I doubt it will work. It reminds
me like if you do patch review of your
Hi all!
A quick announcement that we've done a major upgrade on Transifex.net, which
brings a few exciting features for Fedora's developers and translators,
including a brand-new theme. Some of these were advocated by the Fedora
community itself, so thank you for your feedback!
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 4:13 AM, Nils Philippsen n...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 13:16 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
I don't think a maintainer can realistically replace wide-spread user
based testing in a variety of environments.
I didn't argue that this would be the case, but rather
Compose started at Fri Sep 9 08:15:35 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
acheck-0.5.1-4.fc15.noarch requires perl(Text::Aspell)
airrac-0.1.0-2.fc16.i686 requires libstdair.so.0.36
airrac-0.1.0-2.fc16.i686 requires
Compose started at Fri Sep 9 08:15:07 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686 requires libicuuc.so.46
389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686 requires libicui18n.so.46
389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 2:16 AM, Christoph Frieben
christoph.frie...@googlemail.com wrote:
2011/9/8 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
On behalf of the systemd convertion team Just wanted to say thanks to
Tom Spot Callaway he's been on fire today packaging submitted unit
files and shipping them.
Your
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Jeffrey Ollie j...@ocjtech.us wrote:
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 2:16 AM, Christoph Frieben
christoph.frie...@googlemail.com wrote:
2011/9/8 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
On behalf of the systemd convertion team Just wanted to say thanks to
Tom Spot Callaway he's been on
Hi,
2011/9/7 Pavel Lisy pavel.l...@gmail.com:
Michał Piotrowski píše v Út 06. 09. 2011 v 20:27 +0200:
2011/9/6 Itamar Reis Peixoto ita...@ispbrasil.com.br:
2011/9/6 Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I'm trying to build cherokee-1.2.1 for EL5 on my F15 system and I'm
getting an
Hi,
This took me some time to figure out, so I hope this mail
will save others some grieve.
After installing the glib2 update from todays updates-testing:
glib2-2.29.90-1.fc16.x86_64
The following happens:
[hans@shalem gspca]$ ldd -r /usr/libexec/e-addressbook-factory
linux-vdso.so.1
Hi,
On 09/09/2011 06:31 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
This took me some time to figure out, so I hope this mail
will save others some grieve.
After installing the glib2 update from todays updates-testing:
glib2-2.29.90-1.fc16.x86_64
The following happens:
[hans@shalem gspca]$ ldd -r
Hello,
In order to make gnome-python2-extras build in F16+ and to clean up its
broken deps, I had to kill two of its subpackages.
- gnome-python2-gtkhtml2: needs gtkhtml2 to build, which is already
retired in F16+.
- gnome-python2-gtkmozembed: needs xulrunner's gtkmozembed support
which
Le ven. 09 sept. 2011 18:40:34 CEST, Kalev Lember a écrit :
Hello,
In order to make gnome-python2-extras build in F16+ and to clean up its
broken deps, I had to kill two of its subpackages.
- gnome-python2-gtkhtml2: needs gtkhtml2 to build, which is already
retired in F16+.
-
Jens Petersen (peter...@redhat.com) said:
yum-langpacks has been working pretty well now for a while in Fedora,
but all langpacks are still listed conditionally in comps' language support
groups
in addition to the langpacks meta-section.
So for F17 I'd like to remove them all from comps,
I've grown entirely too fed up with the CRITPATH approval process.
Here's my Fedora FESCo TRAC ticket requesting that the issue be solved
and providing a suggested solution. If you agree, you might want to put
your +1 in the ticket. If you disagree because you think you have a
better solution,
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 18:36 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
As an alternative to downgrading glib2, one can also get a
new evolution-data-server from koji:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=262721
A few more packages are affected (PackageKit, upower,...),
but they are all in
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Dan Horák shar...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
commit ee88cf13670b752fc9fa94f39b1b2e2fe97849c3
Author: Dan Horák d...@danny.cz
Date: Fri Sep 9 19:30:19 2011 +0200
fix build on other arches
antlr3.spec | 15 +--
1 files changed, 9
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Ankitkumar Rameshchandra Patel
an...@redhat.com wrote:
Related note. How about we also change the way we manage translations
for packages?
This gives more control over translations to translators also
translators become independent from package maintainers and
(to both cloud@ and devel@)
I was interested in a yum plugin to support S3, and discovered [1]this
forum post, where Seth and James basically gave their thumbs up. The
author (Robert Mela, even though he's not the original author either)
made it work and there was some feedback provided, which I
Hi,
Virtualization Test day is expected to be on September 15th this year (
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/232).
We are willing to help test
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/XenPvopsDom0 but find too little
information about test methods (
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 14:47, Jeffrey Ollie j...@ocjtech.us wrote:
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 2:16 AM, Christoph Frieben
christoph.frie...@googlemail.com wrote:
2011/9/8 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
On behalf of the systemd convertion team Just wanted to say thanks to
Tom Spot Callaway he's been on
Al Dunsmuir wrote:
I agree, provided you mean not necessarily by each package's maintainer.
In some cases, folks working on the common goal do need the assistance of
the package maintainer. Alternatively, the package maintainer may be able
to make the required changes in a timely manner on
Hi,
Today's yum update on Fedora 14 resulted in about 10 seconds long 100% CPU load
on one of the cores
and an error in scriptlet:
Running Transaction
Updating : farsight2-0.0.22-1.fc14.x86_64
1/26
Updating :
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731907
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731907
Bug 731907 depends on bug 732484, which changed state.
Bug 732484 Summary: Review Request: perl-Digest-Perl-MD5 - Perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712694
Tomas Hoger tho...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
perl-Plack-Test-ExternalServer has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Plack-Test-ExternalServer-0.01-1.fc15.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.4)
On i386:
perl-Plack-Test-ExternalServer-0.01-1.fc15.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.4)
Please
perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks-AndTables has broken dependencies in the F-16
tree:
On x86_64:
perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks-AndTables-0.01-2.fc15.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.4)
On i386:
perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks-AndTables-0.01-2.fc15.noarch requires
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
On i386:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
Please resolve this as soon as
perl-Plack-Middleware-ReverseProxy has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Plack-Middleware-ReverseProxy-0.10-1.fc15.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.4)
On i386:
perl-Plack-Middleware-ReverseProxy-0.10-1.fc15.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.4)
perl-MooseX-Types-LoadableClass has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-MooseX-Types-LoadableClass-0.006-1.fc15.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.4)
On i386:
perl-MooseX-Types-LoadableClass-0.006-1.fc15.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.4)
Please
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
On i386:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
Please resolve this as soon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736604
--- Comment #6 from Till Maas opensou...@till.name 2011-09-09 11:40:15 EDT ---
Is fcgi-perl from EPEL5 affected by this bug as
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734253
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2011-09-09 13:02:11 EDT ---
perl-HTML-Template-2.10-3.fc16
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736604
--- Comment #7 from Jan Lieskovsky jlies...@redhat.com 2011-09-09 13:00:11
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
Is fcgi-perl from
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735062
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-09-09
12:59:27 EDT ---
perl-Date-Manip-6.25-1.fc16 has
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734420
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-09-09
13:03:05 EDT ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734420
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735062
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734253
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712886
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712886
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2011-09-09 13:13:47 EDT ---
perl-Gtk2-1.224-2.fc16 has been
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590826
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=522361action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736712
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=522382action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590826
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=522385action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
50 matches
Mail list logo
